Drug-Drug Interaction in Pharmacology

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (4 October 2023) | Viewed by 4324

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University “Politecnica delle Marche” of Ancona, Via Tronto 71, 60124 Ancona, Italy
Interests: forensic toxicology; analytical toxicology; drugs; pharmacology; chromatography/mass Spectrometry
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
National Centre on Addiction and Doping, National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: clinical pharmacotoxicology; forensic pharmacotoxicology; psychoactive substances; doping agents
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Drug–drug interactions are unintended reactions, toxic side effects, or a lack of clinical efficacy in the body of an individual when multiple medications are simultaneously administered for one or more diseases.

In pharmacology, drug–drug interactions are usually considered in terms of two principal classes of underlying mechanisms: pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic ones. Indeed, the pharmacological effect of one or both drugs may be increased or decreased, or a new and unanticipated adverse effect may be produced.

Concerning pharmacokinetics, drug–drug interactions may result in alterations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME cycle).

Interactions between drugs at the metabolic level can modify the metabolic enzymes, altering drug activation or inactivation. If the metabolism of a drug is inhibited it will remain in the body for longer, increasing its concentration, potentially causing secondary toxic effects. Conversely, increasing the metabolism of a drug can decrease its body concentration and therapeutic effect.

Pharmacodynamically, drugs can interact by binding to the same receptor. Two receptor agonists or two antagonists would increase the pharmacological actions of both, whereas an agonist and an antagonist would decrease each other’s pharmacological effects. In some interactions, drugs may produce biochemical changes that alter the sensitivity to toxicities produced by other drugs. Finally, when drugs and/or their metabolites are excreted by the kidney, one drug may alter kidney function, so that the excretion of the other is increased or decreased.

Finally, whereas in the majority of cases drug–drug interactions can cause toxic adverse effects, there are also a number of therapeutically beneficial drug interactions.

Classifying, describing, and reporting drug–drug interactions provide important insights into how to predict, detect, and avoid adverse interactions, decreases in pharmacological action, or finally beneficial effects.

This research topic will host original investigations, brief reports, and review papers concerning the latest insights in drug–drug interactions at the pharmacological level.

Subtopics:

  • Drug–drug interactions in medicine.
  • Drug–drug interactions in cardiology.
  • Drug–drug interactions in oncology.
  • Drug–drug interactions in pharmacotoxicology.
  • Drugs.

Prof. Dr. Francesco Paolo Busardò
Dr. Simona Pichini
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • drug–drug interactions
  • cardiology
  • oncology
  • pharmacotoxicology

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 935 KiB  
Article
Strategies for Avoiding Typical Drug–Drug Interactions and Drug-Related Problems in Patients with Vascular Diseases
by Klaus Peter Schmelzer, Dominik Liebetrau, Wolfgang Kämmerer, Christine Meisinger and Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr
Medicina 2023, 59(4), 780; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina59040780 - 17 Apr 2023
Viewed by 1636
Abstract
Background and objectives: Drug–drug interactions and drug-related problems in patients with vascular diseases are common. To date, very few studies have focused on these important problems. The aim of the present study is to investigate the most common drug–drug interactions and DRPs [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: Drug–drug interactions and drug-related problems in patients with vascular diseases are common. To date, very few studies have focused on these important problems. The aim of the present study is to investigate the most common drug–drug interactions and DRPs in patients with vascular diseases. Materials and Methods: The medications of 1322 patients were reviewed manually in the time period from 11/2017 to 11/2018; the medications of 96 patients were entered into a clinical decision support system. Potential drug problems were identified, and a read-through consensus was reached between a clinical pharmacist and a vascular surgeon during the clinical curve visits; possible modifications were implemented. The focus was on additional dose adjustment and drug antagonization on drug interactions. Interactions were classified as contraindicated/high-risk combination (drugs must not be combined), clinically serious (interaction can be potentially life-threatening or have serious, possibly irreversible consequences), or potentially clinically relevant and moderate (interaction can lead to therapeutically relevant consequences). Results: A total of 111 interactions were observed. Of these, 6 contraindicated/high-risk combinations, 81 clinically serious interactions, and 24 potentially clinically relevant and moderate interactions were identified. Furthermore, 114 interventions were recorded and categorized. Discontinued use of the drug (36.0%) and drug dose adjustment (35.1%) were the most common interventions. Mostly, antibiotic therapy was continued unnecessarily (10/96; 10.4%), and the adjustment of the dosage to kidney function was overlooked in 40/96; 41.7% of the cases. In the most common cases, a dose reduction was not considered necessary. Here, unadjusted doses of antibiotics were found in 9/96, 9.3% of the cases. Notes for medical professionals summarized information that did not require direct intervention but rather increased attention on the part of the ward doctor. It was usually necessary to monitor laboratory parameters (49/96, 51.0%) or the patients for side effects (17/96, 17.7%), which were expected with the combinations used. Conclusions: This study could help identify problematic drug groups and develop prevention strategies for drug-related problems in patients with vascular diseases. A multidisciplinary collaboration between the different professional groups (clinical pharmacists and surgeons) might optimize the medication process. Collaborative care could have a positive impact on therapeutic outcomes and make drug therapy safer for patients with vascular diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug-Drug Interaction in Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 550 KiB  
Article
Thromboembolic Events in Users of Warfarin Treated with Different Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
by Charles E. Leonard, Colleen M. Brensinger, Warren B. Bilker, Samantha E. Soprano, Neil Dhopeshwarkar, Todd E. H. Hecht, Scott E. Kasner, Edith A. Nutescu, Anne Holbrook, Matthew Carr, Darren M. Ashcroft, Cheng Chen and Sean Hennessy
Medicina 2022, 58(9), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091171 - 29 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1929
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Warfarin and a skeletal muscle relaxant are co-treatments in nearly a quarter-million annual United States (US) office visits. Despite international calls to minimize patient harm arising from anticoagulant drug interactions, scant data exist on clinical outcomes in real-world populations. [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Warfarin and a skeletal muscle relaxant are co-treatments in nearly a quarter-million annual United States (US) office visits. Despite international calls to minimize patient harm arising from anticoagulant drug interactions, scant data exist on clinical outcomes in real-world populations. We examined effects of concomitant use of warfarin and individual muscle relaxants on rates of hospitalization for thromboembolism among economically disadvantaged persons. Materials and Methods: Using 1999–2012 administrative data of four US state Medicaid programs, we conducted 16 retrospective self-controlled case series studies: half included concomitant users of warfarin + one of eight muscle relaxants; half included concomitant users of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) + one of eight muscle relaxants. The ICS analyses served as negative control comparisons. In each study, we calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing thromboembolism rates in the co-exposed versus warfarin/ICS-only exposed person-time, adjusting for time-varying confounders. Results: Among ~70 million persons, we identified 8693 warfarin-treated subjects who concomitantly used a muscle relaxant, were hospitalized for thromboembolism, and met all other inclusion criteria. Time-varying confounder-adjusted IRRs ranged from 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.13–0.77) for metaxalone to 3.44 (95% confidence interval: 1.53–7.78) for tizanidine. The tizanidine finding was robust after quantitatively adjusting for negative control ICS findings, and in numerous prespecified secondary analyses. Conclusions: We identified a potential >3-fold increase in the rate of hospitalized thromboembolism in concomitant users of warfarin + tizanidine vs. warfarin alone. Alternative explanations for this finding include confounding by indication, a native effect of tizanidine, or chance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug-Drug Interaction in Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop