Next Article in Journal
Antibodies Capable of Enhancing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Can Circulate in Patients with Severe COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Extra Virgin Olive Oil-Based Formulations: A “Green” Strategy against Chlamydia trachomatis
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerated Bone Loss in Transgenic Mice Expressing Constitutively Active TGF-β Receptor Type I
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current State of Knowledge Regarding WHO High Priority Pathogens—Resistance Mechanisms and Proposed Solutions through Candidates Such as Essential Oils: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of Benzothiazole and Benzoxazole Derivatives in the Discovery of Agricultural Chemicals

1
National Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for R&D of Fine Chemicals of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Guizhou Rice Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10807; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms241310807
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 24 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibacterial Activity of Drug-Resistant Strains)

Abstract

:
Benzoxazole and benzothiazole have a broad spectrum of agricultural biological activities, such as antibacterial, antiviral, and herbicidal activities, which are important fused heterocyclic scaffold structures in agrochemical discovery. In recent years, great progress has been made in the research of benzoxazoles and benzothiazoles, especially in the development of herbicides and insecticides. With the widespread use of benzoxazoles and benzothiazoles, there may be more new products containing benzoxazoles and benzothiazoles in the future. We systematically reviewed the application of benzoxazoles and benzothiazoles in discovering new agrochemicals in the past two decades and summarized the antibacterial, fungicidal, antiviral, herbicidal, and insecticidal activities of the active compounds. We also discussed the structural–activity relationship and mechanism of the active compounds. This work aims to provide inspiration and ideas for the discovery of new agrochemicals based on benzoxazole and benzothiazole.

1. Introduction

In global agricultural production, plant diseases, insects, and weed damage are the main causes of crop yield loss [1,2]. Fungi [3,4], bacteria [5,6,7], plant viruses [8,9], pests [10,11], weeds [12], nematodes [13,14,15,16], and mites [17] cause huge economic losses to the world’s agriculture every year. At present, the use of agrochemicals is still one of the most effective means to control plant diseases, insects, and grass damage, especially in the management of pest resistance and resistant weeds [18,19]. More importantly, when pests (such as armyworms [20], locusts [21], and walkers [22]) break out in large areas, the use of highly efficient chemical pesticides is the most effective strategy for rapid pest control [23]. However, long-term use of traditional agrochemicals will not only pollute the environment but also increase the resistance of pathogens [24], resulting in more difficult management of plant diseases, insects, and weeds [7,25,26]. Therefore, the development of new agrochemicals with unique action mechanisms to replace traditional pesticides is an urgent problem to be solved in the management of plant diseases, pests, and grass diseases.
Benzoxazole is a combination of a benzene ring and an oxazole ring; benzothiazole is the bioisostere of benzoxazole. They are widely used in drug research and development as the core scaffold structure [27,28,29,30,31,32] and play an important role in drug discovery. Twenty years ago, the research on benzothiazole and benzoxazole was widely focused on the field of medicine [33,34,35,36]; on the contrary, there was little research in the field of agrochemicals. However, 10 years ago, there was a large amount of research on benzothiazole and benzoxazole in new agrochemicals. In terms of commercial agrochemicals, benzoxazole and benzothiazole agrochemicals play an important role. For example, the herbicides metamifop (Figure 1) and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl are acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors, which inhibit the growth of grasses mainly by inhibiting the synthesis of plant fatty acids, eventually leading to the death of plants [37,38,39,40]. Mefenacet, a systemic herbicide, is an inhibitor of cell generation and division, which can prevent cell division and elongation in weed meristem and has a good control effect on barnyard grass [41]. The fungicide benthiavalicarbisopropyl has an inhibitory effect on the sporangia formation and germination of Phytophthora at low mass concentrations. The mechanism of action is still unclear, but it does not affect the oxidation and synthesis of nucleic acid and protein [42,43]. The antiviral agent Dufulin has been widely used against tomato virus disease, cucumber virus disease, tobacco virus disease, and southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus disease [44,45,46]. Oxazosulfyl, the first benzoxazole insecticide with a broad spectrum of insecticidal activity, is currently mainly used to control rice pests, but its mechanism of action is still unclear [47,48].
Benzoxazole and benzothiazole have stable structures and are easily modified, which play an important role in the discovery of new agrochemicals. Research on the discovery of new agrochemicals based on benzoxazole and benzothiazole scaffolds may be strengthened in the future. There is no comprehensive review of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives in the discovery of novel agrochemicals. Herein, we summarize the benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives in the application of new types of agricultural chemicals, perform analysis of the benzoxazole and benzothiazole compounds in terms of antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, weeding, and insecticidal activity, and discuss the structure–activity relationship (SAR) and mechanism of action. It is hoped that this review provides new clues and inspiration for the discovery of new benzoxazole and benzothiazole agrochemicals.

2. Antibacterial Activity

Diseases caused by plant bacteria have seriously restricted the safe production of crops and caused huge output and economic losses to world agriculture every year [49,50]. However, sustained and effective management of these plant bacterial diseases is extremely difficult and often requires integrated management strategies [51,52,53]. The long-term use of chemical antimicrobials has led to the evolution of resistance in bacteria [54]. This puts forward higher requirements for the development of antimicrobial agents and the management of plant bacterial diseases.
Some benzoxazole derivatives or benzothiazole derivatives have good antibacterial activity (Figure 2). For example, the EC50 values of compound 1 against Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzicola (Xoc) and Xanthomonas citri subsp. Citri (Xac) were 47.6 mg/L (Table 1) and 36.8 mg/L, respectively [55]. In addition, compound 1 showed good antibacterial activity by up-regulating the expression of Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) during oxidative phosphorylation, thereby inhibiting bacterial reproduction. At a concentration of 100 mg/L, the inhibition rate of compound 2 against Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae (Xoo) was 52.4%. Based on compound 2, the methoxy group was replaced with the nitro group, and the methyl group at position-2 of the benzene ring was replaced with the trifluoromethyl group at position-4 of the benzene ring. The inhibition rate of compound 3 on Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) was 71.6% [56]. In addition, the introduction of the pyridine e group increased the broad spectrum of antibacterial compounds. For example, the antibacterial activities of compound 4 against Xoo, Xac, and Rs were 52.40%, 50.97%, and 36.49%, respectively. If the pyridyl group was replaced by the electron-withdrawing group, the antibacterial activity of the compound was enhanced. For example, the EC50 value of compound 5 against Xoo was 38.97 mg/L, while the EC50 value of compound 6 against Xac was 13.42 mg/L [57]. The EC50 value of compound 7 against Xoo was 11.4 mg/L. In addition, compound 7 can not only change cell morphology, but also reduce the pathogenicity of Xoo to rice by inhibiting the formation of cell biofilms, thereby affecting cell division [58]. The EC50 values of compounds 8 and 9 against Xoo were 76.1 and 86.1 mg/L. However, the antibacterial activity of compound 10 (EC50 = 20.0 mg/L) was significantly increased when a fluorine atom was introduced into the para position of the benzene ring. In addition, the introduction of para-methyl or ortho-chlorine atoms made the compounds exhibit good antibacterial activity against Xac. For example, compounds 11 and 12 had EC50 values of 35.7 and 28.5 mg/L for Xac. Interestingly, compound 11 can cause fold and damage to cell surface morphology, and the higher the concentration of the compound, the greater the degree of damage on the cell surface [59].

3. Antifungal Activity

There are a wide variety of fungal diseases in plants, and their distribution is widespread [60,61]. Fungal diseases not only affect the yield and quality of crops, but also some fungi can secrete toxins and metabolites that are harmful to humans when they infect crops [62,63]. At present, the use of chemical agents is still one of the main methods of fungal disease activity management. In recent years, the research on benzoxazole and benzothiazole fungicidal compounds has made great progress.
Some benzoxazoles or benzothiazoles have shown excellent fungicidal activity. For example, compound 13 (Figure 3) had an EC50 value of 0.3 mg/L (Table 2) for Alternaria brassicae, which was superior to the commercial agent carbendazim (EC50 = 47.0 mg/L) [64]. At a concentration of 90 mg/L, the protective effect and treatment activities of compounds 14 and 15 against Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea) were greater than 88% [65]. The EC50 value of compound 16 for B. cinerea was 2.40 mg/L, and the introduction of fluorine or chlorine atoms to the phenyl was conducive to the improvement of fungicidal activity of the compound. For example, compounds 17 and 18 for B. cinerea had EC50 values of 1.81 and 1.69 mg/L. In addition, compound 16 may show fungicidal activity by binding to the active site of the sec14p target of fungi [66].
The IC50 value of compound 19 (Figure 4) for B. cinerea was 1.4 μM (Table 3), and the addition of methylene between benzothiazole and aryl increased the fungicidal activity of the compound [67]. At a concentration of 50 mg/L, the inhibitory rates of compound 20 against Rhizoctonia solani (R. solani), B. cinerea, Dothiorella gregaria (D. gregaria), and Colletotrichum gossypii (C. gossypii) were 92%, 97%, 89%, and 78%. Moreover, the introduction of chlorine atoms and trifluoromethyl compounds was not beneficial to the fungicidal activity of the compounds. For example, the inhibitory rates of compound 21 against R. solani, B. cinerea, D. gregaria, and C. gossypii were 40%, 67%, 35%, and 37% [68]. The EC90 values of compound 22 on Sphaerotheca fuliginea (S. fuliginea) and Pseudoperoniospora cubensis (P. cubensis) were 6.17 and 46.32 mg/L, respectively [69]. The inhibition rates of compound 23 on S. fuliginea and P. cubensis were 67% [70] because the introduction of large steric groups reduced the fungicidal activity of the compound. Compounds 24, 26, and 28 showed inhibition rates of 69%, 55%, and 65% against Phytophthora infestans (P. infestans) at concentrations of 100 ppm. The fungicidal activities of compounds 24, 26, and 28 were reduced when chlorine atoms on the position-2 of the benzene ring were replaced by position-4 fluorine atoms of the benzene ring. For example, compounds 25, 27, and 29 have inhibition rates against P. infestans of 58%, 53%, and 58% [71].
The position-2 of benzothiazoles replaced by thioether is a good fungicidal scaffold structure, which has the value of further optimization and derivation. Currently, the framework is mainly combined with benzene, furanone, and thiadiazole. In the future, it may be considered to introduce thiazole, oxazole, and pyridine on sulfur atoms to optimize the structure.
Amide bonds can form hydrogen bonds with target proteins, and compounds obtained by an organic combination of benzothiazole and amide often show good fungicidal activity [72]. At the concentration of 1000 mg/L, compound 30 (Figure 5) showed an inhibition rate of 88.9% (Table 4) against B. cinereal—the 4-nitrophenyl group was beneficial to improve the fungicidal activity of the compound. Interestingly, compound 30 showed better fungicidal activity in vivo than in vitro, suggesting that compound 30 may enhance plant disease resistance [73]. At a concentration of 50 mg/L, the inhibition rates of compound 31 on B. cinerea and Gibberella zeae (G. zeae) were 80% and 75%, respectively, suggesting that the introduction of permethric acid had no significant contribution to the fungicidal activity of the compound [74]. The EC50 values of Compound 32 against Ustilago tritici, Puccinia striiformis, Puccinia triticina, Blumeria graminis, Dickeya oryzae, and Ustilag ohordei are were all less than 0.8 mmol/L [75]. The inhibition rates of compounds 33 and 34 against Helminthosporium maydis were 78.6% and 80.6%. The fungicidal activity of the compound was not significantly improved by the introduction of electron-donating or electron-absorbing groups at position-6 of the benzothiazole ring. This suggests that the fungicidal activity of the compound in this structure is independent of the electron density at position-6 of the benzothiazole ring. In the future, spatial effects, hydrogen bonding, and water transport may be considered [76]. When thiazoles in the structure of compounds 33 and 34 were replaced with oxazoles, the fungicidal activity and broad spectrum of the compounds increased. For example, compound 35 had inhibition rates of 93.8%, 94.1%, 93.4%, 94.6%, and 94.5% against R. solani, B. cinereal, G. zeae, Helminthosporium maydis, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (S. sclerotiorum) [77]. Compound 36 showed a certain inhibitory effect on Fusarium oxysporum (F. oxysporum) (MIC 12.5 mg/mL) [78].
At the concentration of 100 mg/L, compound 37 (Figure 6) had inhibition rates of 38% (Table 5) to Alternaria alternata and 39% to Aspergillus niger, respectively. In addition, compound 37 may show fungicidal activity by inhibiting spore germination [79]. Under the condition of concentration of 250 mg/L, compound 38 G. zeae inhibition rate was 53.5% [80]. At the concentration of 100 mg/L, the inhibition rate of compound 39 against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was 87.5%. However, the substitution of the alkyl group with the aromatic ring is not conducive to the fungicidal activity of the compound, for example, compound 40 showed 43.8% inhibition of S. sclerotiorum [81]. Under the condition of 50 mg/L, the inhibition rate of compound 41 to R. solani was 70.43% [82]. The inhibition rate of compound 42 against F. oxysporum was 60.53% [83]. At the concentration of 10 mg/L, the average inhibitory zone diameter of compound 43 against Aspergillus oryzae (A. oryzae) was 0.81 mm. However, the replacement of chlorine atoms with nitro groups had no significant effect on the fungicidal activity of compounds; for example, the average diameter of the inhibition zone of compound 44 against A. oryzae was 0.81 mm [84]. At the concentration of 50 mg/L, the inhibitory activities of compounds 45 and 46 against Rape sclerotinia rot were 80.08% and 81.61%, respectively [85]. The ED50 values of compounds 47 and 48 for R. solani are 0.96 µM and 1.48 µM, respectively, which may be due to amines having stronger alkalinity than imines. In addition, compound 48 binds to the CYP51 site of fungi, hindering the synthesis of fungal cell membranes and, thus, inhibiting the normal growth of fungi [86].

4. Antiviral Activity

Effective management of plant viral diseases has been one of the hotspots in the field of plant protection [87,88,89]. Plants do not have a complete immune metabolism system, and, once the virus invades the plant, it will reproduce indefinitely in the plant until the plant dies [90,91]. Therefore, plant viral diseases are more difficult to manage than bacterial diseases, fungal diseases, pests, and weeds [92,93,94]. Many studies have been conducted on benzothiazoles against plant virus diseases; some have good antiviral activities. For example, at the concentration of 500 mg/L, the treatment activities of compounds 49 and 50 (Figure 7) against tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) were 52.23% and 54.41% (Table 6), respectively [95]. The electron-donating group in the benzothiazole ring may be an important factor for the antiviral activity of compounds 49 and 50. The protective activity of compound 51 against TMV was 39.27%. In addition, the introduction of chlorine atoms increased the antiviral activity of the compound; for example, the protective activities of compounds 52 and 53 against TMV were 55.96% and 54.21% [96]. The inhibition rate of compound 54 against TMV was 28.2%, while its racemic activity against TMV was 35.4% [97]. Compounds 55 and 56 had treatment activities against TMV of 37.9% and 35.8%. When the alkyl part of the amino phosphonate of these compounds was ethyl, the compounds showed better antiviral activity. For example, the treatment activity of compound 57 against TMV was 48.1% [98]. The treatment activity of compound 58 against TMV was 48.2%. Replacing the fluorine atom of compound 59 with a methoxy group had no significant effect on the antiviral activity of the compound. For example, the treatment activity of compound 59 against TMV was 47.2% [99]. The treatment, protection, and passivation of compound 60 against TMV were 33.2%, 65.1%, and 45.7%, while, for compound 61 against TMV, they were 74.3%, 78.7%, and 94.3%. Molecular docking found that benzothiazole rings are important for the antiviral activity of these compounds, and the hydrazone’s structure can affect the compounds’ antiviral activity [100]. The combination of benzothiazoles with diesters or amino phosphonate had good antiviral activity, which showed the advantage of the skeleton structure in antiviral activity. Currently, benzothiazole, thiazole, benzothiophene, and benzofuran structures are mainly introduced into benzothiazole scaffolds. In the future, the introduction of thiazole, oxazole, and morpholine rings may be considered to find molecules with higher antiviral activity.
At a concentration of 500 mg/L, the treatment activity of compound 62 (Figure 8) against TMV was 52.9% (Table 7), and the replacement of straight-chain alkanes with branched-chain alkanes resulted in a decrease in the antiviral activity of the compound; for example, compound 63 had a treatment activity against TMV of 46.6% [101]. The substitution of alkyl of compound 64 (30.9%) with benzene ring was beneficial to the improvement of the anti-TMV activity of compound 64 (30.9%). For example, compounds 65, 66, and 67 had anti-TMV activities of 32.1%, 38.1%, and 44.0%, respectively, at a concentration of 0.05% [102]. Under the condition of concentration of 50 mg/L, the inhibition rate of compound 68 against Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was 46.3%, while the growth of the alkyl chain had little effect on the antiviral activity of the compound; for example, the inhibition rate of compound 69 against CMV was 45.1% [103]. At the concentration of 500 mg/L, the inhibition rate of compound 70 on TMV was 44.5%, while the substitution position of the methyl group in the benzothiazole ring had no significant effect on the antiviral activity of the compound. For example, the inhibition rate of compound 71 on TMV was 45.1% [104]. The treatment activity of compound 72 against TMV was 39.3%. When the oxazole ring was replaced by a thiazole ring, the antiviral activity of the compound increased. For example, the treatment activity of compound 73 against TMV was 52% [105]. The protective and passivation activities of compound 74 against TMV were 78.3% and 79.5%, and the protective and passivation activities of compound 75 against TMV were 83.3%. The replacement of chlorine atoms with nitro atoms did not significantly change the antiviral activity of the compound [55].

5. Herbicidal Activity

Weeds compete with crops for nutrients, sunlight, and water, harming the normal growth and yield of crops. Furthermore, some weeds contain toxins in their seeds or pollen that can harm human health [106,107]. The use of chemical herbicides is the most effective and cost-effective way to manage weeds [108,109]. Currently, 263 species of weeds worldwide have shown resistance to 23 herbicides [110,111]. Therefore, the discovery of new herbicides is an urgent need for weed management [112,113].
Although the herbicidal activities of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives have been less reported, some compounds have shown excellent herbicidal activities. For example, compounds 76 and 77 (Figure 9) both achieved 90% (Table 8) herbicidal activity against the monocotyledon weeds Digitaria sanguinalis and Setaria viridis at a concentration of 75 g/ha [114]. In addition, compounds 76 and 77 showed good safety on the stems and leaves of rice. At a concentration of 100 μg/L, compound 78 had 93% and 85% herbicidal activities against the roots and stems of Chenopodium album (C. album), respectively. In addition, compound 78 may show herbicidal activity by inhibiting the growth of the taproot and stem of the C. album [68]. Under the condition of 37.5 g/hm2, compound 79 showed 100% inhibition rate against Setaria viridis, Ditaria sanguinalis, and Abutilon theophrasti. The introduction of the alkoxy group was beneficial to increase the herbicidal activity of the compound [115]. The inhibition rate of compound 80 to Amaranthus retroflexus (A. retroflexus) was 100% at 1400 g/ha, and the introduction of the nitro group improved the herbicidal activity of the compound [116]. Compounds 81, 82, and 83 showed 99% herbicidal activities against A. retroflexus at a concentration of 10 mg/L, and the introduction of fluorine may have increased the herbicidal activity of the compounds [117]. Under the condition of 37.5 g/hm2, the inhibition rate of compound 84 against Abutilon theophrasti, Cyperus iria, Rumex acetasa, and Eclipta prostrate was greater than 80%, which has the prospect of further development [118].

6. Insecticidal Activity

The wide variety of pests is an important factor in crop yield reduction and some pests are characterized by the outbreak, such as Pyrausta nubilalis [119], Helicoverpa armigera [120], Oriental armyworm [121,122], and Locust [123,124,125]. Traditional insecticides have played an irreplaceable role in pest control, and the long-term use of traditional insecticides not only leads to the rapid increase in pest resistance but also pollutes the environment and threatens human health [126,127,128]. The discovery of insecticides has always been a hot topic in pesticide research [129]. However, there are relatively few reports on the insecticidal activity of benzoxazole and benzothiazole, which may be strengthened in the future. The Maximum Likelihood Programmer (MLP) calculation showed that the combination of benzothiazole and pyridine could increase the antifeedant activity of the compounds. For example, LC50 of compounds 8588 (Figure 10) against Spodoptera litura were 0.38, 0.24, 0.10, and 0.07, respectively [130,131]. The insecticidal activity of compounds 86, 87, and 88 was significantly higher than that of compound 85, which may be due to the different electronegativity of groups introduced at position-6 of benzothiazole. Perhaps this is a hint that we can try to introduce strong electron-absorbing groups such as nitro and trifluoromethyl to benzothiazole in the future to find new insecticides.
At a concentration of 1 mg/L, the insecticidal activity of compound 89 (Figure 11) against Spodoptera exigua was 100% (Table 9); perhaps the strong electron-absorbing group trifluoromethyl played an important role in the insecticidal activity of compound 89 [132]. The insecticidal activity of compound 90 against Mythimna separata Walker was 62.1%, which was better than that of the lead compound magnolol [133]. Under the concentration of 5 g/L, the mean killing time of compound 91 to cockroaches was 147 min, which was better than that of commercial Parathion (280 min) [134]. The LC50 of compound 92 for Tetranychus urticae was 0.07 mg/L [135]. The insecticidal activity of compound 93 against Aphis was 54% at a concentration of 200 mg/mL [136]. The ED50 value of compound 94 for Achaea janata (A. janata) was 19.3 μg/cm2. The insecticidal activity of the compounds was significantly improved when fluorine atoms on the benzene ring were replaced with methoxide. For example, compounds 95 and 96 had ED50 values of 7.0 and 5.2 μg/cm2 for A. janata, respectively. Meanwhile, the insecticidal activities of compounds 95 and 96 against Spodoptera litura were greater than 95% at a concentration of 0.2 μg/insect [137]. The LC50 value of compound 97 against Bollworm was 4.90 mg/L [138]. The insecticidal activity of compound 98 against the Diamondback moth was 88% at a concentration of 1 mg/L. In addition, at high concentrations, compound 99 showed good insecticidal activity by activating the release of calcium ions from the central neurons of insects [139].

7. Conclusions

Benzothiazoles and benzoxazoles not only have a bicyclic structure, but also have seven modifiable sites, illustrating the important value of benzothiazoles and benzoxazoles in the discovery of pesticides. It is worthy to carry out more exploration and research based on benzothiazoles or benzoxazoles. In recent years, benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives have been increasingly studied as fungicides, antimicrobials, herbicides, antiviral agents, and insecticides. However, the research on the mechanism of action and the discovery of new targets of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives compounds is still weak and needs to be further strengthened in the future, which is a key factor restricting the discovery of new green pesticides. We systematically reviewed the application of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives compounds in the discovery of new agrochemicals, summarized the antibacterial, fungicidal, and antiviral agents, as well as herbicidal and insecticidal activities, of the compounds, and discussed the structural–activity relationship and mechanism of action of the active compounds, aiming to provide new clues and inspiration for the discovery of new pesticides.

Author Contributions

J.C. conceived and designed the title; the data were analyzed and interpreted by Y.Z. (Yue Zou), Y.Z. (Yong Zhang), X.L., H.S., Q.C. and S.W.; Y.Z. (Yue Zou) wrote the paper; J.C. and C.Y. critically revised the paper with regard to important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2021YFD1400800), the Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province (QKHJC-ZK (2022)039), and Scientific Research Project of Guizhou Provincial Education Department (Young Project) (No. 2022115).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Abbreviations

SARStructural–activity relationship
XocXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola
XacXanthomonas citri subsp. Citri
XooXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
SDHSuccinate dehydrogenase
RsRalstonia solanacearum
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereal
R. solaniRhizoctonia solani
D. gregariaDothiorella gregaria
C. gossypiiColletotrichum gossypii
S. fuligineaSphaerotheca fuliginea
P. cubensisPseudoperoniospora cubensis
P. infestansPhytophthora infestans
G. zeaeGibberella zeae
S. sclerotiorumSclerotonia sclerotiorum
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporum
A. oryzaeAspergillus oryzae
TMVtobacco mosaic virus
CMVCucumber mosaic virus
C. albumChenopodium album
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexus
A. janataAchaea janata
MLPMaximum Likelihood Programmer

References

  1. Strange, R.N.; Scott, P.R. Plant disease: A threat to global food security. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, J.X.; Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Chen, Y.F. Recent research progress and outlook in agricultural chemical discovery based on quinazoline scaffold. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 184, 105122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Möller, M.; Stukenbrock, E.H. Evolution and genome architecture in fungal plant pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 756–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A.; Masi, M. Phytotoxins produced by pathogenic fungi of agrarian plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2019, 18, 843–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.F.; Luo, X.; Wang, Y.; Xing, Z.F.; Peng, J.; Chen, J.X. Design, synthesis and antibacterial activity of 1,3,4-oxadiazole sufones containing sulfonamide structure. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 43, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Leonard, S.; Hommais, F.; Nasser, W.; Reverchon, S. Plant–phytopathogen interactions: Bacterial responses to environmental and plant stimuli. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 19, 1689–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wei, C.Q.; Huang, J.J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Luo, X.; Wang, S.B.; Wu, Z.X.; Xing, Z.F.; Chen, J.X. Discovery of novel dihydrolipoamide S-Succinyltransferase inhibitors based on fragment virtual screening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.X.; Luo, X.; Chen, Y.F.; Wang, Y.; Peng, J.; Xing., Z.F. Recent research progress: Discovery of anti-plant virus agents based on natural scaffold. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 926202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hernan, G.R. Susceptibility genes to plant viruses. Viruses 2018, 10, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gougherty, V.A.; Jonathan, D.T. Towards a phylogenetic ecology of plant pests and pathogens. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2021, 276, 20200359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nelson, D.C. The mechanism of host-induced germination in root parasitic plants. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 1353–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morin, L. Progress in biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2020, 58, 201–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, J.X.; Song, B.A. Natural nematicidal active compounds: Recent research progressand outlook. J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 2015–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, J.X.; Wei, C.Q.; Wu, S.K.; Luo, Y.Q.; Wu, R.; Hu, D.Y.; Song, B.A. Novel 1,3,4-oxadiazole thioether derivatives containing flexible-chain moiety: Design, synthesis, nematocidal activities, and pesticide-likeness analysis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, J.X.; Chen, Y.Z.; Gan, X.H.; Song, B.J.; Hu, D.Y.; Song, B.A. Synthesis, nematicidal evaluation, and 3D-QSAR analysis of novel 1,3,4-oxadiazole-cinnamic acid hybrids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9616–9623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, S.; Yoon, K.A.; Cho, S.; Lee, J.; Lim, Y.; Lee, S.H. Molecular and kinetic properties of three acetylcholinesterases in the Varroa mite, Varroa destructor. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goeb, J.; Lupi, F. Showing pesticides’ true colors: The effects of a farmer-to-farmer training program on pesticide knowledge. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 279, 111821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, C.Q.; Huang, J.J.; Luo, Y.; Wang, S.B.; Wu, S.K.; Xing, Z.F.; Chen, J.X. Novel amide derivatives containing an imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine moiety: Design, synthesis as potential nematicidal and antibacterial agents. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 175, 104857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nagoshi, R.N.; Meagher, R.L. The Spodoptera frugiperda host strains: What they are and why they matter for understanding and controlling this global agricultural pest. J. Econ. Entomol. 2022, 115, 1729–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; Lecoq, M.; Latchininsky, A.; Hunter, D. Locust and Grasshopper Management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019, 64, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Lin, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, D.; Wang, R.; Wang, R.; Gao, S. Molecular cloning, characterization and functional analysis of GluCl from the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata Walker. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 156, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Torto, B.; Cortada, L.; Murungi, L.K.; Haukeland, S.; Coyne, D.L. Management of cyst and root knot nematodes: A chemical ecology perspective. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8672–8678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Meftaul, I.M.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Dharmarajan, R.; Annamalai, P.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Parven, A.; Megharaj, M. Controversies over human health and ecological impacts of glyphosate: Is it to be banned in modern agriculture? Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pu, J.; Wang, Z.; Chung, H. Climate change and the genetics of insecticide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, J.X.; Luo, Y.Q.; Wei, C.Q.; Wu, S.K.; Wu, R.; Wang, S.B.; Hu, D.Y.; Song, B.A. Novel sulfone derivatives containing a 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety: Design and synthesis based on the 3D-QSAR model as potential antibacterial agent. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3188–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Skrzypek, A.; Karpińska, M.; Juszczak, M.; Grabarska, A.; Wietrzyk, J.; Krajewska-Kułak, E.; Studziński, M.; Paszko, T.; Matysiak, J. Cholinesterases inhibition, anticancer and antioxidant activity of novel benzoxazole and naphthoxazole analogs. Molecules 2022, 27, 8511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Plattner, J.J.; Easom, E.E.; Waterson, D.; Ge, M.; Li, Z.; Li, L.; Jian, Y. An efficient synthesis for a new class antimalarial agent, 7-(2-carboxyethyl)-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,1-benzoxaborole. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 3909–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, M.Z.; Wang, W.W.; Wang, Z.K.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhu, Y.F.; Lin, Z.Q.; Tian, S.Q.; Huang, Y.; Hu, Q.H.; Li, H. Discovery and computational studies of 2-phenyl-benzoxazole acetamide derivatives as promising P2Y14R antagonists with anti-gout potential. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 227, 113933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bhat, M.; Belagali, S.L. Structural activity relationship and importance of benzothiazole derivatives in medicinal chemistry: A comprehensive review. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2020, 17, 323–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lányi, K.; Laczay, P.; Lehel, J. Effects of some naturally occurring substances on the photodegradation of herbicide methabenzthiazuron. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kyung, K.S.; Ahn, K.C.; Kwon, J.W.; Lee, Y.P.; Lee, E.Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Führ, F.; Lee, J.K. Long-term fate of the herbicide mefenacet in a rice-grown lysimeter over a period of 6 consecutive years. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2015, 58, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jin, L.H.; Song, B.A.; Zhang, G.P.; Xu, R.Q.; Zhang, S.M.; Gao, X.W.; Hu, D.Y.; Yang, S. Synthesis, x-ray crystallographic analysis, and antitumor activity of N-(benzothiazole-2-yl)-1-(fluorophenyl)-O,O-dialkyl-alpha-aminophosphonates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1537–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sondhi, S.M.; Singh, N.; Kumar, A. Synthesis, anti-inflammatory, analgesic and kinase (CDK-1, CDK-5 and GSK-3) inhibition activity evaluation of benzimidazole/benzoxazole derivatives and some Schiff’s bases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 14, 3758–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sigmundova, I.; Zahradnik, P.; Magdolen, P.; Bujdakova, H. Synthesis and study of new antimicrobial benzothiazoles substituted on heterocyclic ring. Arkivoc 2008, 2008, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mortimer, C.G.; Wells, G.; Crochard, J.P.; Stone, E.L.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Stevens, M.F.G.; Westwell, A.D. Antitumor Benzothiazoles. 26. 2-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-fluorobenzothiazole (GW 610, NSC 721648), a Simple Fluorinated 2-Arylbenzothiazole, Shows Potent and Selective Inhibitory Activity against Lung, Colon, and Breast Cancer Cell Lines. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 949, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barik, S.R.; Ganguly, P.; Patra, S.; Dutta, S.K.; Goon, A.; Bhattacharyya, A. Persistence behavior of metamifop and its metabolite in rice ecosystem. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhu, W.; He, Y.; Li, L. Effects of 10%metamifop wp on gramineous weeds control in direct seeding paddy field. Weed Sci. 2011, 29, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smith, A.E. Persistence and transformation of the herbicides [14C] fenoxaprop-ethyl and [14C] fenthiaprop-ethyl in two prairie soils under laboratory and field conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1985, 33, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cai, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Gao, H.; Xiang, B.; Dong, L. Mefenacet resistance in multiple herbicide-resistant Echinochloa crus-galli L. populations. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2022, 182, 105038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Chai, B.; Wu, Q.; Liu, C. A Novel fungicide benthiavalicarb-isopropyl. Agrochemicals 2011, 50, 756–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bi, Q.; Ma, Z. Sensitivity, resistance stability, and cross-resistance of Plasmopara viticola to four different fungicides. Crop Prot. 2016, 89, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, D.; Xie, X.; Gao, D.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.; Jin, L.; Li, X.; Song, B. Dufulin intervenes the viroplasmic proteins as the mechanism of action against southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 11380–11387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, Z.; Zeng, M.; Song, B.; Hou, C.; Hu, D.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Fan, H.; Bi, L.; Liu, J. Dufulin activates HrBP1 to produce antiviral responses in tobacco. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Li, X.Y.; Cheng, Z.; Yang, S.; Song, B.A. Research progress of structure biology of tobacco mosaic virus coat protein as molecular targets. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2010, 12, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ma, G.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Dufulin enhances salt resistance of rice. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, X.Y.; Chen, S.H.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.X.; Zhang, L.X. Research progress of insecticide oxazosulfyl and its analogues. Contemp. Chem. Ind. 2022, 51, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Suzuki, T.; Yamato, S. Oxazosulfyl, a novel sulfyl insecticide, binds to and stabilizes the voltage-gated sodium channels in the slow-inactivated state. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 4048–4055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, J.X.; Yi, C.F.; Wang, S.B.; Wu, S.K.; Li, S.Y.; Hu, D.Y.; Song, B.A. Novel amide derivatives containing 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety: Design, synthesis, nematocidal and antibacterial activities. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, Z.; Hu, D.; Song, B. Novel cinnamic acid derivatives containing the 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety: Design, synthesis, antibacterial activities, and mechanisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 11804–11815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mou, H.; Shi, J.; Chen, J.; Hu, D. Synthesis, antibacterial activity and mechanism of new butenolides derivatives containing an amide moiety. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 178, 104913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sundin, G.W.; Wang, N. Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ji, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhao, K. Rice Routes of Countering Xanthomonas oryzae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 2018 19, 3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Wu, S.; Shi, T.; Chen, J.; Hu, D.; Zang, L.; Song, B. Synthesis, antibacterial activity, and mechanisms of novel 6 sulfonyl-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4 b][1,3,4]thiadiazole derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 4645–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, T.; Shi, J.; Liu, D.; Zhang, D.; Song, B.; Hu, D. Discovery of novel benzo[4,5]thiazolo(oxazolo)[3,2-a]pyrimidinone mesoionic derivatives as potential antibacterial agents and mechanism research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhong, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; He, M.; Xue, W. Synthesis and biological activities of benzothiazole derivativesbearing a 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2019, 194, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Su, S.; He, J.; Chen, M.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W.; He, M.; et al. Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of novel chalcone derivatives containing a benzothiazole scaffold. Monatsh. Chem. 2019, 150, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, J.; Wei, C.; Li, S.; Hu, D.; Song, B. Discovery of novel bis-sulfoxide derivatives bearing acylhydrazone and benzothiazole moieties as potential antibacterial agents. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 167, 104605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Sun, N.; Sun, M.; He, M.; Wu, Y.; Xue, W. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of novel 1,4-pentadien-3-one derivatives bearing a benzothiazole moiety. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2021, 59, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kang, Z.S. Current status and development strategy for research on plant fungal diseases in China. Plant Protect. 2010, 36, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El-Baky, N.A.; Amara, A.A.A.F. Recent approaches towards control of fungal diseases in plants: An updated review. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Luo, X.; Chen, Y.F.; Wang, Y.; Xing, Z.; Peng, J.; Chen, J.X. Design, synthesis and antifungal activity of novel amide derivatives containing a pyrrolidine moiety as potential succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors. Mol. Divers. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ons, L.; Bylemans, D.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P. Combining biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated plant fungal disease control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wei, Y.; Li, S.; Hao, S. New angular oxazole-fused coumarin derivatives: Synthesis and biological activities. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 1824–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xu, H.; Wei, Y.; Hao, S. 4-Methylumbelliferone fused oxazole thioether derivatives: Synthesis, characterization and antifungal activities. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fan, L.; Luo, Z.; Yang, C.; Guo, B.; Miao, J.; Chen, Y.; Tang, L.; Li, Y. Design and synthesis of small molecular 2-aminobenzoxazoles as potential antifungal agents against phytopathogenic fungi. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ballari, M.S.; Cano, N.H.; Lopez, A.G.; Wunderlin, D.A.; Feresin, G.; Santiago, A.N. Green Synthesis of potential antifungal agents: 2-benzyl substituted thiobenzoazoles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10325–10331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huang, W.; Yang, G. Microwave-assisted, one-pot syntheses and fungicidal activity of polyfluorinated 2-benzylthiobenzothiazoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 8280–8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, W.; Zhao, P.; Liu, C.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Z.; Yang, G. Design, synthesis, and fungicidal activities of new strobilurin derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3004–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, P.; Wang, F.; Huang, W.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Z. Synthesis and Fungicidal Activities of Novel Thioethers Containing Benzothiazole Moiety. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 30, 1567–1573. [Google Scholar]
  70. Singh, R.P.; Singh, D.V.; Singh, C.R.; Tripathi, S.P.; Singh, S. Synthesis and antifungal activity of 2-azetidinones, 4-thiazolidinones and 5-imidazolidinones incorporating benzthiazole moiety. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2012, 4, 2055–2060. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang, Y.; Song, H.Y.; Wang, S.; Cai, Q.F.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.X. Discovery of quinazoline compound as a novel nematicidal scaffold. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 189, 105310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hou, X.; Wang, M.; Jing, S.; Niu, S. Synthesis and induced resistance activities of methyl 2-amidobenzothiazole-7-carboxylates. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2006, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, X.; Lie, Z.; Zhu, G.; Jing, C. Synthesis and biological activities of N-(substituted-thiazole-2-yl)-chrysanthemumamide. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 30, 719–725. [Google Scholar]
  74. Sidhu, A.; Kukreja, S. Synthesis of novel fluorinated benzothiazol-2-yl-1,2,4-triazoles: Molecular docking, Antifungal evaluation and in silico evaluation for SAR. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 2118–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, X.; Gao, S.; Yang, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, L.; Tang, X. Synthesis and antifungal activity evaluation of new heterocycle containing amide derivatives. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 30, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gao, Y.; Yang, J.; Gao, S.; Wang, X.; Tang, X. Synthesis of N-(benzod]thiazol-2-yl) furan-2-carboxamide and Research on Its Antifungal Activity. J. Xihua Univ. 2016, 9, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bondock, S.; Fadaly, W.; Metwally, M.A. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of some new thiazole, thiophene and pyrazole derivatives containing benzothiazole moiety. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3692–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sareen, V.; Khatri, V.; Garg, U.; Jain, P.; Sharma, K. Synthesis of Some New 2-(4-Nitrobenzothiazol-2′-ylamino)-4-(2-chloro-4-trifluoromethylanilino)-6-(substituted Thioureido)-1,3,5-triazines as Antifungal Agents. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2007, 182, 2943–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lv, X.; Zhang, X.; Tang, W. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of cinnamic acyl thiourea derivatives. Appl. Chem. 2010, 25, 1286–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Weng, J.; Huang, H.; Ta, C.; Liu, X.; Chu, W.; Chen, J. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel substituted-3-aryl-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4-b]benzothiazoles. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 32, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Weng, J.; Tan, C.; Liu, X. Synthesis and fungicidal activity of hydrazones containing 4-methylbenzod]thiazole moiety. J. Pestic. Sci. 2012, 37, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Xiao, H.; Wu, F.; Shi, L.; Chen, Z.W.; Su, S.H.; Tang, C.H.; Wang, H.T.; Li, Z.N.; Li, M.C.; Shi, Q.C. Cinchona alkaloid derivative-catalyzed enantioselective synthesis via a Mannich-type reaction and antifungal activity of β-amino esters bearing benzoheterocycle moieties. Molecules 2014, 19, 3955–3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Zeng, Z.; Huang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Q. Synthesis, crystal structure and antibacterial activity of thiourea derivatives with benzothiazole-ring. Chem. Reagents 2017, 39, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Huo, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, B.; Chen, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Han, X.; Dai, B. Synthesis and fungicidal evaluation of novel β-carboline benzimidazole and β-carboline-benzothiazole hybrids. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 3356–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Upadhyay, R.K.; Saini, K.K.; Deswal, N.; Singh, T.; Tripathi, K.P.; Kaushik, P.; Shakil, N.A.; Bharti, A.C.; Kumar, R. Synthesis of benzothiazole-appended bis-triazole-based structural isomers with promising antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 24412–24426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jones, R.A.C. Global plant virus disease pandemics and epidemics. Plants 2021, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Xie, D.; Song, B.; Hu, D. First report on anti-TSWV activities of quinazolinone derivatives containing a dithioacetal moiety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 12135–12142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. He, F.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Gan, X.; Song, B.; Hu, D. Synthesis, Antiviral activity, and mechanisms of purine nucleoside derivatives containing a sulfonamide moiety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8459–8467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tatineni, S.; Hein, G.L. Plant viruses of agricultural importance: Current and future perspectives of virus disease management strategies. Phytopathology 2023, 113, 117–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Calil, I.P.; Fontes, E.P. Plant immunity against viruses: Antiviral immune receptors in focus. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Xiao, Q.Z.; Deng, B.; Zou, H.L.; Teng, Q.J.; Zhou, Z.C. Study progress in biological prevention of plant virus. South China Agric. 2021, 15, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yu, W.X.; Shen, J.Z. An overview on plant viral diseases and antiviral agents. World Pestic. 2021, 43, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, J.; He, F.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hu, D.; Song, B. Purine nucleoside derivatives containing a sulfa ethylamine moiety: Design, synthesis, antiviral activity, and mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 5575–5582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jiang, D.; Chen, J.; Zan, N.; Li, C.; Hu, D.; Song, B. Discovery of novel chromone derivatives containing a sulfonamide moiety as anti-ToCV agents through the tomato chlorosis virus coat protein-oriented screening method. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 53, 128431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Han, X.; Zheng, P.C.; Tang, C.P.; Xie, Y.; Wu, F.; Song, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.N.; Li, M.C. Synthesis and anti-TMV activity of dialkyl/dibenzyl 2-((6-substituted-benzod]thiazol-2-ylamino)(benzofuran-2-yl)methyl) malonates. Molecules 2013, 18, 13623–13635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xiao, H.; Li, P.; Hu, D.; Song, B.A. Synthesis and anti-TMV activity of novel β-amino acid ester derivatives containing quinazoline and benzothiazole moieties. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 3452–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yao, Y.Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.X.; Xing, M.M.; Shu, H.; Tang, B.C.; Xue, W. Synthesis of benzothiazol-β-amino acid esters derivatives applied to research of anti-TMV. Molecules 2016, 32, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, P.; Tang, C.; Chen, Z.; Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Jin, L.; Yang, S.; Hu, D. Design, synthesis, and antiviral activity of α-aminophosphonates bearing a benzothiophene moiety. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2014, 189, 530–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Xie, D.; Zhang, A.; Liu, D.; Yin, L.; Wan, J.; Zeng, S.; Hu, D. Synthesis and antiviral activity of novel a-aminophosphonates containing 6-fluorobenzothiazole moiety. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2017, 192, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tian, J.; Ji, R.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, G. Discovery of novel α-aminophosphonates with hydrazone as potential antiviral agents combined with active fragment and molecular docking. Adv. Novel Nat. Prod. Pestic. 2022, 10, 2296–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, L.; Song, B.; Bhadury, P.S.; Hu, D.; Yang, S. Synthesis and bioactivities of α-aminophosphonate derivatives containing benzothiazole and thiourea moieties. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2012, 187, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yang, S.; Song, B.; Liu, X.; Pang, L.; Jin, L.; Wang, H.; Hu, D.; Liu, G. Synthesis and anti-tmv activity of 2-(benzod]thiazol-2-ylthio)-1-(2,3,4-trimethoxyphenyl) ethanoxime ester and ether derivativies. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 25, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ouyang, G.; Song, B.; Hu, D.Y. A novel synthesis of (E)-3-methylthio-3-substituted arylamino-2-cyanoacrylates under microwave irradiation. Molecules 2005, 10, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Xue, W.; Li, H.; Fan, H.; Xiong, Z.; He, Y.; Qi, H. Synthesis and biological activity of anthranilic diamides compounds containing fluorine and benzothiazole unites. J. Univ. Jinan Sci. Tech. 2012, 26, 353–357. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wang, Z.B.; Zhu, X.S.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; Xue, W. Synthesis and biological activity of oxime ethers of curcumin derivatives. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 34, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Sun, J.Q.; Ren, X.L.; Hu, H.Y.; Jiang, W.L.; Ma, Y.J.; Wang, D.; Song, X.P.; Ma, Y.; Ma, X.Y. The factors influencing weed community succession in the crop field. J. Weed Sci. 2019, 37, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zheng, Z.; Ruhai, L.; Can, Z.; Sheng, Q. Reduction in weed infestation through integrated depletion of the weed seed bank in a rice-wheat cropping system. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jabusch, T.; Tjeerdema, R. Chemistry and fate of triazolopyrimidine sulfonamide herbicides. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 193, 31–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chipman, D.; Duggleby, R.; Tittmann, K. Mechanisms of acetohydroxyacid synthases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhou, J.; Liu, K.; Xin, F.; Ma, J.; Xu, N.; Zhang, W.; Fang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Dong, W. Recent insights into the microbial catabolism of aryloxyphenoxy-propionate herbicides: Microbial resources, metabolic pathways and catabolic enzymes. World J. Microb. Biot. 2018, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, X.; Huang, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Yin, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R. An eco-and user-friendly herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7783–7792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Neve, P.; Vila-Aiub, M.; Roux, F. Evolutionary-thinking in agricultural weed management. New Phytol. 2009, 184, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Beckie, H.J.; Ashworth, M.B.; Flower, K.C. Herbicide resistance management: Recent developments and trends. Plants 2019, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Liu, Q.; Hu, A.X.; Wang, X.G.; Lei, M.X.; OU, X.M.; Ren, Y.G.; Haung, L.; Liu, A.P. Synthesis and herbicidal activity of N-arylmethyl-2-(4-arylxoyphenoxy) propionamide. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2014, 35, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ji, Z.; Zhou, F.; Wei, S. Synthesis and herbicidal activities of benzothiazole N,O-acetals. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 4065–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Che, J.Y.; Meng, X.S.; Xu, X.Y.; Jiang, S.; Gu, Y.C.; Shi, D.Q. Synthesis and herbicidal evaluation of novel uracil derivatives containing benzothiazole-2-yl moiety. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2016, 53, 1494–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xun, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Design, synthesis, acaricidal activities, and structure–activity relationship studies of oxazolines containing ether moieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 13538–13544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jiang, L.L.; Ying, T.; Zhu, X.L.; Wang, Z.F.; Yang, Z.; Qiong, C.; Zhen, X.; Yang, G.F. Design, synthesis, and 3D-QSAR analysis of novel 1,3,4-Oxadiazol-2(3H)-ones as protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 2643–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Rios, D.A.; Specht, A.; Roque Specht, V.F.; Sosa Gómez, D.R.; Fochezato, J.; Malaquias, J.V.; Gonçalves, G.L.; Moreira, G.R. Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa zea hybridization: Constraints, heterosis, and implications for pest management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhou, J.; Meng, L.; Li, B. Non-reproductive effects of two parasitoid species on the oriental armyworm Mythimna separate on wheat and maize plants. BioControl 2019, 64, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sun, R.; Li, Y.; Maoyun, L.; Xiong, L.; Wang, Q. Synthesis, larvicidal activity, and sar studies of new benzoylphenylureas containing oxime ether and oxime ester group. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 4693–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Shi, D.; Liang, P.; Zhang, L.; Lv, H.; Gao, X.; You, H.; Li, J.; Ma, K. Susceptibility baseline of Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) to the novel insecticide afidopyropen in China. Crop Prot. 2022, 151, 105834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chen, Y.P.; Wang, Z.D.; Fu, H.T.; Liao, L.P.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.F. Analytical methods and research progress of neonicotinoid insecticides. Fine Chem. Intermed. 2023, 53, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Yi, C.F.; Chen, J.X.; Wei, C.Q.; Wu, S.K.; Wang, S.B.; Hu, D.Y.; Song, B.A. α-Haloacetophenone and analogues as potential antibacterial agents and nematicides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 126814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sword, G.; Lecoq, M.; Simpson, S. Phase polyphenism and preventative locust management. J. Insect. Physiol. 2010, 56, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, J.; Li, Q.X.; Song, B. Chemical nematicides: Recent research progress and outlook. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12175–12188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Alexzandrino, D.A.M.; Almeida, C.; Marisa, R.; Mucha, A.P.; Carvalho, M.F. Revisiting pesticide pollution: The case of fluorinated pesticides. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lv, J.; Guo, L.; Gu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xue, Q.; Yang, X.; Wang, Q.; Meng, X.; Xu, D. National temporal trend for organophosphate pesticide DDT exposure and associations with chronic kidney disease using age-adapted eGFR model. Environ. Int. 2022, 169, 107499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tian, P.Y.; Liu, D.Y.; Liu, Z.J.; Shi, J.; He, W.J.; Qi, P.Y.; Chen, J.X.; Song, B.A. Design, synthesis, and insecticidal activity evaluation of novel 4-(N,N-diarylmethylamines)furan-2(5H)-one derivatives as potential acetylcholine receptor insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mithlesh, P.K.P.H. ChemInform Abstract: Microwave synthesis of new biologically Important 1,4-Dihydropyridines containing benzothiazole moiety. Collect. Czech. Chem. 2010, 75, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Pareek, P.; Kant, R.; Shukla, S.; Ojha, K. Rapid synthesis and biological evaluation of 1, 4-dihydropyridine derivatives containing a benzothiazolyl moiety. Open Chem. 2010, 8, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Guan, A.; Qin, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, B. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of novel dihalopropene derivatives containing benzoxazole moiety: A structure–activity relationship study. J. Fluor. Chem. 2013, 156, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yang, C.; Zhi, X.; Xu, H. Synthesis of benzoxazole derivatives of honokiol as insecticidal agents against Mythimna separata Walker. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2217–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Singh, T.; Srivastava, V.K.; Saxena, K.K.; Goel, S.L.; Kumar, A. Synthesis of new thiazolylthiazolidinylbenzothiazoles and thiazolylazetidinylbenzothiazoles as potential insecticidal, antifungal, and antibacterial agents. Arch. Pharm. 2006, 339, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Pareek, D.; Chaudhary, M.; Pareek, P.K.; Kant, R.; Ojha, K.G.; Iraqi, S.; Pareek, A. Synthesis of some biologically important 2-thiobarbituric acid derivatives incorporating benzothiazole moiety. Der Pharm. Lett. 2010, 2, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Deng, X.G.; Guo, S.X.; Wang, Y.M.; Zhou, Z.H. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of new neonicotinoid compounds. Fine Chem. Intermed. 2012, 3, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kalavagunta, P.K.; Pala, R.; Pathipati, U.R.; Ravirala, N. Identification of naphthol derivatives as novel antifeedants and insecticides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6571–6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Li, J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wu, Q.Y.; Yang, G.F. Design, synthesis and insecticidal activity of novel 1, 1-dichloropropene derivatives. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shang, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, N.; Xiong, L.; Wang, B. Synthesis and evaluation of novel1-(((6-substitutedbenzod]thiazol-2-yl)amino)(heteroaryl) methyld) naphthalen-2-ol as pesticidal agents. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Ch. 2022, 37, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of some pesticides containing benzoxazole or benzothiazole scaffolds.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of some pesticides containing benzoxazole or benzothiazole scaffolds.
Ijms 24 10807 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of benzoxazole and benzothiazole antibacterial active compounds 112.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of benzoxazole and benzothiazole antibacterial active compounds 112.
Ijms 24 10807 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure of benzoxazole antifungal active compounds 1318.
Figure 3. Chemical structure of benzoxazole antifungal active compounds 1318.
Ijms 24 10807 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structures and modified fragments analysis of benzothiazole antifungal active compounds 1929.
Figure 4. Chemical structures and modified fragments analysis of benzothiazole antifungal active compounds 1929.
Ijms 24 10807 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structures of benzothiazole fungicidal active compounds 3036.
Figure 5. Chemical structures of benzothiazole fungicidal active compounds 3036.
Ijms 24 10807 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structures of benzothiazole fungicidal active compounds 3748.
Figure 6. Chemical structures of benzothiazole fungicidal active compounds 3748.
Ijms 24 10807 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structures and modified fragments analysis of benzothiazole antiviral active compounds 4961.
Figure 7. Chemical structures and modified fragments analysis of benzothiazole antiviral active compounds 4961.
Ijms 24 10807 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structures analysis of benzothiazole antiviral active compounds 6275.
Figure 8. Chemical structures analysis of benzothiazole antiviral active compounds 6275.
Ijms 24 10807 g008
Figure 9. Chemical structures analysis of benzoxazole and benzothiazole herbicidal active compounds 7684.
Figure 9. Chemical structures analysis of benzoxazole and benzothiazole herbicidal active compounds 7684.
Ijms 24 10807 g009
Figure 10. Chemical structures and modified fragments analysis of benzothiazole insecticidal active compounds 8588.
Figure 10. Chemical structures and modified fragments analysis of benzothiazole insecticidal active compounds 8588.
Ijms 24 10807 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structures of benzothiazole insecticidal active compounds 8999.
Figure 11. Chemical structures of benzothiazole insecticidal active compounds 8999.
Ijms 24 10807 g011
Table 1. Benzoxazole or benzothiazole antibacterial derivatives with antifungal activity.
Table 1. Benzoxazole or benzothiazole antibacterial derivatives with antifungal activity.
CompoundBacteriaConcentrationAntibacterial ActivitySAR/Physiology and Biochemistry
1Xoc
Xac
47.6 a
36.8 a
The expression of SDH during oxidative phosphorylation is up-regulated.
2Xoo100 mg/L52.4%
3Rs100 mg/L71.6%The introduction of the nitro group and trifluoromethyl group plays a key role.
4Xoo
Xac
Rs
100 mg/L52.40%
50.97%
36.49%,
The introduction of electron-withdrawing groups enhances the antibacterial activity of the compounds.
7Xoo 11.4 aCell morphology is altered and biofilm formation is inhibited.
10Xoo 20.0 aThe introduction of the fluorine atom plays a key role.
11Xac 35.7 aThe cell surface morphology is folded and damaged.
12Xac 28.5 a
a median effective concentration (EC50, mg/L).
Table 2. Benzoxazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
Table 2. Benzoxazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
CompoundFungusConcentrationAntifungal ActivitySAR/Molecular Docking
13Alternaria brassicae 0.3 a
14Botrytis cinerea90 mg/L>88%
16Botrytis cinerea 2.40 a Compound 16 may show fungicidal activity by binding to the active site of the sec14p target of fungi
18Botrytis cinerea 1.69 aThe introduction of electron-absorbing groups is beneficial for antifungal activity.
a median effective concentration (EC50, mg/L).
Table 3. Benzothiazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
Table 3. Benzothiazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
CompoundFungusConcentrationAntifungal ActivitySAR
19Botrytis cinerea 1.4 aThe addition of methylene between benzothiazole and aryl increased the fungicidal activity of the compound
20Rhizoctonia solani,
Botrytis cinereal,
Dothiorella gregaria,
Colletotrichum gossypii
50 mg/L92%
97%
89%
78%
22Sphaerotheca fuliginea,
Pseudoperoniospora cubensis
6.17 b
46.32 b
23Sphaerotheca fuliginea,
Pseudoperoniospora cubensis
50 mg/L67%
67%
The introduction of large steric groups reduces the fungicidal activity of the compound.
25
27
29
Phytophthora infestans100 ppm58%
53%
58%
The fungicidal activity improves when chlorine atoms on position-2 of the benzene ring are replaced by position-4 fluorine atoms.
a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50, μmol/L). b concentration for 90% of maximal effect (EC90, mg/L).
Table 4. Benzothiazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
Table 4. Benzothiazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
CompoundFungusConcentrationAntifungal ActivitySAR
30Botrytis cinereal1000 mg/L88.9%The introduction of the nitrophenyl group increases antifungal activity.
31Botrytis cinereal,
Gibberella zeae
50 mg/L80%
75%
The introduction of permethric acid had no significant contribution to the fungicidal activity of the compound
32Ustilago tritici,
Puccinia striiformis,
Puccinia triticina,
Blumeria graminis,
Dickeya oryzae
Ustilag ohordeiare
<0.8 a
35Rhizoctonia solani,
Botrytis cinereal,
Gibberella zeae,
Helminthosporium maydis,
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
50 mg/L93.8%,
94.1%,
93.4%,
94.6%,
94.5%
The introduction of oxazoles plays a key role
36Fusarium oxysporum 12.5 b
a median effective concentration (EC50, mmol/L). b minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, mg/mL).
Table 5. Benzothiazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
Table 5. Benzothiazole derivatives with antifungal activity.
CompoundFungusConcentrationAntifungal Activity
37Alternaria alternate,
Aspergillus niger
100 mg/L38%
39%
38Gibberella zeae250 mg/L53.5%
39Sclerotinia sclerotiorum100 mg/L87.5%
41Rhizoctonia solani50 mg/L70.43%
42Fusarium oxysporum50 mg/L60.53%
43Aspergillus oryzae10 mg/L0.81 a
46Rape sclerotinia rot50 mg/L81.61%
47Rhizoctonia solani 0.96 b
a The inhibitory zone diameter(mm). b median effective concentration (EC50, µM).
Table 6. Benzothiazole derivatives with antiviral activity.
Table 6. Benzothiazole derivatives with antiviral activity.
CompoundVirusConcentrationAntiviral ActivitySAR
50TMV500 mg/L54.41% aThe electron-donating group in the benzothiazole ring may play a key role
52TMV500 mg/L55.96% bThe introduction of the chlorine atom plays a key role
54TMV500 mg/L28.2%
57TMV500 mg/L48.1% a
58TMV500 mg/L48.2% a
61TMV500 mg/L74.3% a
78.7% b
94.3% c
The hydrazone’s structure can affect the compounds’ antiviral activity.
a treatment activity, b protective activity, c passivation activity.
Table 7. Benzothiazole derivatives with antiviral activity.
Table 7. Benzothiazole derivatives with antiviral activity.
CompoundVirusConcentrationAntiviral ActivitySAR
62TMV500 mg/L52.9% aStraight-chain alkane is beneficial to the antiviral activity of the compound
67TMV500 mg/L44.0%The introduction of the benzene ring is beneficial to the improvement of the anti-TMV activity of the compound
68CMV50 mg/L46.3%The growth of the alkyl chain had little effect on the antiviral activity of the compound
71TMV500 mg/L45.1%
73TMV500 mg/L52%The introduction of the thiazole ring is beneficial to the antiviral activity of the compound
75TMV500 mg/L83.3% b,c
a treatment activity, b protective activity, c passivation activity.
Table 8. Benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives with herbicidal activity.
Table 8. Benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives with herbicidal activity.
CompoundWeedsConcentrationHerbicidal ActivitySAR/Physiology and Biochemistry
76Digitaria sanguinalis,
Setaria viridis
75 g/ha90%The compound shows good safety on the stems and leaves of rice
78the roots of Chenopodium album,
the stems of Chenopodium album
100 μg/L93%
85%
The compound inhibits the growth of the taproot and stem of the Chenopodium album
79Setaria viridis,
Ditaria sanguinalis,
Amaranthus retroflexus
37.5 g/hm2100%The introduction of the alkoxy group was beneficial to increase the herbicidal activity.
81Amaranthus retroflexus10 mg/L99%The introduction of fluorine may have increased the herbicidal activity of the compounds
84Abutilon theophrasti,
Cyperus iria,
Rumex acetasa,
Eclipta prostrate
37.5 g/hm2>80%
Table 9. Benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives with insecticidal activity.
Table 9. Benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives with insecticidal activity.
CompoundPestsConcentrationInsecticidal ActivitySAR
88Spodoptera litura 0.07 aThe introduction of the ethoxy group may play a key role
89Spodoptera exigua1 mg/L100%The strong electron-absorbing group may play a key role
90Mythimna separata Walker1 mg/L62.1%
91cockroaches5 g/L147 b
92Tetranychus urticae 0.07 c
93Aphis200 mg/mL54%
96Achaea janata 5.2 dFluorine atom on the benzene ring improves the insecticidal activity of the compound
97Bollworm 4.90 c
98Diamondback moth1 mg/L88%
a the calculation of LC50/LD50 using the Maximum Likelihood Programmer (MLP). b the mean killing time (min). c lethal concentration 50 (LC50, mg/L). d a median effective concentration (EC50, μg/cm2).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Song, H.; Cai, Q.; Wang, S.; Yi, C.; Chen, J. Research Progress of Benzothiazole and Benzoxazole Derivatives in the Discovery of Agricultural Chemicals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10807. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms241310807

AMA Style

Zou Y, Zhang Y, Liu X, Song H, Cai Q, Wang S, Yi C, Chen J. Research Progress of Benzothiazole and Benzoxazole Derivatives in the Discovery of Agricultural Chemicals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10807. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms241310807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Yue, Yong Zhang, Xing Liu, Hongyi Song, Qingfeng Cai, Sheng Wang, Chongfen Yi, and Jixiang Chen. 2023. "Research Progress of Benzothiazole and Benzoxazole Derivatives in the Discovery of Agricultural Chemicals" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10807. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms241310807

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop