Next Article in Journal
Longitudinal Relationship Study of Depression and Self-Esteem in Postnatal Korean Women Using Autoregressive Cross-Lagged Modeling
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Health-Related Behaviors of Adult Korean Women at Normal BMI with Different Body Image Perceptions: Results from the 2013–2017 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES)
Previous Article in Journal
Inadequate Knowledge, Attitude and Practices about Second-Hand Smoke among Non-Smoking Pregnant Women in Urban Vietnam: The Need for Health Literacy Reinforcement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prepregnancy Endocrine, Autoimmune Disorders and the Risks of Gestational Hypertension-Preeclampsia in Primiparas: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph17103745
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ethiopian Health Care Workers’ Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study

by
Bosena Tebeje Gashaw
1,2,*,
Berit Schei
3,4,
Kari Nyheim Solbraekke
5 and
Jeanette H. Magnus
2,6
1
College of Health Sciences, Jimma University, 1355 Jimma, Ethiopia
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
3
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Olav’s Hospital, 7030 Trondheim University Hospital, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway
5
Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
6
Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(10), 3745; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103745
Submission received: 30 March 2020 / Revised: 10 May 2020 / Accepted: 11 May 2020 / Published: 25 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Women's Health)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Violence against women is a global pandemic, with the potential to spread through generations. Intimate partner violence has impacts on women’s sexual, reproductive, and psycho-social health. It can occur during pregnancy and adversely affect the health of both mother and child. Health care workers involved in antenatal care can have a unique role in identifying intimate partner violence and in intervening, preventing, and mitigating its consequences. In this study, the objective was to explore Ethiopian health care workers’ insights of and responses to intimate partner violence in pregnancy. Using an exploratory design, this qualitative study includes ten semi-structured interviews of health care workers representing different antenatal care centers in Jimma, Ethiopia. The content analyses of translated interview notes were conducted with Atlas.ti7 software, (Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development Gmbh, Berlin). The health care workers shared their insights of the consequences of intimate partner violence during pregnancy in addition to their experience with and responses to the victims. There was a limited understanding of the extent of the adverse impacts of intimate partner violence on pregnancy outcomes, as well as the potential long-term health implications. The informants described how they only gave medical treatment for obstetric complications or visible trauma during pregnancy. There was no formal referral to or linkages with other resources. Women’s empowerment and systemic changes in the health care, including training and capacity building, clear guidelines addressing management of intimate partner violence in pregnancy, and inclusion of intimate partner violence screening tools in the Ethiopian antenatal care chart/card, were recommended by the informants. The adverse impacts of intimate partner violence on pregnancy outcomes were poorly understood by the Ethiopian health care workers in this study. They offered limited assistance to the victims and recommended changes in the routine antenatal care (ANC) and health care systems. They identified various policy initiatives focusing on women’s empowerment to reduce intimate partner violence and its complications especially during pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive public health problem globally, affecting one in three women [1]. IPV figures are at an epidemic level in the Sub-Saharan Africa [1,2]. It affects more than three in four women in Ethiopia during their lifetime, and more than a third of all pregnant women [3,4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, the IPV prevalence is higher during pregnancy than any obstetric complications routinely screened for during antenatal care (ANC) visits [8,9]. Women exposed to IPV prior to pregnancy, during pregnancy, and/or during the postpartum period are more likely to experience adverse short- and long-term physical, reproductive, and mental health consequences [10,11,12,13,14]. IPV in pregnancy may increase women’s vulnerability to psychological distress and reduce the victim’s coping skills to survive other stressful life events [15]. It also adversely affects the fetus by increasing the risk of intrauterine fetal death, preterm birth, and low birth weight [16,17].
Health care workers (HCWs) are critically significant in advancing the health sectors’ responses to IPV in general and during pregnancy in particular [16]. They can identify women experiencing violence, and provide support and adequate care. Studies show that screening for IPV provides a distinctive opportunity for identification and interventions [18,19,20]. Health care workers, specifically nurses and midwives working at antenatal care (ANC) centers, are in a unique position to address issues related to IPV with pregnant women [17].
However, the personal perceptions and response of HCWs to IPV in pregnancy can serve as a facilitator or as a barrier when integrating IPV prevention, care and supportive services into health care practice [18]. Some HCWs are willing to address IPV in their clinical activities regarding identification of IPV as a preventive health care issue [19], while others do not support including IPV screening tools in their prenatal reports [20,21].
In Ethiopia, 36% women report IPV in pregnancy, and as many as 81% report lifetime physical or emotional IPV experience [7,22]. IPV screening is not included in ANC services in Ethiopia, where 74% of the pregnant women have at least one ANC visit [23]. Thus, ANC clinics provides an ideal ‘window of opportunity’ to address IPV, as this might be the only time most women come into contact with a health care providers.
In order to get a deeper understanding of Ethiopian ANC clinic health care workers insights of and responses to IPV during pregnancy [24], we developed a qualitative study. Considering the rate of IPV in pregnancy, its impact on the health of the pregnant woman and her unborn fetus [25,26], the ANC visit creates an opportunity for HCWs to identify and interact with IPV victims.

2. Methods and Participants

2.1. Study Design

A qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews was employed to explore the insights and responses of different HCWs from different ANC clinics related to IPV in pregnant women.

2.2. Study Setting

The study was conducted from November 2015 to 30 April 2016, in Jimma town, Oromiya regional state, one of the largest cities in Ethiopia. This multi-ethnic town is located 352 km southwest of the capital, Addis Ababa, distinguished by different religions, cultures and languages, with a total population of 177,900 (CSA, 2015).

2.3. Participants

Ethical approval was obtained from the Norwegian Regional Ethical Committee, Norway and Jimma university institutional review board, Ethiopia. Permission was provided by the respective administrative health bureaus. We presented the objective of the study to the heads of each institution, who recruited the participants among their staff members working at ANC in Jimma town. Following this, participants were contacted in person to arrange an appointment that was convenient with their working schedule. Participant characteristics included: professional men and women (age 23–51 years); service years ranging 3–32; married and unmarried; of different religions (Table 1).

2.4. Data Collection Tools and Procedures

The interview guide was designed to capture the participants’ understanding of the consequences of IPV in pregnancy; individual encounters with and professional responses to pregnant IPV victims; as well as their reflections and recommendations on what could or should be done about IPV in pregnancy. The authors developed the interview guide based on prior experience, expert opinions, and after reviewing relevant literature on the subject. The interview guide was pretested in institutions at other sites with similar characteristics for clarity. We obtained the informants’ voluntary consent prior to the interview after explaining the aim of the study. Before initiating the interviews, measures were taken to make participants relaxed using different techniques (set induction, such as, small talk for a few minutes), which would help them remain conformable during the interview. We also assured participants that their response will be kept confidential and conducted the interviews at their work place, privately.
We prepared for taping the interviews, but as the majority of the informants declined, the primary investigator (first author) conducted face-to-face interviews with two trained note takers having MSc and midwifery backgrounds took comprehensive notes during the sessions. The interviews lasted an hour on average and were conducted in Amharic, as the interviewer, assistants, and interviewees were all able to speak the Amharic language. The richness of the notes were further strengthened by debriefing sessions (discussing the notes) with the informants right after completion of each interview, and text analyses were conducted as planned.
In an effort to minimize bias, participant health care workers were asked to provide their insights and experiences of IPV in pregnancy, not their own personal experiences. We focused on conceptual requirements, and continued data collection until no additional information emerged and we reached saturation [27,28]. The notes were later translated into English by the interview team and checked by others (outside the research team) with English and Amharic proficiency to ensure accuracy. In order to clarify statements, three set of notes were discussed later with the informants, and amended.

2.5. Data Processing and Analysis

The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was followed in this study. COREQ is a formal reporting guideline that helps the researchers to comprehensively report crucial features of a qualitative study [29]. The data collection and analysis were conducted concurrently in line with the iterative nature of qualitative methods [30,31].The first author did the data coding and categorizing using the Atlas.ti software. Then the co-authors reviewed and agreed upon the final list of categories and themes.
We used Atlas.ti7 software [32], an efficient device to organize, capture, and analyze data, facilitating sharing between the researchers, as it provide an overview of the findings during the analytical process. This ensured a systematic process of coding, recognizing themes and categories based on previous research on IPV and the emerging issues, while interpreting the content of the textual data, as illustrated in Table 2 in the text. The decision regarding which item belongs to which particular set (i.e., a group, a category, a pattern, a theme) is a matter of judgment for the researcher/s based on preset criteria or purpose [33,34,35,36]. Furthermore, the content analysis, used to analyze our data, involves an interpretation through systematic process of coding while recognizing themes or categories [36,37]. The categories or themes describing the issue are the outcomes of the content analysis and its goal is to provide knowledge and understanding of the issue under study [38,39].

2.6. Ethics and Consent

Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from Jimma University College of Health Sciences, IRB, Ref No: HRPGC/305/2015 and the Norwegian Regional Ethical Committee (REK), Ref No: 2015/623/REK Nord, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2008. Subsequently, permission to initiate the data collection was obtained from the Jimma town health bureau and Jimma University specialized hospital (JUSH) in response to the collaboration letter written from Jimma University College of Health Sciences. Furthermore, informed written and verbal consent from the respondents was obtained before data collection. A list of the participant numbers (code), as well as the signed consent forms were kept locked in a file cabinet, where no one had access to it, and the respondents were fully anonymized to assure the confidentiality of their responses, their voluntary participation and the right to terminate their participation at any time.
Care was also taken that the interviews did not cause ethical or emotional trauma for the participant HCWs or the interview team. The training and preparation prior to the interviews enable the interviewers to discuss various scenarios promoting a professional non-verbal and verbal attitude during the interviews. The HCWs expressed satisfaction with the interview and the discussion on the notes possibly served as a debriefing session, and to enrich our data.

3. Results

The themes emerging among the Ethiopian HCWs were: 1.the important adverse IPV outcomes are physical health consequences; 2. recommendation of reconciliation with perpetrator; and 3. health care systems change is imperative if IPV in pregnancy are to be addressed. Each theme is briefly exemplified using direct quotes from the interviews.

3.1. Mainly Physical Health Consequences Were Accepted as an Adverse Outcome

Participant HCWs described encountering many pregnant women with varying degrees of IPV-related injuries, including bleeding, abortion, preterm labour or birth, intrauterine death, and stillbirths. However, they do not help them much other than dressing visible trauma and its obstetric complications related to their clinical training. They emphasized that physical violence particularly can adversely affect the health of the mother and fetus, and that they focus their help on it.
“Partner violence during pregnancy especially physical violence is dangerous and may cause the death of woman and fetus, and should be considered as attacking two lives simultaneously”.
(Nurse)
Although the respondents mostly talked about physical impact of IPV, the generic impact IPV has on any aspect of a woman’s life was acknowledged, including that the co-occurrence of pregnancy and IPV may exceed what a pregnant victim can cope with.
“Pregnancy by itself causes different problems and IPV on top of this might be unbearable”.
(Midwife)
The impact of IPV during pregnancy may restrict survivors’ access to every aspect of life and opportunities, including utilization of maternal health services and prenatal care. One participant relates how IPV, specifically a partner’s controlling actions, acts as a barrier for women’s health care utilization.
“Partners who have controlling behavior patrol every step of their wives’ movement and life. They are controlling everything, including her access to money, her movement, and the need for maternal health care service utilization, including antenatal care (ANC) visits”.
(Nurse)
The HCWs also expressed that they do not ask women if they were victims of IPV, as they fear and lack skill in managing the resultant consequences and emotional problems while asking and talking about history of abuse.
“Whenever we meet victims, we only treat visible trauma, stop bleeding and dress open wounds, that is all. Unless they open it up, nobody will ask, as we cannot offer much help if they disclose it”.
(Midwife)
Health care institutions’ linkage with relevant organizations, would improve the responses to victims of partner violence, but there is no such formal arrangement in the studied facilities to refer IPV victim-survivors for further assistances.
“We do not have formal lines to refer intimate partner violence victims; we only treat visible trauma and send them back home”.
(Midwife)
Other reasons given for the limited assistance provided by the HCWs were: the absence of IPV on the items listing of the ANC chart, lack of guidelines on how to manage IPV, lack of skills and knowledge on how to screen, and instructions on how to help, IPV victims. The following statements substantiate their responses:
“Many times I met victims of partner violence with obstetric complications, but I did not help them much, other than clinical management, I myself was even beaten by my husband; I think IPV has nothing to do with ANC, because it is not listed in the ANC card, mainly we focus on whether fetus is injured or not, and check fetal movement andheart rate”.
(Nurse)
“I had a pregnant woman beaten by her husband to death, she started to have vaginal bleeding, and then a dead fetus was expelled. We gave only medical care because there is no guideline to follow, we do not know how to help, and we have no skill for managing it (IPV)”.
(Midwife)
“I met victims many times, especially I do remember a pregnant woman whose husband is heavy Khat (stimulant) user and she told me that he sexually abused and made her to sufferer throughout the night and caused her genital trauma but because it is not indicated in the ANC card, I even do not know how to ask and help out”.
(Nurse)

3.2. Reconciliation in IPV

Advising victims to calm down, asking them to bring their husbands to indirectly teach abusers that IPV in pregnancy may affect the fetus (without mentioning what happens (the IPV) between the couple) was strategies expressed by the HCWs. One of the reasons for this was that, because most women had several children, leaving their husband holds many consequences, making advice of reconciliation the only options:
“I usually advice victims to reconcile with their husbands, because children should not be brought up without father”.
(Midwife)
Women’s economic dependency on their husbands, being housewives with nowhere to go if evicted from their house, were also mentioned by the HCWs when justifying advising victims of reconciliation. Comments made by participants are illustrative:
“I met many victims, including pregnant partner violence victim women. As most of them are economically dependent on their husband, I used to advise them to reconcile with their husbands”.
(Nurse)
“I met pregnant woman victim of IPV who developed complication as a consequence, I did nothing, but referred her to specialized hospital, and dead fetus expelled then she got back to her husband”.
(Nurse)
Our study revealed partner violence is perceived to be widespread and not seen as a big deal by many, including police officers. The participants in our study explained that if a woman resorts to police and when the police realize that the perpetrator is her husband, they immediately refer her to neighbors for reconciliation. Additionally, when the partner finds out his wife stepping to police, he would even become more aggressive and fired her from home. In Ethiopia, there is no linkage or system that allows HCWs reporting IPV to police that may assist them to hold perpetrators accountable for their actions, further forcing HCWs to encourage reconciliation over reporting to police. The responses reflect the community acknowledgement and attitude towards IPV, possibly related to the prevailing male-dominated traditional values and gender norms. The following participant quote demonstrates how police downplay IPV:
“Survivors should not go to police directly, rather turn to their family, because if they go to police things will get much worse. I think going to police has no importance, even perpetrator may start joking on her and say let the police save you’’.
(Midwife)
In the discussion, we also discovered victim women’s previous experience of police deterring women to resort to police assistance, and forcing HCWs’ to prefer reconciliation.
“I saw specially one woman severely beaten, I’ve never seen such incident in my life…hmmm, and her flesh was visible. We advised her to go to police but she refused, because she went to police previously and police referred her back to reconcile with her husband”.
(Midwife)

3.3. Changes in the Health Care Systems

The participating HCWs highlighted that IPV so far had not been given any priority by Ethiopian government bodies or the community. In order to prevent IPV in pregnancy and its threats to pregnancy outcomes, training and capacity building, developing and use of IPV intervention guidelines, and women’s empowerment were emphasized by the HCWs.
Participants acknowledged the need to train HCWs, including health extension workers working at the grassroots level in Ethiopia, on how to take care of pregnant women experiencing IPV.
“We need to be knowledgeable and teach the public about IPV and its consequences on pregnancy like we do on birth preparedness and complication readiness”.
(Nurse)
The need to develop and use guidelines to manage victimized pregnant women, along with clear referral linkage with other resource centers help HCWs to adequately deal with IPV issues when presented in the ANC setting was also stressed by the participants. HCWs claimed the absence of IPV screening tools in the lists of ANC card as one of the reasons for not asking women about their victim status and considering it as part of their responsibilities.
“We need to have clear guidelines, and IPV screening tools should be included in the ANC and family planning cards so that we can assist victim survivors”.
(Nurse)
The importance of raising public awareness about the harmful effects of IPV on pregnancy, the current legislation and women’s rights related to IPV were highlighted. More specifically, the HCWs emphasized that they need to have training on women’s rights related to IPV in order to be able to assist, to advise victims on what to do and where to go when abused.
“Even we do not know about women’s rights properly, but if we had enough knowledge about the issue, we could teach others”.
(Nurse)
Empowering women through education, employment, and income-generating activities was also emphasized by the participants to bring a sustainable national solution towards the prevention of IPV. Participants particularly underscored the prevention and liberation of women from IPV requires income-generating activities for women. They strongly recommended this, as most women in Ethiopia are housewives and need to have their own earnings. One participant voiced:
“I would suggest a sustainable solution including short-term training especially for housewives, in order to generate their own money”.
(Nurse)

4. Discussion

This is one of few qualitative studies in East Africa addressing HCWs perspectives on IPV in pregnancy [40,41]. The participant HCWs expressed a fear that IPV during pregnancy could discourage victims to visit ANC centers and that it could result in obstetric complications such as bleeding and abortion, which is in concert with international studies [26,42]. They also claimed that it is mainly physical violence that gives adverse outcomes on pregnancy and gave their recommendations on what could be done related to IPV during pregnancy and its adversaries.
The HCWs in our study highlighted mainly physical adverse obstetrical outcomes on pregnancy (bleeding and abortion), illustrating a knowledge gap related to the impacts of IPV on pregnancy in general and the impacts of sexual and psychological IPV on pregnancy outcomes in particular. This is supported by prior studies which noted that HCWs are more likely to focus on physical abuse to respond to IPV and/or during prenatal care visits [43,44].
In this Ethiopian context, such response is not unexpected. There is a common proverb in Ethiopian communities, “an insult never tear cloths” which support and illustrate the importance of the physical harm of IPV. However, many studies illustrate the ongoing effect of psychological violence (emotional torture, mental stress, or living under terror) can be as unbearable as physical brutality, and consequently affecting pregnancy outcomes [45,46]. Similarly, not only physical IPV, but also psychological, sexual IPV in pregnancy adversely affect maternal and fetal well-being. For instance, women who are psychologically abused can be at a greater risk of postnatal depression, are more likely to think about harming themselves and their infants [46,47], while emotional IPV is linked with preeclampsia [26,48] and hypertension [26]. In line with the reflections of the HCWs in our study, prior studies have documented the effect IPV has on maternal health service utilization [22,49,50], illustrating that the impacts of IPV in pregnancy is multifaceted [42,51].

4.1. The Role of HCWs in Addressing IPV in Pregnancy

HCWs can help address IPV during pregnancy both through screening, provider-based counseling and referral to legal or social services [52]. In the ANC setting, they have a unique opportunity to identify women experiencing IPV, assess feto–maternal well-being, provide ongoing support [53,54], and prevent complications. The 2013 clinical guidelines developed by WHO, recommend that health systems responses to violence against women should be integrated within clinical care at all levels [53]. Contrary to this recommendation, most health sectors have been rather slow to integrate violence against women into their routine practices [53,55,56,57]. The Ethiopian health system is no exception, and is ill-equipped to deal with IPV, as emphasized by our informants.
Most women [58,59], are reluctant to disclose their experiences of IPV because of the traditional gender attitudes and role perception, and possibly because of fear of further violence or other consequences. As evidenced by our study, very few pregnant victims open up to health care professionals after being brutally hurt. The HCWs participating in our study, shared feelings of frustration and powerlessness to deal with abused pregnant women due to their limited knowledge, responsibility and ability to provide any support, consequently limiting their role to obstetric and medical care for those with visible trauma. The HCWs also feared that asking and talking about abuse with the victims may cause unpredictable and harmful results, as it may open a ‘Pandora’s box’, for which they had neither the skills nor the time to deal with. This is in line with an earlier study in Norway that noted the midwives’ “fear of knowing” how to deal with a positive answer was one of the barriers to asking pregnant women about their experiences of violence [60].
The participants in our study also stated how they did not feel mandated to help the IPV victims, as it was not clearly indicated within the domain of health care. This is consistent with other studies illustrating how many HCWs feel poorly prepared to ask questions about domestic violence or to make appropriate referrals if abuse was disclosed [61,62]. Studies also demonstrated that most HCWs never or seldom ask about abuse when a woman presents with injuries [63]. Another study found that midwives perceived IPV as a non-clinical, social, and domestic problem that does not call for their attention [40]. Likewise, studies elsewhere [64,65], and a recent study in Australia showed that community health care professionals’ barriers to screening pregnant women for violence originated from a lack of recognizing it as a part of their role [66]. This was enforced by lack of domestic violence screening policies, lack of time, lack of resources, safety issues, and lack of confidence in undertaking the screening and referral [66]. Contrary to this, a recent study in South Africa demonstrated that HCWs were supportive to addressing IPV in the health care setting, including identification of and responding to IPV in the antenatal care given appropriate training and referral system [19]. Another study in Serbia reported HCWs as willing to help victims of IPV, but that they did not know how [18], demonstrating the gap between HCWs’ willingness to address IPV and the educational and training resources needed.

4.2. Reconciliation in IPV during Pregnancy

The participants in our study highlighted that, although the IPV was brutal, the pregnant women might rarely reveal their victim status to the HCWs. Apart from other reasons, the reconciliation recommendations and actions of the nurses and midwives in our study might be affected by the traditional community concepts related to IPV, including the social taboo of discussing family matters with outsiders, the common belief in male superiority, and the complementary female submissiveness [67], indicating how the respondents’ own cultural beliefs may influence their professional attitude or actions regarding IPV [44]. There was a clear lack of concept related to how to manage IPV in an ANC setting. IPV victim management requires addressing women’s psycho-social needs, including respectful and non-judgmental listening; confidential interaction and showing compassion; providing support information; referrals to specialist help; addressing safety concerns, and so forth [68], in addition to good obstetric and medical care.

4.3. Systems Change in the Health Care Setting Is Imperative

The participant HCWs highlighted what could be done towards the prevention of IPV in pregnancy and its consequences in Ethiopia, recommending systems change, specifically in health care. The Ethiopian culture and religion do not encourage discussing or disclosing IPV with others [69], nevertheless, the HCWs recommended several issues to be considered. This included public education on the harmful effects of IPV on pregnancy. The government has a responsibility to raise public awareness about the rights of women, as stipulated in the Ethiopian constitution. The HCWs in conjunction with other relevant agencies should play a key role in the prevention of IPV during pregnancy. It is also evidenced that in most high income countries, HCWs perform a primary prevention and/or health promotion role in conjunction with other agencies [42,70,71], where information on IPV are integrated in their routine health education messages and promoting of positive parenting [53]. A systematic evaluation of IPV prevention done in low and middle income countries, highlights the potential effectiveness of structural interventions for IPV prevention [72], signifying that intervention strategies for IPV should vary depending on the socio-cultural, economic and geographic contexts.

4.3.1. Training and Capacity Building

The need for training of the HCWs, including health extension workers (HEWs), and other community health care workers in Ethiopia was emphasized by the participants of our study. Our result is supported by the WHO report which states that community efforts and awareness-raising play a key role in primary prevention [73], which can lead to increased demand for justice, care for the survivors, and punishment for the perpetrators, particularly in settings where resources are limited [74].
Raising the awareness of both the public and the HCWs about legislations on IPV as well as on other women’s rights issues were also highlighted as a need by our study participants. Prior studies demonstrate that training and strengthening of health systems through abuse assessment protocols, capacity building, effective coordination between relevant agencies, and referral networks can enable health care providers to better address violence against women in their practices [17,53].

4.3.2. Develop Intervention Guideline

The participants in our study suggested developing and including IPV screening tools in the Ethiopian ANC chart/card, conducting short-term training for HCWs, creating comprehensive legislation and guidelines on how to manage IPV in general and IPV in pregnancy more specifically, as an imperative to properly assist pregnant victims. In concordance with our findings, other studies recommend the incorporation of an abuse assessment protocol into the routine prenatal clinics as this increases the assessment, identification, and documentation and referral of abused pregnant women [75,76]. Effective intervention in IPV also requires health care services linking with other relevant sectors [69], including with police. But, participants in our study do not support reporting IPV victim survivors to police and they are not mandated to do so, while there are countries (e.g., the US), obligating HCWs’ mandatory reporting of IPV to police [77]. However, such action requires further risk and benefit analysis as it may escalate the rate of IPV and/or may not guarantee to a greater safety and well-being of survivors and HCWs. Thus, a culturally sensitive and carefully designed health systems’ response in addressing IPV in the ANC clinics will be an important step in achieving sustainable impact towards improving maternal and infant health in the country.

4.3.3. Empowering Women

In our study, the participants underlined the need to produce a sustainable solution to prevent IPV in pregnancy and liberate women from IPV by empowering them through education, employment, and income-generating activities. This was especially recommended for housewives, in order for them to generate their own money, which is in concert with other studies stating that empowered women are less likely to experience IPV [78,79]. A recent study also demonstrated that a higher income was associated with lower past-year physical IPV [80]. Among others, possible explanations for a relationship between women’s empowerment and IPV might be that empowered women may have more information on IPV, be more likely to make decision on their own life and thus more likely to seek help from different sources. While disempowered women, including those having financial constraints, have limited ability to access information and health care services [81]. This is reinforced by the societal norms that encourages maintaining the marriage for the sake of children, family, and better social positions or respect [69,82].
Most women in Ethiopia are economically dependent on their husbands [83], and have many children which may force them to stay in abusive relationships. Women’s economic dependency on their partners is also profoundly deterring many women to sending their abusive partner to prison [84]. Although the relationship between women’s empowerment and IPV are inconclusive, it can be argued that, empowering women economically may encourage increased independence and consequently help women to exit from their abusive relationship [85]. In fact, it may not be the sole solution to protect women against IPV, but if combined with education and the transformation of cultural gender norms that negatively affect women, along with providing other services, it may ultimately protect women from IPV [79,86,87]. Additionally, empowering women and improving their status is of societal importance and essential for achieving the national sustainable development goals [88,89].

4.4. Limitations and Strengths

To increase the validity of data and reduce bias, we requested verifications and/or corrections to the notes at the end of each session, and used additional interviews when necessary. We accounted for the researchers’ positionality by having two note-takers in addition to the interviewer in the room, in this way minimizing the influence of the unique identities, experiences, and biases that researchers bring to a given study [90]. Similarly, taking into account the nature of qualitative study, subject and participants (i.e., the responses of female participants may be influenced by their own experience of IPV), care was taken that the participants’ focused their responses on the objective of the study.
However, this study has also some limitations. The subject being studied is very sensitive and shaped by social norms and values. Consequently, the participants may not have disclosed the real scenario about the topic or may have provided biased information. As the majority of participants declined to be taped, we did not record the interviews, but we tried to reduce these gaps by running the sessions using the PI moderating the sessions and two note takers (to ensure the participants own responses) who are familiar with the subject matter. The debriefing while discussing the notes with the interviewee after the session was experienced as positive. Summary notes were developed by the main researcher and the assistants immediately after each session.
The gender of the informants was mainly women, and this might put some limitations on the results. On the other hand, as the general profiles of the health care workers who engage in contact with women are women themselves, we find the gender composition to be relevant for the research question of the study.
As in most qualitative studies, our findings cannot be generalized to a larger population. However, in accordance with the quality criteria of transferability, we argue that the knowledge obtained from this study could be of interest for others in similar settings/contexts.

5. Conclusions

The analysis of our study highlights that Ethiopian HCWs encounter pregnant IPV victims frequently, however, their understanding of the adverse impacts of IPV on pregnancy and their professional response to IPV are limited. Improving the capacity of HCWs in addressing IPV in pregnancy through training and subsequent capacity building could improve their knowledge base and skills. The HCWs called for interventions aimed at advancing women’s empowerment through education, employment, and income generating activities as means to prevent IPV in pregnancy and its consequences. The informants also recommended that improving and linking the health sector response with other relevant institutions, and incorporating IPV screening tools in the Ethiopian ANC chart/card along with a clear guidelines, could alleviate IPV during pregnancy and its adverse impacts on mother and fetus. Effectiveness studies of cross-sectorial complex interventions, aimed at reducing IPV in Ethiopia, are also warranted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.T.G., J.H.M., and B.S.; methodology, B.T.G., J.H.M., B.S., and K.N.S.; data collection and software, B.T.G.; formal data analysis and interpretation, B.T.G., J.H.M., B.S., and K.N.S.; investigation, B.T.G., J.H.M., B.S., and K.N.S.; project administration, J.H.M.; supervision, J.H.M., B.S., and K.N.S.; visualization, B.T.G.; writing—original draft, B.T.G.; writing—review and editing, B.T.G., J.H.M., B.S., and K.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by NORAD (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation) under the NORHED-Programmed, Agreement no. ETH-13/0024, but the funding body had no role in the data collection and analyses, writing of the manuscript and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Acknowledgments

The Jimma Town Health Bureau, Institutions and JUSH administrators, midwives and nurses working at ANC and the research assistants and participants from different institutions all deserve acknowledgements for their collaboration. We are also grateful to our funding agency, NORAD project.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.

References

  1. García-Moreno, C.; Pallitto, C.; Devries, K.; Stöckl, H.; Watts, C.; Abrahams, N. Globaland Regional Estimates of Violence against Women: Prevalence and Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-Partner Sexual Violence; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahinkorah, B.O.; Dickson, K.S.; Seidu, A.-A. Women decision-making capacity and intimate partner violence among women in sub-Saharan Africa. Arch. Public Health 2018, 76, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Alebel, A.; Kibret, G.D.; Wagnew, F.; Tesema, C.; Ferede, A.; Petrucka, P.; Bobo, F.T.; Birhanu, M.Y.; Tadesse, A.A.; Eshetie, S. Intimate partner violence and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: Asystematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Health 2018, 15, 196–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gebrezgi, B.H.; Berta, M.; Cherkose, E.A.; Weldehaweria, N.B. Factors associated with intimate partner physical violence among women attending antenatal care in Shire Endaselassie town, Tigray, northern Ethiopia: Across-sectionalstudy, July 2015. Reprod. Health 2017, 14, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Abate, B.A.; Wossen, B.A.; Degfie, T.T. Determinants of intimate partner violence during pregnancy among married women in Abay Chomen district, Western Ethiopia: A community based cross sectional study. BMC Women’s Health 2016, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Laelago, T.; Belachew, T.; Tamrat, M. Prevalence and Associated Factors of IntimateP artner Violence during Pregnancy among Recently Delivered Women in Public Health Facilities of HossanaTown, HadiyaZone, SouthernEthiopia. OALib 2014, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gashaw, B.T.; Schei, B.; Magnus, J.H. Social ecological factors and intimate partner violence in pregnancy. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Devries, K.; Kishor, S.; Johnson, H.; Stoeckl, H.; Bacchus, L.J.; Garcia-Moreno, C.; Watts, C. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: Analysis of prevalence data from19 countries. Reprod. Health Matters 2010, 18, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mezey, G.C.; Bewley, S. Domestic violence and pregnancy: Risk is greatest afterdelivery. Br. Med. J. Publ. Group 1997, 314, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Machisa, M.; Christofides, N.; Jewkes, R.K. Mentalill health in structural pathways to women’s experiences of intimate partner violence. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Donovan, B.; Spracklen, C.; Schweizer, M.L.; Ryckman, K.; Saftlas, A.F. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the risk for adverse infant outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2016, 123, 1289–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schei, B.; Lukasse, M.; Ryding, E.L.; Campbell, J.; Karro, H.; Kristjansdottir, H.; Laanpere, M.; Schroll, A.-M.; Tabor, A.; Temmerman, M.; et al. A History of Abuse and Operative Delivery–Results from a European Multi-Country Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Henriksen, L.; Vangen, S.; Schei, B.; Lukasse, M. Sexual Violence and Antenatal Hospitalization. Birth 2013, 40, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Heise, L.E.; llsberg, M.; Gottmoeller, M. A global overview of gender-based violence. Int. J. Gynecol. Obs. 2002, 78, S5–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Orzechowska, A.; Zajączkowska, M.; Talarowska, M.; Gałecki, P. Depression and ways of coping with stress: A preliminary study. Med. Sci. Monit. 2013, 19, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Phelan, M.B. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in medical settings. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007, 8, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. WHO. Responding to Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Against Women; WHO Clinical and Policy Guidelines; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Djikanovic, B.; Celik, H.; Simić, S.; Matejic, B.; Cucic, V. Health professionals’ perceptions of intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: Opportunities and barriers for response improvement. Patient Educ. Couns. 2010, 80, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hatcher, A.; Woollett, N.; Pallitto, C.C.; Mokoatle, K.; Stoeckl, H.; Garcia-Moreno, C. Willing but Not Able: Patient and Provider Receptiveness to Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in Johannesburg Antenatal Clinics. J. Interpers. Violence 2016, 34, 1331–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Procentese, F.; DiNapoli, I.; Tuccillo, F.; Chiurazzi, A.; Arcidiacono, C. Health care Professionals ’Perceptions and Concerns towards Domestic Violence during Pregnancy in Southern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Deshpande, N.A.; Lewis-O’Connor, A. Screening for intimate partner violence during pregnancy. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 6, 141. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gashaw, B.T.; Magnus, J.H.; Schei, B. Intimate partner violence and late entry into antenatal care in Ethiopia. Women Birth 2019, 32, e530–e537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ethiopian Public Health Institute(EPHI) and ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey Key Indicators; EPHI and ICF: Rockville, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jakobsson, A.; Vonorgstede, C.; Krantz, G.; Spak, F.; Hensing, G. Possibilities and Hindrances for Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence: Perceptions among Professionals and Decision Makers in a Swedish Medium-SizedTown. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2013, 20, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Shay-Zapien, G.; Bullock, L. Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Maternal Child Health. MCN Am. J. Matern. Nurs. 2010, 35, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Han, A.; Stewart, D.E. Maternal and fetal outcomes of intimate partner violence associated with pregnancy in the Latin American and Caribbean region. Int. J. Gynecol. Obs. 2013, 124, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Saunders, B.; Sim, J.; Kingstone, T.; Baker, S.; Waterfield, J.; Bartlam, B.; Burroughs, H.; Jinks, C. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual. Quant. 2017, 52, 1893–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Moser, A.; Korstjens, I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2018, 24, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P.; Craig, J.C. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lasch, K.E.; Marquis, P.; Vigneux, M.; Abetz, L.; Arnould, B.; Bayliss, M.; Crawford, B.; Rosa, K. PRO development: Rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M.; Huberman, M.A.; Huberman, P.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  32. Graneheim, U.; Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursingresearch:Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ. Today 2004, 24, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Friese, S. Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti; SAGE Publications Limited: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  34. Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  35. Davidson, J.; diGregorio, S. Qualitative Research & Technology: In the Midst of a Revolution. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed.; Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., Eds.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 627–643. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hsieh, H.-F.; Shannon, S.E. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2005, 15, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elo, S.; Kääriäinen, M.; Kanste, O.; Pölkki, T.; Utriainen, K.; Kyngäs, H. Qualitative Content Analysis. Sage Open 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vaismoradi, M.; Jones, J.; Turunen, H.; Snelgrove, S. Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. J. Nurs. Educ. Pr. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cho, J.Y.; Lee, E.-H. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. Qual. Rep. 2014, 19, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shamu, S.; Abrahams, N.; Temmerman, M.; Zarowsky, C. Opportunities and obstacles to screening pregnant women for intimate partner violence during antenatal care in Zimbabwe. Cult. Health Sex. 2013, 15, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Turan, J.M.; Hatcher, A.; Odero, M.; Onono, M.; Kodero, J.; Romito, P.; Mangone, E.; Bukusi, E.A. A Community-Supported Clinic-Based Program for Prevention of Violence against Pregnant Women in Rural Kenya. Aids Res. Treat. 2013, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Alhusen, J.L.; Ray, E.; Sharps, P.; Bullock, L. Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. J. Women’s Health 2015, 24, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Durant, T.; Gilbert, B.C.; Saltzman, L.; Johnson, C.H. Opportunities forintervention: Discussing physical abuse during prenatal care visits. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2000, 19, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Colombini, M.; Mayhew, S.H.; Ali, S.H.; Shuib, R.; Watts, C. “I feel it is not enough…” Health providers’ perspectives on services for victims of intimate partner violence in Malaysia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2013, 13, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. McMahon, S.; Huang, C.-C.; Boxer, P.; Postmus, J.L. The impact of emotional and physical violence during pregnancy on maternal and child health at one year post-partum. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2011, 33, 2103–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tiwari, A.; Chan, K.L.; Fong, D.Y.T.; Leung, W.; Brownridge, D.; Lam, H.; Wong, B.; Lam, C.; Chau, F.; Chan, A.; et al. The impact of psychological abuse by an intimate partner on the mental health of pregnant women. BJOG Int. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2008, 115, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gausia, K.; Fisher, C.; Ali, M.; Oosthuizen, J. Antenatal depression and suicidal ideation among rural Bangladeshi women: A community-based study. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2009, 12, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sanchez, S.E.; Qiu, C.; Perales, M.T.; Lam, N.; García, P.; Williams, M.A. Intimate partner violence (IPV) and preeclampsia among Peruvian women. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Boil. 2008, 137, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mohammed, B.H.; Johnston, J.M.; Harwell, J.I.; Yi, H.; Tsang, K.W.-K.; Haidar, J. Intimate partner violence and utilization of maternal healthcare services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017, 17, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Pun, K.D.; Infanti, J.J.; Koju, R.; Schei, B.; Darj, E.; ADVANCE Study Group. Community perceptions on domestic violence against pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study. Glob. Health Action 2016, 9, 31964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. VanParys, A.S.; Deschepper, E.; Michielsen, K.; Galle, A.; Roelens, K.; Temmerman, M.; Verstraelen, H. Intimate partner violence and psychosocial health, across-sectional study in a pregnant population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Swailes, A.L.; Lehman, E.B.; Perry, A.N.; McCall-Hosenfeld, J.S. Intimate partner violence screening and counseling in the healthcare setting: Perception of provider-based discussions as a strategic response to IPV. Health Care Women Int. 2016, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Garcia-Moreno, C.; Hegarty, K.; D’Oliveira, A.F.L.; Koziol-McLain, J.; Colombini, M.; Feder, G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet 2015, 385, 1567–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rees, K.; Zweigenthal, V.; Joyner, K. Health sector responses to intimate partner violence: A literature review. Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med. 2014, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Garcia-Moreno, C.; Amin, A. The sustainable development goals, violence and women’s and children’s health. Bull. World Health Organ. 2016, 94, 396–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Garcia-Moreno, C.; Zimmerman, C.; Morris-Gehring, A.; Heise, L.; Amin, A.; Abrahams, N.; Montoya, O.; Bhate-Deosthali, P.; Kilonzo, N.; Watts, C. Addressing violence against women: A call to action. Lancet 2015, 385, 1685–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deosthali-Bhate, P.; Rege, S.; Pal, P.; Nandi, S.; Bhatla, N.; Kashyap, A. Intimate Partner Violence in India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2015, 141, 757–759. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ali, T.S.; Krantz, G.; Gul, R.; Asad, N.; Johansson, E.; Mogren, I. Gender roles and their influence on life prospects for women in urban Karachi, Pakistan:A qualitative study. Glob. Health Action 2011, 4, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. WHO. Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Researchon Domestic Violence against Women; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  60. Henriksen, L.; Garnweidner-Holme, L.; Thorsteinsen, K.; Lukasse, M. ’It is a difficult topic’-a qualitative study of midwives´experiences with routine antenatal enquiry for intimate partner violence. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Agnew-Davies, R. Responding to disclosures of domestic violence. In Domestic Violence and Mental Health; RCPsych Publications: London, UK, 2013; pp. 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  62. Goff, H.; Shelton, A.; Byrd, T.; Parcel, G. Preparedness of healthcare practitioners to screen women for domestic violence in a border community. Health Care Women Int. 2003, 24, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ramsay, J.; Rutterford, C.; Gregory, A.; Dunne, D.; Eldridge, S.; Sharp, D.; Feder, G. Domestic violence: Knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary health care clinicians. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2012, 62, e647–e655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Mezey, G.; Bacchus, L.; Haworth, A.; Bewley, S. Midwives’ perceptions and experiences of routine enquiry for domestic violence. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2003, 110, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rishal, P.; Joshi, S.K.; Lukasse, M.; Schei, B.; Swahnberg, K.; ADVANCE Study Group. ‘They just walka way’–women’s perception of being silenced by antenatal health workers: A qualitative study on women survivors of domestic violence in Nepal. Glob. Health Action 2016, 9, 31838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. O’Reilly, R.; Peters, K. Opportunistic domestic violence screening for pregnant and post-partumwomen by community based health care providers. BMC Women’s Health 2018, 18, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nascimento, E.D.F.G.A.D.; Ribeiro, A.P.; DeSouza, E.R. Perceptions and practices of Angolan health care professionals concerning intimate partner violence against women. Cad. Saúde Pública 2014, 30, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Feder, G.; Hutson, M.; Ramsay, J.; Taket, A.R. Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gashaw, B.T.; Magnus, J.H.; Schei, B.; Solbrække, K.N. Community Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence during Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study from Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Sharps, P.; Bullock, L.F.; Campbell, J.C.; Alhusen, J.L.; Ghazarian, S.R.; Bhandari, S.S.; Schminkey, D.L. Domestic Violence Enhanced Perinatal Home Visits:The DOVE Randomized ClinicalTrial. J. Women’s Health 2016, 25, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Olds, D.; Henderson, C.R.; Phelps, C.; Kitzman, H.; Hanks, C. Effect of Prenatal and Infancy Nurse Home Visitation on Government Spending. Med. Care 1993, 31, 155–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bourey, C.; Williams, W.; Bernstein, E.E.; Stephenson, R. Systematic review of structural interventions for intimate partner violence in low-and middle-income countries: Organizing evidence for prevention. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Michau, L. (Ed.) Community Mobilization: Preventing Partner Violence by Changing Social Norms; Prepared for Expert Group Meeting on Prevention of Violence Against Women and Girls; UN Women September: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  74. Harvey, A.; Garcia-Moreno, C.; Butchart, A. Primary Prevention of Intimate-Partner Violence and Sexual Violence: Background Paper for WHO Expert Meeting 2–3 May 2007; World Health Organization, Department of Violence and Injury Prevention and Disability: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wiist, W.H.; McFarlane, J. The effectiveness of an abuse assessment protocol in public health prenatal clinics. Am. J. Public Health 1999, 89, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Women, P.; Yawn, B.; Yawn, R.; Uden, D. American Medical Association diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence. Arch. Fam. Med. 1992, 1, 39. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rodriguez, M.A. Should Physicians Be Required to Report Domestic Violence to the Police? Against: Mandatory reporting does not guarantee safety. West. J. Med. 2000, 173, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kabir, R.; Khan, H.T.A. A Cross-Sectional Study to Explore Intimate Partner Violence and Barriers to Empowerment of Women inArmenia. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6939684-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. WHO. Understanding and Addressing Violence against Women: Intimate Partner Violence; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  80. Abramsky, T.; Lees, S.; Stoeckl, H.; Harvey, S.; Kapinga, I.; Ranganathan, M.; Mshana, G.; Kapiga, S. Women’s income and risk of intimate partner violence: Secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomized trial in North-Western Tanzania. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Firoz, T.; Vidler, M.; Makanga, P.T.; Boene, H.; Chiaú, R.; Sevene, E.; Magee, L.A.; VonDadelszen, P.; Munguambe, K.; CLIP Working Group; et al. Community perspectives on the determinants of maternal health in rural southern Mozambique: A qualitative study. Reprod. Health 2016, 13, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Sigalla, G.N.; Mushi, D.; Gammeltoft, T.M. “Staying for the children”: The role of natal relatives in supporting women experiencing intimate partner violence during pregnancy in northern Tanzania–A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Gossaye, Y.; Deyessa, N.; Berhane, Y.; Ellsberg, M.; Emmelin, M.; Ashenafi, M.; Alem, A.; Negash, A.; Kebede, D.; Kullgren, G.; et al. Women’s health and life events study in ruralEthiopia. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2003, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Odero, M.; Hatcher, A.M.; Bryant, C.; Onono, M.; Romito, P.; Bukusi, E.A.; Turan, J.M. Responses to and resources for intimate partner violence:Qualitative findings from women, men, andservice providers in rural Kenya. J. Interpers. Violence 2014, 29, 783–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kim, J.C.; Watts, C.H.; Hargreaves, J.R.; Ndhlovu, L.X.; Phetla, G.; Morison, L.A.; Busza, J.; Porter, J.D.; Pronyk, P. Understanding the Impact of a Microfinance-Based Intervention on Women’s Empowerment and the Reduction of Intimate Partner Violence in South Africa. Am. J. Public Health 2007, 97, 1794–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Semahegn, A.; Torpey, K.; Manu, A.; Assefa, N.; Tesfaye, G.; Ankomah, A. Are interventions focused on gender-norms effective in preventing domestic violence against women in low and lower-middle income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Health 2019, 16, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Schuler, S.; Nazneen, S. Does Intimate Partner Violence Decline as Women’s Empowerment Becomes Normative? Perspectives of Bangladeshi Women. World Dev. 2018, 101, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bayeh, E. The role of empowering women and achieving gender equality to the sustainable development of Ethiopia. Pac. Sci. Rev. B Hum. Soc. Sci. 2016, 2, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Warth, L.; Koparanova, M. Empowering Women for Sustainable Development; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bourke, B. Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. Qual. Rep. 2014, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants (N = 10).
Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants (N = 10).
Participant Characteristicsn
Age18–357
36–513
SexMale1
Female9
Marital statusMarried8
Single2
ReligionOrthodox4
Muslim3
Protestant3
OccupationNurse7
Midwife3
Level of EducationDiploma4
BSc degree6
Service years3–147
15–323
Table
Table 2. Procedures/steps of data analysis in Atlas Ti, based on the content analysis.
Table 2. Procedures/steps of data analysis in Atlas Ti, based on the content analysis.
Steps Descriptions
FamiliarizationsAll scripts were read to make a general sense out of it and reflect on the overall meaning
Creating file namingCreate file name and save the project (under new hermeneutic unit/analysis project) and add document in the library
Importing filesImport all scripts (#10 Interviews) lined up under ‘P-Docs’
Condensed meaning unitesOpen each scripts turn by turn and create meaning unites that gives sense
CodingCreate codes/label (under code manager) Highlight quotations for each scripts, then drug and drop codes for each respective quotations, or create new codes as necessary
CategorizingCategorize/create family codes (themes) based on similarities
Producing outputs(categories/families)Open code manager, click on each codes, click on outputs and save each outputs of the codes of categories/families
Data familiarizationFor more data familiarization, scripts were read repeatedly alongside field-notes
Result (describing themes and quotationsIn the result section—a detail description of each output of categories under the respective themes, based on the content Analysis method (selected for this specific analysis) and include supporting quotations in each respective theme.
DiscussionIn the discussion—interpret results and discuss them in light of relevant literatures within the topic.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gashaw, B.T.; Schei, B.; Solbraekke, K.N.; Magnus, J.H. Ethiopian Health Care Workers’ Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3745. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103745

AMA Style

Gashaw BT, Schei B, Solbraekke KN, Magnus JH. Ethiopian Health Care Workers’ Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(10):3745. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gashaw, Bosena Tebeje, Berit Schei, Kari Nyheim Solbraekke, and Jeanette H. Magnus. 2020. "Ethiopian Health Care Workers’ Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 10: 3745. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop