Next Article in Journal
Environments, Behaviors, and Inequalities: Reflecting on the Impacts of the Influenza and Coronavirus Pandemics in the United States
Next Article in Special Issue
Indicators of Absolute and Relative Changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass during Adulthood and Ageing
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Gender and Age on Dietary Intake and Body Mass Index in Hypertensive Patients: Analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Prevalence of the Sarcopenia Level Using Machine Learning Techniques: Case Study in Tijuana Baja California, Mexico
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Functional and Clinical Characteristics for Predicting Sarcopenia in Institutionalised Older Adults: Identifying Tools for Clinical Screening

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(12), 4483; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17124483
by Maria A. Cebrià i Iranzo 1,2,3, Anna Arnal-Gómez 1,4,*, Maria A. Tortosa-Chuliá 5,6, Mercè Balasch-Bernat 1,3, Silvia Forcano 2, Trinidad Sentandreu-Mañó 1,7, Jose M. Tomas 7,8 and Natalia Cezón-Serrano 1,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(12), 4483; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17124483
Submission received: 29 May 2020 / Revised: 13 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 22 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sarcopenia, Exercise and Quality of Life)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study was to analyse the relationship between sarcopenia and functional ability, hospitalisation, number of falls, polypharmacy and comorbidity in order to support and facilitate sarcopenia screening in older adults. And additional purpose is to identify which of our clinical and functional variables are the most relevant as supporting tools for screening sarcopenia.

It is well organized overall, but needs to be revised.

  1. It is thought that the number of study subjects is insufficient, and a description of the considerations for this is required.
  2. Detailed description of the BIA measurement method is required to support the results of muscle mass analysis by BIA measurement.
  3. Results of Table 1 and Table 5 were different for the age group of the study subjects. Given the ages listed in Table 1, the logistic results in Table 4 are not well understood.
  4. In the results of Sarcopenia evaluation, the results of physical performance are important. How was this considered?
  5. In the evaluation results of this study, there were very few subjects corresponding to sarcopenia, and the validity of the results obtained was questionable.
  6. When looking at the aspect of this study, it seems that the statistical processing method described in the research method is not sufficiently described.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments: Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript Functional and clinical characteristics for predicting Sarcopenia in institutionalised older adults: identifying tools for clinical screening by Cebrià i Iranzo et al is well presented and will add to the already existing literature on the topic of sarcopenia and how to identify this complex age related muscle loss.

The main concern with the study is the imbalance cohort. The majority of the subject involved are women (77.7%). This needs to be addressed as a limitation.

Additionally, these women had near 5 year age difference (older) to the men involved with the higher age range in men is actually the lower age range in women. Therefore the results may be obscured to a degree. if possible a subgroup of men and women with matched age group should be included to make sure that the gender related differences and age really do exist. If that cannot be done, then it is also needs to be addressed as a limitation. 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments: Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall, it has been revised well according to the judging results.

Back to TopTop