Next Article in Journal
How Could Peers in Online Health Community Help Improve Health Behavior
Next Article in Special Issue
Association between Sleep Quality and Duration and Periodontal Disease among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution of Land Surface Temperatures in Kuwait: Urban Heat and Cool Islands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Correlation between Caries, Body Mass Index and Occlusion in an Italian Pediatric Patients Sample: A Transverse Observational Study

1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dentistry and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98122 Messina, Italy
2
Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
3
Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Insubria, Via G. Piatti 10, 21100 Varese, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(9), 2994; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17092994
Submission received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 22 April 2020 / Accepted: 24 April 2020 / Published: 26 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral and Dental Health)

Abstract

:
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between caries, body mass index (BMI) and occlusion in a sample of pediatric patients. Methods: The study group included 127 patients (72 female, 55 male) aged between 6 and 16 years (mean age 10.2) and selected between January and June 2019 at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Messina. Caries incidence was evaluated using the decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index. On the basis of BMI values, using a table adjusted for age and gender, patients were grouped into four categories (underweight, normal weight, risk of overweight, overweight). Results: There was no significant correlation between BMI and DMFT in the whole sample. The study of the correlation between BMI and DMFT in patients with different types of malocclusion showed a significant inverse correlation for patients affected by II class and deepbite malocclusion. Conclusions: The incidence of caries does not seem to be significantly related to BMI and occlusal patterns, but it decreases with increasing age.
Keywords:
BMI; malocclusion; caries

1. Introduction

Over the past two decades, overweight and obesity have increased among children and adolescents around the world, representing a public health concern. A study performed by the World Health Organization analyzed the weight and height of around 130 million people, including 31.5 million people aged between 5 and 19 years. The aim of this study was to observe how the levels of body mass index (BMI) and obesity have changed in the last 40 years; the results of this analysis showed a substantial increase in the body weight of growing subjects [1]. The varying prevalence of obesity according to socioeconomic level is influenced by two main risk factors: insufficient physical activity and unhealthy diet [2,3]. Oral health and obesity share common risk factors, such as genetic and socioeconomic factors and eating disorders [4,5]. Caries significantly affects the state of oral health because decayed teeth, if not treated, in addition to a progressive destruction of teeth, can produce parodontal problems, halitosis, occlusal and esthetic effects, etc. Dental caries is a multi-factorial disease and affects most of the world population. It is the primary cause of oral pain and tooth loss. It is considered one of the major health-related problems in young children and one of the most prevalent oral diseases [6]. For epidemiological purposes, the most frequent index used to evaluate the intensity of caries is the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth—the so-called DMFT index—which is used worldwide. Several clinical studies have investigated the relation between obesity and dental caries by the mean of BMI and DMFT. Different studies reported an association between the increase in body weight status in children and the development of caries [7,8]. Other studies instead revealed an increased incidence of caries in underweight patients [9,10]. Other authors, such as Peng and De Jong, have not found evidence of an association between the two variables [11,12]. Different authors have evaluated the association between caries and obesity considering also various third correlating factors, such as socioeconomic conditions [13,14,15,16] demographic items [17], oral hygiene [18], periodontal status [19], general clinical history [20], salivar characteristics [21] or physical activity [22]. However, no study to date has assessed subject occlusion as the third factor. However, occlusion can play an important role in caries incidence, because some malocclusion can lead to areas of low detergency, both salivary and mechanical. Our hypothesis is that a correlation exists between the incidence of caries, weight and occlusal characteristics of growing subjects. The aim of this transverse observational study was to evaluate the correlation between caries, body mass index (BMI) and occlusion [23] at pediatric age.

2. Materials and Methods

This observational study was performed between January and June 2019 at the University of Messina, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University Hospital “G. Martino”, Messina. The study included 127 patients (72 female, 55 male) aged between 6 and 16 years (mean age 10.2), all of whom came from oriental Sicily and south Calabria, with their parents being natives of the same geographical areas. Clinical examination was performed by the same experienced operator, using predefined data collection forms, after acquiring the informed consent and data from the parents or legal guardians of the child. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee (Approval No. 437, 02 October 2018), and the procedures followed adhered to the World Medical Organization Declaration of Helsinki. Unhealthy patients and those suffering from systematic disease, undertaking any pharmacological therapy or affected by dental diseases [24,25,26,27,28,29] were excluded from the study. Both patients’ weight (kg) and height (cm) were registered twice for each patient in order to prevent any measurement error [30]. These values were used to calculate the body mass index, using the formula BMI = kg/m2. The BMI values for age and gender were evaluated taking into consideration the graphs developed by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) 2000 standards [31]. According to these curves, the subjects were classified into four weight groups.
  • Underweight: BMI by age below the fifth percentile;
  • Normal: BMI by age greater than or equal to the fifth percentile and less than the 85th percentile;
  • At risk of being overweight: BMI by age greater than or equal to the 85th percentile and less than the 95th percentile;
  • Overweight: BMI by age greater than or equal to the 95th percentile.
The sample size was established assuming an effect size of 0.25 for correlation between BMI and DMF [32], a two-sided significance level of 5% and a power of 80%. Based on these assumptions, a minimum number of 120 patients was necessary to ensure an adequate statistical power. Our sample was composed of 123 subjects; therefore, it reached a power of 81.1%. Power and sample size calculation was performed using G-power software (3.1.9.4 version, HHU, Dusseldorf, Germany). The incidence of caries was evaluated with the DMFT index recording the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth. Patients’ clinical examination was performed following the guidelines to prevent infections. Occlusion was evaluated using the anteroposterior relationships of the maxillary and mandibular first molars and canine in maximum intercuspation according to Angle’s classification. Dental analysis also included the overbite evaluation, which is the vertical relationship of the upper and lower incisors. This was recorded as increased when the maxillary central incisors covered the mandibular central incisors by more than 3 mm. An anterior open bite was recorded when the incisal edges of the maxillary incisors did not overlap the incisal edges of the mandibular incisors. Overbite was measured using a ruler which was able to measure the vertical distance between the superior and inferior incisal margin in occlusion. The evaluation was repeated in 20 randomly selected patients to assess the intra-operator reliability. Systematic and random errors were calculated comparing the first and second measurements with dependent t-tests and Dahlberg’s formula at a significance level of p < 0.05. All measurement error coefficients were found to be adequate for the appropriate reproducibility of the study.

3. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as the absolute frequency and percentage while the numerical variables were expressed as the mean and standard deviation. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to verify the variable distribution’s normality. This test allowed us to determine the statistically significant deviation of normality for the three variables of age, BMI and DMFT; consequently, we decided to use a non-parametric approach for the statistical analysis of the data. Spearman’s test was used to calculate the statistical dependence between the rankings of the two variables BMI and DMFT. The same analysis was conducted for each malocclusion class and overbite type. Lastly, these values were correlated to age. The significance level set for the analysis was α = 0.050; thus, for the two-sided CI, only p-values inferior to 0.050 were considered as statistically significant. The statistical software used was SPSS for Windows, version 22.0(IBM, New York, NY, United States).

4. Results

After calculating the BMI for each subject, the data were catalogued in four groups: underweight, normal weight, risk of overweight and overweight. The absolute frequency and percentage were calculated as recorded in Table 1.
The same analysis was used to calculate the frequency and percentage of malocclusion types (Table 2).
For each overbite type, the percentage and frequency were calculated counting non-valuable subjects in Table 3 and excluding them in Table 4.
Descriptive statistics in terms of the mean value and standard deviation for the numerical variables of age, BMI and DMFT are reported in Table 5.
The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (Table 6) normality test showed that the distribution of the data of BMI and DMFT values was not normal, so it was decided to apply non parametric tests to conduct the statistical evaluation.
The correlation between BMI and DMFT was calculated in a sample of 127 subjects using the Rho Spearman correlation index. The correlation between the two variables is not positive (Table 7).
The correlation between BMI and DMF was also calculated by subdividing subjects into four groups: underweight, normal weight, risk of overweight and overweight. There is a significant (two-tailed asymptomatic significance) inverse relationship for normal weight patients; i.e., when BMI rises, DMF decreases (Table 8).
In underweight (Table 9), risk of overweight (Table 10) and overweight (Table 11) subjects, there were no statistically significant results.
The Spearman index was also used in subjects with Class I and Class III malocclusion (Table 12 and Table 13) to evaluate the correlation between BMI and DMFT. This result is not statistically significant at p > 0.050.
In Class II patients, the correlation was inverse (coefficient = −0.377) and was statistically significant (p-value < 0.050). This means that when BMI increases, DMFT decreases (Table 14).
The statistical study also included an overbite evaluation of the samples analyzing the variables BMI and DMFT. In deepbite subjects, the correlation between the two variables was almost statistically significant (i.e., the p-value was near the 0.050 level); therefore, there is a weakly negative correlation between BMI and DMFT (Table 15).
On the other hand, no significant correlation was shown for openbite (Table 16) and normal occlusion (Table 17) patients between the two variables.
Applying the Rho Spearman coefficient to the correlation between BMI, DMFT and age (Table 18), it was found that with increasing age, BMI also rises in a significant way (p > 0.001). This test shows that DMFT decreases with increasing age, showing that the incidence of caries decreases with increasing age. Demographic and clinical variables of patients according to gender are reported in Table 19.

5. Discussion

This transverse observational study has been performed to evaluate the correlation between caries, body mass index (BMI) and occlusion in a sample of pediatric patients; the correlation between obesity and caries allowed us to verify the relations of interdependency between the variables BMI and DMFT for each class of malocclusion and each type of overbite. The correlation between BMI and DMFT in our sample revealed a negative coefficient with the data available in the literature. Normal weight patients showed a significant inverse correlation of the two variables, while in overweight and risk of overweight patients, the statistical correlation was not statistically significant. On the basis of the results of the present study, BMI does not appear to be significantly related to caries incidence. The study of the correlation between BMI and DMFT in patients with each type of malocclusion showed a significant inverse correlation only in class II and deepbite patients. For all other types of malocclusion and overbite, the correlation was not statistically significant. On the basis of the results of the present study, molar occlusion and bite depth patterns do not seem to be significantly related to caries incidence; however, further studies are necessary to evaluate a possible correlation between the degree of dental crowding and caries incidence. The results of the present study agree with the finding of a systematic review performed by Paisi et al. [33]. At the end of the review process, only seven studies have been considered: two of them—conducted in an Indian [32] and Saudi Arabian [34] population sample—showed a positive correlation between the two variables, while the other five studies did not find any association between caries and BMI [35,36,37,38,39]. Honne [33] found a positive correlation between BMI, decayed teeth (DT) and the sum of decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) in 463 adolescents aged between 13 and 15. The study also proved that the risk of caries in overweight subjects was 3.68 times higher than normal or underweight subjects. Sakeenabi [34] examined a sample of 1550 children, and he found that in 6-year-old overweight patients, the risk of caries was 1.92 times higher than normal weight patients. The risk of caries in 13-year-old overweight patients was 1.68 times higher than normal weight subjects. These two studies found different results than ours, because they revealed a positive correlation between BMI and DMF in overweight patients. The studies by Honne and Sekeenabi, performed in an Indian population sample, found a positive correlation between caries and BMI; their results may depend on the number of subjects enrolled in the studies and their geographical origin. In the study performed by Peng et al. [35], no correlation was found between caries and weight; however, this study is not comparable to ours, because BMI has been evaluated in a different way. In the study performed by Dye et al. [36] in children aged between 2 and 5 years old, the aim was to evaluate the correlation between caries in deciduous teeth and eating habits. However, in this study, which focused only on milk teeth, the DMF index was not related to the BMI of children but to the daily fruit consumption and quantity of milk consumed; no correlation was evaluated with the weight characteristics of the child. In the study performed by Hong et al. [36], the correlation between BMI and caries in 1507 children aged between 2 and 6 years old was evaluated; the results showed a statistically significant association between caries and obesity only in 60–72-month-old subjects; the remaining sample did not show any significant correlation between the two variables. The study conducted by Jürgensen et al. [38] evaluated a sample of 624 subjects at 12 years old and did not highlight any association between BMI and oral health or common risk factors; the evaluation of the data consisted in the clinical registration of caries, parodontal state and dental trauma. Tramini et al. [39] examined a sample of subjects aged between 11 and 12 years old; in this study, the authors evaluated not only DMF and BMI but also the preference and sensibility to sweet and bitter. No statistically significant association was found between caries and weight. According to the data found in the systematic review, this study proves that it is not possible to find a positive correlation between the variables BMI and DMFT. However, interesting data came to light that lead to an inverse correlation between caries and obesity in children and adolescents. According to the result of this observational transverse study, is possible to state that the incidence of caries decreases with increasing age; moreover, in younger patients affected by weight disorders, caries incidence was found to be higher in comparison to adolescents. These data may be related to the increase of the oral hygiene level and to the better eating habits that often occur with children’s growth. Obesity and caries have several common risk factors, and in pediatric patients, they require a multidisciplinary approach both by medical and dental clinicians. For a more accurate and specific analysis, the next study should also take into account a better evaluation of oral hygiene methods and plaque indexes using parodontal probing as well. It is also necessary to further analyze the BMI evaluation considering eating habits and the DMF index considering respiratory and functional habits [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. The clinical examination could be also associated with radiological investigations with specific low-dose protocols [41,48,49,50] in order to better evaluate any caries which are not clinically evident and to assess occlusal patterns not only in the context of the dental relationship but also considering skeletal factors.

6. Conclusions

According to the results of the present study, no statistical correlation has been found between BMI and DMFT, but a decrease of caries incidence has been observed with increasing age. A significant inverse correlation between BMI and DMFT in patients with each type of malocclusion was shown only in Class II and deepbite patients; occlusal patterns do not seem to be related to caries incidence. However, more evidence is needed in order to evaluate the correlations between BMI, malocclusion and caries incidence.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and M.P.; methodology, R.N.; software, L.C., A.A. and R.F.; validation, A.M., R.L.G. and R.N.; investigation, L.C. and R.F.; data curation, A.A. and R.L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, M.P.; supervision, M.P.; project administration, A.M.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hill, J.O.; Wyatt, H.R.; Peters, J.C. The importance of energy balance. Eur. Endocrinol. 2010, 9, 111. [Google Scholar]
  3. NIH. Overweight and Obesity—Risk Factors|National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); NIH: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018.
  4. Lempert, S.M.; Froberg, K.; Christensen, L.B.; Kristensen, P.L.; Heitmann, B.L. Association between body mass index and caries among children and adolescents. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2014, 42, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Palmer, C.A. Dental caries and obesity in children: Different problems, related causes. Quintessence Int. 2005, 36, 457–461. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meyer, F.; Enax, J. Early Childhood Caries: Epidemiology, Aetiology, and Prevention International. Int. J. Dent. 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Halder, S.; Kaul, R.; Angrish, P.; Saha, S.; Bhattacharya, B.; Mitra, M. Association between Obesity and Oral Health Status in Schoolchildren: A Survey in Five Districtsof West Bengal, India. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2018, 11, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alswat, K.; Mohamed, W.S.; Wahab, M.A.; Aboelil, A.A. The association between body mass index and dental caries: Cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2016, 8, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Alkarimi, H.A.; Watt, R.G.; Pikhart, H. Dental caries and growth in school age children. Pediatrics 2014, 133, e616–e623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Serrano Pina, R.; Aguilara-Ayala, F.J.; Scougall-Vilchis, R.J.; Truillo-Gulza, M.L.; Mendieta-Zeron, H. Prevalence of obesity in elementary school children and its association with dental caries. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2020, 18, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Yu, J.; Chen, S.; Chen, Z. Caries experience and its association with weight status among 8-year-old children in Qingdao, China. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Peng, S.M.; Wong, H.M.; King, N.M.; McGrath, C. Association between dental caries and adiposity status (general, central, and peripheral adiposity) in 12-year-old children. Caries Res. 2014, 48, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. De Jong-Lenters, M.; Van Dommelen, P.; Schuller, A.A.; Verrips, E.H.W. Body mass index and dental caries in children aged 5 to 8 years attending a dental paediatric referral practice in the Netherlands. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, Y.S.; Kim, J.H. Body Mass Index and Oral Health Status in Korean Adults: The Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2017, 15, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Almerich-Torres, T.; Montiel-Company, J.M.; Bellot-Arcís, C.; Almerich-Silla, J.M. Relationship between caries, body mass index and social class in Spanish children. Gac. Sanit. 2017, 31, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kumar, S.; Kroon, J.; Lalloo, R.; Kulkarni, S.; Johnson, N.W. Relationship between body mass index and dental caries in children, and the influence of socio-economic status. Int. Dent. J. 2017, 67, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lara-Capi, C.; Cagetti, M.G.; Cocco, F.; Lingström, P.; García-Godoy, F.; Campus, G. Effect of body weight and behavioural factors on caries severity in Mexican rural and urban adolescents. Int. Dent. J. 2018, 68, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Gonçalves, J.A.; Moreira, E.A.; Rauen, M.S.; Rossi, A.; Borgatto, A.F. Associations Between Caries Experience, Nutritional Status, Oral Hygiene, and Diet in a Multigenerational Cohort. Pediatr. Dent. 2016, 38, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Fadel, H.T.; Pliaki, A.; Gronowitz, E.; Mårild, S.; Ramberg, P.; Dahlèn, G.; Yucel-Lindberg, T.; Heijl, L.; Birkhed, D. Clinical and biological indicators of dental caries and periodontal disease in adolescents with or without obesity. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014, 18, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bastos, I.H.A.; Alves, E.S.; Sousa, C.D.; Martins, G.B.; Campos, E.J.; Daltro, C. Prevalence of risk factors for oral diseases in obese patients referred for bariatric surgery. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2018, 149, 1032–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Modéer, T.; Blomberg, C.C.; Wondimu, B.; Julihn, A.; Marcus, C. Association between obesity, flow rate of whole saliva, and dental caries in adolescents. Obesity 2010, 18, 2367–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fernández, M.R.; Goettems, M.L.; Demarco, F.F.; Corrêa, M.B. Is obesity associated to dental caries in Brazilian schoolchildren? Braz. Oral Res. 2017, 31, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Portelli, M.; Militi, A.; Cicciù, M.; Lo Giudice, A.; Cervino, G.; Fastuca, R.; Nucera, R. No compliance correction of class II malocclusion in growing patients with herbst appliance: A case report. Open Dent. J. 2018, 1, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Caccianiga, G.; Lo Giudice, A.; Paiusco, A.; Portelli, M.; Militi, A.; Baldoni, M.; Nucera, R. Maxillary orthodontic expansion assisted by unilateral alveolar corticotomy and low-level-laser therapy: A novel approach for correction of posterior unilateral cross-bite in adults. J. Laser Med. Sci. 2019, 10, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vitale, C.; Militi, A.; Portelli, M.; Cordasco, G.; Matarese, G. Maxillary Canine-First Premolar transposition in the permanent dentition. J. Clin. Orthod. 2009, XLIII, 517–524. [Google Scholar]
  26. Portelli, M.; Nucera, R.; Militi, A.; Matarese, G. Trattamento chirurgico-ortodontico di un primo molare mandibulare affetto da cisti follicolare. Mondo Ortod. 2009, 4, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  27. Militi, A.; Vitale, C.; Portelli, M.; Matarese, G.; Cordasco, G. Open bite anteriore con agenesia dei secondi premolari inferiori: Terapia estrattiva con utilizzo di attacchi auto leganti. Mondo Ortod. 2012, 37, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lucchese, A.; Portelli, M.; Marcolini, M.; Nocini, P.F.; Caldara, G.; Bertossi, D.; Lucchese, C.; Tacchino, U.; Manuelli, M. Effect of dental care on the oral health of Sjögren’s syndrome patients. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2018, 32, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  29. Portelli, M.; Nucera, R.; Fastuca, R.; Cicciù, M.; Lo Giudice, A.; Militi, A. Use of 3D Imaging for Treatment Planning in Cases of Impacted Canines. Open Dent. J. 2019, 13, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, J.A.; Choi, H.M.; Seo, Y.; Kang, D.R. Relations among obesity, family socioeconomic status, oral health behaviors, and dental caries in adolescents: The 2010-2012 Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. US Department of Health and Human Services. National center for Health Statistics. Clinical Growth Charts. BMI for Age, Ages 2–20 Males and Female. Public Use Data Files. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ (accessed on 9 September 2010).
  32. Honne, T.; Pentapati, K.; Kumar, N.; Acharya, S. Relationship between obesity/ overweight status, sugar consumption and dental caries among adolescents in South India. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2012, 10, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Paisi, M.; Kay, E.; Bennett, C.; Kaimi, I.; Witton, R.; Nelder, R.; Lapthorne, D. Body mass index and dental caries in young people: A systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2019, 19, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sakeenabi, B.; Swamy, H.S.; Mohammed, R.N. Association between obesity, dental caries and socioeconomic status in 6- and 13-year-old school children. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2012, 10, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Peng, S.M.; Wong, H.M.; King, N.M.; McGrath, C. Is dental caries experience associated with adiposity status in preschool children? Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2014, 24, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dye, B.A.; Shenkin, J.D.; Ogden, C.L.; Marshall, T.A.; Levy, S.M.; Kanellis, M.J. The relationship between healthful eating practices and dental caries in children aged 2-5 years in the United States, 1988–1994. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2004, 135, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hong, L.; Ahmed, A.; McCunniff, M.; Overman, P.; Mathew, M. Obesity and dental caries in children aged 2–6 years in the United States: National Health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2002. J. Public Health Dent. 2008, 68, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jürgensen, N.; Petersen, P.E. Oral health and the impact of socio-behavioural factors in a cross sectional survey of 12-year old school children in Laos. BMC Oral Health 2009, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tramini, P.; Molinari, N.; Tentscher, M.; Demattei, C.; Schulte, A.G. Association between caries experience and body mass index in 12-year-old French children. Caries Res. 2009, 43, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crupi, P.; Portelli, M.; Matarese, G.; Nucera, R.; Militi, A.; Mazza, M.; Cordasco, G. Correlations between cephalic posture and facial type in patients suffering from breathing obstructive syndrome. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2007, 8, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lo Giudice, A.; Fastuca, R.; Portelli, M.; Militi, A.; Bellocchio, M.; Spinuzza, P.; Briguglio, F.; Caprioglio, A.; Nucera, R. Effects of rapid vs slow maxillary expansion on nasal cavity dimensions in growing subjects: A methodological and reproducibility study. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2017, 18, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  42. Martina, R.; Cioffi, I.; Farella, M.; Leone, P.; Manzo, P.; Matarese, G.; Portelli, M.; Nucera, R.; Cordasco, G. Transverse changes determined by rapid and slow maxillary expansion--a low-dose CT-based randomized controlled trial. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2012, 15, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fastuca, R.; Lorusso, P.; Lagravère, M.O.; Michelotti, A.; Portelli, M.; Zecca, P.; D’Antò, V.; Militi, A.; Nucera, R.; Caprioglio, A. Digital evaluation of nasal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion with different anchorage and appliance design. BMC Oral Health 2017, 17, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Portelli, M.; Gatto, E.; Matarese, G.; Militi, A.; Catalfamo, L.; Gherlone, E.; Lucchese, A. Unilateral condylar hyperplasia: Diagnosis, clinical aspects and operative treatment. A case report. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2015, 16, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Portelli, M.; Matarese, G.; Militi, A.; Logiudice, G.; Nucera, R.; Lucchese, A. Temporomandibular joint involvement in a cohort of patients with Juvenile Idiopatic Arthritis and evaluation of the effect induced by functional orthodontic appliance: Clinical and radiographic investigation. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2014, 15, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Portelli, M.; Nucera, R.; Militi, A.; Mazza, M.; Matarese, G. Valutazione dei diametri trasversi del mascellare e delle cavità nasali attraverso un protocollo TC a bassa dose. Mondo Ortod. 2007, 6, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fastuca, R.; Michelotti, A.; Nucera, R.; D’Antò, V.; Militi, A.; Logiudice, A.; Caprioglio, A.; Portelli, M. Midpalatal Suture Density Evaluation after Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion with a Low-Dose CT Protocol: A Retrospective Study. Medicina 2020, 56, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Portelli, M.; Militi, A.; Lo Giudice, A.; Lo Giudice, R.; Fastuca, R.; Ielo, I.; Mongelli, V.; Lo Giudice, G.; Lucchese, A.; Nucera, R. Standard and Low-Dose cone beam computer tomography protocol for orthognatodonic diagnosis: A comparative evaluation. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2018, 32, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cordasco, G.; Portelli, M.; Militi, A.; Nucera, R.; Lo Giudice, A.; Gatto, E.; Lucchese, A. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: Comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques. Prog. Orthod. 2013, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Matarese, G.; Portelli, M.; Mazza, M.; Militi, A.; Nucera, R.; Gatto, E.; Cordasco, G. Evaluation of skin dose in a low dose spiral CT protocol. Eur. J. Pediatr. Dent. 2006, 7, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Frequency and percentage of the sample, divided according to the weight curves.
Table 1. Frequency and percentage of the sample, divided according to the weight curves.
BMIFrequencyPercentage
Underweight118.7%
Normal Weight6047.2%
Risk of overweight2822.0%
Overweight2822%
Total127100%
Table 2. Frequency and percentage of the sample divided according to the molar relationship.
Table 2. Frequency and percentage of the sample divided according to the molar relationship.
MalocclusionFrequencyPercentage
I Class4132.3%
II Class4233.1%
III Class4434.6%
Total127100%
Table 3. Frequency and percentage of patients divided according to the depth of the bite.
Table 3. Frequency and percentage of patients divided according to the depth of the bite.
OverbiteFrequencyPercentage
Deepbite3930.7%
Openbite2217.3%
Normal occlusion6047.2%
Not evaluable64.7%
Total127100%
Table 4. Frequency and percentage of patients divided according to the depth of the bite, excluding non-valuable subjects.
Table 4. Frequency and percentage of patients divided according to the depth of the bite, excluding non-valuable subjects.
OverbiteFrequencyPercentage
Deepbite3932.2%
Openbite2218.2%
Normal occlusion6049.6%
Total121100%
Table 5. Mean value and standard deviation of the age, body mass index (BMI) and DMFT index of the sample.
Table 5. Mean value and standard deviation of the age, body mass index (BMI) and DMFT index of the sample.
MeanStandard Deviation
Age9.873.55
BMI19.694.88
DMF3.283.17
Table 6. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for the sample.
Table 6. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for the sample.
BMIDMF
Z Kolmogorov–Smirnov1.2682.033
Sig. Asint. two-sided CI0.0390.001
Table 7. Data related to the correlation between the BMI and DMF evaluated in the whole sample.
Table 7. Data related to the correlation between the BMI and DMF evaluated in the whole sample.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-sided CI)
N
1.000

127
−0.155
0.82
127
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-sided CI)
N
−0.155
0.082
127
1.000

127
Table 8. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in normal weight patients.
Table 8. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in normal weight patients.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

60
−0.290 *
0.024
60
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.290 *
0.024
60
1.000

60
* The correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tail).
Table 9. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in underweight patients.
Table 9. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in underweight patients.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

11
0.234
0.489
11
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
0.234
0.489
11
1.000

11
Table 10. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in risk of overweight patients.
Table 10. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in risk of overweight patients.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

28
−0.289
0.136
28
DMF Coefficient of Correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.289
0.136
28
1.000

28
Table 11. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in overweight patients.
Table 11. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF evaluated in overweight patients.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

28
−0.018
0.929
28
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.018
0.929
28
1.000

28
Table 12. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients with a Class I molar relationship.
Table 12. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients with a Class I molar relationship.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

41
−0.193
0.227
41
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.193
0.227
41
1.000

41
Table 13. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients with a Class III molar relationship.
Table 13. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients with a Class III molar relationship.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

44
0.095
0.538
44
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
0.095
0.538
44
1.000

44
Table 14. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients with a Class II molar relationship.
Table 14. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients with a Class II molar relationship.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

42
−0.377 *
0.014
42
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.377 *
0.014
42
1.000

42
* The correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-code).
Table 15. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients affected by deepbite.
Table 15. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients affected by deepbite.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

39
−0.303
0.061
39
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.303
0.061
39
1.000

39
Table 16. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients affected by openbite.
Table 16. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in patients affected by openbite.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

22
−0.311
0.159
22
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.311
0.159
22
1.000

22
Table 17. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in normal occlusion patients.
Table 17. Data related to the correlation between BMI and DMF in normal occlusion patients.
BMIDMF
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

60
−0.111
0.396
60
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.111
0.396
60
1.000

60
Table 18. Data related to the correlation between BMI, DMF and age for the whole sample.
Table 18. Data related to the correlation between BMI, DMF and age for the whole sample.
BMIDMFAge
BMI coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
1.000

127
−0.155
0.082
127
0.475 **
0.00
127
DMF coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
−0.155
0.082
127
1.000

127
−0.306 **
0.00
127
ETA’ coefficient of correlation
Sig. (two-tail)
N
0.475 **
0.000
127
−0.306 **
0.000
127
1.000

127
** Correlation is significant at the level 0.01 (two-tail).
Table 19. Demographic and clinical variables of patients according to gender.
Table 19. Demographic and clinical variables of patients according to gender.
VariablesMaleFemalep Value
BMI19.3 ± 4.619.9 ± 5.10.744
DMF3.5 ± 3.23.1 ± 30.501
Age9.6 ± 3.510 ± 3.60.535
Normal weight
Risk of overweight
Overweight
Underweight
47.3%
23.6%
20.0%
9.1%
47.2%
20.8%
23.6%
8.3%
0.957
Malocclusion
I Class
II Class
III Class

30.9%
30.9%
38.2%

33.3%
34.7%
31.9%

0.762
Overbite
Deepbite
Openbite
Normal occlusion
Not evaluable

32.7%
14.5%
49.1%
3.6%

29.2%
19.4%
45.8%
5.6%

0.832

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Militi, A.; Nucera, R.; Ciraolo, L.; Alibrandi, A.; Fastuca, R.; Lo Giudice, R.; Portelli, M. Correlation between Caries, Body Mass Index and Occlusion in an Italian Pediatric Patients Sample: A Transverse Observational Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2994. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17092994

AMA Style

Militi A, Nucera R, Ciraolo L, Alibrandi A, Fastuca R, Lo Giudice R, Portelli M. Correlation between Caries, Body Mass Index and Occlusion in an Italian Pediatric Patients Sample: A Transverse Observational Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(9):2994. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17092994

Chicago/Turabian Style

Militi, Angela, Riccardo Nucera, Ludovica Ciraolo, Angela Alibrandi, Rosamaria Fastuca, Roberto Lo Giudice, and Marco Portelli. 2020. "Correlation between Caries, Body Mass Index and Occlusion in an Italian Pediatric Patients Sample: A Transverse Observational Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 9: 2994. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17092994

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop