Next Article in Journal
Tribological Performance of Biomass-Derived Bio-Alcohol and Bio-Ketone Fuels
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Thermogravimetric and Kinetic Analysis of High-Temperature Thermal Conversion of Pine Wood Sawdust under CO2/Ar
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Importance of Under-Keel Sound Velocity Sensor in Measuring Water Depth with Multibeam Echosounder
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toxic Effect of Ammonium Nitrogen on the Nitrification Process and Acclimatisation of Nitrifying Bacteria to High Concentrations of NH4-N in Wastewater

by
Iwona Beata Paśmionka
1,*,
Karol Bulski
1,
Piotr Herbut
2,3,
Elżbieta Boligłowa
1,
Frederico Márcio C. Vieira
3,
Gabriela Bonassa
4,
Marcelo Bortoli
4 and
Marina Celant de Prá
4
1
Department of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
2
Department of Rural Building, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
3
Grupo de Estudos em Biometeorologia—GEBIOMET (Biometeorology Study Group), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Estrada para Boa Esperança, km 04, Comunidade São Cristóvão, Dois Vizinhos 85660-000, Brazil
4
Grupo de Pesquisa em Gerenciamento e Tratamento de Resíduos—GETRAT, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Estrada para Boa Esperança, km 04, Comunidade São Cristóvão, Dois Vizinhos 85660-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 25 August 2021 / Published: 27 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wastewater, Water and Energy)

Abstract

:
The aim of the conducted research was to assess the effectiveness of the nitrification process, at different concentrations of ammonium nitrogen, in biologically treated wastewater in one of the largest municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in Poland. The studies also attempted to acclimate nitrifying bacteria to the limited concentration of ammonium nitrogen and determined the efficiency of nitrification under the influence of acclimated activated sludge in the biological wastewater treatment system. The obtained results indicate that the concentration of ammonium nitrogen above 60.00 mg·dm−3 inhibits nitrification, even after increasing the biomass of nitrifiers. The increase in the efficiency of the nitrification process in the tested system can be obtained by using the activated sludge inoculated with nitrifiers. For this purpose, nitrifiers should be preacclimated, at least for a period of time, allowing them to colonize the activated sludge. The acclimated activated sludge allows reducing the amount of ammonium nitrogen in treated sewage by approx. 35.0%. The process of stable nitrification in the biological treatment system was observed nine days after introducing the acclimated activated sludge into the aeration chamber.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen is the basic building element that regulates biological productivity in the aquatic environment. This element, like other biogeochemical elements, has its own circulation cycle. The main source of nitrogen in wastewater is proteins and other organic compounds, including urea. In the sewage system, as a result of hydrolysis and ammonification processes, part of the nitrogen present in the organic form (especially urea) is converted into the ammonium or ammonia form. The balance between ammonia (NH3-N) and ammonium (NH4-N) in wastewater is governed by pH [1]. Additionally, total ammonium nitrogen (TAN) represents the sum of these two forms. Therefore, in the inflow to the treatment plant, total nitrogen (TKN) is usually in the non-oxidized form. The major part of the non-oxidized forms of nitrogen is TAN, while the rest is bound in the form of various organic compounds [2,3].
In wastewater treatment plants that remove biogenic compounds in a biological way, the elimination of ammonium nitrogen is carried out through the processes of metabolic assimilation and dissimilation [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In the assimilation process, ammonium nitrogen is used to create new, activated sludge cells, which are then removed from the system in the form of biomass [13,14]. The ratio of metabolizable organic carbon to nitrogen (C:N) determines the rate of biomass growth, and thus the amount of ammonium nitrogen removed with excess activated sludge. It also depends on the availability and biodegradability of the wastewater organic carbon. According to the literature data, the most favourable C:N ratio ranges from 10:1 to 12:1 [15] or 17:1 [16] and enables the assimilation of about 20–30% of nitrogen [17,18,19]. A higher rate of biomass increase is observed in municipal wastewater due to the maintenance of the required proportions between biogenic elements. In the case of industrial wastewater, in which biogenic elements are present in unfavourable proportions or carbon is in a form that is not available for organisms, the rate of biomass increase is lower [20,21,22,23,24]. During metabolic dissimilation, ammonium nitrogen is transformed in the processes of nitrification and then denitrification [25,26,27,28,29]. In the process of nitrification, nitrogen changes from one mineral form (ammonium) to another (nitrite or nitrate). Therefore, this process does not contribute to the direct elimination of nitrogen from the system, but is only a process that determines the occurrence of the second, key dissimilation pathway-denitrification [30,31].
Nitrifying bacteria belong to the most sensitive group of microorganisms involved in the wastewater treatment process [32,33]. The rate of oxidation of ammonium nitrogen during nitrification is influenced by: dissolved oxygen concentration, pH, total alkalinity, ammonia concentration [34,35,36], C/N ratio [37,38,39], temperature and the presence of inhibitors [40,41,42]. Moreover, in order to prevent the removal of nitrifying bacteria from the system and to maintain a constant effect of NH4-N oxidation, a sufficiently long age of the activated sludge and biomass reserve should be ensured [43,44,45].
The aim of the research was to evaluate the effectiveness of the nitrification process at high concentrations of ammonium nitrogen and to determine the limit concentration of NH4-N inhibiting nitrification. Moreover, the study attempted to acclimatize nitrifying bacteria to the increased concentration of ammonium nitrogen and the effectiveness of NH4-N elimination in the aeration chamber inoculated with acclimatized cultures of nitrifying bacteria in WWTP was checked.

2. Materials and Methods

The research was carried out in the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim (50°02′17.1′′ N 19°19′13.8′′ E), one of the largest sewage treatment plants in Poland. The wastewater treatment plant treats industrial and municipal wastewater mixed in a 2:1 ratio. The technological design of the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim assumed the dephosphatation process, without taking into account nitrification. Due to the above, the basic problem of the sewage treatment plant has become the need to obtain stable nitrification in order to reduce the TAN concentration in the treated sewage supplied to the Vistula River. This task turned out to be difficult, because, in the discussed system, the nitrification process is additionally limited by temperature drops and the presence of inhibitory substances contained in industrial wastewater, flowing from the nearby Chemical Production Plants. The diagram of the conducted experiments is shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Determination of the Limiting Concentration of Ammonium Nitrogen Which Inhibits Nitrification—Laboratory Tests

Industrial wastewater mixed with municipal wastewater in the ratio 2:1, with different concentrations of NH4-N, was used for the research. Before starting the research, the activated sludge was centrifuged and then washed in an aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate and ammonium sulphate. The activated sludge prepared in this way was diluted with distilled water in the ratio 1:10 and centrifuged again. Then, the activated sludge was suspended in the appropriate volume of tap water in order to obtain the concentration required for the tests. Before the tests, the TAN concentration in the wastewater was manually adjusted to the values of 140.00 mg·dm−3, 120.00 mg·dm−3, 100.00 mg·dm−3, 80.00 mg·dm−3, 70.00 mg·dm−3, 60.00 mg·dm−3, 50.00 mg·dm−3. These concentrations were the initial concentrations in the mixture of wastewater and activated sludge in each test series. In order to carry out the research, two experimental systems with activated sludge were established:
  • Static system with aeration
  • Dynamic system operating under continuous supply conditions based on wastewater flowing to biological treatment.
The basic parameters of both systems were maintained at a level similar to the values of the WWTP parameters (Table 1).
Under static conditions, a system consisting of fourteen conical flasks with a capacity of 500 cm3 was prepared (Table 2). An amount of 125 cm3 of active sludge with a biomass concentration (MLVSS) 3.748 g·dm−3 and 125 cm3 of sewage with the currently tested NH4-N concentration were introduced into each of the flasks. The volume of the mixture in each of the flasks was 250 cm3. Additionally, the biomass of nitrifying bacteria was increased in seven flasks by adding nitrifying cultures with a biomass of 0.25 mg. The activated sludge was kept in suspension for 4 h by mixing and aerating. A controlled method of supplying air with a constant capacity of 2 mg O2·dm−3 was used. Then the samples were filtered and the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N was determined. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
Under dynamic conditions (Figure 1), a system consisting of a glass bottle (3) with a capacity of 10 dm3 was used for the sewage flowing into the aeration chamber through a silicone hose connected to a peristaltic MICRODOSING PUMP TYPE 335 with a capacity of 20–40 cm3·min−1. Another element of the system is an aeration chamber (1) with a capacity of 1 dm3 with a side outlet connected by a silicone hose with a peristaltic pump discharging the activated sludge with sewage to the secondary settling tank (4). The lower part of the chamber was equipped with a Schott G-1 filter, terminated with an outlet connected through a silicone hose with the pump aerating the active sludge with compressed air VEB ELMET TYPE Fp 09 (2). The vertical secondary settling tank was equipped with two outlets, a side discharge of the supernatant to the treated sewage tank (5) and a bottom one through which the activated sludge was recirculated to the aeration chamber with a silicone hose connected to the peristaltic pump. HRT was about 4 h.
Activated sludge with a volume of 500 cm3 and a biomass concentration (MLVSS) of 3.748 g·dm−3 was mixed with nitrifiers (biomass of 1.00 mg) and sewage with a specific concentration of NH4-N (in a 1:1 ratio), then placed in the chamber and aerated compressed air with a constant efficiency at the level of 2 mg O2·dm−3. Wastewater with the currently tested TAN concentration (70.00 mg·dm−3, 60.00 mg·dm−3 and 50.00 mg·dm−3) ware dosed to the aeration chamber. The duration of the experiment was 8 h. Samples were collected from the treated sewage tank each hour, filtered and the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N was determined.

2.2. Acclimatisation of Nitrifiers to the Limit Concentration of NH4-N

Due to the removal of nitrifying bacteria from the system, an attempt was made to populate the activated sludge with nitrifying cultures. For this purpose, in the first series of tests (Figure 1) nitrifying bacteria (with a biomass of 3.00 mg for each dm3 of sludge) were added to 3 dm3 of activated sludge (with a biomass of 3.748 g·dm−3), the whole was mixed with an ammonium sulphate solution (buffered with sodium bicarbonate) in a ratio of 1:1 (to maintain the pH at about 7) and transferred to the aeration chamber (1). The concentration of NH4-N in the system at the beginning of the experiment was 70.00 mg·dm−3. The mixture was alternately aerated with compressed air at four-hour intervals using a VEB ELMET TYPE Fp 09 pump (2) and sedimented. The concentration of dissolved oxygen in the aeration chamber was about 2 mg·dm−3. The experiment was carried out for 4 days. Every 24 h a small amount of supernatant was collected, filtered and the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N was determined. At the same time, after each test day, an activated sludge (MLVSS–3.879 g·dm−3) sample was collected from the system, with a volume of 500 cm3, which was transferred in the aeration chamber, mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the sewage with a NH4-N concentration of 70.00 mg·dm−3 and used in dynamic tests (as described in Section 2.1.), dosing sewage (with the tested concentration of TAN) into the chamber in the amount of 20 cm3·min−1. The studies were conducted over eight hours. Every hour the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N was determined in the sample of treated sewage.
In the second series of tests, in order to increase the biomass of nitrifying bacteria in the activated sludge chamber, a breeding system was established consisting of two tanks with a capacity of 250 dm3 each (Figure 1). Active sludge (MLVSS–3.879 g·dm−3) mixed with sewage in a 1:1 ratio was placed in both tanks (1), and then previously grown nitrifying bacteria with a biomass of 30.00 mg were introduced into each tank.
In order to enable the nitrifiers to colonize the activated sludge, both tanks were alternately aerated compressed air (2) with a constant efficiency at the level of 2 mg O2·dm−3 (4 h) and subjected to sedimentation (4 h) for a period of 4 days. Every 24 h, a sample was collected from each tank and the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N was determined after filtering.
After four days, when the concentration of TAN in both tanks decreased significantly, their content (400 dm3) was introduced into the working aeration chamber (research in a working WWTP). The effectiveness of TAN removal by activated sludge enriched in nitrifying bacteria cultures was assessed based on the differences in the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N and NO3-N in the wastewater flowing into the aeration chamber and in the treated sewage. Samples were taken every 24 h and observations were made for 16 days.

2.3. Isolation of Cultures of Nitrifying Bacteria

Cultures of nitrifying bacteria were isolated from the activated sludge from the Municipal Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim using the serial dilution technique in order to minimize the amount of organic compounds and eliminate heterotrophic organisms. Then the isolates were grown on mineral liquid media, enriched with ammonia (culture of the first phase nitrifiers) and nitrite (culture of the second phase nitrifiers) [46].
A mineral medium was used for the isolation and cultivation of the first phase nitrifiers belonging to the genus Nitrosomonas [46]. For this purpose, the following was added to a small amount of distilled water:
K2HPO4
2HPO4—0.5 g
K2HPO4
(NH4)2SO4—0.5 g
K2HPO4
phenol red—0.5 g
K2HPO4
MgSO4·7H2O—0.05 g
K2HPO4
CaCl2·2H2O—0.02 g
K2HPO4
NaCl—0.02 g
K2HPO4
Na2MoO4·2H2O—2.4 μg
K2HPO4
microelements—1 cm3
The microelements solution was prepared by adding a few drops of H2SO4 to a small amount of distilled water, and then:
ZnSO4
sub>4·7H2O—1.1 g
ZnSO4
FeSO4·7H2O—0.5 g
ZnSO4
EDTA—0.25 g
ZnSO4
MnSO4·7H2O—0.154 g
ZnSO4
CuSO4·5H2O—0.04 g
ZnSO4
Co(NO3)2·6H2O—0.025 g
ZnSO4
Na2B4O7·10H2O—0.018 g, the whole was made up of water to 100 cm3.
Then, the medium was supplemented with distilled water to a volume of 1 dm3 and sterilized in an autoclave for 15 min, at 121 °C, under a pressure of 1 atmosphere. The pH of the medium was 7.5.
A mineral medium was used for the isolation and cultivation of the second phase nitrifiers belonging to the genus Nitrobacter [46]. For this purpose, the following was added to a small amount of distilled water:
KHCO3
sub>3—1.5 g
KHCO3
KH2PO4—0.5 g
KHCO3
K2HPO4—0.5 g
KHCO3
KNO2—0.3 g
KHCO3
MgSO4·7H2O—0.2 g
KHCO3
NaCl—0.2 g
KHCO3
CaCl2·2H2O—0.01 g
KHCO3
FeSO4·7H2O—0.01 g.
The prepared medium was supplemented with distilled water to the volume of 1 dm3. The medium was sterilized in an autoclave for 15 min at 121 °C and 1 atmosphere pressure. The pH of the medium was 7.5.
The nitrifying bacteria cultures were incubated for 14 days at 28 °C.

2.4. Analytical Methods

  • pH—determined using a UF 100-01 UniFETTM pH meter.
  • DO—was determined using a MYCOM/COM 141 S-1A00 ELMETRON oxygen meter. This probe consists of two electrodes, an electrolyte layer surrounding the electrodes and an oxygen-permeable membrane that separates the electrodes and electrolyte from the test sample. The determination consisted in measuring the intensity of the current as a result of the reduction in oxygen particles on the cathode. Dissolved oxygen concentration was measured continuously and the result was given in mg·dm−3.
  • MLVSS—the concentration of activated sludge biomass was determined by the weight method. For this purpose, 250 cm3 of a well-mixed sample was filtered through a medium, balanced filter paper, and then the material was dried to constant weight at 105 °C. The amount of total suspended solids was calculated according to the formula:
    X = ( m 2   -   m 1 ) · 1000 V
    • X—biomass concentration, mg·dm−3
    • m1—weight of the weighing bottle and the dried filter, mg
    • m2—weight of the weighing bottle with filter and activated sludge, mg
    • V—volume of the sample taken for testing, cm3
  • COD—determined by the bichromate method. For this purpose, the number of milligrams of potassium dichromate was determined, converted into milligrams of oxygen used for the oxidation of organic compounds and some inorganic compounds present in the analyzed wastewater. The oxidation process was carried out in sulfuric acid in the presence of silver sulfate as a catalyst. The results were calculated according to the formula:
    X = ( V 2     V 1 ) · n · 8 · 1000 · f V
    • V—the volume of the wastewater sample, cm3
    • V1—volume of ferrous ammonium sulphate solution used for titration of the test sample, cm3
    • V2—the volume of the ferrous ammonium sulphate solution used for the titration of the control sample, cm3
    • n—normality of the ferrous ammonium sulphate solution
    • 8—the conversion factor of the result into milligrams of oxygen
    • f—factor of ferrous ammonium sulphate solution
  • The concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N—was determined by the colorimetric method on the CADAS 30S spectrophotometer by Dr Lange, using appropriate cuvette tests.
    The following tests were used to determine the concentration of NH4-N: LCK-302 (with a measuring range of 47.00–130.00 mg·dm−3), LCK-303 (with a measuring range of 2.00–47.00 mg·dm−3) and LCK-304 (with a measuring range of 0.015–2.00 mg·dm−3). The concentration of NO2-N was determined based on the LCK-341 test (with a measuring range of 0.015–0.60 mg·dm−3). As in many test series, nitrite nitrogen was present in trace amounts and its concentration was beyond the detection range of the CADAS 30S spectrophotometer, on most Tables, this parameter was omitted. The LCK-339 tests (with a measuring range of 0.23–13.50 mg·dm−3) and LCK-340 (with a measuring range of 5.00–35.00 mg·dm−3) were used to determine the concentration of NO3-N.
  • The specific rate of nitrification was determined on the basis of changes in NH4-N concentration, according to the formula:
    X = ( NH 4 - N ) t 1   -   ( NH 4 - N ) t 2 MLVSS · 4
    • X—specific rate of nitrification, mg·gh−1
    • NH4-N—concentration of ammonium nitrogen, mg·dm−3
    • t—time of the initial (t1) and final (t2) measurement, h
    • MLVSS—concentration of activated sludge biomass used for research, g·dm−3.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To determine the significance of differences between the concentration of NH4-N, NO2-N, and NO3-N in the samples (depending on the variant of the experiment), a one-way ANOVA analysis was applied—Tukey test aimed to verify the differences in concentrations (significant differences for p < 0.05). The tests were performed in Statistica v. 13.1 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulusa, OK, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Determination of the Limit Concentration of Ammonium Nitrogen

In the first series of tests, the limit concentration of TAN was determined in wastewater directed to biological treatment, above which the nitrification process is inhibited. The tests were carried out in static conditions, during a four-hour aeration time on a laboratory scale.
The results obtained in the first test series (Table 3) indicate a low efficiency of NH4-N oxidation both in the samples containing cultures of nitrifying bacteria, with a biomass of 0.25 mg, and in the control samples, only when the concentration of ammonium nitrogen did not exceed 60.00 mg·dm−3 (Figure 2). Starting from the concentration of NH4-N, amounting to 70.00 mg·dm−3, there was a clear inhibition of nitrification. In the samples containing TAN in the concentration of 140.00 mg·dm−3, 120.00 mg·dm−3 and 100.00 mg·dm−3, inhibition of both the first and the second phase of nitrification was observed. In this series of tests, the average specific nitrification rate of the control samples was 0.44, and of the samples with the addition of nitrifying bacteria—0.76. A slight loss of ammonium nitrogen in these samples (1.60 mg·dm−3 on average) could have occurred because of chemical oxidation, stripping, denitrification or incorporation into the biomass of activated sludge. Tests performed on wastewater, where the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was 70.00 mg·dm−3 and 80.00 mg·dm−3, respectively, indicate a greater sensitivity of the second phase nitrifiers to the toxic effect of this ion. This is evidenced by the accumulation of NO2-N in the samples after four hours of aeration, with a slight increase in the concentration of NO3-N, on average by approx. 1.00 mg·dm−3.
Conducting tests under static conditions, it was found that the lowest concentration of NH4-N, which is toxic to nitrifying bacteria, was 70.00 mg·dm−3. Therefore, using NH4-N concentrations of 70.00 mg·dm−3, 60.00 mg·dm−3 and 50.00 mg·dm−3, respectively, in the second series the model tests were continued in the activated sludge chamber under dynamic conditions. For this purpose, active sludge mixed with sewage, with the currently tested concentration of NH4-N, was introduced into the aeration chamber, nitrifying bacteria with a biomass of 1.00 mg were added and sewage was dosed in the amount of 20 cm3·min−1. for a period of eight hours.
In the case of wastewater in which the concentration of NH4-N was 70.00 mg·dm−3, the toxic effect of TAN on the nitrifying bacteria of the second phase was clearly visible (Table 4). During the eight-hour test cycle, the NO3-N concentration increased only by approx. 1.00 mg·dm−3, which confirms the results obtained in static tests. In the case of the first phase of nitrification, a slight and constant loss of NH4-N, were observed (62.76 mg·dm−3), in the fourth hour of the experiment. In the fifth hour of the tests, the concentration of ammonium nitrogen increased to 64.24 mg·dm−3 and remained more or less than this until the end of the tests (up to the eighth hour). The specific nitrification rate was 0.28. However, there were no significant differences in the concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N during the eight-hour test cycle (Tukey test, p > 0.05).
In the case of tests on wastewater containing TAN at a concentration of 60.00 mg·dm−3, in the first hour of the experiment, a clear loss of NH4-N by 16.88 mg·dm−3 was observed (Table 5). In the following hours of the experiment, the concentration of ammonium nitrogen fluctuated slightly, reaching a value equal to 46.11 mg·dm−3 (at eight hours), i.e., close to the concentration of NH4-N in the control test, after four hours of static aeration (45.19 mg·dm−3, Table 3). The concentration of NH4-N 60.00 mg·dm−3 did not inhibit the second phase of nitrification. The content of nitrate nitrogen from the first to the eighth hour of the experiment was on the average level of about 11.00 mg·dm−3, which was not reflected in the static tests, in which after four hours of aeration, the concentration of this ion in the control flask was only 4.29 mg·dm−3, and in the flask with the addition of nitrifying bacteria—9.36 mg·dm−3 (Table 3). The specific nitrification rate was 0.93. In this case, the analysis showed significant differences in the concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N during the eight-hour test cycle (Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Similar results were obtained when examining the sewage in which the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was 50.00 mg·dm−3 (Table 6). In the first hour of the experiment, the concentration of NH4-N decreased by 20.17 mg·dm−3, and then it fluctuated, reaching in the eighth hour the value equal to 28.95 mg·dm−3. In the case of nitrate nitrogen, in the first hour of the tests, the concentration of this ion increased to 9.65 mg·dm−3, and in the eighth hour to 15.08 mg·dm−3. The specific nitrification rate was 1.41. Thus, both the concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N after eight hours of aeration under dynamic conditions confirm the results obtained in control tests, during static tests (Table 3). The statistical analysis showed significant differences in the concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N during the eight-hour test cycle (Tukey test, p < 0.05).
The obtained results indicate that the cultures of nitrifying bacteria added to the samples did not manage to colonize the activated sludge flocs and were removed from the system together with the treated sewage.

3.2. Acclimatisation of Nitrifying Bacteria to the Limit Concentration of Ammonium Nitrogen

Due to the removal of nitrifying bacteria from the system, an attempt was made to adapt the activated sludge by inoculating with nitrifying cultures. For this purpose, the research was conducted in two parallel series.
In the first research series, activated sludge, to which nitrifier cultures with a biomass of 3.00 mg were added for each dm3 of activated sludge, were alternately aerated (4 h) and sedimented (4 h) for four days. In order to prevent the removal of nitrifying bacteria from the system, the tests were carried out in static conditions, without dosing and discharging sewage. The results obtained in the first series of tests (Figure 3) showed that over time there was a constant significant decrease in the content of TAN, the initial concentration of which in the sample was 70.00 mg·dm−3, while there was a constant significant increase in nitrate concentration (Tukey test, p < 0.05). Already after the first day of testing in the system, a significant decrease in the concentration of NH4-N (from 70.00 mg·dm−3 to 49.46 mg·dm−3) was observed, amounting to 20.54 mg·dm−3, with a simultaneous increase in the concentration of NO3-N from 0.00 mg·dm−3 to 6.72 mg·dm−3. In the last monitoring day (after 96 h), the concentration of TAN decreased by 63.98 mg·dm−3, reaching the value of 6.02 mg·dm−3, with an increase in the concentration of NO3-N to 35.22 mg·dm−3. The specific nitrification rate was 4.23. As on the fourth day of the experiment the NH4-N concentration dropped to 6.02 mg·dm−3, the tests under static conditions were discontinued due to an insufficient amount of substrate necessary for the further course of nitrification.
Parallel to the static tests, an experiment was conducted under dynamic conditions to determine the effect of the time of settling of activated sludge by nitrifier cultures on the efficiency of TAN oxidation. Therefore, every 24 h, a sample of acclimated activated sludge was collected, which was used in studies taking into account the constant inflow of sewage (with the concentration of NH4-N equal to 70.00 mg·dm−3) to the system. At the same time, under the same conditions, control tests were carried out in which activated sludge was added to the system and, immediately before the start of aeration, nitrifier cultures with a biomass of 3.00 mg for each dm3 of activated sludge (Figure 4). The specific nitrification rate was 0.23. There were no statistically significant differences in concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N during eight-hour control tests under dynamic conditions (Tukey test, p > 0.05).
The obtained results (Figure 5a–d) indicate that even a 24-h time of settling the activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria increases the efficiency of the nitrification process (Figure 5a; Tukey test, p < 0.05). The specific nitrification rate was 0.70.
The studies conducted on activated sludge, in which nitrifying bacteria were colonized for 48 h, indicate a further gradual increase in the efficiency of the nitrification process (Figure 5b; Tukey test, p < 0.05). The concentration of TAN gradually decreased during the eight hours of the experiment, reaching its final value equal to 46.12 mg·dm−3. The loss of NH4-N in the sample amounted to 23.88 mg·dm−3, so compared to the control sample it was greater by 19.40 mg·dm−3. The specific nitrification rate was 1.58. Additionally, in this case, the concentration of NO3-N increased, reaching the value of 7.78 mg·dm−3 in the eighth hour of the experiment.
In the case of tests with the use of activated sludge, in which the time of colonization by nitrifying bacteria was extended to 72 h, the concentration of NH4-N decreased by 38.79 mg·dm−3, reaching a value of 31.21 mg·dm−3 after eight hours of experiment (Figure 5c; Tukey test, p < 0.05). The loss of NH4-N in the system, compared to the control sample, increased by 34.31 mg·dm−3. The specific nitrification rate was 2.56. The studies also showed a much more effective functioning of the second phase nitrifying bacteria, as evidenced by the increase in the concentration of N-NO3 from 0.00 mg·dm−3 to 10.98 mg·dm−3.
The most favourable results were obtained in studies with the activated sludge colonized with nitrifiers for 96 h. In this case, the concentration of NH4-N in the eighth hour of the experiment decreased by 41.99 mg·dm−3, reaching the final value of 28.01 mg·dm−3 (Figure 5d; Tukey test, p < 0.05). The specific nitrification rate was 2.77. Compared to the control sample, the loss of NH4-N in the system increased by 37.51 mg·dm−3. It should be noted that the stable nitrification process was achieved already in the fifth hour of the experiment. From the fifth to the eighth hour of aeration, the NH4-N concentration was around 28.00 mg·dm−3, while the NO3-N content was around 12.00 mg·dm−3.
In the second series of studies, the effectiveness of the nitrification process on the macro scale in the working aeration chamber was assessed under the influence of the increased biomass of nitrifiers in the activated sludge. The research was conducted in two stages.
In the first stage, the activated sludge (MLVSS-3.879 g·dm−3) was colonized with cultures of nitrifying bacteria. The research was carried out in a model system under static conditions, acclimating the sludge until the maximum degree of NH4-N oxidation was achieved in the wastewater directed for biological treatment. During the period of the research, the average concentration of TAN in the sewage flowing into the biological treatment system was approx. 30.00 mg·dm−3, the concentration of NH4-N in the model system was adjusted to 35.00 mg·dm−3 (Figure 6). The loss of NH4-N on the first day of the experiment was only 3.55 mg·dm−3 (Tukey test, p > 0.05). However, after a period of sludge acclimatisation, were observed the decrease in TAN concentration and at the final of the monitored day, the effluent was with 2.13 mg·dm−3. The specific nitrification rate was 2.13. Concomitantly, the concentration of NO3-N increased by 31.28 mg·dm−3 (Tukey test, p < 0.05). These studies confirmed the results obtained in laboratory conditions (Figure 3), disregarding the fact that the biomass used to colonize activated sludge flocs was shown 10 times lower.
In the second stage, the activated sludge (MLVSS-3.879 g·dm−3), acclimated in model studies, was used to carry out the relevant research in the WWTP. For this purpose, the activated sludge previously inhabited by nitrifiers was transferred to one aeration chamber and for the next 16 days the effectiveness of the nitrification process in the system was assessed (Table 7 and Figure 7). On the first day from the inoculation of the chamber with the acclimated-activated sludge, the concentration of ammonium nitrogen significantly decreased by 7.86 mg·dm−3, while the concentration of NO3-N significantly increased by 7.73 mg·dm−3 (Tukey test, p < 0.05). The difference in the concentration of both forms of nitrogen proves that TAN was completely oxidized by the nitrification process, and not removed as a result of the increase in biomass. On the second and third days, TAN and nitrate nitrogen were lost (Tukey test, p < 0.05). This removal could be attached by the simultaneous consortium with heterotrophic bacteria (denitrification process). Then, in the following days, a successive significant decrease in the concentration of NH4-N and a significant increase in the concentration of NO3-N were observed. Nine days after inoculation of the chamber with the acclimated active sludge, a stable nitrification process was achieved, with an average concentration of NH4-N in the treated sewage amounting to approx. 0.72 mg·dm−3 and an average concentration of NO3-N of approx. 10.24 mg·dm−3. The specific nitrification rate was 1.94.
In parallel, tests were carried out in a control chamber where no activated sludge with nitrifiers was added. The comparison among the introduction of the acclimated-activated sludge into the aeration chamber with the control (Table 8 and Figure 8) showed the significant difference in the decrease TAN in the treated sewage, with a simultaneous increase in the concentration of nitrate nitrogen (Tukey test, p < 0.05). The tests in the control chamber were carried out in similar conditions, ie with the average concentration of NH4-N in the incoming sewage, amounting to 30.00 mg·dm−3, biomass concentration 3.871 g·dm−3 and with the average sewage temperature of 12.5 °C. The specific nitrification rate was much lower (0.6).

4. Discussion

Researches concerning the influence of high concentrations of TAN on the nitrification process are very discrepant. According to Wang et al. [45], the nitrification process is inhibited by concentrations of above 150.00 mg·dm−3 NH4-N. In the case of the research conducted by Wang et al. [47], the nitrification process took place in industrial wastewater, where the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was 450.00 mg·dm−3. On the other hand, Zeng et al. [48] observed nitrification at concentrations of NH4-N ranging from 300.00–900.00 mg·dm−3. The results obtained in the research carried out at the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim did not confirm these observations. Under static conditions, the efficiency of the nitrification process was significantly reduced when the concentration of ammonium nitrogen exceeded the value of 60.00 mg·dm−3. At the NH4-N concentration of 70.00 and 80.00 mg·dm−3, respectively, a clear inhibition of the second phase of nitrification was observed. According to the literature, nitrifying bacteria belonging to the genus of Nitrobacter are more sensitive to the influence of NH4-N than nitrifiers of the first phase belonging to the genus of Nitrosomonas [49]. In samples where the NH4-N concentration was 100.00 mg·dm−3; 120.00 mg·dm−3 and 140 mg·dm−3, complete inhibition of nitrification was observed, both in the first and second phases.
Due to the low efficiency of the nitrification process, or even its complete absence, cultures of previously isolated nitrifying bacteria were added to the systems. The obtained results confirmed that the NH4-N concentration exceeding the value of 60.00 mg·dm−3, inhibits the nitrification process. Cultures of nitrifying bacteria, added to the samples, supported the process of ammonia oxidation, however, they were equally sensitive to high NH4-N concentrations as the nitrifiers present in the activated sludge. Due to this fact, further studies determined the effect of increased biomass of nitrifying bacteria on the efficiency of the ammonium nitrogen oxidation process in wastewater with a concentration of 50.00 mg·dm−3, 60.00 mg·dm−3 and 70.00 mg·dm−3 in a dynamic system. The efficiency of the nitrification process after eight hours of experiment, in all three systems, was similar to that observed in static conditions after four hours of aeration, using the same concentrations of ammonium nitrogen and not increasing the biomass of nitrifiers in the activated sludge. The obtained results suggest that in the first hours of the tests, the nitrification process was supported by nitrifiers added to the sample, but with time their successive removal from the system along with the treated sewage took place. In the following hours of the study, only the reduced activity of nitrifying bacteria present in the activated sludge was visible. These tests confirm the results obtained in static conditions, during which, after a four-hour period of aeration, the concentration of ammonium nitrogen in the control flask without the addition of nitrifiers was 65.50 mg·dm−3. Under dynamic conditions, a similar value was obtained after eight hours (65.74 mg·dm−3), ie after removing the nitrifiers added to the system. In the static system with the addition of nitrifiers, after four hours of aeration, the NH4-N concentration decreased to the value of 62.30 mg·dm−3. In the dynamic tests, a similar result was obtained in the fourth hour of the experiment—62.76 mg·dm−3. This fact suggests a tendency to remove from the system nitrifying bacteria that did not manage to colonize the activated sludge during the eight hours of the experiment.
The NH4-N concentration of 60.00 mg·dm−3 showed no toxic effect on the nitrifying bacteria of the second phase. The content of nitrate nitrogen from the first to the eighth hour of the experiment was on average at the level of about 11.00 mg·dm−3, which was not reflected in the static tests, where after four hours of aeration, the NO3-N concentration in the control sample was only 4.29 mg·dm−3, and in the sample with the addition of nitrifying bacteria—9.36 mg·dm−3.
The results obtained in dynamic tests indicate that the cultures of nitrifying bacteria added to the system were successively removed with the treated sewage over time, which corresponds to the data found in the literature [11,23,50].
The research conducted on the acclimated activated sludge shows that even a 24-h time of settling the activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria prevents the removal of these microorganisms from the system, and thus increases the efficiency of the nitrification process. The best results were obtained on the fourth and last day of acclimatisation, when the NH4-N concentration added to the sample was reduced by 91.4%. The obtained results were satisfactory, so it was decided to conduct similar tests in the WWTP. Additionally, in this case, the four-day acclimatisation time of the activated sludge allowed the oxidation of ammonium nitrogen to a degree equal to 93.9%. Skoyles et al. [49] obtained a similarly high degree of TAN oxidation in industrial wastewater with a four-day aeration time.
The activated sludge, acclimated under static conditions, was then transferred to the aeration chamber in the WWTP, and nine days after inoculation, a stable nitrification process was achieved. The degree of ammonium nitrogen oxidation increased from approx. 62.0% (before the chamber inoculation) to approx. 97.0%, with the average sewage temperature of approx. 12 °C. It should be emphasized that in the previous years, the limit temperature for the nitrification process in the system was 13 °C. Similar results were obtained by Li et al. [49], in which the biological wastewater treatment system supported the nitrification process with acclimated nitrifying bacteria, allowing shortening the sludge age from 13–18 days to 7–10 days at a temperature of 10 °C.
Proper operation of mechanical and biological wastewater treatment plants from the chemical industry is a difficult matter, especially in the case of plants that receive different wastewater. In such plants, the amount and composition of wastewater and the concentration of the organic pollutant are constantly fluctuating [51,52]. Meanwhile, the biocenosis of activated sludge is reluctant to acclimate to specific industrial substances [53]. There are many wastewater treatment plants that are unable to eliminate toxic substances and to reduce the concentration of incoming organic pollutants by wastewater pretreatment by the plants producing them. Additionally, low temperatures limit the course of many biochemical processes, the most sensitive of which is the nitrification process [54]. An example of such a treatment plant is the Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant in Oświęcim, where the only real chance of achieving stable nitrification after the occurrence of disturbances is the use of inoculation with cultures of nitrifying bacteria.

5. Conclusions

  • The limit concentration of ammonium nitrogen at which the nitrification process is inhibited at the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim is 70 mg·dm−3.
  • Ammonium nitrogen at the concentration of 100 mg·dm−3, 120 mg·dm−3 and 140 mg·dm−3 inhibits both the first and the second phase of nitrification in the tested system.
  • The cultures of nitrifying bacteria added to the dynamic system do not colonize activated sludge during the 8-h aeration time and are removed from the system together with the treated sewage.
  • In the WWTP, the inoculation of the aeration chamber with cultures of nitrifying bacteria gives effect only after the previous four-day acclimatisation of the activated sludge and significantly shortens the waiting time for the effective process of NH4-N oxidation during periods of nitrification disappearance.
  • Acclimated activated sludge, added to the aeration chamber in the form of inoculum in periods unfavourable for nitrifiers, allows increasing the degree of TAN oxidation in treated sewage by approx. 35.0%.
  • The nitrification process was achieved with the tested strategies, which is good in the WWTP point-of-view. With such is possible to apply the subsequent denitrification process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.P. and K.B.; methodology, I.B.P.; formal analysis, I.B.P., K.B., P.H. and E.B.; investigation, I.B.P.; resources, I.B.P.; data curation, I.B.P. and K.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.B.P.; writing—review and editing, I.B.P., K.B., F.M.C.V., M.B., M.C.d.P. and G.B.; supervision, P.H. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anthonisen, A.C.; Loehr, R.C.; Prakasam, T.B.S.; Srinath, E.G. Inhibition of Nitrification by Ammonia and Nitrous Acid. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1976, 5, 835–852. [Google Scholar]
  2. McCarty, P.L. What is the Best Biological Process for Nitrogen Removal: When and Why? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3835–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhu, G.; Peng, Y.; Li, B.; Guo, J.; Yang, Q.; Wang, S. Biological Removal of Nitrogen from Wastewater. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Whitacre, D.M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; Volume 192, pp. 159–195. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bawiec, A. Efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds removal in hydroponic wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 2062–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hu, H.; Ma, S.; Zhang, X.; Ren, H. Characteristics of dissolved organic nitrogen in effluent from a biological nitrogen removal process using sludge alkaline fermentation liquid as an external carbon source. Water Res. 2020, 176, 115741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jóźwiakowski, K.; Bugajski, P.; Kurek, K.; Nunes de Carvalho, M.F.; Araújo Almeida, M.A.; Siwiec, T.; Borowski, G.; Czekała, W.; Dach, J.; Gajewska, M. The efficiency and technological reliability of biogenic compounds removal during long-term operation of a one-stage subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 202, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jucherski, A.; Walczowski, A.; Bugajski, P.; Jóźwiakowski, K. Technological reliability of domestic wastewater purification in a small Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor (SBBR). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 224, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Micek, A.; Jóźwiakowski, K.; Marzec, M.; Listosz, A.; Malik, A. Efficiency of Pollution Removal in Preliminary Settling Tanks of Household Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Roztocze National Park. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mucha, Z.; Mikosz, J. Technological characteristics of reject waters from aerobic sludge stabilization in small and medium-sized wastewater treatment plants with biological nutrient removal. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2020, 12, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nguyen, P.Y.; Carvalho, G.; Reis, A.C.; Nunes, O.C.; Reis, M.A.M.; Oehmen, A. Impact of biogenic substrates on sulfamethoxazole biodegradation kinetics by Achromobacter denitrificans strain PR1. Biodegradation 2017, 28, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, Y.; Zhu, G. Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 73, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Szeląg, B.; Gawdzik, J. Assessment of the Effect of Wastewater Quantity and Quality, and Sludge Parameters on Predictive Abilities of Non-Linear Models for Activated Sludge Settleability Predictions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2017, 26, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shen, S.; Li, X.; Cheng, F.; Zha, X.; Lu, X. Review: Recent developments of substrates for nitrogenand phosphorus removal in CWs treating municipal wastewater. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2020, 27, 29837–29855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yan, C.; Wang, M.; Ma, T.; Yang, S.; Kong, M.; Shen, J.; Yang, L.; Gao, Y. Study on the experimental performance by electrolysis-integrated ecological floating bed for nitrogen and phosphorus removal in eutrophic water. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ajibade, F.O.; Wang, H.C.; Guadie, A.; Ajibade, T.F.; Fang, Y.K.; Sharif, H.M.A.; Liu, W.Z.; Wang, A.J. Total nitrogen removal in biochar amended non-aerated vertical flow constructed wetlands for secondary wastewater effluent with low C/N ratio: Microbial community structure and dissolved organic carbon release conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 322, 124430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, X.; Huang, M.; Bao, S.; Tang, W.; Fang, T. Nitrate removal from low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio wastewater by combining iron-based chemical reduction and autotrophic denitrification. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koren, D.W.; Gould, W.D.; Bédard, P. Biological removal of ammonia and nitrate from simulated mine and mill effluents. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 56, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Racz, L.A.; Datta, T.; Goel, R. Effect of organic carbon on ammonia oxidizing bacteria in a mixed culture. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6454–6460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Singh, R.P.; Geng, C.; Fu, D. Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio influence on the performanceof bioretention for wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2020, 27, 17652–17660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shoupeng, D.; Yanyan, Z.; Zheng, S. Heterotrophic nitrifying bacteria in wastewater biological nitrogen removal systems: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Su, M.H.; Azwar, E.; Yang, Y.F.; Sonne, C.; Yek, P.N.Y.; Liew, R.K.; Cheng, C.K.; Show, P.L.; Lam, S.S. Simultaneous removal of toxic ammonia and lettuce cultivation in aquaponic system using microwave pyrolysis biochor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, Z.; Zhu, W.; Liu, Y.; Peng, P.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Xu, J. An integrated three-dimensional electrochemical system for efficient treatment of coking wastewater rich in ammonia nitrogen. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Ruan, R.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, L. New progress of ammonia recovery during ammonia nitrogen removal from various wastewaters. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xu, N.; Liao, M.; Liang, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, X.; Fan, Q.; Zhu, Y. Biological nitrogen removal capability and pathways analysis of a novel low C/N ratio heterotrophic nitrifying and aerobic denitrifying bacterium (Bacillus thuringiensis strain WXN-23). Environ. Res. 2021, 195, 110797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Albright, M.B.N.; Timalsina, B.; Martiny, J.B.H.; Dubnar, J. Comparative Genomics of Nitrogen Cycling Pathways in Bacteria and Archaea. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 77, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ding, F.; Liang, D.; Wu, Y.; Li, D.; Bian, W.; Li, J. Effect of C/N on partial nitrification in an MBBR at low temperature. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 3391–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Massoompour, A.R.; Borghei, S.M.; Raie, M. Enhancement of biological nitrogen removal performance using novel carriers based on the recycling of waste materials. Water Res. 2020, 170, 115340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rahimi, S.; Modin, O.; Mijakovic, I. Technologies for biological removal and recovery of nitrogen from wastewater. Biotechnol. Advanc. 2020, 43, 107570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Bai, J.; Liu, Z.; Song, X.; Yan, D.; Abiyu, A.; Zhao, Z.; Yan, D. High efficiency of inorganic nitrogen removal by integrating biofilm-electrode with constructed wetland: Autotrophic denitrifying bacteria analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 227, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chistiakova, T.; Mattsson, P.; Carlsson, B.; Wigren, T. Nonlinear system identification of the dissolved oxygen to effluent ammonia dynamics in an activated sludge process. IFAC-Pap. 2017, 50, 3917–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tao, C.; Hamouda, M.A. Steady-state modeling and evaluation of partial nitrification-anammox (PNA) for moving bed biofilm reactor and integrated fixed-film activated sludge processes treating municipal wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bishoff, D.; AlSayed, A.; Fergala, A.; Eldyasti, A. Redirecting methane for a novel biological nitrogen removal process using methanotrophic mixed culture in a sequential batch reaktor. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cao, Q.; Li, X.; Jiang, H.; Wu, H.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, N.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; et al. Ammonia removal through combined methane oxidation and nitrification-denitrification and the interactions among functional microorganisms. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Rong, H.; Zheng, G.; Zhao, L. The effect of dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) on oxygen diffusion and bacterial community structure in moving bed sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR). Water Res. 2017, 108, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, Y.; Lan, S.; Wang, L.; Dong, S.; Zhou, H.; Tan, Z.; Li, X. A review: Driving factors and regulation strategies of microbial community structure and dynamics in wastewater treatment systems. Chemosphere 2017, 174, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, X.; Zheng, S.; Wang, R. Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration (microaerobic and aerobic) on community structure and activity of culturable heterotrophic nitrifying bacteria in activated sludge. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 36, 953–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ding, J.; Gao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Wang, K.; Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, Q. Simulation and prediction of electrooxidation removal of ammonia and its application in industrial wastewater effluent. Water Environ. Res. 2020, 93, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Guo, X.; Li, B.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, J.; Lin, L.; Zhang, G.; Li, R.; Liu, J.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; et al. Performance and bacterial community of moving bed biofilm reactors with various biocarriers treating primary wastewater effluent with a low organic strength and low C/N ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 287, 121424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Shen, J.; Zhao, X.; Kang, J. Impact of carbon to nitrogen ratio on the performance of aerobic granular reactor and microbial population dynamics during aerobic sludge granulation. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 271, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ariff, I.F.M. Application of Inhibition Model to Prevent Nitrification Upset in Petrochemical Wastewater Treatment Plant. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering, Kuching, Malaysia, 13–15 June 2020; Mohammed, B.S., Shafiq, N., Rahman, M., Kutty, S., Mohamad, H., Balogun, A.L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; Volume 132, pp. 281–304. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vasiliadou, I.A.; Molina, R.; Martinez, F.; Melero, J.A.; Stathopoulou, P.M.; Tsiamis, G. Toxicity assessment of pharmaceutical compounds on mixed culture from activated sludge using respirometric technique: The role of microbial community structure. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, F.; Xu, S.; Liu, L.; Wang, S.; Ji, M. One-stage partial nitrification and anammox process in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Start-up, nitrogen removal performance and bacterial community dynamics in response to temperature. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 772, 145529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jaramillo, F.; Orchard, M.; Muñoz, C.; Zamorano, M.; Antileo, C. Advanced strategies to improve nitrification process in sequencing batch reactors—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 218, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Quoc, B.N.; Wei, S.; Armenta, M.; Bucher, R.; Sukapanpotharam, P.; Stahl, D.A.; Stensel, H.D.; Winkler, M.K.H. Aerobic granular sludge: Impact of size distribution on nitrification capa city. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, Z.; Zheng, M.; Xue, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhong, H.; Ni, G.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Hu, S. Free ammonia shock treatment eliminates nitrite-oxidizing bacterial activity for mainstream biofilm nitritation process. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 393, 124682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Atlas, R.M.; Parks, L.C. Hand book of Microbiological Media, 2nd ed.; CRC Press INC.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 258–316. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, J.; Gong, B.; Wang, Y.; Wen, Y.; Zhou, J.; He, Q. The potential multiple mechanisms and microbial communities in simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process treating high carbon and nitrogen concentration saline wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zeng, D.; Miao, J.; Wu, G.; Zhan, X. Nitrogen removal, microbial community and electron transport in an integrated nitrification and denitrification system for ammonium-rich wastewater treatment. Internat. Biodet. Biodeg. 2018, 133, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Skoyles, A.; Chaganti, S.R.; Mundle, S.O.C.; Weisener, C.G. Nitrification kinetics and microbial community dynamics of attached biofilm in wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 81, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, X.; Lu, M.Y.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Yuan, Y. Influence of seasonal temperature change on autotrophic nitrogen removal for mature landfill leachate treatment with high-ammonia by partial nitrification-Anammox process. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 102, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hosseinlou, D. Determination of design loading rates for simultaneous anaerobic oxidation/partial nitrification–denitrification process and application in treating dairy industry effluent. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Palmer, S.; Noone, G.; Hoyland, G. A review of physical relationships between form and function in wastewater biotreatment and a new theory relating activated sludge and biofilm systems behaviour. Water Environ. J. Prom. Sust. Sol. 2021, 35, 148–157. [Google Scholar]
  53. Van den Broeck, R.M.R.; Van Impe, J.F.M.; Smets, I.Y.M. Assessment of activated sludge stability in lab-scale experiments. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 141, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, Q.; Yang, T.; Shi, Y.; Xin, Y.; Zhang, L.; Gu, Z.; Li, Y.; Ding, Z.; Shi, G. The nitrogen removal characterization of a cold-adapted bacterium: Bacillus simplex H-b. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 323, 124554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schemes of conducted experiments.
Figure 1. Schemes of conducted experiments.
Energies 14 05329 g001
Figure 2. Influence of nitrifying bacteria cultures on the efficiency of NH4-N oxidation—static conditions. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in concentration of NH4-N between the samples containing cultures of nitrifying bacteria (with a biomass of 0.25 mg), and the control samples, only when the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was not exceeded 60.00 mg·dm−3 (for 50 and 60 mg·dm−3 of NH4-N). When the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was exceeded 60.00 mg·dm−3 (70–140 mg·dm−3), there were no significant differences in concentration of NH4-N between the samples containing cultures of nitrifying bacteria, and the control samples. The analysis showed significant differences in average concentration of NH4-N in control samples and samples with cultures of nitrifying bacteria after 4 h of aeration, only when the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was not exceeded 60.00 mg·dm−3.
Figure 2. Influence of nitrifying bacteria cultures on the efficiency of NH4-N oxidation—static conditions. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in concentration of NH4-N between the samples containing cultures of nitrifying bacteria (with a biomass of 0.25 mg), and the control samples, only when the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was not exceeded 60.00 mg·dm−3 (for 50 and 60 mg·dm−3 of NH4-N). When the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was exceeded 60.00 mg·dm−3 (70–140 mg·dm−3), there were no significant differences in concentration of NH4-N between the samples containing cultures of nitrifying bacteria, and the control samples. The analysis showed significant differences in average concentration of NH4-N in control samples and samples with cultures of nitrifying bacteria after 4 h of aeration, only when the concentration of ammonium nitrogen was not exceeded 60.00 mg·dm−3.
Energies 14 05329 g002
Figure 3. An attempt to colonize activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Figure 3. An attempt to colonize activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Energies 14 05329 g003
Figure 4. Removal of TAN at a concentration of 70.00 mg·dm−3 by the activated sludge method—control tests under dynamic conditions; *averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Figure 4. Removal of TAN at a concentration of 70.00 mg·dm−3 by the activated sludge method—control tests under dynamic conditions; *averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Energies 14 05329 g004
Figure 5. Influence of the (a) 24-h, (b) 48-h, (c) 72-h, (d) 96-h time of settling of activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria on the increase in the efficiency of the nitrification process—dynamic conditions; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Figure 5. Influence of the (a) 24-h, (b) 48-h, (c) 72-h, (d) 96-h time of settling of activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria on the increase in the efficiency of the nitrification process—dynamic conditions; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Energies 14 05329 g005aEnergies 14 05329 g005b
Figure 6. Settlement of activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Figure 6. Settlement of activated sludge by nitrifying bacteria; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, separately for concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N).
Energies 14 05329 g006
Figure 7. The influence of nitrifying bacteria cultures settled in the activated sludge on the efficiency of nitrification in the biological wastewater treatment system in the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim.
Figure 7. The influence of nitrifying bacteria cultures settled in the activated sludge on the efficiency of nitrification in the biological wastewater treatment system in the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim.
Energies 14 05329 g007
Figure 8. The efficiency of the nitrification process in the biological wastewater treatment system in the control chamber.
Figure 8. The efficiency of the nitrification process in the biological wastewater treatment system in the control chamber.
Energies 14 05329 g008
Table 1. Basic technological parameters of wastewater and activated sludge used in the research.
Table 1. Basic technological parameters of wastewater and activated sludge used in the research.
Technological ParameterValue
pH7.0–7.6
DO (mg O2·dm−3)2–3
Aeration time (h)4–5
MLVSS (mg·dm−3)3500–4000
Recirculation (% in relation to the incoming sewage)95
Dry mass of activated sludge (%)1.64
COD (mg O2·dm−3)251–393
BOD5 (mg O2·dm−3)150–280
Table 2. Diagram of a static system.
Table 2. Diagram of a static system.
Conical Flasks ContentFlask Number
1234567891011121314
Activated sludge (cm3)125125125125125125125125125125125125125125
NH4-N 140.00 mg·dm−3125125------------
NH4-N 120.00 mg·dm−3--125125----------
NH4-N 100.00 mg·dm−3----125125--------
NH4-N 80.00 mg·dm−3------125125------
NH4-N 70.00 mg·dm−3--------125125----
NH4-N 60.00 mg·dm−3----------125125--
NH4-N 50.00 mg·dm−3------------125125
Nitrifiers (mg)-0.25-0.25-0.25-0.25-0.25-0.25-0.25
Total volume (cm3)250250250250250250250250250250250250250250
Table 3. The effect of TAN concentration on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—static conditions.
Table 3. The effect of TAN concentration on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—static conditions.
Sample 3Concentration of NH4-N
(mg·dm−3)
Concentration of NO2-N
(mg·dm−3)
Concentration of NO3-N
(mg·dm−3)
before Aerationafter 4 h of AerationRemoval NH4-N (%)before Aerationafter 4 h of Aerationbefore Aerationafter 4 h of AerationIncrease in NO3-N Production Due to Added Nitrifying Cultures (mg·dm−3)
sewage 1140.00138.64b *0.970.000.012a0.000.32a
sewage 2140.00137.78b1.590.000.017a0.000.56a0.24
sewage 1120.00119.39b0.500.000.010a0.000.36a
sewage 2120.00117.83b1.800.000.021a0.000.71a0.35
sewage 1100.0099.11b0.890.000.013a0.000.68a
sewage 2100.0097.63b2.370.000.018a0.000.96a0.28
sewage 180.0076.16b4.800.001.260a0.000.86a
sewage 280.0073.26b8.400.003.780a0.001.13a0.27
sewage 170.0065.50b6.400.001.730a0.000.99a
sewage 270.0062.30b11.000.004.260a0.001.28a0.29
sewage 160.0045.19b24.680.000.063a0.004.29a
sewage 260.0031.24a47.030.000.017a0.009.36a5.07
sewage 150.0030.11b39.780.000.071a0.0015.90a
sewage 250.0020.29a59.420.000.000a0.0021.65a5.75
1 industrial sewage mixed with municipal sewage in a ratio of 2:1, with a variable concentration of NH4-N; 2 nitrifying bacteria cultures with a biomass of 0.25 mg added to the sample; 3 MLVSS—3.748 g·dm−3; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, significant differences in concentration between sewage 1 and sewage 2).
Table 4. The effect of ammonium nitrogen at a concentration of 70 mg·dm−3 on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—dynamic conditions.
Table 4. The effect of ammonium nitrogen at a concentration of 70 mg·dm−3 on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—dynamic conditions.
Experiment Time (h)Concentration (mg·dm−3) 1
NH4-NRemoval NH4-N (%)NO3-NIncrease in NO3-N Production (mg·dm−3)
070.00a *-0.00a-
168.72a1.830.01a-
265.24a6.800.12a0.11
364.12a8.400.06a0.50
462.76a10.341.02a1.01
564.24a8.231.01a1.00
665.18a6.890.93a0.92
767.23a3.961.11a1.10
865.74a6.091.13a1.12
1 MLVSS—3.748 g·dm−3; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, taking into account the time of the experiment).
Table 5. The effect of ammonium nitrogen at a concentration of 60 mg·dm−3 on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—dynamic conditions.
Table 5. The effect of ammonium nitrogen at a concentration of 60 mg·dm−3 on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—dynamic conditions.
Experiment Time (h)Concentration (mg·dm−3) 1
NH4-NRemoval NH4-N (%)NO3-NIncrease in NO3-N Production (mg·dm−3)
060.00b *-0.00a-
143.12a28.139.48b-
248.16a19.7310.90b1.42
352.64ab12.2711.92b2.44
449.46a17.5712.63b3.15
547.20a21.3311.51b2.03
645.13a24.7812.14b2.66
747.23a21.2810.09b0.61
846.11a23.1511.29b1.81
1 MLVSS—3.748 g·dm−3; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, taking into account the time of the experiment).
Table 6. The effect of ammonium nitrogen at a concentration of 50 mg·dm−3 on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—dynamic conditions.
Table 6. The effect of ammonium nitrogen at a concentration of 50 mg·dm−3 on the activity of nitrifying bacteria—dynamic conditions.
Experiment Time (h) Concentration (mg·dm−3) 1
NH4-NRemoval NH4-N (%)NO3-NIncrease in NO3-N Production (mg·dm−3)
050.00b *-0.00a-
129.83a40.349.65b-
236.94a26.1212.93b3.28
339.12ab21.7614.06b4.41
435.79a28,4212.11b2.46
526.11a47.7813.62b3.97
629.16a41.6815.91b6.26
728.14a43.7414.26b4.61
828.95a42.1015.08b5.43
1 MLVSS—3.748 g·dm−3; * averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, taking into account the time of the experiment).
Table 7. The differences in average concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N (mg·dm−3) in the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim.
Table 7. The differences in average concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N (mg·dm−3) in the Municipal and Industrial Sewage Treatment Plant in Oświęcim.
Experiment Time (Days)Wastewater Temperature (°C)Concentration (mg·dm−3)Concentration (mg·dm−3)
Inflowing SewageTreated Sewage
NH4-NNH4-NNO3-N
014.332.3012.30e *7.57a
115.032.304.44d15.30d
214.732.303.33c7.73a
314.034.203.15bc6.70a
411.934.203.27bc6.98a
512.034.202.54b8.65ab
611.027.702.16b8.99b
711.127.703.31c7.21a
811.237.502.04b9.82b
911.137.501.08a9.94b
1011.237.501.01a9.99b
1111.231.600.93a10.01b
1211.831.600.61a10.00b
1310.531.600.92a9.48b
1410.628.800.32a11.30
1510.328.800.64a10.60c
1610.928.800.28a10.60bc
* averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, taking into account the time of the experiment).
Table 8. The differences in average concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N (mg·dm−3) in the biological wastewater treatment system in the control chamber.
Table 8. The differences in average concentration of NH4-N and NO3-N (mg·dm−3) in the biological wastewater treatment system in the control chamber.
Experiment Time (days)Wastewater Temperature (°C)Concentration (mg·dm−3)Concentration (mg·dm−3)
Inflowing SewageTreated Sewage
NH4-NNH4-NNO3-N
012.028.9019.20c *0.74a
212.629.6022.70d1.07a
413.629.2025.50e1.81b
613.828.8024.10e4.76c
810.341.6024.10e2.08b
1010.428.8022.50d2.77b
1211.626.3015.20b4.17c
1411.623.9018.90c1.57a
1612.933.8012.74a2.53b
* averages marked with the same letters are not significantly different by Tukey test (α = 0.05) (one-way ANOVA, taking into account the time of the experiment).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paśmionka, I.B.; Bulski, K.; Herbut, P.; Boligłowa, E.; Vieira, F.M.C.; Bonassa, G.; Bortoli, M.; Prá, M.C.d. Toxic Effect of Ammonium Nitrogen on the Nitrification Process and Acclimatisation of Nitrifying Bacteria to High Concentrations of NH4-N in Wastewater. Energies 2021, 14, 5329. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en14175329

AMA Style

Paśmionka IB, Bulski K, Herbut P, Boligłowa E, Vieira FMC, Bonassa G, Bortoli M, Prá MCd. Toxic Effect of Ammonium Nitrogen on the Nitrification Process and Acclimatisation of Nitrifying Bacteria to High Concentrations of NH4-N in Wastewater. Energies. 2021; 14(17):5329. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en14175329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paśmionka, Iwona Beata, Karol Bulski, Piotr Herbut, Elżbieta Boligłowa, Frederico Márcio C. Vieira, Gabriela Bonassa, Marcelo Bortoli, and Marina Celant de Prá. 2021. "Toxic Effect of Ammonium Nitrogen on the Nitrification Process and Acclimatisation of Nitrifying Bacteria to High Concentrations of NH4-N in Wastewater" Energies 14, no. 17: 5329. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en14175329

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop