Next Article in Journal
Assessing Urban Fragmentation at Regional Scale Using Sprinkling Indexes
Next Article in Special Issue
Implementing Sustainably Managed Fisheries Using Ecological Risk Assessment and Bowtie Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Soil Properties and Productivity under Different Tillage Practices and Wheat Genotypes: A Short-Term Study in Iran
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Driving Risk of Near-Crash Events Using a Mixed-Ordered Logit Model
Article

Modelling Perceived Risks Associated to the Entry of Complementors’ in Platform Enterprises: A Case Study

1
Research Group Knowledge Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Vienna, Währinger Str. 29, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Business Engineering and Management, University Politehnica Bucharest, Splaiul Inpendentei 313, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(9), 3272; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10093272
Received: 13 August 2018 / Revised: 4 September 2018 / Accepted: 10 September 2018 / Published: 13 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Collection Risk Assessment and Management)
Third-party innovators, i.e., complementors, in platform enterprises develop and commercialize add-on products which are one of the main attraction points for customers. To ensure a sustainable evolution of the enterprise, the platform owner needs to attract and retain high-quality third-party innovators. We posit that the transaction costs incurred upon joining the enterprise as well as the controls imposed by the platform owner throughout the development and commercialization process shape the innovator’s perceived risk and influence his decision on whether to join or not. Based on a literature review, the paper at hand proposes a conceptual model for complementors to assess their perceived risk and subsequently evaluates the model in a case study of a platform enterprise for IT-based modelling tools. While some of the propositions are validated, i.e., that informational controls decrease the perceived environmental uncertainty and implicitly the perceived risks, other propositions, such as the fact that asset specificity is a deterrent to entering the platform enterprise could not be validated. Further case studies are necessary to provide a conclusive proof of the proposed model. View Full-Text
Keywords: platform enterprise sustainability; third-party innovators; platform controls; transaction cost theory; risk assessment platform enterprise sustainability; third-party innovators; platform controls; transaction cost theory; risk assessment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Miron, E.-T.; Purcarea, A.A.; Negoita, O.D. Modelling Perceived Risks Associated to the Entry of Complementors’ in Platform Enterprises: A Case Study. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3272. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10093272

AMA Style

Miron E-T, Purcarea AA, Negoita OD. Modelling Perceived Risks Associated to the Entry of Complementors’ in Platform Enterprises: A Case Study. Sustainability. 2018; 10(9):3272. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10093272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miron, Elena-Teodora, Anca A. Purcarea, and Olivia D. Negoita. 2018. "Modelling Perceived Risks Associated to the Entry of Complementors’ in Platform Enterprises: A Case Study" Sustainability 10, no. 9: 3272. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10093272

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop