Next Article in Journal
Worldwide Statistical Correlation of Eight Years of Swarm Satellite Data with M5.5+ Earthquakes: New Hints about the Preseismic Phenomena from Space
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Space–Time Joint Sparse Processing Method with Airborne Active Array for Severely Inhomogeneous Clutter Suppression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combinational Fusion and Global Attention of the Single-Shot Method for Synthetic Aperture Radar Ship Detection
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Deep Learning Models for Passive Sonar Signal Classification of Military Data

by Júlio de Castro Vargas Fernandes *, Natanael Nunes de Moura Junior and José Manoel de Seixas
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Submission received: 12 May 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 25 May 2022 / Published: 1 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Learning for Radar and Sonar Image Processing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a resubmitted manuscript.  The authors have addressed all of my previous comments. A new problem in the revised paper is that the quality of some images is very low, which has to be improved.

Author Response

Thanks for the review and the comments. Concerning the quality of the images in the revised version we observed such a problem when we downloaded the manuscript.pdf, which is available through the Susy platform. The images in the compiled pdf were indeed blurry. However, none of the images were of low quality when we submitted them. Additionally, when we downloaded the entire project (also uploaded), the quality of the images was fine. Maybe some compression happened specifically in the pdf. Nonetheless, we believe that this will not be a problem in the final version.

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has addressed my previous comments reasonably well.  

Author Response

The authors would like to thank the reviewer for their comments. A thorough review of the manuscript was done and a spell check was applied.

Reviewer 3 Report

The edited version of the paper appears good and I think the manuscript is ready for publication.

Author Response

The authors would like to thank the reviewer for their comments. A thorough review of the manuscript was done and a spell check was applied.

Back to TopTop