Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Citrus HLB Symptom Variations Associated with “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” Strains Harboring Different Phages in Southern China
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Glucosinolates on the Growth and Development of Helicoverpa armigera Larvae and the Expression of Midgut Sulfatase Genes
Previous Article in Journal
Bioinformatic-Based Approaches for Disease-Resistance Gene Discovery in Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ovicidal and Physiological Effects of Essential Oils Extracted from Six Medicinal Plants on the Elm Leaf Beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Mull.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Sublethal Concentrations of the Novel Pyropene Insecticide, Afidopyropen, in Whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED (Q Biotype)

1
Hubei Engineering Technology Center for Pest Forewarning and Management, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
2
Institute of Plant and Environment Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
3
College of Agriculture and Forestry Technology, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, China
4
Key Laboratory of Pesticide Harmless Application of Hunan Higher Education, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi 417000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 October 2021 / Revised: 30 October 2021 / Accepted: 3 November 2021 / Published: 9 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pesticide Discovery and Application)

Abstract

:
Bemisia tabaci is a devastating agricultural insect pest worldwide, and B. tabaci MED (formerly biotype ‘Q’) threatens the production of horticultural and economic crops in China as a growing number of cases of insecticide resistance have issued, highlighting the requirement for alternative methods and measures of pest management. In the present work, the toxicities of eight popular chemical agents, including the novel pyropene insecticide afidopyropen, on adults of B. tabaci MED were determined, and then physiological and biochemical responses to sublethal concentrations were confirmed. Among all tested chemical agents, afidopyropen exhibited the highest toxicity to adult whiteflies (LC50: 7.38 mg/L). The sublethal effects of afidopyropen were studied at two sublethal concentrations, LC10 (0.53 mg/L) and LC25 (1.84 mg/L), and LC25 treatment extended the duration of growth stages and reduced viabilities in the stages of nymphal, pseudopupae, and adults. The egg-laying days and eggs laid per female were also decreased significantly, as was hatchability in the LC25 treatment. Metabolic enzyme assays suggested that the sublethal effects of LC25 treatment could be ascribable to enhanced detoxification mediated by glutathione S-transferase. In summary, our findings indicate that afidopyropen can be used as a chemical agent for the management of B. tabaci MED whiteflies.

1. Introduction

The tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), is a notorious insect pest, which is harmful to horticultural and economic crops and highly invasive across the world, and it has been found to infest over 700 species of plants, primarily feeding in the phloem [1,2]. The whiteflies not only damage their hosts directly but transmit hundreds of plant viruses during sucking as well [3]. B. tabaci is considered a cryptic species complex, which includes the MED cryptic species (also named as biotype Q) and the MEAM1 cryptic species (also named as biotype B) historically. The MEAM1 and MED invaded China successively about 20 years ago and brought about a huge economic loss in agricultural production in China [4,5]. Recently, B. tabaci MED has been the dominant cryptic species and has become one of the most important agricultural insect pests in China [6,7]. More importantly, while B. tabaci MED has been controlled in China through the application of insecticides such as neonicotinoids, anthranilic diamides, and butenolide insecticides for several years, a significant drop in the susceptibility to these popular chemical agents in whiteflies has been detected in different parts of China, owing to the development of resistance [7,8,9,10]. Consequently, it is highly possible that extensive applications of such common chemical agents could not be an appropriate or effective step for controlling whiteflies without high insecticide residues in China.
Afidopyropen, a novel pyropene insecticide, targets the transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) of insects and acts potently against sucking insects by negatively affecting feeding, which result in starvation, desiccation, and mortality, thereby reducing virus transmission [11,12]. It has been reported that afidopyropen can be used as an effective measure for controlling notorious sucking and piercing insect pests, such as Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Monelliopsis pecanis Bissell (Hemiptera: Aphididae), B. tabaci, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae), and Stephanitis pyrioides Scott (Hemiptera: Tingidae) [13,14,15,16,17]. the relative lack of toxicity of afidopyropen to natural enemies means, that along with other selective chemical agents, afidopyropen can be beneficial to integrated biological and chemical pest management; for example, afidopyropen was not toxic to Hippodamia convergens Guerin-Meneville (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Orius insidiosus Say (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), which are important natural enemies of A. glycines [18,19]. Additionally, afidopyropen provides an alternative chemical control option from a novel insecticide group, beyond the three that are currently heavily relied upon and alternated, that could be employed to aid in insecticide resistance avoidance and management programs, and considering that afidopyropen displays a new mechanism of killing insect pests, the application of afidopyropen is one hopeful supplement to common insecticides.
Along with the lethal concentration for killing sucking pests directly, biological and physiological responses to sublethal concentrations of afidopyropen have been demonstrated in D. citri and Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) [16,20]. Specifically, sublethal concentrations could cause various physiological and behavioral alterations and exert negative impacts on a series of fitness components of arthropods, such as prolonging the growth time and reducing the fecundity of their F1 offspring. It has been shown that several popular commercialized chemical agents such as clothianidin, cyantraniliprole, cycloxaprid, and dinotefuran could induce effects of sublethal concentrations on B. tabaci [21,22,23,24]. Hence, to better realize the potential use of afidopyropen as one promising insecticide against field populations of whiteflies, it is essential to confirm the effects of sublethal concentrations of afidopyropen on B. tabaci.
Currently, it has been shown that afidopyropen displays excellent toxic properties for killing a variety of sucking insect pests, and this compound shows little toxic potential to the environment and to humans [18]. However, sublethal effects of afidopyropen on whiteflies have not yet been demonstrated. In the current work, the toxicity of afidopyropen on adults of B. tabaci MED was determined in comparison with the toxicities of seven other commonly used insecticides. Beyond investigating the effects of afidopyropen on the mortality of the adults, the sublethal effects on the target insect’s biology and biochemistry must be considered for a comprehensive assessment [25]. As such, the sublethal effects of afidopyropen on different growth stages, oviposition time, fertility of females, and egg hatch rates were evaluated, respectively. Then, to determine the biochemical responses to sublethal concentrations of afidopyropen, the activities of three main detoxifying enzymes, cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and esterases (EST), were measured.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

The population of Bemisia tabaci MED was obtained from Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China [6], with collection beginning in 2015. Until now, the population has not been exposed to insecticides over ten years and has been reared on the plants of cotton Gossypium hirsutum with the photoperiod as 16:8 h light/dark at the temperature of 27 ± 1 °C and the relative humidity of 60 ± 10%. In the method of insecticide bioassay, adults of B. tabaci MED which emerged within seven days were sampled at random, and sex ratio was considered at about 1:1 of females and males.

2.2. Insecticides and Chemicals

All insecticides used were analytically standardized. Afidopyropen (Dr. Ehrenstorfer, CAS# 915972-17-7, catalog# DRE-C10047000) and sulfoxaflor (Dr. Ehrenstorfer, CAS# 946578-00-3, catalog# DRE-C17015000) were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer, Germany. Acetamiprid (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 160430-64-8, catalog# 33674-100MG-R), flonicamid (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 158062-67-0, catalog# 32509-25MG), flupyradifurone (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 951659-40-8, catalog# 37050-100MG), pymetrozine (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 123312-89-0, catalog# 46119-250MG-R), imidacloprid (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 138261-41-3, catalog# 37894-100MG), thiamethoxam (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 153719-23-4, catalog# 37924-100MG-R), dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 67-68-5, catalog# D8418-500ML) and Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, CAS# 9002-93-1, catalog# 93443-100ML) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Shanghai, China.

2.3. Toxicities of the Eight Insecticides to B. tabaci

The toxicities of afidopyropen, acetamiprid, flonicamid, flupyradifurone, imidacloprid, pymetrozine, sulfoxaflor, and thiamethoxam on whitefly adults were measured using the method of bioassay as described [10]. In brief, stock solutions of the eight tested chemical agents were made in dimethyl sulfoxide. After this, working solutions of differing concentrations were made by diluting the stock solution in distilled water with 0.1% Triton X-100, and six working concentrations were diluted for the bioassay of each chemical agent. Twenty-millimeter diameter discs of cotton leaf were cut and dipped, with the adaxial surface facing downwards, in each replica of every working concentration for twenty seconds. The discs of cotton leaves were air-dried, then placed into 2 mL agar (15 g/L) in one 76 mm long glass tube, and four replicates were used for every working concentration of tested insecticide. In each tube, 20–40 whitefly adults were introduced, then placed in the rearing chamber with the photoperiod as 16:8 h light/dark at the temperature of 27 ± 1 °C and the relative humidity of 60 ± 10%. The mortality of each bioassay was checked after 48 h, and motionless adults were regarded as dead.

2.4. Sublethal Effects of Afidopyropen on B. tabaci

On the basis of the above six-concentration bioassay of afidopyropen on the whitefly adults, values of LC25 and LC10 were obtained and set as the two sublethal concentrations for the study of sublethal effects of afidopyropen. A series of fitness components were checked, including the growth time and survivability of every developmental stage of F1 offspring, days of egg laying, fecundity, and hatch rate of eggs. In brief, three insect-rearing cages were prepared and five plants of whitefly-free cotton were put into each cage. Among the three cages, two of them were set as treatment cages (LC25 cage and LC10 cage) and the rest were pointed as the control cages. One hundred adults of B. tabaci, previously maintained on leaf discs treated with afidopyropen (LC10 or LC25), according to the referenced protocol [22], were introduced into each experimental cage, and egg laying was measured. An equal number of B. tabaci adults without treatment were put into the control cage. After a 12 h egg-laying period, the cotton plants were moved out of the cages, respectively, and ten leaves were sampled at random in each plant. Using a microscope, twenty eggs were left on each sampled leaf and contained in one 2.5 cm-diameter leaf clip-cage, and two clip cages were set in each plant. On the leaves, positions of eggs were marked with pen, which helped us to check the development of the eggs until emergence of adults. Leaves/eggs were kept in an isolated climatic chamber at 27 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 10% relative humidity, and a 16:8 h light/dark photoperiod (L: D). To determine the fecundity of treated insects, newly emerged whitefly adults were move onto new leaves, and kept in clip cages until they were all dead, after which hatchability was checked.

2.5. Metabolic Enzyme Assays

Activities of esterases, glutathione S-transferases and P450 monooxygenases were measured based on our previously published method [26]. According to the method, to measure P450 monooxygenases activity, one hundred randomly selected whitefly adults with mixed sex were used for each sample, and the enzyme activity was confirmed with the use of 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase (ECOD) as the substrate. In the test of esterase, twenty whitefly adults were collected at random and used as each replicate for the test, and the activity was determined with the use of α-naphthyl acetate (α-NA) as the substrate. In the test of glutathione S-transferases, fifty whitefly adults of mixed sex were used for each sample and the activity was confirmed with the use of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as the substrate. In all tests of the three enzymes, three replicates were set up in LC25, LC10, and the control group, respectively.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of insecticide bioassays was performed to confirm statistically significant differences in death rate by PoloPlus [27]. To analyze the significance of statistics in the survival rates and growth time of whiteflies among LC25, LC10, and the control group, along with fecundity, egg-laying days per female, and hatch rate of eggs, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honest significance difference (HSD) test for multiple comparisons were conducted. Activities of the three tested metabolic enzymes were compared among LC25, LC10, and the control group by the use of a one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test. All analyses of statistics were carried out using SPSS software [28].

3. Results

3.1. Toxicities of Eight Common Chemical Agents

The values of LC50 of all the tested chemical agents administered to whitefly adults by feeding are indicated in Table 1, and the death rate of the control in each bioassay was no more than 5%. Among the eight tested chemical agents, the most toxic to adults of B. tabaci MED was afidopyropen (LC50 = 7.38 mg/L), followed by acetamiprid (LC50 = 9.85 mg/L), sulfoxaflor (LC50 = 11.73 mg/L), flonicamid (LC50 = 13.28 mg/L), flupyradifurone (LC50 = 18.74 mg/L), thiamethoxam (LC50 = 19.29 mg/L), imidacloprid (LC50 = 26.37 mg/L), and pymetrozine (LC50 = 116.37 mg/L), which were 1.33, 1.59, 1.80, 2.54, 2.61, 3.57, and 15.77 times less toxic than afidopyropen, respectively.

3.2. Sublethal Effects of Afidopyropen on B. tabaci Biology

Considering that most chemical agents could degrade rapidly or gradually after the first-time field applications [26], turning lethal concentrations into sublethal concentrations, we evaluated the sublethal effects of LC25 and LC10 of afidopyropen. The bioassays of afidopyropen toxicity in whitefly adults determined the LC25 to be 1.84 mg/L and the LC10 to be 0.53 mg/L. Figure 1 shows that the LC25 treatment of afidopyropen delayed the time of each growth period in comparison with the control group; the LC10 concentration of afidopyropen only prolonged the pseudopupae and adult stages. Figure 2 shows that the survival rates of the second and third instar nymphs, pseudopupae, and adults of B. tabaci were significantly reduced with LC25 treatment in comparison with the unexposed whitefly adults and the LC10 treatment ones. Furthermore, exposure to the LC25 treatment significantly reduced reproductive parameters such as fecundity (119.40 ± 9.92 eggs/female) (Figure 3A) and oviposition duration (9.64 ± 1.04 days) (Figure 3B) as compared with the control (146.87 ± 8.12 eggs/female and 12.79 ± 1.11 days, respectively). In addition, the egg hatch rate of the LC25-treated group (82.45 ± 2.26%) (Figure 3C) was significantly lower than the control (91.44 ± 1.96%) and LC10 treated groups (90.19 ± 2.17%), respectively.

3.3. Activities of Metabolic Enzymes

According to Table 2, compared to the CK group of Bemisia tabaci MED adults, GST activities assayed with CDNB were markedly higher in the LC25 group (elevated 1.31-fold) (p < 0.001), whereas a significant difference was not observed for the LC10 group (elevated 1.05-fold). Additionally, the activities of P450 and esterases were also measured in the LC25 and LC10 and CK groups, but no significant differences were observed among the LC25, LC10, and CK groups of B. tabaci MED.

4. Discussion

It has been reported that afidopyropen is a promising alternative compound that could be effectively used in crop protection against insect pests [11,12]. Understanding the effects of any pesticide is important for the implementation of appropriate resistance management strategies, to reduce pesticide treatment thresholds of pest insects, and to prevent the reduced efficacy of the control method. In the current study, we found that the toxicity of afidopyropen was the highest among the eight commonly used insecticides tested against B. tabaci MED, while imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, flupyradifuron, flonicamid, sulfoxaflor, and acetamiprid exhibited moderate to relatively high efficacy, and pymetrozine displayed low toxicity. Considering this, in China, increasing instances of insecticide resistance to several widely used insecticides such as flupyradifurone, cyantraniliprole and spirotetramat, have recently been reported in whiteflies [10,29,30]; identifying new chemical agents with different mechanisms of action is important for avoiding selection for the identical mechanism(s) of resistance. The newly introduced insecticide afidopyropen displayed a high toxicity against B. tabaci and no cross-resistance was detected, indicating that afidopyropen could be utilized as an effective chemical agent in controlling B. tabaci in China, or that afidopyropen could be considered as an effective alternative insecticide to be used in insect resistance abatement programs for B. tabaci in China [14].
In addition to the direct, lethal toxic effects of chemical agents against insect pests, sublethal concentrations of various insecticides also exerted an impact on the most important components required for insect survival and growth, including the reduction in the oviposition period, fecundity, and hatchability of eggs, as demonstrated [25]. In the present work, the LC25 concentration of afidopyropen markedly delayed the growth time of the egg and nymphal stages, and also negatively affected fecundity and hatchability, in comparison with the LC10 and control groups. Similarly, in the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii, sublethal concentrations (LC10) of afidopyropen significantly decreased the longevity, fecundity, and oviposition days of female adults and, moreover, the total per-adult survival of the F1 generation was also significantly reduced by 30% with the LC10 treatment of afidopyropen [20]. In whiteflies, it has been reported that sublethal concentrations of various types of insecticides such as clothianidin, cyantraniliprole, cycloxaprid, and dinotefuran significantly reduced the life spans of adults and decreased the rates of pupation and survival, respectively with the treatment of LC10 or LC25 [21,22,23,24]. On the contrary, sublethal effects of chemical agents sometimes could be beneficial for insects, with most cases showing that sublethal concentrations could produce a higher fecundity of females and increased insect population growth in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), respectively [31,32], although no similar cases for afidopyropen have been reported so far. Considering that sublethal effects of insecticides interact with a series of life-history traits involved in the development of reproduction of insect pests such as developmental rate, survival rate, foraging and fecundity, it is highly possible that the sublethal effects exert an impact on population reproduction of insects [25]. On this basis, specific strategies of pest management could be formulated for each target insect pest according to its traits. The sublethal effects of chemical agents on life span and fecundity of the insects resulted from biochemical responses, and it has been reported that the activities of various detoxifying enzymes could contribute to the underlying biochemistry of the observed sublethal effects [33,34]. Among them, decreased and increased activities of glutathione S-transferase (GST) are possible in chemically stressed animals, relying on the type of chemical, timing, and dosage exposure [35]. In the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae), the upregulation of two GST genes was detected after treatment with sublethal doses of flumethrin and chlorpyrifos, respectively, and it has been demonstrated that GST genes can be essential for the metabolism of flumethrin in the larvae stage and in male adult ticks [36]. In the present work, we found that the increased activity of glutathione S-transferase may be contributing to the biochemical effects of the LC25 afidopyropen treatment in B. tabaci. The two other types of detoxification enzymes examined, cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and esterases, were not found to be significantly involved. Similarly, in Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), GST genes induced by sublethal doses of chlorpyrifos were highly expressed, indicating that GSTs were involved directly or indirectly in the response to chlorpyrifos treatment [37]. Hence, GSTs possibly have a pivotal role in the biochemical response of arthropods to sublethal concentrations of insecticides. In general, in response to exposure to chemical agents, insects have developed various mechanisms of adaptation, including biological and physiological changes causing avoidance, changed penetration, metabolic detoxification, and mutation of target sites [38], and we will work further on the mechanisms of afidopyropen-induced effects in B. tabaci.

5. Conclusions

Our results suggest that the novel pyropene insecticide afidopyropen could be a good candidate for controlling Bemisia tabaci MED in the field as it exhibits the highest toxicity against B. tabaci amongst eight other commonly used insecticides. Our results also indicate that the LC25 treatment of afidopyropen could induce significant sublethal effects such as a prolonged growth time and reduced rates of survival in various life stages, egg-laying days, female fecundity, and the egg-hatching rate. The metabolic enzyme assays suggested that the sublethal effects of LC25 could be ascribable to increased detoxification mediated by GST. Altogether, afidopyropen exhibited a great insecticidal potency against B. tabaci and showed significant negative effects on development and reproduction, which possibly affect the population growth of B. tabaci, indicating that it could be regarded as an efficacious chemical agent in the insecticide resistance management of B. tabaci.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z., C.L. and R.W.; methodology, X.Z., Z.Z., H.Z. and R.W.; software, H.Z. and R.W.; validation, Q.Z., J.G. and R.W.; formal analysis, H.Z. and Q.Z.; investigation, X.Z., Z.Z.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, X.Z. and R.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z.; writing—review and editing, R.W.; visualization, R.W.; supervision, C.L. and R.W.; project administration, R.W.; funding acquisition, R.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972266), the Scientific and Technological Innovation Capacity Construction Special Funds of the Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, China (KJCX20210437).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Most of the recorded data are available in all tables in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge excellent technical assistance from Xu Baoyun, and Wang Ran gives special thanks to her for giving him the first lesson on B. tabaci fifteen years ago.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.W.; Li, P.; Liu, S.S. Whitefly interactions with plants. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2017, 19, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Horowitz, A.R.; Ghanim, M.; Roditakis, E.; Nauen, R.; Ishaaya, I. Insecticide resistance and its management in Bemisia tabaci species. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 893–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, J.; He, Y.Z.; Guo, Q.; Guo, T.; Liu, Y.Q.; Zhou, X.P.; Liu, S.S.; Wang, X.W. Vector development and vitellogenin determine the transovarial transmission of begomoviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017, 114, 6746–6751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Luo, C.; Yao, Y.; Wang, R.J.; Yan, F.M.; Hu, D.X.; Zhang, Z.L. The use of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase mt COI gene sequences for the identification of biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in China. Acta. Entomol. Sin. 2002, 45, 759–763. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chu, D.; Zhang, Y.J.; Brown, J.K.; Cong, B.; Xu, B.Y.; Wu, Q.J.; Zhu, G.R. The introduction of the exotic Q biotype of Bemisia tabaci from the Mediterranean region into China on ornamental crops. Fla. Entomol. 2006, 89, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, H.P.; Chu, D.; Ge, D.Q.; Wang, S.L.; Wu, Q.J.; Xie, W.; Jiao, X.G.; Liu, B.M.; Yang, X.; Yang, N.N.; et al. Further spread of and domination by Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype Q on field crops in China. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 978–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zheng, H.X.; Xie, W.; Wang, S.L.; Wu, Q.J.; Zhou, X.M.; Zhang, Y.J. Dynamic monitoring (B versus Q) and further resistance status of Q type Bemisia tabaci in China. Crop Prot. 2017, 94, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, S.L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Yang, X.; Xie, W.; Wu, Q.J. Resistance monitoring for eight insecticides on the sweet potato whitefly Bemisia tabaci in China. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, R.; Fang, Y.; Mu, C.Q.; Qu, C.; Li, F.Q.; Wang, Z.Y.; Luo, C. Baseline susceptibility and cross-resistance of cycloxaprid, a novel cis-nitromethylene neonicotinoid insecticide, in Bemisia tabaci MED from China. Crop Prot. 2018, 110, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.; Wang, J.D.; Che, W.N.; Sun, Y.; Li, W.X.; Luo, C. Characterization of field-evolved resistance to cyantraniliprole in Bemisia tabaci MED from China. J. Integr. Agr. 2019, 18, 2571–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kandasamy, R.; London, D.; Stam, L.; Von Deyn, W.; Zhao, X.; Salgado, V.L.; Nesterov, A. Afidopyropen: New and potent modulator of insect transient receptor potential channels. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 84, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jeschke, P. Status and outlook for acaricide and insecticide discovery. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Queiroz, O.D.S.; Nyoike, T.W.; Koch, R.L. Baseline susceptibility to afidopyropen of soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) from the north central United States. Crop Prot. 2020, 129, 105020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Z.; Shi, H.J.; Xu, W.; Liu, J.T.; Geng, Z.Q.; Chu, D.; Guo, L. Pymetrozine-resistant whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) populations in China remain susceptible to afidopyropen. Crop Prot. 2021, 149, 105757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Slusher, E.K.; Cottrell, T.; Acebes-Doria, A.L. Effects of aphicides on pecan aphids and their parasitoids in pecan orchards. Insects 2021, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, X.D.; Ashfaq, M.; Stelinski, L.L. Susceptibility of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae), to the insecticide afidopyropen: A new and potent modulator of insect transient receptor potential channels. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2018, 53, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Joseph, S.V. Repellent effects of insecticides on Stephanitis pyrioides Scott (Hemiptera: Tingidae) under laboratory conditions. Crop Prot. 2020, 127, 104985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koch, R.L.; Queiroz, O.D.S.; Aita, R.C.; Hodgson, E.W.; Potter, B.D.; Nyoike, T.; Ellers-Kirk, C.D. Efficacy of afidopyropen against soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and toxicity to natural enemies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, V.; McKenzie, C.L.; Osborne, L.S. Effect of foliar application of afidopyropen on Bemisia tabaci and Amblyseius swirskii. Arthropod Manage. Tests 2018, 43, tsy071. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma, K.S.; Tang, Q.L.; Liang, P.Z.; Li, J.H.; Gao, X.W. Sublethal concentration of afidopyropen suppressed the population growth of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Integr. Agr. 2021. Online. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fang, Y.; Wang, J.D.; Luo, C.; Wang, R. Lethal and sublethal effects of clothianidin on the development and reproduction of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) MED and MEAM1. J. Insect Sci. 2018, 18, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, R.; Zhang, W.; Che, W.N.; Qu, C.; Li, F.Q.; Desneux, N.; Luo, C. Lethal and sublethal effects of cyantraniliprole, a new anthranilic diamide insecticide, on Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) MED. Crop Prot. 2017, 91, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, R.; Zheng, H.X.; Qu, C.; Wang, Z.H.; Kong, Z.Q.; Luo, C. Lethal and sublethal effects of a novel cis-nitromethylene neonicotinoid insecticide, cycloxaprid, on Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 2016, 83, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qu, C.; Zhang, W.; Li, F.Q.; Tetreau, G.; Luo, C.; Wang, R. Lethal and sublethal effects of dinotefuran on two invasive whiteflies, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J.M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, R.; Wang, J.D.; Zhang, J.S.; Che, W.N.; Luo, C. Characterization of flupyradifurone resistance in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (Q biotype). Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 4286–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. LeOra Software. Polo Plus, A User’s Guide to Probit or Logit Analysis; LeOra Software: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. SPSS. Release 13.0 Version for Windows; SPSS: Chicago, IL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Peng, Z.K.; Zheng, H.X.; Xie, W.; Wang, S.L.; Wu, Q.J.; Zhang, Y.J. Field resistance monitoring of the immature stages of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci to spirotetramat in China. Crop Prot. 2017, 98, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, R.; Wang, J.D.; Che, W.N.; Fang, Y.; Luo, C. Baseline susceptibility and biochemical mechanism of resistance to flupyradifurone in Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 2020, 132, 105132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, R.M.; Jang, E.B.; He, S.Y.; Chen, J.H. Lethal and sublethal effects of cyantraniliprole on Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xiao, D.; Zhao, J.; Guo, X.J.; Li, S.; Wang, S. Sublethal effect of beta-cypermethrin on development and fertility of the Asian multicoloured ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sani, M.F.H.; Naseri, B.; Rafiee-Dastjerdi, H.; Aghajanzadeh, S.; Ghadamyari, M. Effects of three conventional insecticides on life table parameters and detoxifying enzymes activity of Pulvinaria aurantii Cockerell (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Toxin Rev. 2019. Online. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, W.Q.; Lu, Z.B.; Li, L.L.; Yu, Y.; Dong, S.; Men, X.Y.; Ye, B.H. Sublethal effects of imidacloprid on the performance of the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0204097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, Y.H.; Zheng, X.S.; Gao, X.W. Sublethal effects of imidacloprid on the fecundity, longevity, and enzyme activity of Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) and Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus). B. Entomol. Res. 2016, 106, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hernandez, E.P.; Kusakisako, K.; Talactac, M.R.; Galay, R.L.; Hatta, T.; Fujisaki, K.; Tsuji, N.; Tanaka, T. Glutathione S-transferases play a role in the detoxification of flumethrin and chlorpyrifos in Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, N.; Liu, J.; Chen, S.N.; Huang, L.H.; Feng, Q.L.; Zheng, S.C. Expression profiles of glutathione S-transferase superfamily in Spodoptera litura tolerated to sublethal doses of chlorpyrifos. Insect Sci. 2016, 23, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lu, K.; Song, Y.Y.; Zeng, R.S. The role of cytochrome P450-mediated detoxification in insect adaptation to xenobiotics. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2021, 43, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sublethal effects of afidopyropen (LC10 and LC25) on development time in specific life stages of B. tabaci MED. CK denotes the control group, and diverse letters display significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Sublethal effects of afidopyropen (LC10 and LC25) on development time in specific life stages of B. tabaci MED. CK denotes the control group, and diverse letters display significant differences (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02260 g001
Figure 2. Sublethal effects of afidopyropen (LC10 and LC25) on survival of specific life stages of B. tabaci MED. CK denotes the control group.
Figure 2. Sublethal effects of afidopyropen (LC10 and LC25) on survival of specific life stages of B. tabaci MED. CK denotes the control group.
Agronomy 11 02260 g002
Figure 3. Sublethal effects of afidopyropen (LC25 and LC10 treatments) on fertility components of B. tabaci MED. (A) Number of eggs laid by each female. (B) Egg-laying days of each female. (C) Hatchability of eggs. CK denotes the control group and diverse letters display significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Sublethal effects of afidopyropen (LC25 and LC10 treatments) on fertility components of B. tabaci MED. (A) Number of eggs laid by each female. (B) Egg-laying days of each female. (C) Hatchability of eggs. CK denotes the control group and diverse letters display significant differences (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02260 g003
Table 1. Toxicities of eight commonly used insecticides in B. tabaci MED.
Table 1. Toxicities of eight commonly used insecticides in B. tabaci MED.
InsecticidesNumberSlope ± SELC50
(95% Fiducial Limits) (mg/L)
X2 (df)p Values
Afidopyropen7221.12 ± 0.107.38 (6.02–9.25)2.96 (4)0.59
Acetamiprid7681.43 ± 0.159.85 (7.67–12.15)2.44 (4)0.73
Flonicamid7401.19 ± 0.0613.28 (1.72–2.42)2.05 (4)0.76
Flupyradifurone7551.27 ± 0.0818.74 (15.89–21.98)3.29 (4)0.55
Imidacloprid7611.57 ± 0.1126.37 (21.15–32.85)1.13 (4)0.88
Pymetrozine7361.17 ± 0.07116.37 (88.43–161.56)0.97 (4)0.91
Sulfoxaflor7491.25 ± 0.0911.73 (9.88–14.65)3.68 (4)0.47
Thiamethoxam7671.09 ± 0.0619.29 (16.39–24.42)3.29 (4)0.49
Table 2. Activities of three metabolic enzyme in treatments of LC10 and LC25, and the CK a.
Table 2. Activities of three metabolic enzyme in treatments of LC10 and LC25, and the CK a.
StrainP450 Monooxygenase Activity Esterase Activity Glutathione S-Transferase Activity
pmol min−1 mg−1 Protein ± SERatio bnmol min−1 mg−1 Protein ± SERatio bnmol min−1 mg−1 Protein ± SERatio b
CK8.94 ± 1.36 a 26.45 ± 4.05 a 786.33 ± 45.52 a
LC1010.15 ± 1.94 a1.1427.92 ± 3.88 a1.06822.93 ± 58.13 a1.05
LC2510.67 ± 2.33 a1.1925.84 ± 5.19 a0.981026.74 ± 51.88 b1.31
a Diverse letters display significant differences (p < 0.05) among the mean values of enzyme activities in each column. b Ratio = activity of LC10 or LC25 / activity of CK.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Gong, J.; Li, C.; Wang, R. Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Sublethal Concentrations of the Novel Pyropene Insecticide, Afidopyropen, in Whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED (Q Biotype). Agronomy 2021, 11, 2260. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy11112260

AMA Style

Zhou X, Zhang Z, Zheng H, Zhang Q, Gong J, Li C, Wang R. Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Sublethal Concentrations of the Novel Pyropene Insecticide, Afidopyropen, in Whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED (Q Biotype). Agronomy. 2021; 11(11):2260. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy11112260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Xuan, Ziyi Zhang, Huixin Zheng, Qinghe Zhang, Jingyu Gong, Chuanren Li, and Ran Wang. 2021. "Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Sublethal Concentrations of the Novel Pyropene Insecticide, Afidopyropen, in Whitefly Bemisia tabaci MED (Q Biotype)" Agronomy 11, no. 11: 2260. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy11112260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop