Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Reasoning Rules for Home Energy Management (IRRHEM): Algeria Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Clinical Observation of Choroidal Osteoma Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Previous Article in Journal
A Special Issue on Modeling, Dimensioning, and Optimization of 5G Communication Networks, Resources, and Services
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography for Longitudinal Monitoring of Postnatal Retinal Development in Developing Mouse Eyes

by Guangying Ma 1, Jie Ding 1, Tae-Hoon Kim 1 and Xincheng Yao 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 6 January 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2022 / Accepted: 5 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in Ophthalmology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I just have a minor comment:

How a mice model results can be extended to human data? 

The data presented herein are in vivo, I was wondering have authors performed any study on human? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

It is not mentioned in the title that this study was conducted on animals (mice), this fact should be mentioned, without this it s misleading.

What was the basis for choosing P14, P17, P21, P28, P56? Why these particular postnatal days and these periods of time are important? In the abstract postnatal days should also be mentioned. First 56 postnatal days in mice have been analysed.

Could you be more specific in regard to C57BL/6 mice? In what experiments are they usually used?

In the abstract it has been written as follows: „A better study of the postnatal retinal development is not only essential for the in-depth understanding of the nature of the vision system but also may provide insights  for treatment developments of eye conditions, such as retinopathy of premature (ROP).” This sentence should not be used at the beginning of the abstract, it is rather conclusion than the introduction. In the manuscript  I have not found any mention about retinopathy of prematurity.

 The phrase „retinopathy of prematurity” should be used instead of „retinopathy of premature”.

In regard to the discussion, are there any studies on the brain development in mice in the first postnatal days? Retina is a part of central nervous system, thus the discussion may be extended.

Only studies in mice are discussed in the discussion chapter, are there any studien in humans in regard to  OCT of the retina in the first postnatal days?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

All comments have been adressed properly.

Author Response

Thank you!

Back to TopTop