Next Article in Journal
Investigating Pure Bundling in Japan’s Electricity Procurement Auctions
Next Article in Special Issue
A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Analytic Functions Defined by the q-Difference Operator Related to the Janowski Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Behavior of Cryptocurrencies in Turbulent Times Using Association Rules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Qualitative Analyses of Differential Systems with Time-Varying Delays via Lyapunov–Krasovskiĭ Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Families of Apéry-Like Fibonacci and Lucas Series

by
Robert Frontczak
1,
Hari Mohan Srivastava
2,3,4,5 and
Živorad Tomovski
6,*
1
Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (LBBW), D-70173 Stuttgart, Germany
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4, Canada
3
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
4
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Azerbaijan University, 71 Jeyhun Hajibeyli Street, AZ1007 Baku, Azerbaijan
5
Section of Mathematics, International Telematic University Uninettuno, I-00186 Rome, Italy
6
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 5 July 2021 / Accepted: 7 July 2021 / Published: 9 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Analysis and Analytic Number Theory 2020)

Abstract

:
In this paper, the authors investigate two special families of series involving the reciprocal central binomial coefficients and Lucas numbers. Connections with several familiar sums representing the integer-valued Riemann zeta function are also pointed out.

1. Introduction and Motivation

One of the important and widely and extensively investigated functions in Analytic Number Theory is the Riemann Zeta function ζ ( s ) , which is defined for ( s ) > 1 by
ζ s : = k = 1 1 k s = 1 1 2 s k = 1 1 ( 2 k 1 ) s ( s ) > 1 1 1 2 1 s k = 1 ( 1 ) k 1 k s ( s ) > 0 ; s 1
and for ( s ) 1 ; s 1 by its meromorphic continuation (see, for details, [1]).
Elegant single-series representations are known for such zeta values as ζ ( 2 ) , ζ ( 3 ) and ζ ( 4 ) , but no such single-series expressions are known for ζ ( n ) when n 5 . In particular, the following series for ζ ( 3 ) :
ζ ( 3 ) = 5 2 k = 1 ( 1 ) k 1 k 3 2 k k
played a key role in the celebrated proof of the irrationality of ζ ( 3 ) by Apéry [2]. In fact, as pointed out by Chen and Srivastava [3] [pp. 180–181] (see also [4] [p. 333]), the representation (2) was derived independently by (among others) Hjortnaes [5], Gosper [6], and Apéry [2]. With a view to honoring and felicitating Roger Apéry (1916–1994), ζ ( 3 ) is popularly known as the Apéry constant and sums of the type in (2) is referred to as Apéry-like series.
The computation of infinite series containing reciprocal central binomial coefficients is a challenging issue and it is currently an active field in number theory and experimental mathematics. The interest in these series comes from the existence of connections to certain generating functions of the zeta function, special zeta values and other important constants such as the golden ratio. On the other hand, central binomial coefficients are directly linked to the famous Catalan numbers, which are interesting on their own (see [7] for an introduction). In addition to (2), some examples of series with reciprocal central binomial coefficient are recalled here (see [8,9,10]):
k = 1 1 k 2 k k = π 3 3 , k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k = ζ ( 2 ) 3 ,
as well as the alternating series
k = 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 k 2 k k = 2 ln α 5 and k = 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 k 2 2 k k = 2 ( ln α ) 2 α : = 1 + 5 2 ,
with α being the golden ratio.
The following two series evaluations appeared very recently in [11]:
k = 1 F 2 k k 2 k k = 2 π α 25 5 and k = 1 L 2 k k 2 k k = 2 π α 2 α 25 5 ,
where F k and L k are Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, respectively, and the golden ratio α is given in (4). For further information on series involving reciprocal central binomial coefficients, one can see also the papers by Boyadzhiev [12], Glasser [13], Rivoal [14] and Uhl [15].
The goal of this paper is to study two families of Apéry-like series with coefficients involving Fibonacci (Lucas) numbers. One such family of series is evaluated here in closed form. The other family of Apéry-like series, in addition, involves harmonic numbers. Here, we derive an equivalent expression for the series and relate a special case to the Lerch transcendent (or the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function) Φ ( z , s , a ) defined by
Φ ( z , s , a ) : = n = 0 z n ( n + a ) s
a C Z 0 ; s C when z < 1 ; ( s ) > 1 when z = 1 ,
where Z 0 denotes the set of non-positive integers.

2. The First Set of Main Results

Before stating our first main result, we recall some basic facts about Fibonacci and Lucas numbers (see [7] for more information). Both of these number sequences satisfy the second-order recurrence relation:
G n + 1 = G n + G n 1 ,
but they have different initial terms. Fibonacci numbers F n start with F 0 = 0 and F 1 = 1 ; Lucas numbers L n have the initial values L 0 = 2 and L 1 = 1 . Their Binet forms are given by
F n = α n β n α β and L n = α n + β n ( n 0 ) ,
where α and β are roots of the quadratic equation x 2 x 1 = 0 , that is,
α = 1 + 5 2 and β = 1 5 2 .
Some basic arithmetical properties of the Fibonacci numbers are listed below:
gcd ( F n , F n + 1 ) = 1 and gcd ( F n , F n + 2 ) = 1 ,
F m n 0 ( mod F m ) ( m , n 1 ) and F m | F n m | n .
The next lemma will be used in proving our next theorem.
Lemma 1.
For each j 0 , each of the following congruences holds true:
F j 0 ( mod 4 ) j 0 ( mod 6 ) F j 1 ( mod 4 ) j 1 , 2 , 5 ( mod 6 ) F j 2 ( mod 4 ) j 3 ( mod 6 ) F j 3 ( mod 4 ) j 4 ( mod 6 ) .
Proof. 
This lemma can be proved by applying the principle of mathematical induction. □
Theorem 1.
For each j 1 , it is asserted that
1 5 10 F 2 j k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 25 n 4 5 n 2 L 2 j + 1 = 1 2 π 2 5 L j sin π 2 5 L j , i f j 0 , 3 ( mod 6 ) ; 1 2 π 10 F j cos π 2 5 L j , i f j 1 , 4 , 5 ( mod 6 ) ; 1 2 + π 10 F j cos π 2 5 L j , i f j 2 ( mod 6 ) .
Proof. 
Our proof of Theorem 1 starts with the following formula [9] (Equatiion (31)), which holds true for all complex values of x other than an integer:
1 2 k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 3 k 2 + x 2 k 2 x 2 m = 1 k 1 1 x 2 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 n 2 x 2 = π 2 x sin ( π x ) 1 2 x 2 .
Setting x = α j 5 ( j 1 ) gives
k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 = 10 n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 5 n 2 α 2 j = 5 π α j sin π α j 5 5 α 2 j .
Similarly, with x = β j 5 ( j 1 ) , we get
k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 + β 2 j 5 k 2 β 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 β 2 j 5 m 2 = 10 n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 5 n 2 β 2 j = 5 π β j sin ( π β j / 5 ) 5 β 2 j .
Now, using the Binet form, we find that
1 5 k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 = 10 F 2 j n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 25 n 4 5 n 2 L 2 j + 1 = π ( 1 ) j + 1 α j sin π α j 5 β j sin π β j 5 sin π α j 5 sin π β j 5 + 5 F 2 j .
Next, we make use of the following relations:
α j 5 = 1 2 F j + 1 2 5 L j and β j 5 = 1 2 F j + 1 2 5 L j ,
so that
sin π α j 5 = sin π 2 5 L j cos π 2 F j + cos π 2 5 L j sin π 2 F j
and
sin π β j 5 = sin π 2 5 L j cos π 2 F j cos π 2 5 L j sin π 2 F j .
As
sin π 2 n = 0 , if n 0 , 2 ( mod 4 ) ; 1 , if n 1 ( mod 4 ) ; 1 , if n 3 ( mod 4 )
and
cos ( π 2 n ) = 0 , if n 1 , 3 ( mod 4 ) ; 1 , if n 0 ( mod 4 ) ; 1 , if n 2 ( mod 4 ) ,
we find from Lemma 1 that
sin π 2 F j = 0 , if j 0 , 3 ( mod 6 ) ; 1 , if j 1 , 2 , 5 ( mod 6 ) ; 1 , if j 4 ( mod 6 )
and
cos π 2 F j = 0 , if j 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 ( mod 6 ) ; 1 , if j 0 ( mod 6 ) ; 1 , if j 3 ( mod 6 ) ;
Now, the cases can be treated separately. As a showcase, we consider the case when
j 0 ( mod 6 ) F j 0 ( mod 4 ) .
Here, we have
sin π 2 F j = 0 and cos π 2 F j = 1 ,
and
sin π α j 5 = sin π β j 5 = sin π 2 5 L j ,
so that
10 F 2 j n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 25 n 4 5 n 2 L 2 j + 1 = π ( 1 ) j + 1 5 F j sin π 2 5 L j + 5 F 2 j .
Dividing by 10 F 2 j and using the relation F n L n = F 2 n establishes the result.
The other cases are treated similarly. □
Theorem 2.
For each j 0 , the following identity holds true:
1 10 k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 + 15 k 2 + α 2 j 5 k 2 α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 α 2 j 5 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 10 n 2 L 2 j 25 n 4 5 n 2 L 2 j + 1 = π 2 5 L j sin π 2 5 L j 1 2 L 2 j , i f j 0 , 3 ( mod 6 ) ; π 2 F j cos π 2 5 L j 1 2 L 2 j , i f j 1 , 4 , 5 ( mod 6 ) ; π 2 F j cos π 2 5 L j 1 2 L 2 j , i f j 2 ( mod 6 ) .
Proof. 
Theorem 2 can be proved by using the same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1. □
Theorem 3.
For each j 1 , it is asserted that
1 10 5 F 2 j k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 α 2 j 5 k 2 + α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 + α 2 j 5 m 2 15 k 2 α 2 j 5 k 2 + α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 + α 2 j 5 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 25 n 4 + 5 n 2 L 2 j + 1 = 1 2 + ( 1 ) j π 10 F 2 j L j sinh π 2 F j cosh π 2 5 L j + 5 F j sinh π 2 5 L j cosh π 2 F j sinh 2 π 2 5 L j sinh 2 π 2 F j .
Proof. 
Setting x = i y ( i = 1 ) in (9), we get
1 2 k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 3 k 2 y 2 k 2 + y 2 m = 1 k 1 1 + y 2 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 n 2 + y 2 = π 2 y sinh ( π y ) + 1 2 y 2 .
Now, as in our proof of Theorem 1, we put
y = α j 5 and y = β j 5 ( j 1 ) .
In order to simplify, we use the the following elementary identities:
sinh ( A + B ) = sinh ( A ) cosh ( B ) + cosh ( A ) sinh ( B )
and
sinh ( A ) + sinh ( B ) = 2 sinh A + B 2 cosh A B 2 .
The result is
1 10 5 F 2 j k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 α 2 j 5 k 2 + α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 + α 2 j 5 m 2 15 k 2 α 2 j 5 k 2 + α 2 j m = 1 k 1 1 + α 2 j 5 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 25 n 4 + 5 n 2 L 2 j + 1 = 1 2 + ( 1 ) j π 10 F 2 j L j sinh π 2 F j cosh π 2 5 L j + 5 F j sinh π 2 5 L j cosh π 2 F j sinh π 2 5 L j cosh π 2 F j 2 sinh π 2 F j cosh π 2 5 L j 2 .
The denominator in the last expression can be simplified further using
cosh 2 ( A ) sinh 2 ( A ) = 1 .
For j = 1 , we have
1 10 5 k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 15 k 2 α 2 5 k 2 + α 2 m = 1 k 1 1 + α 2 5 m 2 15 k 2 α 2 5 k 2 + α 2 m = 1 k 1 1 + α 2 5 m 2 = n = 1 ( 1 ) n 25 n 4 + 15 n 2 + 1 = 1 2 π 10 sinh π 2 cosh π 2 5 + 5 sinh π 2 5 cosh π 2 sinh 2 π 2 5 sinh 2 π 2 .
Finally, it is worth mentioning that, upon differentiating (9) and (14) with respect to the variables x and y, respectively, if we set y = x in the resulting equation, we are led to the following identities:
k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k m = 1 k 1 1 x 2 m 2 8 k 2 x ( k 2 x 2 ) 2 3 k 2 + x 2 k 2 x 2 m = 1 k 1 2 x m 2 x 2 = n = 1 4 ( 1 ) n 1 x ( n 2 x 2 ) 2 = 2 x 3 π sin ( π x ) + π x cos ( π x ) [ x sin ( π x ) ] 2
and
k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k m = 1 k 1 1 + x 2 m 2 3 k 2 x 2 k 2 + x 2 m = 1 k 1 2 x m 2 + x 2 8 k 2 x ( k 2 + x 2 ) 2 = n = 1 4 ( 1 ) n x ( n 2 + x 2 ) 2 = π sinh ( π x ) + π x cosh ( π x ) [ x sinh ( π x ) ] 2 2 x 3 .
Setting x = 1 2 in (17) and noting that
m = 1 k 1 1 4 m 2 1 = 1 2 m = 1 k 1 1 2 m 1 1 2 m + 1 = 1 2 2 k 2 2 k 1 ,
we can obtain
k = 1 1 k 2 2 k k 24 k 4 + 12 k 3 + 26 k 2 + k + 1 ( 4 k 2 1 ) 2 m = 1 k 1 1 1 4 m 2 = 8 n = 1 ( 1 ) n 1 ( 4 n 2 1 ) 2 = 4 π .
The identities (17) and (18) also allow us to express special cases of the generalized alternating Mathieu series from [16,17] in an Apéry-like fashion.

3. A Further Main Result

Our Theorem 4 below is concerned with a family of reciprocal series involving Fibonacci (Lucas) numbers and harmonic numbers.
Theorem 4.
For each j 1 , each of the following identities holds true:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k j ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 F j ( k + 1 ) = k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 ( 1 ) j ( k + 1 ) m = 0 k + 1 k + 1 m ( 1 ) j m 2 j m F j m 2 2 j + 2 j L j + ( 1 ) j k + 1
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k j ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 L j ( k + 1 ) = k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 ( 1 ) j ( k + 1 ) m = 0 k + 1 k + 1 m ( 1 ) j m 2 j m L j m 2 2 j + 2 j L j + ( 1 ) j k + 1 ,
where
h n = k = 0 n 1 2 k 1 = H 2 n 1 2 H n ,
and H n given by
H n = 1 + 1 2 + 1 3 + + 1 n
denotes the nth harmonic number. In particular, we have the following relations:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 F k + 1 = 4 5 k = 0 1 ( 4 k + 1 ) 2 1 5 k = 1 20 Φ 1 5 , 2 , 1 4
as well as
k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 L k + 1 = 4 5 k = 0 1 ( 4 k + 3 ) 2 1 5 k = 1 20 Φ 1 5 , 2 , 3 4 ,
where Φ ( z , s , a ) is the Lerch transcendent (or the Hurwitz–Lerch function) defined by (6).
Proof. 
The following identity, which is valid for 1 2 < x < 1 , is due to Ramanujan (see [18] [p. 293, Entry 34]):
k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 x 1 + x k + 1 = k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k ( k ! ) 2 h k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x k + 1 .
For j 1 , if we first set
x = α 2 j and x = β 2 j ,
and then combine the two results according to the Binet form, we get
k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 1 5 α j 2 j + α j k + 1 β j 2 j + β j k + 1 = k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 1 5 ( 2 α ) j + ( 1 ) j k + 1 ( 2 β ) j + ( 1 ) j k + 1 ( 2 2 j + 2 j L j + ( 1 ) j ) k + 1 .
By applying the binomial theorem, we straightforwardly find that
1 5 ( 2 α ) j + ( 1 ) j k + 1 ( 2 β ) j + ( 1 ) j k + 1 = ( 1 ) j ( k + 1 ) m = 0 k + 1 k + 1 m ( 1 ) j m 2 j m F j m .
As the right-hand side of the last equation is obvious, the proof of the first identity is completed. If j = 1 , then we have
( 1 ) k + 1 m = 0 k + 1 k + 1 m ( 1 ) m 2 m F m = ( 1 ) k + 1 5 ( 5 ) k + 1 ( 5 ) k + 1 = ( 5 ) k ( 1 + ( 1 ) k ) .
Furthermore, the left-hand side of (23) simplifies to the following form:
k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 ( 5 ) k 1 + ( 1 ) k 5 k + 1 = k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 5 k + 2 2 1 + ( 1 ) k = k = 0 2 ( 4 k + 1 ) 2 5 ( k + 1 ) .
The Lucas series is similar. This completes our demonstration of Theorem 4. □

4. Concluding Remarks and Observations

From the following known series representation of the Lerch transcendent (or the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function) Φ ( z , s , a ) defined by (6):
Φ ( z , s , a ) = 1 1 z n = 0 z 1 z n k = 0 n ( 1 ) k n k 1 ( k + a ) s
s C ; ( z ) < 1 2 ,
we immediately get
k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 F k + 1 = k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k m = 0 k ( 1 ) m k m ( 4 m + 1 ) 2
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 L k + 1 = k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k m = 0 k ( 1 ) m k m ( 4 m + 3 ) 2 .
Moreover, the relation L k + 1 F k + 1 = 2 F k yields
k = 0 ( 1 ) k + 1 2 k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 F k = 16 5 k = 0 2 k + 1 ( 4 k + 1 ) 2 ( 4 k + 3 ) 2 1 5 k = 1 40 Φ 1 5 , 2 , 1 4 Φ 1 5 , 2 , 3 4 .
The case j = 2 finally gives
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 F 2 k + 2 = 4 29 k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 m = 0 k + 1 k + 1 m 4 m F 2 m 29 k
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 L 2 k + 2 = 4 29 k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 m = 0 k + 1 k + 1 m 4 m L 2 m 29 k .
It is remarkable that the inner sums on the right-hand sides of (27) and (28), involving the Fibonacci numbers and the Lucas numbers, respectively, do not seem to possess simple closed forms. It is possible, however, to express the right-hand sides in terms of the Lerch transcendent (or the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function) as follows:
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 F 2 k + 2 = 4 29 1 + 4 α 2 5 k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 1 + 4 α 2 29 k 4 29 1 + 4 β 2 5 k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 1 + 4 β 2 29 k = 7 + 2 5 29 5 Φ 7 + 2 5 29 , 2 , 1 2 7 2 5 29 5 Φ 7 2 5 29 , 2 , 1 2
and
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 k k h k + 1 L 2 k + 2 = 4 ( 1 + 4 α 2 ) 29 k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 1 + 4 α 2 29 k + 4 ( 1 + 4 β 2 ) 29 k = 0 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 1 + 4 β 2 29 k = 7 + 2 5 29 Φ 7 + 2 5 29 , 2 , 1 2 + 7 2 5 29 Φ 7 2 5 29 , 2 , 1 2 .
We conclude this article by remarking further that the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, as well as other widely studied numbers and polynomials, are potentially useful in both pure and applied mathematical sciences (see, for example, [19,20,21]). Indeed, at least partially, the motivation for the results presented in this article can be derived from these as well as other developments in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.F., H.M.S. and Ž.T.; methodology, R.F., H.M.S. and Ž.T.; software, R.F.; validation, R.F., H.M.S. and Ž.T.; formal analysis, R.F.; investigation, R.F. and Ž.T.; resources, R.F. and H.M.S.; data curation, R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F. and Ž.T.; writing—review and editing, H.M.S.; visualization, R.F. and Ž.T.; supervision, H.M.S.; project administration, H.M.S.; funding acquisition, Ž.T. All authors contributed equally in this research paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The statements and conclusions by the first-named author (Robert Frontczak), which are included in this article, are entirely those of the author himself. They do not necessarily reflect the views of LBBW. The third-named author (Živorad Tomovski) was supported by a DAAD Post-Doctoral Fellowship during his visit to the Department of Physics at the University of Potsdam in Germany from 15 June 2021 to 15 September 2021 to collaborate with Ralf Metzler.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Titchmarsh, E.C. The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function, 2nd ed.; Oxford University (Clarendon) Press: Oxford, UK, 1951. [Google Scholar]
  2. Apéry, R. Irrationalité de ζ2 et ζ(3). In Journées Arithmétiques de Luminy; Colloq. Internat. CNRS, Centre Univ. Luminy, Luminy, 1978. Astérisque 1979, 61, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, M.-P.; Srivastava, H.M. Some families of series representations for the Riemann ζ(3). Result. Math. 1998, 33, 179–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Srivastava, H.M. The Zeta and related functions: Recent developments. J. Adv. Engrg. Comput. 2019, 3, 329–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hjortnaes, M.M. Overfring av rekken k = 1 ( 1 / k 3 ) til et bestemt integral. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Scandanavian Mathematical Congress, Lund, Sweden, 10–15 August 1953; pp. 211–213. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gosper, R.W., Jr. A calculus of series rearrangements. In Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results; Traub, J.F., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 121–151. [Google Scholar]
  7. Grimaldi, R.P. Fibonacci and Catalan Numbers: An Introduction; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Almkvist, G.; Granville, A. Borwein and Bradley’s Apéry-like formulae for ζ(4n + 3). Experiment. Math. 1999, 8, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bailey, D.H.; Borwein, J.M.; Bradley, D.M. Experimental determination of Apéry-like identities for ζ(2n + 2). Experiment. Math. 2006, 15, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Borwein, J.M.; Broadhurst, D.J.; Kamnitzer, J. Central binomial sums, multiple Clausen values, and zeta values. Experiment. Math. 2001, 10, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Frontczak, R. Problem H-874. Fibonacci Quart. 2021, 59, 185. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyadzhiev, K.N. Power series with inverse binomial coefficients and harmonic numbers. Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 2017, 70, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Glasser, M.L. A generalized Apéry series. J. Integer Seq. 2012, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rivoal, T. Simultaneous generation of Koecher and Almkvist-Granville’s Apéry-like formulae. Experiment. Math. 2004, 13, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Uhl, M. Recurrence equation and integral representation of Apéry sums. European J. Math. 2021, 7, 793–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pogány, T.; Srivastava, H.M.; Tomovski, Ž. Some families of Mathieu a-series and alternating Mathieu a-series. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 173, 69–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Srivastava, H.M.; Tomovski, Ž. Some problems and solutions involving Mathieu’s series and its generalizations. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2004, 5, 45. [Google Scholar]
  18. Berndt, B.C. Ramanujan’s Notebooks; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  19. Koshy, T. Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Applications, 2nd ed.; Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wiley Series of Monographs and Texts; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  20. Park, H.; Cho, B.; Cho, D.; Cho, Y.D.; Park, J. Representation of integers as sums of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Srivastava, H.M.; Irfan, M.; Shah, F.A. A Fibonacci wavelet method for solving dual-phase-lag heat transfer model in multi-layer skin tissue during hyperthermia treatment. Energies 2021, 14, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frontczak, R.; Srivastava, H.M.; Tomovski, Ž. Some Families of Apéry-Like Fibonacci and Lucas Series. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1621. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9141621

AMA Style

Frontczak R, Srivastava HM, Tomovski Ž. Some Families of Apéry-Like Fibonacci and Lucas Series. Mathematics. 2021; 9(14):1621. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9141621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frontczak, Robert, Hari Mohan Srivastava, and Živorad Tomovski. 2021. "Some Families of Apéry-Like Fibonacci and Lucas Series" Mathematics 9, no. 14: 1621. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9141621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop