Requirements in Design Processes: Open Issues, Relevance and Implications

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Mechanical Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 August 2021) | Viewed by 21958

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università degli Studi di Firenze, via di S. Marta, 3 – 50139 Firenze, Italy
Interests: His main topics of research concern the development of methodologies to support creativity in product and process innovation, business process re-engineering activities, and the product design cycle.

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical Engineering - Politecnico di Milano – Via private Giuseppe La Masa, 1, 20156 Milano, Italy
Interests: His research interests include design methods and tools with particular reference to techniques for the stimulation of designers’ creativity and for problem solving, design cognition, and human behavior in design.

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen, Italy
Interests: sustainable design; creative design; user-product interaction; biometric measures in design; eco-design; design for additive manufacturing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università degli Studi di Firenze – via di S. Marta, 3-50139 Firenze, Italy
Interests: His research interests include engineering design methods, prototyping, problem-solving techniques, and creativity assessment.

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Requirements play a key role in the design process by affecting analysis, synthesis, and evaluation activities at different levels and in different ways.

Specifically, during the analysis of the design problem, requirements are at the cornerstone of designers’ reflection on processes such as formulation and clarification of objectives. Furthermore, requirements guide the process of solution finding, and here, they affect design both positively, by making designers focus on the solution, and negatively, by acting as potential triggers of psychological inertia and fixation. Eventually, during evaluation and selection activities, requirements constitute reference criteria for the assessment of design outcomes in order to identify the solution that is supposedly the most compliant with design objectives.

Therefore, designers’ perspective on requirements and their use relentlessly change along the design process because of mutating detail levels of design representations and differences in terms of information needed to move forward. In the most abstract phases, such as product planning and conceptual design, the designer tries to understand what should be designed and searches for the functions to be delivered and the modalities to implement them. During embodiment and detailed design, the development of the solution progresses until a well-defined structure is identified, which is univocally represented through CAD models and technical drawings. Moreover, due to the iterative nature of the design process, the definition and formulation of requirements is also affected by partial design outcomes, which in turn depend on their own requirements. Therefore, requirements orient the design process by taking into consideration the mutating nature of the design problem without introducing hindrances or leading to dangerous distortions of design objectives. This requires the implementation of strategies to manage and update requirements continuously. In addition, strategies targeting requirements might be tailored to design contexts, such as eco-design or Design for X, or conditions, such as co-design or open innovation.    

The design community has made great efforts to investigate peculiar aspects related to evaluation and selection processes. Conversely, other important issues concerning the whole design process have received less attention—somehow, for example, the big picture has been overlooked. Accordingly, the proposed Special Issue aims to investigate the impact requirements have on the quality and creativity of the design outcomes and the implications of requirement handling in specific design activities, as well as across different phases. More in particular, it welcomes contributions about the main issues summarized in the following, which however should not be considered exhaustive:

  • Methods and tools for the definition, understanding, development, use, and management of requirements in the design process. Case studies and comparative analyses in terms of performance of the proposed approaches;
  • Criteria and metrics to assess requirement lists;
  • Planning R&D strategies through the anticipation of goals, objectives, and requirements;
  • Emergence/elicitation, management and evolution of requirements in co-design contexts. Knowledge externalization techniques and tools for problem analysis and goal/objective formalization;
  • Role and importance of data and information sources to steer the design process and the definition of requirements therefor (Big Data analysis, Artificial Intelligence, etc.);
  • Handling sustainability-oriented requirements in engineering and product design;
  • Handling affective, aesthetic, ethical, and emotional requirements in engineering design;
  • Requirements in Design for X methods, such as Design for Additive Manufacturing;
  • Prototyping requirements in product design and development processes;
  • Tools and techniques for overcoming requirement conflicts;
  • Impact of requirements on design fixation and on creativity of design outcomes. Role of requirements in the assessment of creative design processes;
  • Role and relevance of requirements in stakeholders’ quality evaluation and acceptance of design outcomes;
  • Engineering requirements in teaching and education contexts.
Prof. Federico Rotini
Dr. Niccolò Becattini
Dr. Yuri Borgianni
Dr. Lorenzo Fiorineschi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • engineering requirements
  • engineering design
  • new product development
  • customer requirements
  • task clarification
  • design objectives
  • product planning
  • conceptual design
  • embodiment design
  • detailed design
  • problem analysis
  • problem solution
  • requirements selection
  • design process
  • design methods
  • creativity
  • forecasting
  • knowledge management

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

3 pages, 201 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial for the Special Issue “Requirements in Design Processes: Open Issues, Relevance and Implications”
by Federico Rotini, Niccolò Becattini, Yuri Borgianni and Lorenzo Fiorineschi
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 10109; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app121910109 - 08 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 922
Abstract
Requirements play a key role in the design process by affecting analysis, synthesis and evaluation activities at different levels and in different ways [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial

20 pages, 6304 KiB  
Article
Requirements Analysis in Disruptive Engineering Solutions Using the Paradigm of Living Systems
by Emilia Brad and Stelian Brad
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(21), 9854; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11219854 - 21 Oct 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1812
Abstract
A particular characteristic of disruptive products is in reengineering advanced technologies for addressing the needs of low-end consumers and/or non-consumers, to transform them into new consumers. This requires a lean co-creative analysis of requirements with all stakeholders involved. Even if a theory encourages [...] Read more.
A particular characteristic of disruptive products is in reengineering advanced technologies for addressing the needs of low-end consumers and/or non-consumers, to transform them into new consumers. This requires a lean co-creative analysis of requirements with all stakeholders involved. Even if a theory encourages the continuous connection of designers and users throughout the design lifecycle for agile adaptation of requirements to the new experiences of users by intersecting them with various versions of the prototype, the rigid budget and time allocated to the design project require novel approaches to clarify the right vectors of product-evolution from the very early design stages of the project lifecycle—allowing agile approaches to fine-tune the set of requirements. In this context, an analysis process of requirements that uses a constructor inspired by living systems is introduced in this paper. This constructor identifies gaps in requirement formulation and indicates areas where improvements must be undertaken. The method is applied in the case of a new cybersecurity software solution that targets micro and small companies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6451 KiB  
Article
FULE—Functionality, Usability, Look-and-Feel and Evaluation Novel User-Centered Product Design Methodology—Illustrated in the Case of an Autonomous Medical Device
by Ela Liberman-Pincu and Yuval Bitan
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 985; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11030985 - 22 Jan 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5478
Abstract
The overall goal of the novel Functionality, Usability, Look-and-Feel, and Evaluation (FULE) user-centered methodology for product design proposed in this paper is to develop usable and aesthetic products. Comprising several product design methods, this novel methodology we devised focuses on the product designer’s [...] Read more.
The overall goal of the novel Functionality, Usability, Look-and-Feel, and Evaluation (FULE) user-centered methodology for product design proposed in this paper is to develop usable and aesthetic products. Comprising several product design methods, this novel methodology we devised focuses on the product designer’s role and responsibility. Following the first three formative assessment phases that define the product’s functionality, usability, and look-and-feel, the summative evaluation phase not only assesses the product, but also provide guidelines to its implementation, marketing, and support. A case study devoted to the design of an autonomous medical device illustrates how the FULE methodology can provide the designer with tools to better select among design alternatives and contribute to reducing bias and subjective decisions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 7368 KiB  
Article
Method for Systematic Assessment of Requirement Change Risk in Industrial Practice
by Iris Graessler, Christian Oleff and Philipp Scholle
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(23), 8697; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app10238697 - 04 Dec 2020
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 2587
Abstract
Requirement changes and cascading effects of change propagation are major sources of inefficiencies in product development and increase the risk of project failure. Risk management regarding these requirement changes yields the potential to handle such changes efficiently. Currently unlocked, a systematic approach is [...] Read more.
Requirement changes and cascading effects of change propagation are major sources of inefficiencies in product development and increase the risk of project failure. Risk management regarding these requirement changes yields the potential to handle such changes efficiently. Currently unlocked, a systematic approach is required for risk management to assess the risk of a requirement change with appropriate effort in industrial application. Within the paper at hand, a novel method for systematic assessment of requirement change risk is presented. It is developed in a multiple case study approach with three product development projects from different industrial branches. The change risk is assessed by combining change likelihood and change impact. Propagation effects are considered by analyzing requirement interrelations. To limit application effort, a tailorable approach towards assessment of change causes based on generalized influence factors and a pre-defined rule set for semi-automatized assessment of requirements interrelations is used. A software prototype is developed and implemented to enable evaluation and transfer to industrial application. The approach is evaluated using a combination of case study projects, stakeholder workshops, questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Applying the method, the risks of requirement changes are assessed systematically, and subsequent risk management is enabled. The contribution at hand opens up the research space of risk management in handling requirement changes which is currently almost unexploited. At the same time, it enables more efficient product development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 3005 KiB  
Article
Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity
by Tomislav Martinec, Stanko Škec, Marija Majda Perišić and Mario Štorga
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(18), 6303; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app10186303 - 10 Sep 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2651
Abstract
The conventional prescriptive and descriptive models of design typically decompose the overall design process into elementary processes, such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This study revisits some of the assumptions established by these models and investigates whether they can also be applied for [...] Read more.
The conventional prescriptive and descriptive models of design typically decompose the overall design process into elementary processes, such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This study revisits some of the assumptions established by these models and investigates whether they can also be applied for modelling of problem-solution co-evolution patterns that appear during team conceptual design activities. The first set of assumptions concerns the relationship between performing analysis, synthesis, and evaluation and exploring the problem and solution space. The second set concerns the dominant sequences of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, whereas the third set concerns the nature of transitions between the problem and solution space. The assumptions were empirically tested as part of a protocol analysis study of team ideation and concept review activities. Besides revealing inconsistencies in how analysis, synthesis, and evaluation are defined and interpreted across the literature, the study demonstrates co-evolution patterns, which cannot be described by the conventional models. It highlights the important role of analysis-synthesis cycles during both divergent and convergent activities, which is co-evolution and refinement, respectively. The findings are summarised in the form of a model of the increase in the number of new problem and solution entities as the conceptual design phase progresses, with implications for both design research and design education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3670 KiB  
Article
The Objective Space and the Formulation of Design Requirement in Natural Laminar Flow Optimization
by Shuyue Wang, Cong Wang and Gang Sun
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(17), 5943; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app10175943 - 27 Aug 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2180
Abstract
Design requirement is as important in aerodynamic design as in other industries because it sets up the objective for the samples in design space to approach. Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) optimization belongs to the type of aerodynamic design problems featured by the combination [...] Read more.
Design requirement is as important in aerodynamic design as in other industries because it sets up the objective for the samples in design space to approach. Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) optimization belongs to the type of aerodynamic design problems featured by the combination of distinct aerodynamic performance, where the design requirement is often formulated in form of summation of laminar-related performance and pressure drag performance with different weight assignment according to different perspectives. However, the formulations are rather experience-oriented and are decided non-quantitatively. Inspired by data manipulation approaches in design space (spanned by design variables of geometrical representation parameters) in many aerodynamic designs, this paper proposes new formulations of design requirement in NLF optimization via consideration of objective space (projection of design space through aerodynamics) and shows the impact of the corresponding formulation of design requirement to the result of NLF optimization in cases of transonic airfoil and aero engine compressor blade design from two perspectives: Pareto front convergence and improving effect of accessory performance. The paper uses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to obtain the eigenvectors of objective space to extract the intrinsic information about specific problem. The method is realized in two cases with satisfactory result. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5927 KiB  
Article
From the Extraction of Currently Fulfilled Requirements to Value Curves: A Case Study in the Field of Harvesting Machines for Shell Fruits and Lessons Learnt in Engineering Design
by Lorenzo Maccioni, Marco Bietresato and Yuri Borgianni
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(11), 3809; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app10113809 - 30 May 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2543
Abstract
The market for agricultural machinery is characterized by products with a high degree of maturity in the product life cycle. Consequently, current improvements in new machinery are predominantly incremental and new projects basically use solutions that are already consolidated. This makes this domain [...] Read more.
The market for agricultural machinery is characterized by products with a high degree of maturity in the product life cycle. Consequently, current improvements in new machinery are predominantly incremental and new projects basically use solutions that are already consolidated. This makes this domain appropriate for benchmarking existing systems and envisioning new value propositions. The present paper deals primarily with the former and uses the value curves as a means to structure the comparison among different families of technical systems; in particular, harvesting machines for shell fruits from the ground surface, e.g., chestnuts, walnuts, and hazelnuts, were investigated here. The process of building value curves requires the identification of currently fulfilled requirements. Despite the attention paid by engineering design research to requirements, a structured process is lacking to extract relevant information and create value curves or other representations useful for benchmarking. The present paper approaches this problem and presents how the authors have individuated relevant knowledge for characterizing different categories of harvesting machines. Namely, after an extensive search of the scientific literature and patents, a critical review of existing machines, aimed at individuating their functioning principles, architecture, and attitude in fulfilling specific design requirements, was performed. Then, existing machines were classified in 8 main categories, and their strengths and weaknesses were identified with reference to 11 competing factors. The consequent construction of value curves enabled the identification of possible points of intervention by hypothesizing possible future evolutions of such machinery, both in a structural and in a value-based perspective. Limitations about the repeatability of the followed approach and possible repercussions on design research are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3444 KiB  
Article
Testing a New Structured Tool for Supporting Requirements’ Formulation and Decomposition
by Lorenzo Fiorineschi, Niccolò Becattini, Yuri Borgianni and Federico Rotini
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(9), 3259; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app10093259 - 07 May 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2451
Abstract
The definition of a comprehensive initial set of engineering requirements is crucial to an effective and successful design process. To support engineering designers in this non-trivial task, well-acknowledged requirement checklists are available in literature, but their actual support is arguable. Indeed, engineering design [...] Read more.
The definition of a comprehensive initial set of engineering requirements is crucial to an effective and successful design process. To support engineering designers in this non-trivial task, well-acknowledged requirement checklists are available in literature, but their actual support is arguable. Indeed, engineering design tasks involve multifunctional systems, characterized by a complex map of requirements affecting different functions. Aiming at improving the support provided by common checklists, this paper proposes a structured tool capable of allocating different requirements to specific functions, and to discern between design wishes and demands. A first experiment of the tool enabled the extraction of useful information for future developments targeting the enhancement of the tool’s efficacy. Indeed, although some advantages have been observed in terms of the number of proposed requirements, the presence of multiple functions led users (engineering students in this work) to useless repetitions of the same requirement. In addition, the use of the proposed tool resulted in increased perceived effort, which has been measured through the NASA Task Load Index method. These limitations constitute the starting point for planning future research and the mentioned enhancements, beyond representing a warning for scholars involved in systematizing the extraction and management of design requirements. Moreover, thanks to the robustness of the scientific approach used in this work, similar experiments can be repeated to obtain data with a more general validity, especially from industry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop