Textile Microfibers Pollution: Impacts, Behavior, and Mitigation

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 September 2022) | Viewed by 14445

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CNR-ISMAR, Institute of Marine Sciences, National Research Council, 19032 Lerici, Italy
Interests: microplastics; marine litter; plastic pollution; microfibers; marine debris
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
Interests: polymer science; microplastics; synthetic textiles; surface treatments; composites
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Global fiber production, both synthetic and natural, has more than doubled in the past 20 years, reaching 107 million tons in 2018, and is expected to reach 145 million tons in 2030, if business as usual continues. Largely driven by the production of polyester, synthetic polymers have dominated the textile market since the mid-1990s, when they overtook cotton as the dominant fiber type. Synthetic fibers now account for almost two-thirds of global fiber production and for 14.5% of plastic production by mass, even though evidence is growing that most fibers found in the natural environment are natural fibers of animal or plant origin, like cellulose, cotton, and wool. The main uses of both natural and synthetic fibers are clothing and apparel, followed by household and furnishings, automotive, and other industrial applications such as construction, filtration, and personal care. The shedding of textile fibres is due to washing and wear and tear of fabrics and depends on several factors like textile characteristics, washing conditions, etc. The increasing and widespread consumption of textiles have led to the accumulation of copious amounts of these fibers in the natural environment. Research has shown that large numbers of fibers are discharged into wastewater from washing clothes and garments, and enter the environment mainly through wastewater effluent, aerial deposition, or through the application of contaminated sludge on agricultural soils. As a result, fibers are now the most prevalent type of anthropogenic particle found by microplastic pollution surveys around the world, often accounting for 80–90% of microplastic counts. Substantial concentrations have been detected in surface and subsurface marine waters, in sea ice, deep-sea and coastal sediments, as well as in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Furthermore, recent studies have also reported the presence of these pollutants in wet and dry atmospheric deposition. Given to their abundance, it is not surprising that fibers have been also detected in food, drinking water, and human lungs, as well as in the digestive tracts of many aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Adverse health effects due to ingestion of microfibers have been observed in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial invertebrates, but no proof of harm is currently available for wild organisms exposed to environmentally relevant fiber concentrations and our understanding of their impacts on natural populations is still very limited. In addition, a wide variety of chemicals are used during natural and synthetic textile production, including dyes, additives, and flame retardants, raising concerns about the role of fibers as vectors of hazardous substances into the environment. This Special Issue aims to provide state-of-the-art information on the occurrence, sources, fate, uptake, toxicity, and persistence of natural and synthetic fibers in the natural environment, as well as on the factors that influence the release of fibres and on the possible mitigation solutions. Manuscripts regarding all aspects related to microfiber pollution, including reports on the occurrence of microfibers in natural organisms and ecosystems, analytical methodologies for sampling, characterization and analysis of textile fibers in environmental samples, ecotoxicological evaluation of microfibers impacts, the role of microfibers as vectors of environmental contaminants, quantification methods of microfibers release from textiles, mechanisms and parameters that lead to microfibers release, and mitigation measures will be considered for publication. Both research articles and review papers are welcome.

Dr. Giuseppe Suaria
Dr. Francesca De Falco
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Microfibers
  • Microfibres
  • Textile
  • Fibres
  • Fibers
  • Microplastics
  • Plastic
  • Pollution
  • Synthetic fibers
  • Microplastic fibers
  • Synthetic textiles
  • Textile sustainability

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 2606 KiB  
Article
Spatial Variations in Microfiber Transport in a Transnational River Basin
by Alexia Balla, Ahmed Mohsen, Sándor Gönczy and Tímea Kiss
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10852; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app122110852 - 26 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1602
Abstract
Five countries share the catchment of the Tisza River (Central Europe). In most households electricity and water are available, and by washing synthetic clothes they can produce a large number of microfibers. However, in many sub-catchments of the river, the wastewater treatment is [...] Read more.
Five countries share the catchment of the Tisza River (Central Europe). In most households electricity and water are available, and by washing synthetic clothes they can produce a large number of microfibers. However, in many sub-catchments of the river, the wastewater treatment is insufficient; therefore, microplastics (MP), especially plastic microfiber emissions into rivers, represent a problem. Our goal was to analyze the suspended sediment and microfiber transport at the low stage, making repeated (2021 and 2022) measurements in the Tisza River (946 km) at 26 sites across three countries. Water sampling was performed by pumping 1 m3 of water through sieves (90–200 µm). The mean MP transport in 2021 was 19 ± 13.6 items/m3, but it increased by 17% in 2022 (22.4 ± 14.8 items/m3). The most polluted sections were the Upper Tisza (Ukraine, Hungary) and the Lower Tisza (Serbia), where wastewater treatment is not satisfactory, whereas the Middle Tisza (Hungary) was less polluted. The tributaries increased the sediment and MP budget of the main river. Microfibers dominate (84–97%) the suspended MP transport, and thus it can be determined that they originated from wastewater. The MP transport was influenced by the availability of wastewater treatment plants, dams, tributaries, and mobilization of bottom sediments. At the low stage, no connection was found between the suspended sediment and MP particle transport. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Textile Microfibers Pollution: Impacts, Behavior, and Mitigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

25 pages, 3594 KiB  
Review
Microplastics in Wastewater and Drinking Water Treatment Plants: Occurrence and Removal of Microfibres
by Daniel Sol, Amanda Laca, Adriana Laca and Mario Díaz
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(21), 10109; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app112110109 - 28 Oct 2021
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 7204
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs), and specifically microfibres (MPFs), are ubiquitous in water bodies, including wastewater and drinking water. In this work, a thorough literature review on the occurrence and removal of MPs, and specifically MPFs in WWTPs and DWTPs, has been carried out. When the [...] Read more.
Microplastics (MPs), and specifically microfibres (MPFs), are ubiquitous in water bodies, including wastewater and drinking water. In this work, a thorough literature review on the occurrence and removal of MPs, and specifically MPFs in WWTPs and DWTPs, has been carried out. When the water is treated, an average microfiber removal efficiency over 70% is achieved in WWTPs and DWTPs. These high percentages are still inefficient for avoiding the presence of a large number of microfibres in treated wastewater and also in tap water. RSF, DAF, oxidation ditch and CAS processes have been described as the most efficient treatments for eliminating MPFs from wastewater treatment. It is remarkable the wide range of the data reported on this topic; for example, treated wastewater contains between not detected and 347 MPFs/L, whereas tap water contains between not detected and 168 MPFs/L. Microfibres constitute more than half of the MPs found in treated wastewater and sewage sludge, whereas in DWTP effluents the percentage of MPFs is around 32%. Nevertheless, the relative amount of MPFs reported in tap water is notably higher (71%). Microfibres from WWTPs are discharged to the environment, being a source of MP pollution. Additionally, MPs released by DWTPs directly enter the drinking water lines, which constitute a direct route for MP human consumption, so that it has been estimated that an adult may ingest an average value of 7500 MPFs per year only via tap water. Thus, this review provides an update on the performance of WWTPs and DWTPs in removing MPs from water, which is an issue of great interest. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Textile Microfibers Pollution: Impacts, Behavior, and Mitigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 499 KiB  
Review
Reality Check: Experimental Studies on Microplastics Lack Realism
by Judith S. Weis and Karl H. Palmquist
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(18), 8529; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11188529 - 14 Sep 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4038
Abstract
Environmental microplastics are gaining interest due to their ubiquity and the threat they pose to environmental and human health. Critical studies have revealed the abundance of microplastics in nature, while others have tested the impacts of these small plastics on organismal health in [...] Read more.
Environmental microplastics are gaining interest due to their ubiquity and the threat they pose to environmental and human health. Critical studies have revealed the abundance of microplastics in nature, while others have tested the impacts of these small plastics on organismal health in the laboratory. Yet, there is often a mismatch between these two areas of research, resulting in major discrepancies and an inability to interpret certain findings. Here, we focus on several main lines of inquiry. First, even though the majority of environmental microplastics are plastic microfibers from textiles, laboratory studies still largely use spherical microbeads. There are also inconsistencies between the measurements of microplastics in the environment as compared to the concentrations that tend to be used in experimental studies. Likewise, the period of exposure occurring in experimental studies and in the environment are vastly different. Lastly, although experimental studies often focus on a particular subset of toxic chemicals present on microplastics, textile microfibers carry other dyes and chemicals that are understudied. They also cause types of physical damage not associated with microspheres. This review will analyze the literature pertaining to these mismatches, focusing on aquatic organisms and model systems, and seek to inform a path forward for this burgeoning area of research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Textile Microfibers Pollution: Impacts, Behavior, and Mitigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop