Diversity of Edible and Therapeutically Important Insects and Other Arthropods

A special issue of Diversity (ISSN 1424-2818). This special issue belongs to the section "Animal Diversity".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2021) | Viewed by 4537

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Asian Area Studies, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 171-8501, Japan
Interests: entomophagy; ecosystem services and disservices of social insects

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Since time immemorial, insects and other arthropods have been used by humans as food, feed, and medicine. To select the most appropriate species depends on a variety of criteria, of which abundance and the ease with which specimens can be obtained and processed are paramount. Since the biodiversity of arthropods varies by geographic region, climes, and habitats on Earth, people unsurprisingly do not make use of the same species all over the world but are selective. This Special Issue “Animal Diversity” examines how preferences for edible and therapeutic species of arthropods vary among different cultures and geographic regions and whether the biodiversity of aquatic or terrestrial, herbivorous or carnivorous species is under greater pressure from such uses.

Dr. Joost Van Itterbeeck
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diversity is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Entomophagy
  • Food
  • Zootherapy
  • Folk medicine
  • Aquatic insects
  • Terrestrial arthropods
  • Phytophagous arthropods
  • Carnivorous arthropods
  • Novelty food
  • Food traditions

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 285 KiB  
Article
How Many Edible Insect Species Are There? A Not So Simple Question
by Joost Van Itterbeeck and Laurent Pelozuelo
Diversity 2022, 14(2), 143; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d14020143 - 17 Feb 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3933
Abstract
Insects used as food and medicine are receiving increased attention. There is a need to scrutinise recent estimates of which and how many insect species are used as we have noticed inappropriate assessments and overestimations. We review the contemporary list of edible insects [...] Read more.
Insects used as food and medicine are receiving increased attention. There is a need to scrutinise recent estimates of which and how many insect species are used as we have noticed inappropriate assessments and overestimations. We review the contemporary list of edible insects of the world published online by Wageningen University and compiled by Ijde Jongema since it is widely used in the literature. Each of the 2403 entries were scrutinised, including checking name validity, verifying insect usage in cited references, and categorising each entry. Our revision indicates inappropriate assessments and inclusions such as spiders (not insects) and insect products (e.g., honeydew) when the insect itself is not used. With relevant and accepted definitions, we provide a critical assessment and estimate of the number of food insects (1611) and medicinal insects (81), which is lower than Wageningen University and Jongema’s estimate of 2111 “edible insects”. We acknowledge that our critical assessment may also be an overestimate or an underestimate and deserves further scrutiny, and we encourage a more practical use of a database of food and medicinal insects with our suggestion for a querying online curated database. We conclude that making accurate estimates is a difficult feat but that inappropriate assessments can and need to be avoided. Full article
Back to TopTop