Emergent Literacy in the Early Years

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Early Childhood Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 March 2024) | Viewed by 6219

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
Interests: early years; literacy; speech; language and communication; home learning environment; programme evaluation; randomised controlled trials

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The term ‘emergent literacy’ is used to describe the stage in which children are building the blocks of the basic skills needed to be able to later read and write. These form the foundations for future learning. A child’s environment, whether that be at home or in an early years setting, can be fundamental to children’s early literacy development, which in turn can have an important impact on their later educational achievement and wellbeing (Roulstone et al., 2011; Law, Rush, Parsons and Schoon, 2009). The home learning environment is particularly important for child development, including cognitive ability, language and literacy development (Niklas and Schneider, 2013; Tarelli and Stubbe, 2010). High-quality early childcare has also long been shown to have positive impacts on children’s emerging literacy (Sylva et al. 2004; Ota and Auston, 2013). More recently, however, these factors have been brought to the fore with a recent study showing that children who attended early years settings during COVID-19 restrictions had better vocabulary skills than children who did not (Davies et al, 2021), with widespread concern about weaker language skills in children in the early years during COVID-19 (Tracey et al., 2022).

The components of this ‘emergent literacy’ stage in the early years are many and diverse, involving speech, language and communication, and cognitive and working memory skills. This can be broken down into more specific skills and a range of domains such as phonological awareness, receptive and expressive vocabulary, and conceptual knowledge, all of which are key areas in their own right. For different children, they can develop in different ways and at different times, and their precise impact on overall later ‘literacy’ can be hard to measure. This has led to suggestions that a ‘more sophisticated multidimensional examination of emergent literacy skills’ is needed to understand more about the ways in which they interact in early childhood (Whitehurst, & Lonigan,1998). Alongside this, it is acknowledged that there is a higher risk of preschool language difficulties in children from lower socio-economic groups (Law et al., 2017; Hart and Risley, 1995). Consequently, there have been calls for more support for parents in enhancing the home learning environment, and for improved provision within early years settings, which can often struggle to retain high-quality staff (Bonetti, 2020). One solution is the development and evaluation of programmes designed to improve emergent literacy based on theoretical underpinnings and assess their contribution to our understanding and to children’s literacy outcomes.

Examples of topics for this Special Issue can include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Early years settings, including different types of provision, e.g., childminders
  • Home learning environment
  • Programmes/interventions to enhance emergent literacy and their evaluation
  • Professional development for early years practitioners
  • Teaching literacy skills
  • Early literacy skills including (but not limited to) print motivation, print awareness, letter knowledge, vocabulary, narrative skills, phonological awareness
  • Book gifting and reading
  • Speech, language and communication
  • Children with higher needs
  • Children who are English language learners
  • Children from under-served populations

We welcome quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, as well as theoretical papers and those with different national perspectives. Interested authors are welcome to discuss their ideas with the Guest Editor before submitting their manuscripts.

References

Bonetti, S. (2020.) Early years workforce development in England: Key ingredients and missed opportunities. Education Policy Institute.

Davies, C., Hendry, A., Gibson, S. P., Gliga, T., McGillion, M., and Gonzalez‐Gomez, N. (2021). Early childhood education and care (ECEC) during COVID‐19 boosts growth in language and executive function. Infant and child development, 30(4), e2241.

Hart, B. and Risley, T.R., 1995. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Law, J., Charlton, J., Dockerell, J., Gascoigne, M., McKean, C., & Theakston, A. (2017). Early Language Development: Needs, provision and intervention for preschool children from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. A report for the Education Endowment Foundation.

Law, J., Rush, R., Schoon, I. and Parsons, S. (2009). Modeling developmental language difficulties from school entry into adulthood: Literacy, mental health, and employment outcomes. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52(6), 1401–16.

Niklas, F. and Schneider, W. (2013). Home literacy environment and the beginning of reading and spelling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 40-50.

Ota, C. and Auston, A. (2013). Training and mentoring: Family childcare providers’ use of linguistic inputs in conversations with children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28. 972-983.

Roulstone, S., Law, J., Rush, R., Clegg, J. and Peters, T. (2011). Investigating the role of language in children’s early educational outcomes. Research Report. DFE-RR134. Department of Education.

Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Smees, R., Dobson, A., Jeavons, M., Lewis, K., Morahan, M. and Sadler, S. (2004). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project.

Tarelli, I. and Stubbe, T.C. (2010). Home literacy environment and reading achievement: A model for determining the relationship between socio-economic status, home literacy environment and reading achievement. In: 4th IEA International Research Conference, Göteborg.

Tracey, L., Bowyer-Crane, C., Bonetti, S., Nielsen, D., D’Apice, K. and Compton, S. (2022). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on children’s socio-emotional wellbeing and attainment during the Reception Year. Research Report. Education Endowment Foundation.

Whitehurst, G.J. and Lonigan, C.J. (1998). Child Development and Emergent Literacy. Child Development, 69(3) 848-872.

Dr. Louise Tracey
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • early years
  • literacy
  • reading
  • writing
  • vocabulary
  • speech
  • language and communication
  • home learning environment

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 206 KiB  
Article
The WellComm Toolkit: Impact on Practitioner Skills and Knowledge and Implications for Evaluation Research
by Erin Dysart and Aimee Code
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 263; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci14030263 - 1 Mar 2024
Viewed by 894
Abstract
The WellComm toolkit is used across many areas of the UK to identify and support early years children with their speech, language and communication. There is some evidence for positive outcomes for children who are assessed and supported using the toolkit. However, wider [...] Read more.
The WellComm toolkit is used across many areas of the UK to identify and support early years children with their speech, language and communication. There is some evidence for positive outcomes for children who are assessed and supported using the toolkit. However, wider implications of implementing the toolkit have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to explore the impact of implementing the WellComm toolkit on practitioners, practically and for their knowledge and skills. An additional aim was to reflect on the impact this may have on evaluation research. Early years practitioners (EYPs) in the UK completed an online survey asking about their experiences of using the WellComm toolkit, and a sub-sample participated in interviews. Survey and interview respondents spanned different early years settings. Practitioners described positive ways in which using the WellComm toolkit had impacted their knowledge of speech, language and communication, supported improvements in practice, and the quality and specificity of speech and language referrals. Negative implications, such as time costs and staffing burdens, were also discussed but were found not to outweigh the benefits of use. The positive implications of using the WellComm toolkit on practitioners’ own development and knowledge are likely to support the outcomes of children, though the usefulness of the WellComm toolkit for children who speak English as an additional language (EAL) and children with special educational needs (SEND) is questioned. Such findings have implications for the work of evaluation researchers, who need to be sensitive to the use of such toolkits in settings where interventions are being evaluated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emergent Literacy in the Early Years)
12 pages, 303 KiB  
Article
Reading to Young Children: Higher Home Frequency Associated with Higher Educational Achievement in PIRLS and PISA
by Luisa Araújo and Patrícia Costa
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 1240; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci13121240 (registering DOI) - 15 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1166
Abstract
The benefits of reading aloud to young children for their reading development are well documented, and international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) offer an opportunity to explore its unique contribution to literacy achievement at both the primary and secondary levels. Using Portuguese data from ILSAs, [...] Read more.
The benefits of reading aloud to young children for their reading development are well documented, and international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) offer an opportunity to explore its unique contribution to literacy achievement at both the primary and secondary levels. Using Portuguese data from ILSAs, this study shows the relationship between reading to young children in the home context and their later reading performance. Specifically, we use the Program for International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011, which tests fourth-grade students, and the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018, which is used for the assessment of 15-year-olds. Data sources from these surveys include the mean reading performance of similar cohorts of students and home/parental questionnaires that include questions about the frequency of home book-reading, as well as other background variables. Linear regression analyses show a positive and significant relationship, both at the fourth-grade level and in secondary school, between students’ performance and having been read to at home during early childhood. These findings indicate that the advantages associated with book reading in the early years are maintained throughout students’ schooling. In addition, the analysis shows that, in both surveys, girls score higher than boys in reading, and that there is a positive association between parental education and reading achievement. Implications about how children’s early literacy development sets the foundation for future educational achievement are discussed, namely in the context of country-specific reading initiatives and reading practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emergent Literacy in the Early Years)
27 pages, 992 KiB  
Article
A Multidimensional–Multilevel Approach to Literacy-Related Parental Involvement and Its Effects on Preschool Children’s Literacy Competences: A Sociopedagogical Perspective
by Efthymia Penderi, Alexandra Karousou and Irini Papanastasatou
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 1192; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci13121192 - 27 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1329
Abstract
From a sociopedagogical perspective, literacy development in preschool is conceptualized as a social phenomenon. Sociopedagogical models emphasize the connection between family and school processes to foster children’s literacy competences and parental involvement. Although contemporary models regarding parental involvement reflect its multidimensional and multilevel [...] Read more.
From a sociopedagogical perspective, literacy development in preschool is conceptualized as a social phenomenon. Sociopedagogical models emphasize the connection between family and school processes to foster children’s literacy competences and parental involvement. Although contemporary models regarding parental involvement reflect its multidimensional and multilevel nature, research focusing on early literacy mainly addresses certain parenting practices, especially at home, and their association with a few literacy skills. Based on Bronfenbrenner’s bioecosystemic theory, Epstein’s model of overlapping spheres of influence and the typology of parental involvement as well as Rohde’s Comprehensive Emergent Literacy Model, the present study investigates how different dimensions and components of parental involvement interact to affect young children’s literacy competences. We investigate the complex relationships among all dimensions of parental involvement and their association with children’s literacy outcomes. Additionally, we explore the role of several contextual factors (children’s age, parental education, urbanity, number of children’s books) in these associations. Parents of 214 typically developing children aged 4–6 years filled in four parent-report scales developed and validated for measuring the different dimensions of parental involvement and children’s literacy competences. Results illustrate how multilevel parental practices mediate the effect of literacy-related parental perceptions and family–school relationships on children’s literacy competences. Among the contextual factors, only maternal education was found to have a robust, albeit indirect, effect on literacy outcomes. Implications about the school’s role and strategic planning in promoting literacy-focused parental involvement are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emergent Literacy in the Early Years)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

28 pages, 4292 KiB  
Article
“Too Young to Learn English?”—Nurturing Preschool Children’s English Language Learning across an Early Years Curriculum: A Case Study
by Carmen Lucas
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 949; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci13090949 - 18 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1885
Abstract
School readiness can be used as a key target to support children’s social, emotional, language, and a wide range of communication skills, particularly to promote equity for children in a democratic society. This is especially important for Portuguese children attending early years foundation [...] Read more.
School readiness can be used as a key target to support children’s social, emotional, language, and a wide range of communication skills, particularly to promote equity for children in a democratic society. This is especially important for Portuguese children attending early years foundation settings, as considering “school readiness” creates a much broader educational base for school subjects to subsequently build upon and, in particular, nurturing early years foundation stage Portuguese children’s literacy development in English, the privileged language of international communication. However, little is known about how the English language can be best taught at such young ages, as well as the unique outcomes from such an early exposure, at least in the Portuguese context. Language play has been argued to be a “universal” feature common to all human beings, regardless of their age. This study set out to prepare young preschool children with an English language background for the primary school years. As such, this study examined the impact of exposing children to classroom-based storybook reading sessions and original cartoon-based created materials, hence creating a print-referencing-style environment carried out during an academic year. The impacts on preschoolers’ early literacy development were examined, focusing specifically on the domain of print knowledge. The study reported here set out to determine to what extent a play-based, cross-curricular pedagogic programme for learning English, fastened in CLIL principles (English across the curriculum), could be effective in promoting early literacy development within an early years setting in Portugal, thus preparing children for the formal years of primary school to come. Fifteen native Portuguese preschool children (3–5 years old) were the focus of this study. Their engagement in English lessons was investigated through audio recordings of peer and group conversations. Cross-reference content analyses were carried out separately, with audio recordings of lessons and researcher’s field notes as part of triangulation of the data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emergent Literacy in the Early Years)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop