ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The Social Determinants of Mental Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Mental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (29 March 2021) | Viewed by 31983

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research Institute of Nursing Care for People and Community, University of Hyogo, 13-71, Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
Interests: mental health; social determinants of health; gender

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Hyogo Institute for Traumatic Stress, 1-3-2, Wakinohama-kaigandori, Chuo-ku, Kobe Hyogo, 651-0073, Japan
Interests: mental health; child& adolescent; trauma; PTSD; global health

Special Issue Information

We live in a society where life expectancy has been extended by economic growth, advances in medical technology, and the public health system. Accordingly, rather than merely achieving longevity, public concern has shifted to pursuing a better quality of life, and improvements in health care and public health. The latest global health indicators indicate that mental health disorders, including substance use disorders and neurological disorders, account for over 10% of disability-adjusted life year. Viewed in context, this means that one-tenth of our healthy years are lost to disability and immature death resulting from these mental health disorders. Considering that poor mental health is closely linked to physical inactivity, reduced immune function, dysregulation of the autonomic nerve system, and increased risk of injuries and self-harm, the real impact of mental health disorders on society may be even higher. Consequently, improving quality of life cannot be achieved if mental disorders and their negative impacts are not mitigated.

Social determinants of health are often recognized as the origin of all causes of diseases. Indeed, recent epigenetics research supports this notion by demonstrating that social environmental factors can bring about a change in a phenotype without a change in a genotype. Behavioral science also suggests that health-related behaviors are largely formulated by individuals’ socioeconomic status and social environment, such as the social capital, cultural norms, and social disparities to which they are exposed.

Research in social determinants of mental health faces a variety of challenges, primarily because of the difficulties in replicating conditions in a laboratory or in a randomized control trial design. Despite these challenges, researchers in this field have been producing innovating evidence using quasi-experimental study designs and long-term cohort studies. These findings often show differences between cultures, which could potentially be used to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the processes by which societal factors can affect individuals’ perceptions, behaviors, and thus, health outcomes.

The proposed Special Issue on social determinants of mental health will seek to publish papers on how societal factors may contribute towards the process of developing mental disorders and how to recover from them. Innovative population approaches to enhance mental health and policy research are highly valued for their aims of facilitating implementation studies. International collaborative studies and interdisciplinary research are also highly valued, considering the complexity of the proposed topic.

Prof. Maki Umeda
Dr. Eizaburo Tanaka
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social determinants of health
  • mental health
  • psychosocial
  • population health
  • health equity

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 490 KiB  
Article
Effects of Environmental Quality Perception on Depression: Subjective Social Class as a Mediator
by Liqin Zhang and Lin Wu
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 6130; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18116130 - 06 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2773
Abstract
Although the relationship between environment and public depression has aroused heated debate, the empirical research on the relationship between environmental quality perception and public depression is still relatively insufficient. This paper aims to explore the influence of environmental quality perception on public depression [...] Read more.
Although the relationship between environment and public depression has aroused heated debate, the empirical research on the relationship between environmental quality perception and public depression is still relatively insufficient. This paper aims to explore the influence of environmental quality perception on public depression and the mediating role of subjective social class between environmental quality perception and public depression. Using the China Family Panel Studies data of 2016 for empirical analysis, this study’s results show that environmental quality perception has a significant effect on public depression and subjective social class also has a significant effect on public depression. In addition, we found that subjective social class can play a partial mediating role between environmental quality perception and public depression, and the intermediary effect only comes from the contribution of the perception of living environmental quality, not the perception of overall environmental quality. That is to say, the perception of living environment quality deeply affects the subjective social class, and then induces public depression. In order to alleviate the relationship between environmental quality and public depression, it is recommended that the state environmental protection department and civil affairs department strengthen the improvement of public living environment so as to promote individual subjective social class and reduce the risk of public depression. Moreover, it is suggested that research with longitudinal design and comprehensive indicators be undertaken in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 324 KiB  
Article
Does It Run in the Family? How Family Background Affects Attachment Styles for Students in Higher Education
by Bent E. Mikkelsen, Anette Q. Romani, Inger G. Bo, Frantisek Sudzina and Maria P. Brandão
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(10), 5135; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18105135 - 12 May 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2344
Abstract
Background: Socioeconomic background has traditionally been the most important determinant of an individual’s social advantage. Studies have used social class and opportunities based on parental income and education to predict such advantage. There is limited evidence that stratification mechanisms other than socioeconomic background [...] Read more.
Background: Socioeconomic background has traditionally been the most important determinant of an individual’s social advantage. Studies have used social class and opportunities based on parental income and education to predict such advantage. There is limited evidence that stratification mechanisms other than socioeconomic background can play an important role. The purpose of the study is to examine the influence of the traditional factors (income and education) of family background on students’ social attachment styles compared to other background variables (civil status and number of children). Methods: We used the Vulnerable Attachment Style Questionnaire as an outcome measure to assess students’ social attachment advantage. As a point of departure, we use theories of social psychology to categorize social relations in terms of secure or insecure bonding, respectively. Results: A cross-sectional data set of 912 university students from five European countries was used. With respect to social attachment, the likelihood of being a student with robust relations increases by 23% if the students have high-income parents. Students with robust relations also have a decreased likelihood of poor body self-esteem by 19% when compared with other students. Conclusions: Stratification mechanisms other than social class, such as parental characteristics, civil status, and number of siblings, all affect the privileged students’ social relations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
10 pages, 338 KiB  
Article
Stress, Anxiety, and Depression for Chinese Residents in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Qin Hu and Maki Umeda
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(9), 4958; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094958 - 07 May 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2955
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has profoundly affected the psychological well-being of foreign residents. This study examines stress, anxiety, and depression levels in Chinese residents in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. It identifies risk factors and the roles of disaster preparedness and social [...] Read more.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has profoundly affected the psychological well-being of foreign residents. This study examines stress, anxiety, and depression levels in Chinese residents in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. It identifies risk factors and the roles of disaster preparedness and social support. An online survey among Chinese residents in Japan was conducted from 22 June to 14 July 2020. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, Disaster Preparedness for Resilience Checklist, and Social Support Rate Scale were used to measure psychological symptoms. Multivariable linear regressions identified the risk factors and positive effects of disaster preparedness and social support. Of the total 497 participants, 45.3%, 66.6%, and 54.3% reported severe stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, respectively. People with a lower level of education, a higher level of economic influence, the presence of COVID-19 symptoms, and confirmed or suspected family or friends in China were associated with higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first survey to reveal the protective role of disaster preparedness in reducing psychological symptoms during the pandemic. It offers unique data for further research on how to promote the mental health of vulnerable populations including foreign residents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
12 pages, 3421 KiB  
Article
Language Proficiency and Migrant–Native Disparities in Postpartum Depressive Symptoms
by Sousan Hamwi, Elsa Lorthe and Henrique Barros
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(9), 4782; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094782 - 29 Apr 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2587
Abstract
Migrant women have a higher risk of developing postpartum depressive symptoms (PPDS) than do native women. This study aimed to investigate the role of host-country language proficiency in this disparity. We analysed the data of 1475 migrant and 1415 native women who gave [...] Read more.
Migrant women have a higher risk of developing postpartum depressive symptoms (PPDS) than do native women. This study aimed to investigate the role of host-country language proficiency in this disparity. We analysed the data of 1475 migrant and 1415 native women who gave birth at a Portuguese public hospital between 2017 and 2019 and were participants in the baMBINO cohort study. Migrants’ language proficiency was self-rated and comprised understanding, speaking, reading, and writing skills. PPDS were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale with a cut-off score of ≥10. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the association between language proficiency and PPDS. PPDS were experienced by 7.2% of native women and 12.4% among migrants (p < 0.001). Increasing proportions of PPDS were observed among decreasing Portuguese proficiency levels; 11% among full, 13% among intermediate, and 18% among limited proficiency women (ptrend < 0.001). Full (aOR 1.63 (95% CI 1.21–2.19)), intermediate (aOR 1.68 (95% CI 1.16–2.42)), and limited (aOR 2.55 (95% CI 1.64–3.99)) language proficiencies were associated with increasingly higher odds of PPDS among migrant women, compared to native proficiency. Prevention measures should target migrant women at high risk of PPDS, namely those with limited language skills, and promote awareness, early detection, and help-seeking, in addition to facilitating communication in their perinatal healthcare encounters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 692 KiB  
Article
Loneliness Is Associated with Depressive Affect, But Not with Most Other Symptoms of Depression in Community-Dwelling Individuals: A Network Analysis
by Roland von Känel, Sonja Weilenmann and Tobias R. Spiller
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(5), 2408; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18052408 - 01 Mar 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2588
Abstract
There is a strong relationship between loneliness and depression, but depression is a heterogeneous disorder. We examined the profile of depressive symptoms most strongly related to loneliness. Study participants were 2007 community-dwelling individuals (median age 31 years, 70.4% women) who completed an online [...] Read more.
There is a strong relationship between loneliness and depression, but depression is a heterogeneous disorder. We examined the profile of depressive symptoms most strongly related to loneliness. Study participants were 2007 community-dwelling individuals (median age 31 years, 70.4% women) who completed an online survey on loneliness (single-item question: “never”, “sometimes”, “often”), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and demographics. The relationship between loneliness and depressive symptoms was evaluated with linear regression and network analyses. The prevalence of loneliness (sometimes or often) and of moderate depression was 47.1% and 24.0%, respectively. Loneliness explained 26% of the variance in the total depressive symptom score (p < 0.001), independent of covariates. This result was almost exclusively explained by the relationship with a single depression symptom (“feeling down, depressed, or hopeless”), irrespective of whether loneliness was treated as a nominal or continuous variable. The findings of our study suggest that the role of loneliness in depression should not only be investigated at the syndrome level, but also at the symptom level. Studies are warranted to test whether targeted treatment of depressive affect is particularly effective against loneliness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 353 KiB  
Article
Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter?
by Juan Chen, Lin Gong and Shenghua Xie
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 2042; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18042042 - 19 Feb 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2443
Abstract
Despite growing literature identifying key individual, family, community, and environmental factors as causes for mental disorders during the process of urbanization, the role played by local government has not been taken into account. In this article, we investigate how the effectiveness of local [...] Read more.
Despite growing literature identifying key individual, family, community, and environmental factors as causes for mental disorders during the process of urbanization, the role played by local government has not been taken into account. In this article, we investigate how the effectiveness of local government affects residents’ levels of psychological distress in areas of China undergoing urbanization. We measure the effectiveness of local governments according to their success in promoting access to the social security system through the distribution of social security cards among citizens. We hypothesize that higher local government effectiveness will reduce residents’ psychological distress by alleviating worries about medical expenses and elder care. Drawing on data from the 2018 Urbanization and Quality of Life Survey (N = 3229) conducted in 40 localities undergoing rural–urban transition, we estimate three-level mixed-effects regression models to test the research hypotheses, allowing random effects at the township/county and neighborhood levels while controlling for a series of individual attributes. The results demonstrate that local government effectiveness is negatively associated with residents’ psychological distress: effective local governments alleviate worries about medical expenses and elder care, and thereby reduce psychological distress. The findings indicate that, to reduce residents’ worries and psychological distress during the process of rural–urban transition, it is essential to improve local government effectiveness, particularly in promoting residents’ access to the social security system. Beyond demonstrating how local government effectiveness matters for residents’ psychological distress, our research also illustrates how to properly model locational parameters in analyses of individual well-being. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
12 pages, 1453 KiB  
Article
Trend in the Prevalence of Non-Daily Smoking and Their Relationship with Mental Health Using the Korea Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
by Yunna Kwan, Hye Sim Kim, Dae Ryong Kang and Tae Hui Kim
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(10), 3396; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103396 - 13 May 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2062
Abstract
Introduction: Non-Daily Smoking (NDS), which is increasingly prevalent worldwide, has not yet attracted as much attention as has daily smoking in Asia. The aims of this study were to identify trends in the prevalence of NDS and to compare characteristics by age, gender, [...] Read more.
Introduction: Non-Daily Smoking (NDS), which is increasingly prevalent worldwide, has not yet attracted as much attention as has daily smoking in Asia. The aims of this study were to identify trends in the prevalence of NDS and to compare characteristics by age, gender, and mental health indicators such as depression, suicidality, and alcohol consumption in South Korea. Methods: We included 33,806 adults (aged ≥ 19 years) who participated in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES) from 2010 to 2015. The dataset includes self-reported medical history and questionnaires that explore depression, suicidality, and alcohol use, which are known to be highly related to smoking. We divided the respondents into four groups according to smoking status: Never Smoking (NS, N = 20,270); Past Smoking (PS = 6835); Daily Smoking (DS = 5927), who reported smoking every day; and Non-Daily Smoking (NDS = 774), who reported that they sometimes smoke. Results: Increased NDS prevalence is observed in most age groups in both male and female adults despite the prevalence of total smoking and daily smoking gradually decreasing. Depression and suicidality were significantly more prevalent in the NDS than the NS group (Depression Odds ratio, OR = 1.72, 95% Confidence interval, CI = 1.31–2.26; Suicidality OR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.40–7.02). NDS is also associated with a higher frequency of binge drinking and alcohol use disorder than NS (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 3.49–4.99). Conclusions: This study suggests that more concern is warranted for NDS given the increasing prevalence and characteristics of poor mental health in NDS respondents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 2696 KiB  
Review
The Interplay between Social and Ecological Determinants of Mental Health for Children and Youth in the Climate Crisis
by Maya K. Gislason, Angel M. Kennedy and Stephanie M. Witham
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(9), 4573; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18094573 - 26 Apr 2021
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 13031
Abstract
Children and youth are showing increasing levels of mental health distress due to the climate crisis, characterized by feelings of sadness, guilt, changes in sleep and appetite, difficulty concentrating, solastalgia, and disconnection from land. To gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between [...] Read more.
Children and youth are showing increasing levels of mental health distress due to the climate crisis, characterized by feelings of sadness, guilt, changes in sleep and appetite, difficulty concentrating, solastalgia, and disconnection from land. To gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between climate change and children and youth’s mental health, we conducted a rapid review and a thematic analysis of the results in NVivo 12. Our findings show that children and youth experience a plethora of direct and indirect effects from climate change and this impacts their mental wellbeing in diverse and complex ways. Young people also have varied perceptions of climate change based on their social locations and many are dealing with feelings of immense worry and eco-anxiety. The mental health impacts of climate change on children/youth are tied to Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) but also need to be understood in relation to the Ecological Determinants of Health (EDoH). Through an eco-social lens, this paper explores these conceptual issues and uses them to provide a framework for understanding the interplay of social and ecological determinants of mental health for children/youth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Social Determinants of Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop