Clinical Advances in Musculoskeletal Disorders

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 April 2024) | Viewed by 4162

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Interests: pelvic instability; pelvic reconstruction; non-union; bone regeneration; post fracture fixation complications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Joint Reconstruction Surgery, Sushrut Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India
Interests: trauma; arthroplasty; joint reconstruction

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Musculoskeletal disorders encompass various clinical conditions that affect the human musculoskeletal system. Bones, joints, muscles, tendons, ligaments, nerves, and connective tissues can all be afflicted, leading to pain, tenderness, inflammation, swelling, muscle spasm, and functional restrictions.

Overall, these conditions may be caused by hereditary, congenital or acquired pathological developments. Inflammatory, infectious, degenerative, traumatic, vascular, metabolic and neoplastic processes can lead to various types of impairment and degrees of severity. The three most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions known to be associated with the greatest number of health care-related visits to emergency departments and hospitals are trauma, backache and arthritis.

Musculoskeletal disorders of traumatic origin develop due to a sudden intensity (i.e., lifting a heavy object) or due to the repeated exposure to force, vibration, or an awkward posture. They can affect any part of the body, including the upper extremities, hands, neck, spine, pelvis, lower extremities and feet.

The most popular diagnostic tests employed to screen and diagnose musculoskeletal disorders include radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasonography. 

Musculoskeletal disorders represent the second most prevalent cause of disability globally; this is measured in terms of the number of years those affected live with disability and the fact that it continues to be a burden on society as a whole, due to the enormous direct costs to the health care system it incurs and the indirect costs  suffered due to the loss of work. As the global population ages, it is envisaged that the number of people suffering from musculoskeletal conditions will also increase. Currently, the global prevalence of MSDs is reported to be as high as 40%.

In this Special Issue, we invite authors to submit their research work on this important topic. Papers focusing on epidemiological studies, diagnostic techniques, novel treatment modalities, either surgical, non-invasive or non-operative, rehabilitation protocols, and patient-reported outcomes are all welcome; this is with the aim of enhancing our knowledge and providing further insight into these ever-growing disabling and costly conditions.

Prof. Dr. Peter V. Giannoudis
Prof. Dr. Sushrut Babhulkar
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • musculoskeletal disorders
  • disability
  • pain
  • inflammation
  • arthritis

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 1829 KiB  
Article
Sonographic Characterization of the Pericruciate Fat Pad with the Use of Compression Elastography—A Cross-Sectional Study among Healthy and Post-Injured Patients
by Michał Kanak, Natalia Pawłuś, Marcin Mostowy, Marcin Piwnik, Marcin Domżalski and Jędrzej Lesman
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2578; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13092578 - 27 Apr 2024
Viewed by 199
Abstract
Background: The pericruciate fat pad (PCFP) in the knee joint is still insufficiently studied despite its potential role in knee pathologies. This is the first reported study which aimed to clarify the characteristics of the PCFP in healthy individuals and contrast them [...] Read more.
Background: The pericruciate fat pad (PCFP) in the knee joint is still insufficiently studied despite its potential role in knee pathologies. This is the first reported study which aimed to clarify the characteristics of the PCFP in healthy individuals and contrast them with cases of post-traumatic injuries. Methods: Conducted as a retrospective cross-sectional study (n = 110 knees each) following STROBE guidelines, it employed grayscale ultrasound with echogenicity measurement, compression elastography with elasticity measurement, and Color Doppler for blood flow assessment. Results: PCFP showed a homogenic and hyperechoic echostructure. The echogenicity of the PCFP was higher than that of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) (p < 0.001, z-score = 8.97) and of the medial head of gastrocnemius (MHG) (p = 0.007, z-score = 2.72) in healthy knees, but lower than subcutaneous fat (SCF) (p < 0.001, z-score = −6.52). Post-injury/surgery, PCFP echogenicity surpassed other structures (p < 0.001; z-score for PCL 12.2; for MHG 11.65 and for SCF 12.36) and notably exceeded the control group (p < 0.001, z-score = 8.78). PCFP elasticity was lower than MHG and SCF in both groups, with significantly reduced elasticity in post-traumatic knees (ratio SCF/PCFP 15.52 ± 17.87 in case group vs. 2.26 ± 2.4 in control group; p < 0.001; z-score = 9.65). Blood flow was detected in 71% of healthy PCFPs with three main patterns. Conclusions: The main findings, indicating increased echogenicity and reduced elasticity of PCFP post-trauma, potentially related to fat pad fibrosis, suggest potential applications of echogenicity and elasticity measurements in detecting and monitoring diverse knee pathologies. The description of vascularity variations supplying the PCFP adds additional value to the study by emphasizing the clinically important role of PCFP as a bridge for the middle genicular artery on its way to the inside of the knee joint. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1665 KiB  
Article
Vitamin D Deficiency Is Frequent in Patients with Rapidly Destructive Osteoarthritis—Data from a Single-Center Analysis
by Konstantin Horas, Gerrit Maier, Maximilian Rudert, Axel Jakuscheit, Manuel Weißenberger, Ioannis Stratos, Tizian Heinz, Dominik Rak, Philip Mark Anderson and Jörg Arnholdt
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1296; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13051296 - 25 Feb 2024
Viewed by 484
Abstract
Background: Rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDO) of the hip joint is characterised by the rapid destruction of the femoral head with or without acetabular involvement. There has been increasing interest in this disease over the past years; however, the entity is still poorly understood, [...] Read more.
Background: Rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDO) of the hip joint is characterised by the rapid destruction of the femoral head with or without acetabular involvement. There has been increasing interest in this disease over the past years; however, the entity is still poorly understood, and its pathophysiology remains unknown. Yet, there is ample evidence today that increased bone metabolism might play a role in the onset and progression of the disease. Vitamin D is of utmost importance to maintain a balanced bone metabolism. However, whether vitamin D deficiency is involved in disease development remains to be elucidated. Further, the vitamin D status of patients with RDO has not yet been analysed. For this reason, the objective of this study was to assess the vitamin D status of patients with RDO. Moreover, the aim was to clarify whether there is a difference in the vitamin D status of patients with RDO compared with patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: In this single-centre analysis, the 25(OH)D, PTH, and calcium levels of 29 patients who presented with RDO between 2020 and 2022 were assessed. Results: Altogether, 97% of patients (28/29) were vitamin D deficient, a further 3% (1/29) were vitamin D insufficient, and not a single patient presented with a sufficient vitamin D status. Notably, the vitamin D levels of RDO patients (mean = 11.04 ng/mL) were significantly lower than the vitamin D levels of patients with OA (mean = 22.16 ng/mL, p = 0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, we found a widespread and high rate of vitamin D deficiency in patients with RDO. Hence, we believe that 25(OH)D status should routinely be analysed in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 7324 KiB  
Article
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cartilage Evaluation of the Hand Joints of Systemic Sclerosis Patients: A Novel Insight on Hand Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis—Preliminary Report
by Michał Waszczykowski, Michał Podgórski, Jarosław Fabiś and Arleta Waszczykowska
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7247; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12237247 - 23 Nov 2023
Viewed by 666
Abstract
Background. Osteoarthritis of the hand joints in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients might be an independent manifestation leading to limitation of upper extremity function. There is no publication quantitatively assessing the thickness of articular cartilage within the hand joints of SSc patients by MRI. [...] Read more.
Background. Osteoarthritis of the hand joints in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients might be an independent manifestation leading to limitation of upper extremity function. There is no publication quantitatively assessing the thickness of articular cartilage within the hand joints of SSc patients by MRI. The purpose of our study was to quantify the condition and thickness of hand joints cartilage with three-dimensional quantitative MRI (3D q-MRI). Methods. The study was conducted in twenty people: ten patients with SSc and ten healthy individuals. All participants were examined with the 3D q-MRI with 3T scanner. The cartilage thickness of proximal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints as well as metacarpophalangeal joints was measured. Results. There was no significant difference in cartilage thickness between both groups. However, the joint cartilage was thinner in fingers with acro-osteolysis. In PIP joint of the fingers with acro-osteolysis, the mean cartilage thickness was 0.5 mm (p = 0.0043) and 0.4 mm (p = 0.0034) in DIP joints. Conclusions. Quantitative MRI analysis of the joints of the hands of SSc patients does not indicate changes in thickness of the articular cartilage. A significant reduction in the articular cartilage thickness of the fingers with acro-osteolysis indicates the potential of an ischemic basis of articular cartilage destruction in SSc patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1248 KiB  
Article
Automatic Variable Selection Algorithms in Prognostic Factor Research in Neck Pain
by Bernard X. W. Liew, Francisco M. Kovacs, David Rügamer and Ana Royuela
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6232; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12196232 - 27 Sep 2023
Viewed by 698
Abstract
This study aims to compare the variable selection strategies of different machine learning (ML) and statistical algorithms in the prognosis of neck pain (NP) recovery. A total of 3001 participants with NP were included. Three dichotomous outcomes of an improvement in NP, arm [...] Read more.
This study aims to compare the variable selection strategies of different machine learning (ML) and statistical algorithms in the prognosis of neck pain (NP) recovery. A total of 3001 participants with NP were included. Three dichotomous outcomes of an improvement in NP, arm pain (AP), and disability at 3 months follow-up were used. Twenty-five variables (twenty-eight parameters) were included as predictors. There were more parameters than variables, as some categorical variables had >2 levels. Eight modelling techniques were compared: stepwise regression based on unadjusted p values (stepP), on adjusted p values (stepPAdj), on Akaike information criterion (stepAIC), best subset regression (BestSubset) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO], Minimax concave penalty (MCP), model-based boosting (mboost), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MuARS). The algorithm that selected the fewest predictors was stepPAdj (number of predictors, p = 4 to 8). MuARS was the algorithm with the second fewest predictors selected (p = 9 to 14). The predictor selected by all algorithms with the largest coefficient magnitude was “having undergone a neuroreflexotherapy intervention” for NP (β = from 1.987 to 2.296) and AP (β = from 2.639 to 3.554), and “Imaging findings: spinal stenosis” (β = from −1.331 to −1.763) for disability. Stepwise regression based on adjusted p-values resulted in the sparsest models, which enhanced clinical interpretability. MuARS appears to provide the optimal balance between model sparsity whilst retaining high predictive performance across outcomes. Different algorithms produced similar performances but resulted in a different number of variables selected. Rather than relying on any single algorithm, confidence in the variable selection may be increased by using multiple algorithms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 10343 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Discordant Findings between 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Evaluation of the Knee Meniscus
by Pieter Van Dyck, Jasper Vandenrijt, Thijs Vande Vyvere, Annemiek Snoeckx and Christiaan H. W. Heusdens
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5667; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12175667 - 31 Aug 2023
Viewed by 791
Abstract
Numerous studies have assessed the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting tears of the knee menisci using arthroscopy results as the gold standard, but few have concentrated on the nature of discordant findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze [...] Read more.
Numerous studies have assessed the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting tears of the knee menisci using arthroscopy results as the gold standard, but few have concentrated on the nature of discordant findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze the discordances between 3T MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of the knee meniscus. Medical records of 112 patients who underwent 3T MRI and subsequent arthroscopy of the knee were retrospectively analyzed to determine the accuracy of diagnoses of meniscal tear. Compared with arthroscopy, there were 22 false-negative and 14 false-positive MR interpretations of meniscal tear occurring in 32 patients. Images with errors in diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus and all errors were categorized as either unavoidable, equivocal or as interpretation error. Of 36 MR diagnostic errors, there were 16 (44%) unavoidable, 5 (14%) interpretation errors and 15 (42%) equivocal for meniscal tear. The largest categories of errors were unavoidable false-positive MRI diagnoses (71%) and equivocal false-negative MRI diagnoses (50%). All meniscal tears missed by MRI were treated with partial meniscectomy (n = 14) or meniscal repair (n = 8). Discordant findings between 3T MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of the knee meniscus remain a concern and primarily occur due to unavoidable and equivocal errors. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with meniscal tears should understand why and how the findings seen on knee MRI and arthroscopy may sometimes differ. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop