remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Remote Sensing of Grassland Ecosystem

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 19936

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Prentice’s Climate Group Lab, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, UK
Interests: plant ecology; modelling

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Environmental Sciences (SES) and Concurrent Faculty, Special Centre for Disaster Research, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, India
Interests: disaster; remote sensing; sustainable development; socio-ecological systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
NASI Senior Scientist Platinum Jubilee Fellow, System Analysis for Climate Smart Agriculture, Innovation Systems for the Drylands, ICRISAT, Pathancheru, Hyderabad 502324, India
Interests: land use and land cover change; landscape ecology; biodiversity; land dynamic modelling; assessment of ecological services

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Grassland covers 51% of the world’s land surface, and is among the most prominent biogeographic regions on the Earth for human welfare and livestock. The alpine pasture parts of grasslands are pronounced areas of high-altitude ecosystems, and are important in terms of climate change. The distribution of alpine pastures makes them fragile and sensitive to climate change, in order to ensure sustainable alpine pasture management. Nutrient rich grasslands and herbaceous vegetation play an important role in determining the grazing patterns of livestock, distribution of herbivore population, interlinkages with other trophic levels, and overall ecosystem health and stability. Common practices for detecting grass canopy properties, such as leaf area index, and biomass and chlorophyll content, require detailed sampling, biomass removal, and field settings. Because of the laborious job and inadequate data that is not representative of the population spatially, surveying and mapping techniques, like remote sensing, for estimating grass canopy properties in varying spatial and temporal scales, are therefore critical for a better understanding of grassland productivity, livestock population, and in response to the changing climate system, among other biophysical attributes.

Satellite derived information can provide information to meet the requirements, through the involvement of all actors (livestock farmers and herdsmen/grazers; pastoral systems; and conservation specialists, researchers, and the mangers of protected areas). For these reasons, more research is warranted in order to better understand the capabilities and limits of the different sensor platforms and the retrieval algorithms for the inventory, monitoring, and management of grassland resources. This Special Issue is focused on advancing the range of remote sensing-based techniques for grassland characteristics, covering a wide variety of applications like carbon sequestration, vegetation–climate feedbacks, forage production, and so, but they are not limited to sites, data, and scales.

We would like to invite you to submit articles about your recent research with respect to the following topics under three broad challenges.

Challenge 1: In laboratory/field scale

  • Statistical-based grass canopy properties (e.g., handheld, UAV, airborne campaigns, etc.)—methods and evaluations.
  • Physical-based radiative transfer model of grass structure and biochemistry.
  • Flux tower measurements of grassland ecosystems.

Challenge 2: In satellite scale

  • Optical remote sensing of the grass canopy structure (e.g., LAI and biomass) and biochemical (Chlorophyll), methods and evaluations (e.g., Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2/-3), and future missions (e.g., EnMap, HyspIRI).
  • Radar remote sensing of grass canopy structure—methods and evaluations.
  • Remote sensing of varying treatments (fertilizers) and management (irrigation and pest infestation, fire/wildfire) to grass canopies.
  • Application of new algorithms to biomass/carbon dynamics estimation in grasslands (e.g., alpine prairie).
  • Comparison and evaluation of different remote sensing methods and vegetation indices sensitive to grassland properties.

Challenge 3: Earth System Models

  • Prediction of grass gross primary productivity (GPP) in Earth system models’ (ESMs) framework.
  • Inter-comparison between satellite derived and ESM predictions.

Review or commentary articles covering one or more of these topics are also welcome.

Dr. Ramesh K. Ningthoujam
Prof. Pawan K Joshi
Prof. Parth Sarathi Roy
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 9775 KiB  
Communication
The Impact of Seasonality and Response Period on Qualifying the Relationship between Ecosystem Productivity and Climatic Factors over the Eurasian Steppe
by Qi Liu, Quan Liu, Xianglei Meng, Jiahua Zhang, Fengmei Yao and Hairu Zhang
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(16), 3159; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13163159 - 10 Aug 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2382
Abstract
As climate change intensifies, surface vegetation productivity and carbon exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere are significantly affected by the variation of climatic factors. Due to the sensitivity of grasslands to these climatic factors, it is crucial to understand the response of [...] Read more.
As climate change intensifies, surface vegetation productivity and carbon exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere are significantly affected by the variation of climatic factors. Due to the sensitivity of grasslands to these climatic factors, it is crucial to understand the response of vegetation greenness, or carbon exchange within grasslands, to environment factor dynamics. In this study, we used solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), precipitation (P), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), evaporative stress (ES), and root zone soil moisture (RSM) derived from remote sensing, reanalysis, and assimilation datasets to explore the response of vegetation greenness within Eurasian Steppe to climatic factors. Our results indicated deseasonlization based on the Seasonal-Trend decomposition using Loess (STL) method, which was an effective means to remove the seasonality disturbances that affect the qualification of the relationship between SIF and the four climatic factors. The response of SIF had a time lag effect on these climatic factors, and the longer the response period, the greater the impact on the correlation of SIF with P, VPD, ES, and RSM. We also found, among the four factors, that the response of SIF to ES was the timeliest. The findings of this study emphasized the impact of the seasonality and time lag effect on the dynamic response between variables, and provided references to the attribution and monitoring of vegetation greenness and ecosystem productivity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Grassland Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 4168 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Analysis of the Research Trends and Areas in Grassland Remote Sensing: A Scientometrics Analysis of Web of Science from 1980 to 2020
by Tong Li, Lizhen Cui, Zhihong Xu, Ronghai Hu, Pawan K. Joshi, Xiufang Song, Li Tang, Anquan Xia, Yanfen Wang, Da Guo, Jiapei Zhu, Yanbin Hao, Lan Song and Xiaoyong Cui
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(7), 1279; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13071279 - 27 Mar 2021
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 5448
Abstract
Grassland remote sensing (GRS) is an important research topic that applies remote sensing technology to grassland ecosystems, reflects the number of grassland resources and grassland health promptly, and provides inversion information used in sustainable development management. A scientometrics analysis based on Science Citation [...] Read more.
Grassland remote sensing (GRS) is an important research topic that applies remote sensing technology to grassland ecosystems, reflects the number of grassland resources and grassland health promptly, and provides inversion information used in sustainable development management. A scientometrics analysis based on Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) was performed to understand the research trends and areas of focus in GRS research studies. A total of 2692 papers related to GRS research studies and 82,208 references published from 1980 to 2020 were selected as the research objects. A comprehensive overview of the field based on the annual documents, research areas, institutions, influential journals, core authors, and temporal trends in keywords were presented in this study. The results showed that the annual number of documents increased exponentially, and more than 100 papers were published each year since 2010. Remote sensing, environmental sciences, and ecology were the most popular Web of Science research areas. The journal Remote Sensing was one of the most popular for researchers to publish documents and shows high development and publishing potential in GRS research studies. The institution with the greatest research documents and most citations was the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Guo X.L., Hill M.J., and Zhang L. were the most productive authors across the 40-year study period in terms of the number of articles published. Seven clusters of research areas were identified that generated contributions to this topic by keyword co-occurrence analysis. We also detected 17 main future directions of GRS research studies by document co-citation analysis. Emerging or underutilized methodologies and technologies, such as unmanned aerial systems (UASs), cloud computing, and deep learning, will continue to further enhance GRS research in the process of achieving sustainable development goals. These results can help related researchers better understand the past and future of GRS research studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Grassland Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 2541 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Spectral Reflectance-Based Smart Farming Tools and a Conventional Approach to Determine Herbage Mass and Grass Quality on Farm
by Leonie Hart, Olivier Huguenin-Elie, Roy Latsch, Michael Simmler, Sébastien Dubois and Christina Umstatter
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(19), 3256; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12193256 - 7 Oct 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3327
Abstract
The analysis of multispectral imagery (MSI) acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and mobile near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) used on-site has become increasingly promising for timely assessments of grassland to support farm management. However, a major challenge of these methods is their calibration, [...] Read more.
The analysis of multispectral imagery (MSI) acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and mobile near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) used on-site has become increasingly promising for timely assessments of grassland to support farm management. However, a major challenge of these methods is their calibration, given the large spatiotemporal variability of grassland. This study evaluated the performance of two smart farming tools in determining fresh herbage mass and grass quality (dry matter, crude protein, and structural carbohydrates): an analysis model for MSI (GrassQ) and a portable on-site NIRS (HarvestLabTM 3000). We compared them to conventional look-up tables used by farmers. Surveys were undertaken on 18 multi-species grasslands located on six farms in Switzerland throughout the vegetation period in 2018. The sampled plots represented two phenological growth stages, corresponding to an age of two weeks and four to six weeks, respectively. We found that neither the performance of the smart farming tools nor the performance of the conventional approach were satisfactory for use on multi-species grasslands. The MSI-model performed poorly, with relative errors of 99.7% and 33.2% of the laboratory analyses for herbage mass and crude protein, respectively. The errors of the MSI-model were indicated to be mainly caused by grassland and environmental characteristics that differ from the relatively narrow Irish calibration dataset. The On-site NIRS showed comparable performance to the conventional Look-up Tables in determining crude protein and structural carbohydrates (error ≤ 22.2%). However, we identified that the On-site NIRS determined undried herbage quality with a systematic and correctable error. After corrections, its performance was better than the conventional approach, indicating a great potential of the On-site NIRS for decision support on grazing and harvest scheduling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Grassland Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 8217 KiB  
Article
Predicting Forage Quality of Grasslands Using UAV-Borne Imaging Spectroscopy
by Jayan Wijesingha, Thomas Astor, Damian Schulze-Brüninghoff, Matthias Wengert and Michael Wachendorf
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(1), 126; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12010126 - 1 Jan 2020
Cited by 60 | Viewed by 6995
Abstract
The timely knowledge of forage quality of grasslands is vital for matching the demands in animal feeding. Remote sensing (RS) is a promising tool for estimating field-scale forage quality compared with traditional methods, which usually do not provide equally detailed information. However, the [...] Read more.
The timely knowledge of forage quality of grasslands is vital for matching the demands in animal feeding. Remote sensing (RS) is a promising tool for estimating field-scale forage quality compared with traditional methods, which usually do not provide equally detailed information. However, the applicability of RS prediction models depends on the variability of the underlying calibration data, which can be brought about by the inclusion of a multitude of grassland types and management practices in the model development. Major aims of this study were (i) to build forage quality estimation models for multiple grassland types based on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-borne imaging spectroscopy and (ii) to generate forage quality distribution maps using the best models obtained. The study examined data from eight grasslands in northern Hesse, Germany, which largely differed in terms of vegetation type and cutting regime. The UAV with a hyperspectral camera on board was utilised to acquire spectral images from the grasslands, and crude protein (CP) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) concentration of the forage was assessed at each cut. Five predictive modelling regression algorithms were applied to develop quality estimation models. Further, grassland forage quality distribution maps were created using the best models developed. The normalised spectral reflectance data showed the strongest relationship with both CP and ADF concentration. From all predictive algorithms, support vector regression provided the highest precision and accuracy for CP estimation (median normalised root mean square error prediction (nRMSEp) = 10.6%), while cubist regression model proved best for ADF estimation (median nRMSEp = 13.4%). The maps generated for both CP and ADF showed a distinct spatial variation in forage quality values for the different grasslands and cutting regimes. Overall, the results disclose that UAV-borne imaging spectroscopy, in combination with predictive modelling, provides a promising tool for accurate forage quality estimation of multiple grasslands. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Grassland Ecosystem)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop