sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Social Sustainability in Times of Crisis: Putting People’s Happiness First

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Health, Well-Being and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2023) | Viewed by 12698

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business and Law, CQUiversity, 400 Kent Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
Interests: social sustainability; corporate social responsibility; responsible leadership; strategic HRM
School of Business and Law, CQUniversity, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Interests: diversity; diverse workforce; justice; employee well-being; mental health; career development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Interests: responsible innovation; sustainable and social entrepreneurship; refugee and immigrant entrepreneurship and employment

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Social sustainability is recognized as a fundamental component of sustainable development. It refers to creating a stable, prosperous environment that helps people to prosper and lead satisfying lives by understanding their needs in communities (Staniškienė & Stankevičiūtė, 2018; Schönborn et al., 2019). Commonly, a sustainable community is one where people want to live and work now and in the future. Ideally, it should meet the diverse needs of current and future residents, be sensitive to the environment, and contribute to quality living. It is safe and inclusive with well-designed, built, and operated facilities that offer equal opportunities and quality services (De Stefano et al., 2018; Amrutha & Geetha, 2020). However, the COVID-19 pandemic crisis has shaped the fundamentals of social sustainability and, ultimately, the sustainable development agenda in communities. For example, social and business functions have halted in certain countries or regions. As a result, unemployment and poverty rates have significantly increased among vulnerable groups (e.g., refugees, low-income people, immigrants, disabled and immunocompromised people, and the elderly), and communities have become vulnerable due to lack of employment and health care. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic has led researchers, scholars, and policymakers to rethink and rebuild social and organizational resilience by redefining and reframing the assumptions, fundamentals, and practices through the lenses of social sustainability and happiness. However, not just the COVID-19 pandemic, but crises caused by wars, climate change, and political upheavals, create socio-economic issues that transform the sustainability and happiness of people, workplaces, countries, and regions. Yet, only a few theoretical and empirical studies have addressed social sustainability or happiness issues, particularly concerning the ‘people’ and ‘responsible’ aspects, in the recovery from crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This Special Issue aims to fill these gaps and seeks new avenues for future research on social sustainability and putting people’s happiness first.

Research studies in happiness and social sustainability have roots in multiple academic domains. Scholars have highlighted the importance of leadership, corporate social responsibility (CSR), organizational resilience, social development, and strategic HRM in achieving social sustainability (Staniškienė & Stankevičiūtė, 2018; De Stefano et al., 2018; Sobhani et al., 2021). Likewise, to maintain social sustainability, employee happiness and wellbeing are critical aspects of sustainable workplaces, since employees feel valued and more likely to be satisfied and productive at work (De Stefano et al., 2018; Haque et al., 2021). Furthermore, the crises caused by wars, climate change, and political upheavals create socio-economic issues affecting people's happiness, workplaces, and communities. Hence, potential theoretical and empirical papers could come from a wide range of disciplines that explore policy adaptation for climate change or other crises, the impact of such crises on cities and regions, and the role of corporations, governments and/or small businesses in reshaping social sustainability and happiness. Studies regarding the mitigation and adaptation of policies and strategies, including related governance issues, statistical analyses, and investigations, are welcome. The following three highlights will be the major focus of the Special Issue for its theoretical or empirical contributions:

  1. Exploring social sustainability through the lens of people’s happiness (i.e., employee, employer, leader, manager, or stakeholders) and their implications: What can be done to foster social sustainability/happiness? Does social sustainability work? If so, what do we know about its effectiveness?
  2. Understanding the role of HRM in happiness and social sustainability: What functions, powers, and responsibilities do organizations, small businesses, or societies have? How do these entities react? How do these entities manage HRM challenges? How do they practice leadership? How do these entities link and cooperate with authorities on higher levels within organizations? Can these examples be regarded as good practices for strategic HRM and effective leadership?
  3. Demonstrating opportunities for ways out of a crisis: Do future leaders, policymakers, small business owners, or organizational managers intend to “bounce back” to a pre-crisis strategy? Can they use new opportunities to bring about fundamental changes that might be more favorable to sustainable development, people’s happiness, or social sustainability? Why or why not? Are there any potential effects on social stability and cooperation, the economy, or the environment?

We invite theoretical and empirical papers addressing the challenges outlined above. We particularly welcome papers that explore the intersection between crisis, happiness, and social sustainability. The following are our priority areas:

  • Social and business (including small business) sustainability;
  • Sustainable business practices or models focusing on strategic HRM and Leadership;
  • Sustainable development in the era of SDG 2030;
  • Corporate social responsibility (CSR);
  • Climate change and adaptation;
  • Social or inclusive entrepreneurship for adapting to a crisis;
  • Happiness and wellbeing at work;
  • The resolution of conflicting stakeholder priorities;
  • The potential for step changes in sustainable social and organizational development;
  • Sustainable or green HRM;
  • Value-based leadership practices (e.g., ethical, servant or responsible leadership);
  • Post-crisis HRM and business strategy.

References:

Amrutha, V.N. & Geetha, S.N. (2020). A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119131.

De Stefano, F., Bagdadli, S. & Camuffo, A. (2018). The HR role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability: A boundary‐shifting literature review. Human Resource Management, 57(2), 549-566.

Haque, A., Fernando, M. & Caputi, P. (2021). Responsible leadership and employee outcomes: a systematic literature review, integration, and propositions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(3), 383-408.

Schönborn, G., Berlin, C., Pinzone, M., Hanisch, C., Georgoulias, K. & Lanz, M. (2019). Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 1-10.

Sobhani, F.A.; Haque, A. & Rahman, S. (2021). Socially Responsible HRM, Employee Attitude, and Bank Reputation: The Rise of CSR in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 13, 2753.

Staniškienė, E. & Stankevičiūtė, Ž. (2018). Social sustainability measurement framework: The case of employee perspective in a CSR-committed organisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 708-719.

Dr. Amlan Haque
Dr. Huong Le
Dr. Nadeera Ranabahu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social and business (including small business) sustainability
  • sustainable business practices or models focusing on strategic HRM and Leadership
  • sustainable development in the era of SDG 2030
  • corporate social responsibility (CSR)
  • climate change and adaptation
  • social or inclusive entrepreneurship for adapting to a crisis
  • happiness and wellbeing at work
  • the resolution of conflicting stakeholder priorities
  • the potential for step changes in sustainable social and organizational development
  • sustainable or green HRM
  • value-based leadership practices (e.g., ethical, servant or responsible leadership)
  • post-crisis HRM and business strategy

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 2453 KiB  
Article
Shifting Workplace Paradigms: Twitter Sentiment Insights on Work from Home
by Amlan Haque, Kishore Singh, Sabi Kaphle, Heena Panchasara and Wen-Chun Tseng
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 871; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su16020871 - 19 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1024
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced organisations to evaluate whether work from home (WFH) best fits future office management and employee productivity. The increasing popularity of web-based social media increases the possibility of using employees’ sentiment and opinion-mining techniques to track and monitor their [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced organisations to evaluate whether work from home (WFH) best fits future office management and employee productivity. The increasing popularity of web-based social media increases the possibility of using employees’ sentiment and opinion-mining techniques to track and monitor their preferences for WFH through Twitter. While social media platforms provide useful data-mining information about employee opinions, more research must be conducted to investigate the sentiment on Twitter of WFH employees. This paper meets this research demand by analysing a random sample of 755,882,104 tweets linked to employees’ opinions and beliefs regarding WFH. Moreover, an analysis of Google trends revealed a positive sentiment toward WFH. The results of this paper explore whether people (as employees) are enthusiastic and optimistic about WFH. This paper suggests that WFH has positive and supportive potential as an HRM strategy to increase workplace effectiveness for greater staff engagement and organisational sustainability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1639 KiB  
Article
A Scientometric Analysis of Wellbeing Research in the Construction Industry
by Victor Samwinga, Sambo Zulu and Toyin Ebenezer Adeyemi
Sustainability 2023, 15(24), 16662; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su152416662 - 8 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1002
Abstract
The significance of wellbeing in the construction industry has increased due to the high frequency of accidents. However, the existing research fails to comprehensively address the various aspects of wellbeing. To address this gap, we conducted a literature review on wellbeing in the [...] Read more.
The significance of wellbeing in the construction industry has increased due to the high frequency of accidents. However, the existing research fails to comprehensively address the various aspects of wellbeing. To address this gap, we conducted a literature review on wellbeing in the construction industry and carried out a trend analysis of its multiple dimensions. A systematic review of 162 peer-reviewed journal articles was performed using scientometric analysis and qualitative trend analysis techniques. The results indicated that the discussion on wellbeing in the construction industry tends to overlook its multifaceted nature. Prominent publication outlets were identified, with a focus on environmental and physical wellbeing, while recognising notable contributions in the field of mental wellbeing and the limited contributions to other dimensions of wellbeing. This study offers valuable insights for both researchers and industry practitioners. Researchers can identify priority areas for future research based on the identified gaps, while construction companies can gain awareness of the potential relevance of wellbeing in the industry. This study contributes to the existing knowledge on wellbeing in the construction industry by analysing its various dimensions and providing research directions. It serves as a reference point for interpreting findings and offers guidance for future research endeavours. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4322 KiB  
Article
Unleashing Employee Potential: A Mixed-Methods Study of High-Performance Work Systems in Bangladeshi Banks
by Sardana Islam Khan, Amlan Haque and Timothy Bartram
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14636; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su151914636 - 9 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1306
Abstract
This two-stage sequential mixed-methods study explores the contextual configuration of perceived high-performance work systems (HPWSs) and its association with psychological empowerment (PE), trust in immediate managers (ET), affective commitment (AC) and employee performance (EP) in two Bangladeshi private commercial banks (PCBLs). In the [...] Read more.
This two-stage sequential mixed-methods study explores the contextual configuration of perceived high-performance work systems (HPWSs) and its association with psychological empowerment (PE), trust in immediate managers (ET), affective commitment (AC) and employee performance (EP) in two Bangladeshi private commercial banks (PCBLs). In the first stage, qualitative data were collected through interviews with 15 industry experts. Based on the qualitative findings, a HPWS framework has been hypothesised and tested using the survey data from 436 employees in the two selected PCBLs in Bangladesh. The findings demonstrated that ET and PE both mediated the perceived HPWS–EP link and that perceived HPWS positively influences AC. However, AC does not mediate the HPWS–EP link. In line with the social exchange theory, perceived HPWS can positively predict attitudinal outcomes and employee performance, provided it is configured to the specific institutional context. Implications are drawn for HPWS theory, sustainable HR development and performance, and future international human resource management research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 498 KiB  
Article
Sustainability through Humility: The Impact of Humble Leadership on Work–Family Facilitation in the U.S. and Japan
by Soyeon Kim, Neena Gopalan and Nicholas Beutell
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14367; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su151914367 - 29 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1185
Abstract
This study examines the influence of leader humility on work–family facilitation (WFF) in the U.S. and Japan by exploring the mediating roles of the four dimensions of psychological empowerment (meaningful work, autonomy, competency, and impact) on this relationship. Drawing from a sample of [...] Read more.
This study examines the influence of leader humility on work–family facilitation (WFF) in the U.S. and Japan by exploring the mediating roles of the four dimensions of psychological empowerment (meaningful work, autonomy, competency, and impact) on this relationship. Drawing from a sample of 392 Japanese employees and 132 U.S. employees, our findings suggest that leader humility is positively related to WFF in both cultural contexts. Meaningful work and departmental impact emerge as significant mediators in both cultures, while the mediation effects of autonomy and competency are valid in Japan only. An additional test reveals that meaningful work is the most significant mediator in both countries, underscoring the pivotal role of leader humility and meaningful work in enhancing WFF. The study adds to the growing literature on the beneficial effects of leader humility on sustainable organizations, while offering insights into improving employee wellbeing and work–life interactions across diverse cultural contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 611 KiB  
Article
Does Gender and Cultural Diversity Matter for Sustainability in Healthcare? Evidence from Global Organizations
by Kylie de Klerk and Favil Singh
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11695; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su151511695 - 28 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1444
Abstract
Global healthcare organizations are fundamental in addressing the healthcare needs of local and global communities. This highly regulated sector means it is under constant scrutiny for health, safety, and ethical compliance risks by federal regulatory bodies. Despite higher monitoring, an increasing number of [...] Read more.
Global healthcare organizations are fundamental in addressing the healthcare needs of local and global communities. This highly regulated sector means it is under constant scrutiny for health, safety, and ethical compliance risks by federal regulatory bodies. Despite higher monitoring, an increasing number of healthcare companies receive fines for their irresponsible practices, manifesting significant questions about their corporate governance and sustainability practices. Against this backdrop, this study examines the relationship between boardroom diversity on the sustainability performance of companies operating in healthcare. Utilizing a global sample of publicly listed healthcare companies, using panel regression data and the system-GMM estimator accounting for endogeneity, we find evidence of a positive association between board diversity (gender and culture) and sustainability performance. These findings support critical mass theoretical expectations for board diversity and sustainability performance, suggesting that a meaningful representation (three or more) of women and ethnic directors on the board of healthcare organizations significantly improves sustainability performance. The findings remain robust in a series of robustness tests and continue to hold after accounting for potential endogeneity concerns. This paper has important implications for global healthcare organizational policy concerning diversity management practices and their implications for sustainability performance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 322 KiB  
Article
Examination of the Effects of COVID-19 on Happiness in Different Geographical Regions with Piecewise Linear Panel Data Models
by Elif Tuna, Atıf Ahmet Evren, Zehra Zeynep Şahinbaşoğlu and Mert Veznikli
Sustainability 2023, 15(11), 8569; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15118569 - 25 May 2023
Viewed by 1080
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has recently caused the loss of millions of lives, and billions of others have been deeply affected. This crisis has changed the way people live, think about life, and perceive happiness. The aim of this study is to reveal differences [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has recently caused the loss of millions of lives, and billions of others have been deeply affected. This crisis has changed the way people live, think about life, and perceive happiness. The aim of this study is to reveal differences between geographical regions by investigating the effect of the happiness variable on different countries during the international COVID-19 pandemic. The primary purpose is to demonstrate how such a pandemic may affect different countries in terms of happiness at the individual level and to identify possible strategies for the future. With this aim, both static and dynamic panel data models were used while applying fixed effects, random effects, and the generalized method of moments (GMM). A basic assumption in panel data models is that the coefficients do not change over time. This assumption is unlikely to hold, however, especially during major devastating events like COVID-19. Therefore, the piecewise linear panel data model was applied in this study. As a result of empirical analysis, pre- and post-COVID differences were seen between different geographical regions. Based on analysis conducted for three distinct geographical regions with piecewise linear models, it was determined that the piecewise random effects model was appropriate for European and Central Asian countries, the piecewise FGLS model for Latin American and Caribbean countries, and the piecewise linear GMM model for South Asian countries. According to the results, there are many variables that affect happiness, which vary according to different geographical conditions and societies with different cultural values. Full article
15 pages, 1736 KiB  
Article
Crisis Leadership: Political Leadership during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Ataus Samad, Khalil Al Jerjawi and Ann Dadich
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 266; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15010266 - 23 Dec 2022
Viewed by 3243
Abstract
This article identifies leadership attributes that enable effective leaders to manage crises. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 13 Australian political leaders, including senators, members of federal and state parliament, premiers, ministers, and mayors of local governments. The findings suggest that, to [...] Read more.
This article identifies leadership attributes that enable effective leaders to manage crises. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 13 Australian political leaders, including senators, members of federal and state parliament, premiers, ministers, and mayors of local governments. The findings suggest that, to be an effective leader during a crisis, political leaders need to be: visionary; courageous; calm; inspirational; ethical; empathetic; authentic; and resilient. Single leadership theories do not capture all the attributes necessary to lead during a crisis, suggesting the importance of different, complementary theories. The findings clarify what it takes for politicians to lead during a global crisis, like COVID-19. Furthermore, they provide a foundation to enable constituents to gauge their political leaders’ leadership capacities. Despite extensive research on what it takes to lead, little is known about political leadership during a crisis. The study unveils the key attributes that are essential for political leaders to navigate a crisis, like the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop