sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Critical Dimensions for Effective Collaborative Environmental Governance

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Ecology and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2024) | Viewed by 1443

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Environmental Governance, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Interests: environmental governance; stakeholder participation; social license to operate

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Associate Professor, Centre for Environmental Governance, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Interests: ecological economics; environmental governance; water and sustainability

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Environmental Governance, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Interests: socio-hydrology; participatory modelling; complex systems; computational social science; agent-based modelling
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Environmental Governance, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Interests: climate change adaptation; science–policy–practice interfaces; environmental governance; sustainability transitions

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Proposed focus, scope and purpose

This Special Issue will focus on dimensions of collaborative environmental governance that are emerging as critical for enabling sustainable solutions to complex social-environmental problems. Recognising that the recent literature finds substantial knowledge gaps with regard to realising the problem-solving potential of collaborative governance, this Special Issue draws on multi-disciplinary frameworks and diverse approaches to explore collaborative environmental governance through three proposed dimensions (note the final dimensions will be determined following a participatory systems mapping workshop as described below):

  1. The first dimension focuses on cultural and institutional aspects of collaborative environmental governance. Institutions are well-understood as both a cause of and a solution to environmental problems, and this Special Issue will take a critical perspective regarding how institutions for collaborative environmental governance can facilitate democratic and cross-cultural qualities to build capacities for sustainable solutions.
  1. The second dimension relates to issues of justice and equity within collaborative environmental governance, responding to a growing body of mixed empirical evidence on the equity outcomes of cases, and a call for multilateral environmental instruments that pay stronger attention to justice considerations. Justice and equity are widely understood in this context to span North–South, inter-generational, and more-than-human sub-dimensions.
  1. The third dimension examines practical outcomes of collaborative environmental governance, embracing methodological innovations such as at the interface of qualitative and quantitative data, and approaches that reveal lessons learned and new insights on the causation, characteristics and design of effective and outcome-focused collaboration.

This Special Issue is timely. Collaborative approaches to governance are recognised as critical for addressing key environmental challenges of this century, including climate change, water, natural resources and natural disasters; at the same time, such approaches have not yet delivered effective transitions to sustainability. Through an exploration of these dimensions, this Special Issue will present new understandings of the goals and dynamics of collaborative environmental governance, informing the development of new approaches that better realise the promise of collaborative governance.

Contributions to the literature

There is a burgeoning literature around collaborative environmental governance. A significant portion of this literature describes empirical examples of success and failures, contributing to our understanding of context and diversity. Additionally, there is a strong body of literature exploring theories, frameworks and approaches to collaborative environmental governance. Circling around these main foci are a growing number of studies which are explicitly exploring the nuances of collaboration in practice: the role and impact of institutions and individuals, reconciling multiple values for just outcomes, governance across multiple scales, effective measurement and monitoring of collaborative environmental governance processes and outcomes, to name a few. This Special Issue aims to bring together these nuanced ideas and insights into a critical discourse that explores the three critical dimensions. With three–four papers within each dimension, this Special Issue provides a space to focus on the emerging ideas and understandings, helping to fill the gaps in our understanding of the problem solving potential of collaborative environmental governance.

This Special Issue will commence with an innovative first paper. Invited authors will participate in a facilitated participatory systems mapping workshop. This workshop will enable the invited experts to collaboratively develop a causal map encoding the factors and relationships that either support or hinder collaborative environmental governance. The causal map will be analysed using state-of-the-art network centrality, structural, and controllability methods—the outcomes of this analysis will be used to identify the key barriers and enablers of collaboration in environmental governance–leading to the determination of the final dimensions for inclusion in the Special Issue. This process will not only help to improve the experience of authors in contributing to the Special Issue, but also ensure the papers are focused on leading contemporary understandings of the complexity and challenges of collaborative environmental governance.

Prof. Dr. Lain Dare
Dr. Leonie J. Pearson
Dr. Juan Carlos Castilla-Rho
Dr. Josephine Mummery
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • collaborative environmental governance
  • justice
  • sustainable development
  • natural resource management
  • stakeholder engagement

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 8496 KiB  
Article
Numerical Simulation of 3D Flow Structure and Turbulence Characteristics near Permeable Spur Dike in Channels with Varying Sinuosities
by Peng Xie, Chunguang Li, Suiju Lv, Fengzhu Zhang, Hefang Jing, Xiaogang Li and Dandan Liu
Sustainability 2023, 15(22), 15862; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su152215862 - 11 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 988
Abstract
Owing to the different degrees of bending in rivers in nature, it is difficult to conduct experiments in situ. In this study, the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model in ANSYS Fluent was used to analyze the three-dimensional flow structure and turbulence characteristics [...] Read more.
Owing to the different degrees of bending in rivers in nature, it is difficult to conduct experiments in situ. In this study, the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model in ANSYS Fluent was used to analyze the three-dimensional flow structure and turbulence characteristics near a spur dike and to evaluate the variation trend of flow in rivers with different degrees of bending. The results show that in channels with different curvatures, the vortex appears between the spur dikes and is disturbed by the permeable hole, and the backflow area moves downstream. The strength of secondary flow (SSF) fluctuates greatly in the vicinity of the spur dike and the downstream region, and the peak value appears 3.22 m (21.5 times L) away from the inlet of the bend. The SSF increases as the bend curvature increases. The SSF displays similar variation trends in the three kinds of bends. The peak value of normalized turbulent kinetic energy (NTKE) appears 3.14 m away from the entrance of the bend, the NTKE is the largest in the 45° bend and the smallest in the 180° bend, and it decreases only at distances of 3.25–4.19 m away from the entrance of the bend as the bend curvature increases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop