sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Organic Agriculture and Food Supply Chains

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Food".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 5186

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università politecnica delle Marche, 60123 Ancona, Italy
Interests: agricultural economics and appraisal; organic farming; rural development; farm microeconomics and methodological aspects concerning applied economics analysis, particularly those integrating qualitative and quantitative data; recent studies on scenario analysis of organic markets; risk-based evaluation of organic certification systems in Europe; duration models of organic farms with econometric and Bayesian network approaches

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The challenges in terms of changing climate and environmental conditions and the emerging need for equity in the distribution of value are likely to shape the future trends in sustainable food production for the coming decades. Organic agriculture has tipically considered the theme of sustainability at the core of its development. Recent trends in geographic areas where organic agriculture is already established, such as the recent “Farm to Fork” policy in the EU, or strategies for stimulating organic agriculture where this is still at an early adoption stage as in developing and in-transition countries, show that policy makers and agro-food sector operators consider organic agriculture a feasible approach to comply with the need for sustainable food production.

This Special Ossue aims at providing scientific evidence regarding the sustainability of organic agriculture and aquaculture and respective supply chains (OAASC). The specific purpose of this Special Issue is to analyze the contribution of OAASC to the enforcement of different aspects concerning sustainability and to provide stakeholders and policy makers with scientific results that might contribute specifically to the future development of sustainable food production. The conceptual framework refers to the capability of OAASC to contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). From this perspective, the Special Issue will focus on the performance of OAASC in terms of ecosystem services provided, on the resilience of organic systems in the context of climate change, and on their capability to represent a credible alternative for future economic and social development. Particular attention will be paid to innovation processes tailored to OAASC: organic production based on cultivars, and breeding traits and technologies mostly developed for the conventional food sector, which might negatively affect the future sustainability of organic food production.

Specific areas of interest therefore include but are not limited to the following:

  • Theoretical framework for the analysis of sustainability in OAASC;
  • Approaches to measure and assess sustainability in OAASC;
  • Economic and financial sustainability of OAASC;
  • Ecosystem services and OAASC: classification, measurement, and comparison with alternative farming systems;
  • Sustainability of organic livestock production in terms of use of soil and natural resources, profitability, and carbon emissions;
  • Sustainability along the supply chain for organic products, including social and economic equity, and environmental issues related to processing and/or distribution;
  • Consumers’ attitude toward sustainable food products and effectiveness of organic labeling;
  • Certification;
  • Innovation in organic systems to enforce sustainability: organic seed development, breeding traits selection, precision farming, innovative technical means, etc.;
  • Social sustainability and inclusivity in OAASC;
  • Sustainability in the context of the international trade of organic products.

Comparisons of sustainability performance across different agricultural regimes (e.g., organic vs. conventional or integrated farming) and innovative methodological approaches are encouraged.

Dr. Danilo Gambelli
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • organic farming and livestock
  • organic aquaculture
  • ecosystem services
  • sustainable food production
  • supply chain for organic food
  • carbon emission
  • climate change
  • economic and financial sustainability
  • social equity and farming
  • innovation in organic food systems

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 304 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Dried Citrus Pulp Addition to Total Mixed Ration in Replacement to Corn on Mutton Goat Performance and Health Indices
by Abdur Rahman, Huma Kalsoom, Sadia Khanum, Muhammad Sajid, Muhammad Zaman Zahid, Zafar Hayat, Akhtar Rasool Asif, Mubarik Mahmood, Irfan Ahmed, Shah Nawaz, Muhammad Yousaf, Aziz ur Rehman, Sayyed Aun Muhammad and Hafiz Ishfaq Ahmad
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6584; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15086584 - 13 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1165
Abstract
Due to the human population explosion, demand for food, especially meat, has also increased. Increasing mutton production, in this scenario, is one way to mitigate this emerging issue as it nourishes a large human population. However, its production is challenging due to high [...] Read more.
Due to the human population explosion, demand for food, especially meat, has also increased. Increasing mutton production, in this scenario, is one way to mitigate this emerging issue as it nourishes a large human population. However, its production is challenging due to high feeding costs. This study was executed to develop cost-effective feed for mutton goat production by adding dried citrus pulp to the total mixed ration. Citrus pulp was used as an energy source instead of corn grain. A total of 12 bucks were divided into 4 groups, each having 3 animals. After 21 days of adaptation, bucks were assigned to experimental groups. The experimental groups were designated as A, B, C and D. They were fed TMR with 0, 10, 15 and 20% dried citrus pulp, respectively, as a replacement for corn grain for 90 days. The effect of the dried citrus pulp inclusion on the bucks’ growth performance such as feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion ratio was evaluated on weekly basis. Hematological and biochemical parameters including total protein, triglycerides, cholesterol, complete blood count and serum antioxidant (catalase) activity were also determined. Results indicated that all hematological and biochemical parameters showed non-significant differences among the control and treatment groups. Weekly weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio were equal in corn based as well as in dried citrus pulp-based diet with a lower feeding cost for the latter. It is concluded that the use of dried citrus pulp up to 20% as a replacement of corn in ration of fattening bucks is economical to use without any adverse effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Organic Agriculture and Food Supply Chains)
14 pages, 1322 KiB  
Article
Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Conventional and Organic Vineyards in Northern Italy
by Isabella Ghiglieno, Anna Simonetto, Luca Facciano, Marco Tonni, Pierluigi Donna, Leonardo Valenti and Gianni Gilioli
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5252; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15065252 - 16 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3471
Abstract
The carbon footprint is an index used to assess the impact of an activity in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Viticulture contributes to greenhouse gas emissions due to the use of fuels, fertilizers and pesticides, and the consequent soil erosion. Organic viticulture differs [...] Read more.
The carbon footprint is an index used to assess the impact of an activity in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Viticulture contributes to greenhouse gas emissions due to the use of fuels, fertilizers and pesticides, and the consequent soil erosion. Organic viticulture differs from conventional viticulture, mainly because of the absence of synthetic products, the soil tillage, and the level of organic carbon in the soil. The purpose of the study was to determine the actual differences between conventional and organic vineyard management in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, comparing multiannual data from 25 wineries in northern Italy. No statistically significant differences were found between the overall mean values of conventional and organic management. In organically farmed vineyards, a higher incidence of fuel consumption was observed, while in conventionally farmed vineyards higher emissions were observed, due to the use of such products as pesticides and fertilizers. No differences were found between the two management systems in terms of emissions resulting from direct fertilizing. Further assessment of the potential sequestration of organic fertilizer would be necessary. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Organic Agriculture and Food Supply Chains)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop