sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability and Development of Remote Regional Economies in the North

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 8931

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2018 Meander Drive Anchorage, AK 99516, USA
Interests: economies of remote regions; role of cities in development in the North; rural–urban migration; economic history of Northern development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The objective of this Special Issue is to provide a better understanding of the opportunities for and constraints to sustainable economic development in remote Arctic economies. Economic well-being in these economies depends primarily on government spending and  resource production for both local and external markets. Sustainable economic development, which is central to the long-term economic well-being of residents, has been a challenge for Arctic economies at every scale, village, town, and region.

Papers for this Issue might address:

  1. The factors and circumstances that hinder the creation of sustainable Arctic economies. Papers might explore the way particular factors limit the creation of sustainability or how many factors interact to this same end.
  2. The means Northern economies have used to overcome some of the limits to development. Of special interest are examples of innovative efforts undertaken to create sustainable economies in the Arctic.
  3. The role of institutions and changing institutions in Arctic economic development. The “rules of the game” affect the activities that can take place in an economy and the distribution of the costs and gains from economic action.
  4. The ways past economic activity affects current prospects for the remote Arctic economy. Infrastructure, scale, or environmental costs left behind are factors influencing the success of the economy going forward.
  5. The paths from resource development or government spending to economic development. Economic growth may not lead to sustainable development.

One objective of this Special Issue is to share stories between particular parts of the North. Since remote Arctic economies are spread across many nations, each has its own history, institutions, and environmental conditions. This also makes comparative analysis of particular interest. Such an approach might include other remote economies, such as Northern Australia.

The aim of this Special Issue is to provide information that is useful for decision makers in the Circumpolar North. While it is expected that most papers will have a theoretical base, the examination of actual cases should be the primary focus.

Prof. Lee Huskey
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • natural resource production
  • land claims
  • economic remoteness
  • structural change
  • cyclical development
  • sparsely settled regions
  • transfer economies
  • economic growth
  • economic development

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 1418 KiB  
Article
Doublespeak? Sustainability in the Arctic—A Text Mining Analysis of Norwegian Parliamentary Speeches
by Mikko Moilanen and Stein Østbye
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9397; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13169397 - 21 Aug 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2310
Abstract
This paper contributes to the recent literature on sustainability in the Arctic as a political concept. Parliamentary proceedings have increasingly been recognized as an important source of information for eliciting political issues. In this paper, we use unsupervised text mining techniques to analyze [...] Read more.
This paper contributes to the recent literature on sustainability in the Arctic as a political concept. Parliamentary proceedings have increasingly been recognized as an important source of information for eliciting political issues. In this paper, we use unsupervised text mining techniques to analyze parliamentary speeches for Norway from the period from 2009 to 2016 to answer whether political coalitions talk differently about sustainability in the Arctic depending on being in opposition or government. We find that the difference between being in government and opposition, controlling for political label (left-right), is far more important than the difference between left and right, controlling for role (opposition-government). The results suggest that in the trade-off between political preferences and election success, the balance is tilted in favour of the latter. Our interpretation is that opportunistic behavior seems to dominate partisan behavior in the politics related to sustainability in the Arctic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 278 KiB  
Article
Building Energy Sovereignty through Community-Based Projects in Nunavik
by Thierry Rodon, Louise Nachet, Christophe Krolik and Tommy Palliser
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9061; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13169061 - 13 Aug 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3055
Abstract
Inuit communities in Canada are overwhelmingly dependent on expensive and polluting local diesel-powered generators for electricity production. This article seeks to understand the legal and political obstacles relative to the development of renewable energy in Nunavik, Québec’s Inuit territory. After an analysis of [...] Read more.
Inuit communities in Canada are overwhelmingly dependent on expensive and polluting local diesel-powered generators for electricity production. This article seeks to understand the legal and political obstacles relative to the development of renewable energy in Nunavik, Québec’s Inuit territory. After an analysis of the legal regimes, political configurations, and policies affecting energy production in Nunavik, we present two case studies of renewable energy projects in the communities of Kuujjuaq and Inukjuak. This allows us to demonstrate that the development of alternative energy projects is not only determined by technical and economic issues but is also inseparable from the asymmetrical post-colonial power relations between Quebec institutions and the Inuit people. Our results not only illustrate the value of community ownership and leadership for sustainable northern development but also the ambiguous attitude of public authorities regarding the political and financial support for such projects. Full article
16 pages, 565 KiB  
Article
Demographic Instability as a Barrier to Remote Economic Development in the North: Are Cities the Answer?
by Dean Bradley Carson and Doris Anna Carson
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8566; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13158566 - 31 Jul 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1437
Abstract
Remote and sparsely populated northern peripheries in Australia, Europe and North America experience high rates of population turnover and struggle to recruit and retain populations. There has been discussion about the extent to which their larger urban centres may be key to navigating [...] Read more.
Remote and sparsely populated northern peripheries in Australia, Europe and North America experience high rates of population turnover and struggle to recruit and retain populations. There has been discussion about the extent to which their larger urban centres may be key to navigating common ‘boom and bust’ cycles, thus contributing to more stable and resilient demographic and economic development in their jurisdictions. This paper examines the population development in twelve remote northern jurisdictions dominated by a large city, comparing urban and regional growth patterns around periods of economic boom and bust since 1990. It was expected that periods of high population growth would be initially led by regional areas where resource projects are commonly located, but that the cities would ultimately benefit more from high growth periods and suffer less from periods of low population growth. It was also expected that cities would retain key populations better than regions because of a growing global urban preference. Results suggest that regional areas did grow more at the start of high growth periods, but there was no universal experience of higher city growth throughout the two boom and bust cycles. Rather, each city and region had unique growth pattern properties. Cities must not be assumed a priori to be the drivers of demographic development, but attention needs to be paid to what types of cities promote less volatile growth and development potential in the regions. Full article
24 pages, 7656 KiB  
Article
Household Harvesting, State Policy, and Migration: Evidence from the Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic
by Matthew Berman
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 7071; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13137071 - 23 Jun 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1520
Abstract
Household harvesting of wild fish and game contributes to food security in indigenous communities across the Arctic, and in some regions plays an important role in cultural identity of indigenous peoples. The degree to which the state regulates harvesting and restricts distribution of [...] Read more.
Household harvesting of wild fish and game contributes to food security in indigenous communities across the Arctic, and in some regions plays an important role in cultural identity of indigenous peoples. The degree to which the state regulates harvesting and restricts distribution of country foods varies widely, however, and this intervention in local economies can affect livelihood opportunities. The paper hypothesizes that where state policy has contributed to harvesting remaining a culturally embedded livelihood strategy, its contribution to the quality of life may influence people to remain in rural communities, despite potentially lower material living standards. Lacking such a cultural linkage, harvesting may become the employer of last resort for people unable to find paying jobs or leave declining communities for a better life elsewhere. The paper examines the association between Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic (SLiCA) respondents’ intent to remain in their community of residence and household harvesting, cash income from work, and other relevant factors. The results include both similarities and differences for residents of arctic Alaska, arctic Canada, Greenland, and Chukotka. Systematic differences found appear consistent with the hypothesis about the role of household harvesting and state policy toward harvest and distribution of country foods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop