sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Responsible Transitions in Agri-Food: Towards a Sustainable Future

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 3907

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Interests: adoption of sustainable practices in agrifood systems; behaviour change; social psychology; behavioural economics; system innovation; circular agriculture; transition processes

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Interests: responsible research and innovation; ethics, digital farming; autonomous robots; AI

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Interests: transition sustainable food system and circular bioeconomy; learning evaluation; policy intervention; social acceptance of novelties and diffusion of innovations; science-practice collaboration and learning

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Agri-food sectors need to change drastically to realize a more sustainable and healthier food system that responds adequately to challenges related to climate change, environmental pollution, biodiversity loss, social injustice, public health decline and frail food security and animal welfare. This asks for a transition which will have effect on all actors in these sectors who have a role in the value-chains, ranging from primary producers and input suppliers to retailers and consumers, as well as on their collaboration with governmental institutes and NGO’s.  Routines and behaviour of all chain actors have to be changed, as well as the societal norms and values concerning food and food production that usually guide their (inter)actions. Careful thought should go into the (re-)distribution of responsibilities between businesses, governmental institutes and citizen actors, as well as the knowledge and technology that should support all these changes.

Alternative products, production approaches and consumptions patterns are key to changing the status quo. Although several promising sustainability innovations and initiatives are available (such as plant-based meat substitutes or agro-ecological production systems) their market share is minimal and growth is difficult to change-resistant dynamics such as vested economic interests, established routines, dependencies and infrastructures. This means that not only individuals have to do an effort to change their behaviour, or adopt new technologies which allow them to use more sustainable production methods. It also demands contextual changes, including revisions of institutional structures and collaborations between public organizations and private companies.

Transitions demand (joint) efforts from a lot of people, yet ‘responsibility’ is most commonly understood as a capacity of individuals. Responsibility presupposes a person’s preferences regarding different available choice alternatives and a capacity to reason about these alternatives. A rational individual is assumed to be able to take into account the relevant available information and probability of events, potential costs and benefits for oneself and others and (moral) values in his or her reasoning about choice alternatives. What constitutes ‘responsibility’ depends generally on the type of considerations that an individual takes into account in this reasoning. In the field of responsible research and innovation, however, ‘responsibility’ is usually interpreted in a social manner. It means being ‘responsive’ to the values of stakeholders. In order to innovate responsibly, one therefore has to find out what values various stakeholders hold dear in relation to the innovation, and take those into consideration in the further development of the innovative product (such as a technology, or a new type of food) or the innovation trajectory. Doing that may occasionally mean that individual actors do effort to find out about the values of stakeholders, but more often it means that the various actors who have a role in innovation make sure that it is  ‘responsive’; that is, that it is well aligned with or responds to values of end-users and other stakeholders. (Owen et al. 2012; Owen et al 2013; Van de Poel et al. 2018)

The question is what responsible transitioning is and how it can be effectuated in the agri-food sector to realize a more sustainable future.

The need for a responsible transition triggered the development of this special issue. We invite multidisciplinary perspectives on the meaning and content of transitioning responsibly to a more sustainable agri-food system, based on scholarship in transition theory, responsible and social innovation, behavioural psychology and economics, moral philosophy and ethics.  Both conceptual papers and case studies are welcomed. Questions we seek to answer are for example:

  • What makes a transition towards a sustainable agrifood system ‘responsible’?
  • Who are the relevant (market)actors involved? What is their role in transitioning responsibly toward more sustainable ways of working?
  • How can behaviour change of the relevant (market)actors involved be realized in this transition?
  • What can be learned about the practice of responsible transitions from regional, sectoral or niche case studies?
  • Which friction and traction between stakeholder groups hamper or support responsible transitions?
  • What is the role of markets in transitions toward a more sustainable agri-food sectors (taking into account that?

References

Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society31, 27-50. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/9781118551424.ch2

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and public policy39(6), 751-760. DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/scipol/scs093

Van de Poel, I., & Sand, M. (2018). Varieties of responsibility: Two problems of responsible innovation. Synthese, 1-19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/scipol/scs09310.1007/s11229-018-01951-7

Dr. Carolien C. de Lauwere
Dr. Simone van der Burg
Dr. Anne-Charlotte Hoes
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • responsible transition
  • futureproof agrifood systems
  • social innovation
  • behaviour change
  • ethical and sustainable markets
  • responsiveness

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 1385 KiB  
Article
A Circularity Evaluation of New Feed Categories in The Netherlands—Squaring the Circle: A Review
by Daniel Puente-Rodríguez, Harmen van Laar and Maayke Veraart
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2352; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14042352 - 18 Feb 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3434
Abstract
The concept of circularity is currently proposed to address key sustainability issues affecting and affected by livestock production. Through a desk study, this paper evaluates some feed sources that are being developed in The Netherlands as an alternative to current feeds, namely food [...] Read more.
The concept of circularity is currently proposed to address key sustainability issues affecting and affected by livestock production. Through a desk study, this paper evaluates some feed sources that are being developed in The Netherlands as an alternative to current feeds, namely food waste; seaweed; and localized production and alternative plant-based feed sources. These feed categories are evaluated according to four circularity criteria. The first two criteria concern standard circularity principles aimed at both stopping and preventing environmental damage as well as a focus on natural resources use efficiency: (1) safeguard the health of ecosystems and (2) avoid the production of unnecessary products and use/recycle biomass effectively, as well as evaluating possible food–feed competition. In addition, two ‘people’ and ‘animal’ centred principles have been integrated: (3) fairness and accessibility and (4) animal health and wellbeing. The article concludes that people and animal centred principles are key to thinking of, developing, implementing, and evaluating circularity initiatives. Moreover, the article suggests that categories such as the local production of soya (approx. 132 ha) or seaweed (approx. 10–15 ha) are as yet irrelevant regarding production volumes within the Dutch context. However, some feed sources such as seaweed, insects, livestock leftovers produced at farms and abattoirs, and food waste might strengthen the transition towards more circular and sustainable practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Responsible Transitions in Agri-Food: Towards a Sustainable Future)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop