sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Use of Marine Resources: Challenges, Dilemmas and Opportunities from Catch to Consumers

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 5560

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Norwegian Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway
Interests: sustainable fisheries; seafood quality; market performance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Nofima, 9291 Tromsø, Norway
Interests: consumer research; food choice behaviour; new product development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Business School, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
Interests: resource economics; corporate environmental sustainability; sustainable finance; energy efficiency; renewable energy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Norwegian Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, 9291 Tromsø, Norway
Interests: fisheries management; strategic management; industrial organisation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The Special Issue aims to supplement the existing literature by focusing on the challenges, dilemmas and opportunities related to the utilization of marine resources throughout value chains from catch to consumer and in line with sustainability goals at the national and supranational level. In 2013, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations assessed that almost 90% of all marine fish stocks were fully fished or overfished, and thus urged states to manage fisheries in a biologically sustainable way. Accordingly, the FAO encouraged states to utilize fish stocks to contribute to the nutritional, social and economic value of fish, where preserving quality throughout the value chain, from catch to consumer, is paramount.

Several dilemmas are present at the harvest end of the value chain. For example, differences in fishing gear, varying catch efficiency and costs provide fish of different quality, which obtain different prices, implying that trade-offs between quality, price and costs may be present. Should policy-makers steer for profitability and move quotas to the most cost-effective vessels or vessel groups, at the expense of vessels that provide better quality and higher potential for value-adding in downstream markets, but have higher costs and lower profitability? This is an interesting dilemma in policy which has received little attention in previous research. At the same time, a focus on fish quality and value-adding may be at odds with the United Nations’s sustainability goal number 2; zero hunger, which implies nutritious and affordable food produced at the lowest possible costs. This indicates a dilemma for nations and value chains seeking to generate maximum value from limited fish stocks.

Harvesting at low trophic levels may provide species that have low market value and may contribute to the goal of zero hunger. However, some of these species are also potential sources of feed for farmed fish. They are also a very important food source for larger predatory fish in the ocean.

Accordingly, relevant research questions are: Should we harvest at a low-trophic level? How should this raw material be used—should we aim to prevent hunger, using it as cheap feed for fish farming, or should we avoid harvesting in order to secure feed for more valuable species at higher trophic levels?

The organization and performance of ex-vessel markets are also important for the sustainable use of limited marine resources. With direct sales, market power and asymmetric information may distort the price–quality relationship and lead to less than optimal use of resources, an issue which has not been given much attention in the literature. Fish auction markets may also be less efficient than predicted by theory. Why? To what extent should authorities intervene in ex-vessel markets to facilitate more efficient markets?

The EU Green Deal aims to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. A part of this is the farm-to-fork strategy, which addresses the challenges of sustainable food systems. One of these challenges is consumer behavior: How can we shift consumer dietary behavior to a more sustainable direction? What are the barriers to this? Consumers are presented with an increasing number of communication cues focusing on sensory characteristics, healthiness, environmental and social sustainability, origin, convenience, etc. Which of these cues have the highest impact on consumer choices? Does environmental and social sustainability labelling and information influence consumers as intended? Do consumers understand what ecolabels mean?

We seek research applying diverse research methods, including detailed case studies and econometric modeling of fisheries management systems, fisher behavior and fisher–processor interactions, as well as the performance of ex-vessel markets, to further our understanding of factors influencing sustainable resource use. We also encourage ethnographic and survey-based consumer research as well as novel methods such as eye-tracking to examine consumers’ in-store choices, focusing on the role of sustainability claims, ecolabels and quality cues. Studies on barriers to and drivers of sustainable consumer behavior related to seafood are also welcome. Topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • Dilemmas between sustainability goals and fishery management and regulation;
  • Trade-offs in fishery management such as costs and efficiency versus price and quality;
  • Species at low trophic levels: harvest for food or feed for fish farming or leave as food for more valuable spieces?;
  • Market performance at the ex-vessel level with a focus on quality–price relationships and auction markets versus direct sales;
  • The environmental footprint in seafood value chains;
  • Waste and drivers of waste in seafood value chains;
  • Fisher behavior, fishery management and sustainability;
  • Fishery management and effects on coastal communities;
  • Carbon footprint, how to best reduce footprint in harvest;
  • Consumer preferences regarding fish products;
  • Closing the gap between attitude and behavior related to sustainable seafood consumption;
  • Moving consumers’ dietary behavior towards a more sustainable direction;
  • Consumers and efficient fish product quality and sustainability cues;
  • Social responsibility in seafood value chains.

Dr. Geir Sogn-Grundvåg
Dr. Themistoklis Altintzoglou
Dr. Dengjun Zhang
Dr. Bent Dreyer
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability goals
  • seafood
  • fishery management
  • fish quality
  • market performance
  • ecolabelling
  • consumer behavior
  • cost–benefit analysis of ecolabelling

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 543 KiB  
Article
Shaping Aquaculture Management—An Interest Tug O’ War
by Signe A. Sønvisen and Christian Vik
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8853; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13168853 - 07 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1908
Abstract
(1) Background: Although Norwegian aquaculture has experienced tremendous development, environmental challenges limit opportunities for growth. To promote environmentally sustainable industry growth, a new spatial management regime was introduced: the Traffic Light System (TLS). However, with a focus on environmental sustainability and economic growth, [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Although Norwegian aquaculture has experienced tremendous development, environmental challenges limit opportunities for growth. To promote environmentally sustainable industry growth, a new spatial management regime was introduced: the Traffic Light System (TLS). However, with a focus on environmental sustainability and economic growth, the new regime largely ignores important factors for industry development: legitimacy and acceptance. (2) Methods: This study used qualitative methods such as interviews and document analysis. (3) Results: The results showed how aquaculture stakeholders perceive and weigh the dimensions of sustainability. Low social sustainability, owing to low content legitimacy and acceptance, places stakeholders in an interest tug o’ war. (4) Conclusions: Legitimacy and acceptance are prerequisites for industry growth, which may ultimately affect the objective of sustainable growth. In particular, a lack of legitimacy and acceptance may affect procedural legitimacy and thus the long-standing institutional setup in Norway. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1327 KiB  
Article
Technical Efficiency Analysis of Coastal Small-Scale Fisheries in Liberia
by Alvin Slewion Jueseah, Tumi Tómasson, Ogmundur Knutsson and Dadi Mar Kristofersson
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7767; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13147767 - 12 Jul 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2850
Abstract
The coastal fisheries in Liberia comprise small-scale Kru and Fanti low technology canoes and open boats, as well as industrial trawlers. At the end of the war in 2003, foreign industrial trawlers dominated the coastal fisheries in Liberia. After the war, the industrial [...] Read more.
The coastal fisheries in Liberia comprise small-scale Kru and Fanti low technology canoes and open boats, as well as industrial trawlers. At the end of the war in 2003, foreign industrial trawlers dominated the coastal fisheries in Liberia. After the war, the industrial fleet declined rapidly from 60 in 2004 to 15 in 2010. Over the same period the local Kru canoes grew from <400 to over 2400 and the motorized Fanti boats increased from <200 to about 800. Since 2010, when the government established a six nautical mile inshore exclusion zone, the industrial fleet has continued to decline, the Fantis have remained fairly constant, but the Kru fleet has continued to expand, reaching 3800 canoes by 2019. This paper analyzes the technical efficiency and productivity of the SSF fleets in Liberia. Data were collected from 46 randomly chosen Kru and 86 Fanti boats. There is a considerable difference between the Kru and the Fanti boats in terms of quantities of inputs used and output produced. Mean efficiency of the Kru canoes was 0.53, while for the Fanti boats it was 0.70, indicating considerable inefficiencies and scope for technical improvement. Vessel length and skipper’s age are the two main factors significantly influencing technical efficiency of the Kru and Fanti boats. The younger Kru operators (≤40 years) using newer and smaller dugout canoes (≤6.1 m) were more efficient than the older fishers in older and larger canoes, while the opposite was true for the Fantis. There were efficient boats and inefficient vessels among the Kru and Fanti but on average they were profitable. However, the design of these vessels offers limited scope to introduce improved fishing technology. To address the current technological regress and increase productivity in the fisheries, it is recommended that the Liberian government explore new harvesting technologies such as fiberglass reinforced plastic in the coastal fisheries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop