sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Future-Oriented LCA: Current Practice, Emerging Topics and Innovative Approaches

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Engineering and Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 December 2021) | Viewed by 9104

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
LIRIDE, Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
Interests: circular economy; life cycle assessment; carbon footprint; sustainable engineering; ecodesign

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly used as a tool for evaluation of the environmental performance of products and services as well as of the environmental consequences of strategies and policies, both on the institutional and commercial level. Often, LCA studies are used for decision support in the context of long-term investments, consequences of certain policy measures, or development of processes and technologies within a long-time horizon.

However, in current practice, the LCA framework is somewhat limited when it comes to future-oriented LCA: Inventory data are mostly based on current or even past processes, consequences in economic sectors other than the one in focus are hardly and poorly considered, rebound effects are often ignored, and potential future developments—be they economic, social, or environmental—are rarely accounted for in a consistent way. Further, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods usually reflect current or past conditions, and the temporal aspects of different indicators (e.g., GHG emissions) are still not yet integrated. These limitations are often motivated and justified by, e.g., the lack of inventory data reflecting a future state of the economy, by inherent uncertainties in future developments, by difficulties in predicting consequences of decisions, or by lack of consistent economic and technologic scenarios. However, in a context when LCA studies are used for decision support for a long-term perspective, these limitations make reaching such an objective impractical.

This Special Issue aims at presenting current practice and limitations in future- and decision-oriented LCA and at discussing innovative approaches for overcoming these limitations. We welcome papers that report ideas on how to integrate methods from other areas of research into LCA, such as economic modeling, forecasting tools, machine learning tools, agent-based modeling, and scenario analysis.

Prof. Dr. Ben Amor
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Consequential life cycle assessment
  • Life cycle inventory
  • Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods
  • Innovative modelling approaches
  • Economic modeling
  • Forecasting tools
  • Machine learning tools
  • Agent-based modeling
  • Scenario analysis

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

35 pages, 3779 KiB  
Article
Design of a Lifecycle-Oriented Environmental and Economic Indicators Framework for the Mechanical Manufacturing Industry
by Andrea Barni, Claudio Capuzzimati, Alessandro Fontana, Marco Pirotta, Saara Hänninen, Minna Räikkönen and Teuvo Uusitalo
Sustainability 2022, 14(5), 2602; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14052602 - 23 Feb 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2547
Abstract
As a result of the worldwide depletion of natural resources, increased energy use, and environmental, economic, and social imbalance, organizations are working to identify the proper strategies supporting the continuous reduction of their impacts. While this trend is fundamentally agreed upon in the [...] Read more.
As a result of the worldwide depletion of natural resources, increased energy use, and environmental, economic, and social imbalance, organizations are working to identify the proper strategies supporting the continuous reduction of their impacts. While this trend is fundamentally agreed upon in the literature, several manufacturing industries still fail to identify which elements most influence their contributions to the impact of sustainability and how to easily manage the calculation of these effects within a manufacturing system. The purpose of this article is to incorporate sustainability practices into manufacturing by developing a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) for assessing and improving environmental and economic management practices at the corporate and production level. The definition of the framework began with in-depth research of the leading indicators and framework types in the literature, integrating the most exploited industrial standards to make them easily acceptable in the industrial domain. Then, to provide a broad view of company behavior, the framework has been designed to take either an inventory and impact point of view, thus providing indicators for the online monitoring of the company operations, or assessing their impacts in an LCA-LCC perspective. In selecting the indicators and the definition of the framework structure, five industrial cases covering different business sectors were involved in identifying the most critical indicators in terms of calculability and defining a structure that would allow for their application in various business situations. Therefore, the defined framework has been validated at a conceptual level, thus laying the basis for future quantitative validation. Twenty key performance indicators (KPIs) for assessing the sustainability of manufacturing firms have been created based on the 163 indicators studied. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 16484 KiB  
Article
Changing Technology or Behavior? The Impacts of a Behavioral Disruption
by Marianne Pedinotti-Castelle, Pierre-Olivier Pineau, Kathleen Vaillancourt and Ben Amor
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 5861; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115861 - 23 May 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2539
Abstract
Transportation is a key factor in the fight against climate change. Consumer behavior changes in transportation are underrepresented in energy policies, even if they could be essential to achieve the fixed GHG emission reduction targets. To help quantify the role of behaviors in [...] Read more.
Transportation is a key factor in the fight against climate change. Consumer behavior changes in transportation are underrepresented in energy policies, even if they could be essential to achieve the fixed GHG emission reduction targets. To help quantify the role of behaviors in energy transition and their implications on the dynamics of an energy system, this study is conducted using the North American TIMES Energy Model, adapted to Quebec (Canada). A behavioral disruption scenario (an increase in carpooling) is introduced in the model’s transportation sector and is compared to a massive electrification scenario. Our results highlight the fact that a behavioral disruption can lead to the same GHG emission reductions (65%) by 2050 as an electrification policy, while alleviating different efforts (such as additional electrical capacity and additional costs) associated with massive electrification. Moreover, the results are sensitive to behavior-related parameters, such as social discount rates and car lifetimes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1863 KiB  
Article
Analyzing Temporal Variability in Inventory Data for Life Cycle Assessment: Implications in the Context of Circular Economy
by Sayyed Shoaib-ul-Hasan, Malvina Roci, Farazee M. A. Asif, Niloufar Salehi and Amir Rashid
Sustainability 2021, 13(1), 344; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13010344 - 02 Jan 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3187
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used frequently as a decision support tool for evaluating different design choices for products based on their environmental impacts. A life cycle usually comprises several phases of varying timespans. The amount of emissions generated from different life cycle [...] Read more.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used frequently as a decision support tool for evaluating different design choices for products based on their environmental impacts. A life cycle usually comprises several phases of varying timespans. The amount of emissions generated from different life cycle phases of a product could be significantly different from one another. In conventional LCA, the emissions generated from the life cycle phases of a product are aggregated at the inventory analysis stage, which is then used as an input for life cycle impact assessment. However, when the emissions are aggregated, the temporal variability of inventory data is ignored, which may result in inaccurate environmental impact assessment. Besides, the conventional LCA does not consider the environmental impact of circular products with multiple use cycles. It poses difficulties in identifying the hotspots of emission-intensive activities with the potential to mislead conclusions and implications for both practice and policy. To address this issue and to analyze the embedded temporal variations in inventory data in a CE context, the paper proposes calculating the emission intensity for each life cycle phase. It is argued that calculating and comparing emission intensity, based on the timespan and amount of emissions for individual life cycle phases, at the inventory analysis stage of LCA offers a complementary approach to the traditional aggregate emission-based LCA approach. In a circular scenario, it helps to identify significant issues during different life cycle phases and the relevant environmental performance improvement opportunities through product, business model, and supply chain design. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop