sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Socially Sustainable and Sustainable Social Innovation

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 15446

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK
Interests: Design management; sustainable design; design for manufacture and assembly

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Manufacturing, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS, UK
Interests: design for social sustainability; design for marginalised societies; humanitarian design; design for development; distributed manufacturing; digital fabrication
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Social sustainability and sustainable social innovation have never been more important. There are many pressing social problems and challenges throughout the world. We face increasing resource scarcity and damaging environmental impacts following ever more consumption. There are global political instabilities, breakdowns in social cohesion, and increasing levels of inequality across the world.

Sustainable social innovation and social sustainability could provide new approaches to addressing these challenges. However, the dominant paradigm in sustainability still remains a ‘technological’ one in which we seek solutions that are ‘less bad’ and that do not necessarily challenge the underlying socio-economic systems.

Part of the challenge facing scholars in this domain is a lack of clarity regarding the concepts of social sustainability and social innovation. Both concepts are comparatively new and more work is needed to establish these ideas in the mainstream of sustainability thinking.

It is clear that this cannot be achieved without a significant change in direction, which may be dependent upon understanding: how social innovations might help make the world more sustainable; how any innovations and interventions themselves might be more sustainable; and how sustainability might be more effective with a greater emphasis on the social dimension.

Some big issues might include:

  • critical perspectives on social sustainability and social innovation;
  • citizen-based activism and grassroots, distributed design;
  • systems approaches to sustainability transitions;
  • participatory design and service design in the future;
  • new economic models, degrowth, the circular economy, and new patterns of production and consumption;
  • policy approaches and politics of social innovation;
  • pluriversal thinking and decolonial perspectives;
  • interventions and innovations in the Third Sector and the Global South; and
  • the role of designers and design education in addressing social and sustainability challenges.

We hope that this Special Issue will provide a state-of-the-art overview of this critical topic. It is our expectation that it will provide a resource for accessing seminal and current thinking, will provide a platform for future research, and offer new insights into how this field might contribute to solving pressing global challenges.

We welcome empirical and conceptual papers of every variety. We are especially keen to welcome new perspectives and more challenging or provocative works that seek to propose original ways of thinking regarding social sustainability and social innovation. Papers might address global, national, regional, or local topics. Papers may also address more complex socio-technical systems and networks. Empirical work reflecting on case studies or interventions is also welcome.

We would be happy to receive a brief abstract or summary of your proposed paper, if you wish to enquire about the appropriateness of your submission for consideration in this Special Issue.

Dr. James Moultrie
Dr. Lucia Corsini
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social innovation
  • social sustainability
  • systems thinking
  • socio-technical systems
  • circular economy
  • degrowth
  • design for social sustainability
  • global challenges

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 312 KiB  
Article
Social Sustainability in Business Organizations: A Research Agenda
by Merlina Missimer and Patricia Lagun Mesquita
Sustainability 2022, 14(5), 2608; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14052608 - 24 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3840
Abstract
Since the economic crisis in 2008, the world has seen a partly negative shift in social progress, highlighting that current economic models and practices do not guarantee long-lasting societal and human wellbeing. Economic models and business practices are deeply intertwined; thus, businesses play [...] Read more.
Since the economic crisis in 2008, the world has seen a partly negative shift in social progress, highlighting that current economic models and practices do not guarantee long-lasting societal and human wellbeing. Economic models and business practices are deeply intertwined; thus, businesses play a major role in the advancement of social sustainability, and academic research can offer support in navigating the complexity of this issue. However, social sustainability tends to be under-researched. This article summarizes the discussion in general business management, product development, and supply-chain management, and from this suggest a research agenda to help in guiding systematic change in business organizations towards social sustainability. The article identifies ten main challenges and offers five recommendations to move the field forward, namely, a more explicit engagement with and discussion of social systems-science based ideas, and a more explicit determination as a field to converge on key pieces leading towards a clearer definition of the concept. Lastly, it recommends that research needs to focus on how to overcome fragmented organizational structures, how to achieve true integration into existing processes and tools, and how to support organizations to become more dynamic in working with these issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socially Sustainable and Sustainable Social Innovation)
25 pages, 3916 KiB  
Article
Applying Values-Led Communication Design to Engage Stakeholders in Developing Dementia-Friendly Visitor Destinations
by Chih-Shiang (Mike) Wu and Tung-Jung (David) Sung
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4504; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13084504 - 18 Apr 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1778
Abstract
Developing dementia-friendly visitor destinations (DFVDs) has been acknowledged as essential for maintaining quality of life for people with dementia (PwD) and carers. While research has identified the lack of sufficient information as one of the major barriers in DFVD development, this study argues [...] Read more.
Developing dementia-friendly visitor destinations (DFVDs) has been acknowledged as essential for maintaining quality of life for people with dementia (PwD) and carers. While research has identified the lack of sufficient information as one of the major barriers in DFVD development, this study argues that the underlying problem comes from poor communication promoting this social vision. Values have a significant impact on stakeholders’ communication. By working with values, the stakeholders may uncover latent issues through an authentic dialog, helping them shape meaningful design directions and find ways of working together. Accordingly, this study proposes a 3 × 3 matrix of values-led communication design and presents an action research. The results suggest that the vertical axis, negotiation for values, can act as agonistic space for stakeholders to uncover values and make appropriate decisions. The horizontal axis is constituted by a systematic communication process of design for value proposition, design for value-in-context, and design for value constellation to facilitate stakeholders in integrating their core competences and construct the value creation system for DFVD development. Through these two axes of values-led communication design, the stakeholders can transfer their knowledge and assets into new social practice, usage, and dissemination, thereby increasing societies’ ability to act. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socially Sustainable and Sustainable Social Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1953 KiB  
Article
Technowomen: Women’s Autonomy and Its Impact on Environmental Quality
by Saima Mujeed, Shuangyan Li, Musarrat Jabeen, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Sameh E. Askar, Khalid Zaman, Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, Sriyanto and Hanifah Jambari
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 1611; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13041611 - 03 Feb 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2606
Abstract
The role of women in economic development and the global environment is vital for progressing them towards the United Nations sustainable development goal (SDG-5) that emphasized the need to empower women in every walk of life. The study examines women’s autonomy in the [...] Read more.
The role of women in economic development and the global environment is vital for progressing them towards the United Nations sustainable development goal (SDG-5) that emphasized the need to empower women in every walk of life. The study examines women’s autonomy in the sustainable development agenda under China’s open innovation system from 1975 to 2019. The study employed an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model, vector autoregressive (VAR) Granger causality, and innovation accounting matrix to estimate parameters. The existing data are summarized and collated in the context of China to explain as a correlational study. The results show that women’s autonomy moderated with technology spills over to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and substantiate the hump-shaped relationship between them. The increased spending on research and development (R&D) activities, patent publications, and renewable energy consumption empowers women to be equipped with the latest sustainable technologies to improve environmental quality. The pollution haven hypothesis verifies a given country, where trade liberalization policies tend to increase polluting industries to set up their plants that engaged in dirty production that exacerbate GHG emissions. The causality estimates confirmed that technological innovations and renewable energy consumption leads to women’s autonomy. In contrast, females’ share in the labor force participation rate leads to an increase in renewable energy consumption. Thus, it is evident that there is a positive role of women in the country’s sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socially Sustainable and Sustainable Social Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 841 KiB  
Review
What Is Design for Social Sustainability? A Systematic Literature Review for Designers of Product-Service Systems
by Lucia Corsini and James Moultrie
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 5963; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13115963 - 25 May 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5635
Abstract
Social sustainability is concerned with the wellbeing and flourishing of societies now and in the future. Despite its importance, it has been largely overlooked compared with environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability. Additionally, although there is a longstanding history of design being used [...] Read more.
Social sustainability is concerned with the wellbeing and flourishing of societies now and in the future. Despite its importance, it has been largely overlooked compared with environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability. Additionally, although there is a longstanding history of design being used to tackle social and sustainability problems, the concept of design for social sustainability is not well-understood. In light of this, the current study aims to conceptually develop design for social sustainability. It specifically focuses on how this concept can be developed for the design of product-service systems. A systematic literature review of social design and sustainable design literature is conducted to synthesise fragmented knowledge on design for social sustainability. A total of 69 articles are analysed with respect to terminology, context, methods, focus and key themes. In doing so, it helps to summarise current knowledge and identify several promising areas for further research. In particular, it calls for additional contextual and place-based perspectives; development of appropriate metrics, methods and tools; and research on the linkages between design for social sustainability and existing sustainable design approaches and methods. This article contributes to knowledge in three ways: (1) it integrates disparate knowledge on design for social sustainability within the domain of product-service systems, (2) it defines design for social sustainability and makes progress toward operationalising the concept by identifying its key dimensions, and (3) it identifies current gaps in the literature and highlights areas for further research. This study is important for designers of product-service systems because it sheds a light on what is desirable and achievable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Socially Sustainable and Sustainable Social Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop