sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 18635

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DINÂMIA’ CET, ISCTE, 2835029 Lisbon, Portugal
Interests: territorial development; sustainable development; territorial cohesion; territorial impact assessment; spatial planning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DINÂMIA'CET, Centre for Socioeconomic and Territorial Studies, Iscte – Lisbon University Institute, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
Interests: architecture; urban planning and urban studies

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DINÂMIA'CET, Centre for Socioeconomic and Territorial Studies, Iscte – Lisbon University Institute, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
Interests: urban design; public space; urban planning and urban studies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will comprise papers covering a wide range of aspects related to the legacies of the late 20th century urban policies and transformations.

The late 20th century featured an optimistic feeling about social and economic models of the western democracies, which was described by Francis Fukuyama in 1992 as “the end of History”. The move to a post-industrial society, the growth of the tertiary sector of the economy, the impacts of new technologies, and the widespread use of the internet strengthened globalization and introduced new challenges to the world economy.

Since then, urban mega-projects have become more and more strategic in processes of urban and regional change, e.g., the organization of mega-events (such as the Olympics, Expo, Football World Cup, as well as the European Capital of Culture), the redevelopment of large brownfields, the development of new cultural and sport venues, the construction of new infrastructures, the growth of real estate and tourism sectors, as well as the international repositioning of cities and regions.

The growing interest in mega-projects and mega-events was also influenced by a strengthening and urban entrepreneurial culture in many cities. In most cases, the transformations took place in vacant areas located close to city centers, redeveloped for idleness and cultural programs as well as real estate investments. These areas were labs of architecture and urban design rehearsal, inspiring people’s imagination for new century landscapes. The role of architects was decisive in this period, which was defined by exploring new shapes and typologies and a renovated sense of monumentality.

Despite the recurrent use of these strategies over the last two decades, and some positive legacies, the model has been criticized for the unsustainable economic cost and the social and territorial imbalances produced. Nevertheless, it is still seen as being implemented as a viable strategy to carry out urban development.

Almost twenty years have passed from the “golden era” of the 1990s, and today, the unprecedented urban and economic changes in hand seem to be the overwhelming closure of a cycle. The world is committed to new challenges to respond to pandemics, to climate changes, to the refugee crises and new democracy demands, as well as geopolitical uncertainties.

In this sense, this Special Issue intends to debate and analyze the impacts that policies and urban models inherited from the 20th century have had on different territories and to discuss the relevance of those legacies to facing present-day challenges. It aims to contribute to the literature and debate on the sustainability of mega-projects and mega-event developments, assessing their economic, social, spatial, and cultural impacts and their implications to the current global challenges of climate change, health crisis, economic downturn, and social justice.

The Special Issue is connected to the conference ‘Grand Projects 2021—Urban Legacies of the late 20th Century”, from which articles will be selected to be submitted as full papers, but also welcomes contributions outside this event.

Evidence-based and theoretical articles addressing the following topics are welcome:

  • Mega-events
  • Starchitecture and architecture as economic value;
  • Terrain vague and brownfield redevelopments;
  • Environmental awareness and green policies;
  • Urban policies, urban competitiveness, and social challenges;
  • Urban art and urban creativity;
  • Mega-projects and events in the Global South;
  • Methods and technologies on architectural design and urban planning;
  • Urban analytics and city design.

Papers selected for this Special Issue are subject to a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, developments, and applications. Please note that Sustainability is an open access journal providing fast review process but requiring a compulsory Article Processing Charge. However, discounts are potentially available for authors with a good academic background.

Prof. Dr. Eduardo Medeiros
Prof. Dr. Paulo Tormenta Pinto
Dr. Ana Brandão
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • urban planning
  • urban development
  • Global South
  • urban creativity
  • urban sustainability

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

32 pages, 9455 KiB  
Article
Olympic Waterfronts: An Evaluation of Wasted Opportunities and Lasting Legacies
by Pedro Janela Pinto and Gustavo Lopes dos Santos
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 1968; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14041968 - 09 Feb 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3670
Abstract
Mega-events such as the Olympic Games are powerful tools for city-branding and urban development, carrying the ability to create lasting physical, political, social, and economic legacies. Waterfront redevelopment has become a primary mechanism for revitalizing urban spaces, especially through brownfield requalification, and the [...] Read more.
Mega-events such as the Olympic Games are powerful tools for city-branding and urban development, carrying the ability to create lasting physical, political, social, and economic legacies. Waterfront redevelopment has become a primary mechanism for revitalizing urban spaces, especially through brownfield requalification, and the Olympics have not been indifferent to this trend. Several recent editions have engaged in the rehabilitation of urban waterfronts. To analyze common mistakes that may impair the quality of these interventions, we apply a revised version of a binary evaluation tool to nine such Olympic Waterfronts, starting with Barcelona 1992, assessing their contexts, budgets, programs, plans, and environmental integration. The results show that the Olympic Waterfront can drastically change the image of the city, greatly contributing to the perceived success of the event’s legacy and creating new urban centralities. However, the inadequate management in the planning, delivery and, especially, legacy stages of the event can compromise this “Olympic Effect”. The test application of the evaluation tool proved successful in the context of mega-event planning and post-event transformation. It could potentially be useful in informing present and future decision-making regarding waterfront regeneration projects by highlighting pressure-points that, if not addressed, may hinder the future success of the interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3425 KiB  
Article
The “Expo” and the Post-“Expo”: The Role of Public Art in Urban Regeneration Processes in the Late 20th Century
by Rita Ochoa
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 985; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020985 - 16 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2049
Abstract
In 1998, the Lisbon Universal Exhibition—Expo’98—led to an urban regeneration process on Lisbon’s waterfront. Following the example of other cities, this event was a pretext for rethinking and replacing a depressed area and for reconnecting it with the Tagus river through the creation [...] Read more.
In 1998, the Lisbon Universal Exhibition—Expo’98—led to an urban regeneration process on Lisbon’s waterfront. Following the example of other cities, this event was a pretext for rethinking and replacing a depressed area and for reconnecting it with the Tagus river through the creation of a set of new spaces for common use along the water. It was promoted as a public art program, which can be considered quite innovative in the Portuguese context. In view of this framework, this article aims to debate the relationships between public art and the dynamics of urban regeneration at the end of the 20th century. For that, it will analyse: (1) Expo’98’s public art program, comparing its initial assumptions with the final results; and (2) the impact of this program, through the identification of the placement of public art before (1974–1998) and after (1999–2009) the event. Although most of the implemented works did not (intentionally) explore aspects of space integration nor issues of public space appropriation, Expo’98’s public art program originated a monumentalisation of Lisbon’s eastern riverfront, later extended to other waterfront areas. At the same time, it played an important role in the way of understanding the city and public space that decisively influenced subsequent policies and projects. It is concluded that public art had a significant role in urban processes in the late 20th century, which is quite evident in a discourse of urban art as space qualifier and as a means of economic and social development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 49260 KiB  
Article
Development Clusters for Small Places and Rural Development for Territorial Cohesion?
by Eduardo Medeiros
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 84; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14010084 - 22 Dec 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3896
Abstract
This article proposes an alternative policy development approach for territories encompassing rural areas with small urban settlements or ‘small places’, which normally suffer from lagging territorial development trends. The proposed ‘Development Clusters for Small Places’ approach draws on the potential of all places [...] Read more.
This article proposes an alternative policy development approach for territories encompassing rural areas with small urban settlements or ‘small places’, which normally suffer from lagging territorial development trends. The proposed ‘Development Clusters for Small Places’ approach draws on the potential of all places to further their development via municipal clustering, based on four analytic dimensions: (i) existing functional areas; (ii) similarities in economic circularity and specialisation; (iii) presence of ongoing territorial and governance cooperation processes; and (iv) spatial physical connectivity and accessibility. Besides a theoretical overview of this policy approach, the article analyses concrete examples of its potential implementation in two case studies: Alentejo in Portugal and Innlandet in Norway. The findings highlight the potential advantages of municipal clustering over current mainstream regional development rationales to implement endogenous rural development in a supra-municipal scale, thus increasing institutional thickness and policy influence towards a more territorial cohesive region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 43510 KiB  
Article
Counter-Mapping through Digital Tools as an Approach to Urban History: Investigating the Spatial Condition of Activism
by Mesut Dinler
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8904; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13168904 - 09 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2541
Abstract
Cultural heritage has a central role in sustainable development, and it has the potential to re-imagine more democratic cities. Yet, critical theory has framed cultural heritage not only as the material remains of the past, but also as a dynamic interaction of humans [...] Read more.
Cultural heritage has a central role in sustainable development, and it has the potential to re-imagine more democratic cities. Yet, critical theory has framed cultural heritage not only as the material remains of the past, but also as a dynamic interaction of humans with their past that encompasses tangible and intangible entities. Thus, it is necessary to research these dynamics to understand the role of cultural heritage as a resource for sustainable development. In this context, the main research question of this article is: “How does heritage is shaped and managed by the ‘present’? Can we understand this process through the opportunities of digital humanities?”. To confront this question, the research adapts the counter-mapping methodology with the digital humanities perspective focusing on the urban protest movements that took place in the historic areas of Istanbul throughout the 1960s. It is seen that the spatial pattern of these movements was the result of the urban operations of the 1950s. In the 1950s, an autocratic government shaped the urban space and redefined the urban heritage to concentrate more power. However, in the 1960s, workers and students used the very same spaces and again redefined the urban heritage by exercising their social rights. Based on these results, the main conclusion is that for revealing the full potential of cultural heritage in sustainable development, it is necessary to deepen our knowledge on how heritage operates in a society, considering that heritage changes meaning depending on the socio-political context of the period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3278 KiB  
Article
Urban Planning Policies to the Renewal of Riverfront Areas: The Lisbon Metropolis Case
by Eduardo Medeiros, Ana Brandão, Paulo Tormenta Pinto and Sara Silva Lopes
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5665; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13105665 - 18 May 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4722
Abstract
Urban planning offers various design possibilities to solve fundamental challenges faced in urban areas. These include the need to physically renew old industrial and harbour riverside areas into liveable, inclusive and sustainable living spaces. This paper investigates the way urban planning policies have [...] Read more.
Urban planning offers various design possibilities to solve fundamental challenges faced in urban areas. These include the need to physically renew old industrial and harbour riverside areas into liveable, inclusive and sustainable living spaces. This paper investigates the way urban planning policies have helped to renew the waterfront areas in the Lisbon metropolis in the past decades. For this purpose, the contribution of the European Union (EU) and national urban development plans over the past decades are analysed. The results demonstrate an intense renewal of the waterfront areas in the Lisbon metropolitan area (LMA), particularly in Lisbon over the past three decades into leisure, ecologic and touristic areas, vis-à-vis the previous industrial and harbour vocation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Legacies of the Late 20th Century)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop