Topic Editors

ITI, LARSyS, Técnico Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
INESC-ID, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Heriot-Watt University, School of Engineering & Physical Sciences, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK

Water and Energy Monitoring and Their Nexus

Abstract submission deadline
31 January 2025
Manuscript submission deadline
31 March 2025
Viewed by
1729

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Drought, population growth, energy and land use, socioeconomic changes, and a shifting climate exacerbate the pressure on water and energy infrastructures. Therefore, it is critical to re-think how water and electricity are managed, including their interactions, e.g., water used to generate energy, and energy used in water treatment.

By focusing on the nexus between water and energy, we aim to identify sustainable strategies and technologies that can alleviate the mounting pressures on these vital resources. However, we also recognize the importance of examining water and energy individually to gain a comprehensive understanding of their unique complexities.

In this sense, this topic aims to provide a platform for researchers and participants from academic and industrial sectors to report their recent research findings that contribute to the comprehensive understanding and effective planning and management of water and energy systems. To this end, five journals were meticulously selected: Water, Energies, Sensors, Sustainability, and Data.

We are pleased to invite the research community to submit review or regular research papers focusing on, but not limited to, the following relevant topics related to water and energy monitoring and their nexus:

  • Water and energy monitoring technologies;
  • Electricity and water disaggregation;
  • Water–energy and energy–water nexus modelling;
  • Water–energy–food nexus modelling;
  • Public datasets;
  • Standards for data sharing and re-use;
  • Decision-making tools;
  • User experience and visualization of the water–energy and energy–water nexus;
  • Human factors in water–energy and energy–water nexus;
  • Water–energy and energy–water nexus integration in buildings and industries;
  • Optimization considering the water–energy and energy–water nexus;
  • Integration of RES and DER in energy and water infrastructures and their nexus;
  • Forecasting of power production and demand in water–energy and energy–water nexus;
  • Forecasting water demand in water–energy and energy–water nexus.

Dr. Lucas Pereira
Dr. Hugo Morais
Dr. Wolf-Gerrit Früh
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • water
  • energy
  • nexus
  • monitoring
  • modeling
  • control
  • RES
  • DER
  • food
  • data
  • human-in-the-loop

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Data
data
2.6 4.6 2016 22 Days CHF 1600 Submit
Energies
energies
3.2 5.5 2008 16.1 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sensors
sensors
3.9 6.8 2001 17 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.9 5.8 2009 18.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Water
water
3.4 5.5 2009 16.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 2664 KiB  
Article
Is Biomethane Production from Common Reed Biomass Influenced by the Hydraulic Parameters of Treatment Wetlands?
by Liviana Sciuto, Feliciana Licciardello, Antonio Carlo Barbera, Vincenzo Scavera, Salvatore Musumeci, Massimiliano Severino and Giuseppe Luigi Cirelli
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2751; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su16072751 - 26 Mar 2024
Viewed by 401
Abstract
Treatment wetlands (TWs) are Nature-Based Solutions which have been increasingly used worldwide for wastewater (WW) treatment as they are able to remove mineral and organic pollutants through both physical and biochemical processes. Besides the reusable effluent, the TWs produce, as their main output, [...] Read more.
Treatment wetlands (TWs) are Nature-Based Solutions which have been increasingly used worldwide for wastewater (WW) treatment as they are able to remove mineral and organic pollutants through both physical and biochemical processes. Besides the reusable effluent, the TWs produce, as their main output, plant biomass that needs to be harvested and disposed of at least once a year with significant management costs and causing the TW to be temporarily out of service. This study aims (i) to evaluate the potential of TWs’ biomass for local energy production and (ii) to understand the effects of TWs’ hydraulic conductivity (Ks) on the biomass biomethane yield. Specifically, this was addressed by determining the Biochemical Methane Potential of common reed (CR) (Phragmites australis) samples collected at three harvest times from the 10-year-old horizontal subsurface treatment wetland (HSTW) used as a secondary WW treatment system for the IKEA® store situated in Catania (Eastern Sicily, Italy). Furthermore, the falling-head test was conducted to assess the hydraulic conductivity (Ks) variation in the hydraulic conductivity (Ks) of the HSTW, in order to understand its influence on the CR biomethane production. The average methane content values were 130.57 Nm3CH4/tVS (±24.29), 212.70 Nm3CH4/tVS (±50.62) and 72.83 Nm3CH4/tVS (±23.19) in August, September, October 2022, respectively. Ks was correlated with both dry matter (R2 = 0.58) and fiber content (R2 = 0.74) and, consequently, affected the biomethane yield, which increased as the Ks increased (R2 = 0.30 in August; R2 = 0.57 in September). In the framework of a circular economy, the results showed the successful possibility of integrating bioenergy production into TWs. The research could contribute (i) to encouraging plant operators to reuse biomass from TWs for local energy production and (ii) to help plant operators to understand Ks effects on the biomass biomethane yield in order to increase the sustainability of the system and to reduce the maintenance costs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Water and Energy Monitoring and Their Nexus)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2973 KiB  
Article
Phytohormone Supplementation for Nutrient Removal from Mariculture Wastewater by Oocystis borgei in Sequential Batch Operation
by Yang Liu, Chengcheng Deng, Xinyue Song, Zhangxi Hu, Feng Li, Yulei Zhang, Changling Li, Xianghu Huang and Ning Zhang
Water 2024, 16(4), 552; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w16040552 - 11 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1035
Abstract
To enhance the nutrient removal efficiency of Oocystis borgei for mariculture wastewater (MW), the effects and processes of three phytohormones on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from synthetic mariculture wastewater (SMW) by O. borgei under sequential batch operation were compared. The findings revealed that [...] Read more.
To enhance the nutrient removal efficiency of Oocystis borgei for mariculture wastewater (MW), the effects and processes of three phytohormones on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from synthetic mariculture wastewater (SMW) by O. borgei under sequential batch operation were compared. The findings revealed that the supplementation with 10−6 M 3-indoleacetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), and zeatin (ZT) resulted in the most effective elimination, while there was no appreciable difference among them. The nitrogen and phosphorus indices of the effluent dramatically reduced (p < 0.01) upon the supplementation of phytohormones, and the removal effects were ranked as NO3-N > PO43−-P > NH4+-N > NO2-N. The removal rates for NH4+-N and PO43−-P were 0.72–0.74 mg·L−1·d−1 and 1.26–1.30 mg·L−1·d−1, respectively. According to physiological studies, phytohormones enhanced the levels of photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm and φPSII), thereby improving photosynthetic activity. Additionally, they stimulated Nitrate Reductase (NR) and Glutamine Synthetase (GS) activities to promote nitrogen metabolism and increased Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT), and carotenoid contents to mitigate oxidative stress damage caused by abiotic stress. These activities contribute to the proliferation of O. borgei, which in turn resulted in an increase in the assimilation of nitrogen and phosphorus from SMW. In conclusion, phytohormone supplementation significantly increased nutrient removal from SMW by O. borgei in a sequential batch reactor, which has potential application in MW treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Water and Energy Monitoring and Their Nexus)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop