Next Article in Journal
A Crash Prediction Method Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Driving Behavior Event Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Recently Developed Adsorbing Materials for Fluoride Removal from Water and Fluoride Analytical Determination Techniques: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Seedling Provenance and Site Heterogeneity on Abies cephalonica Performance in a Post-Fire Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantifying Ecosystem Services of High Mountain Lakes across Different Socio-Ecological Contexts
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessing the Potential of Catch-Only Models to Inform on the State of Global Fisheries and the UN’s SDGs

Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6101; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13116101
by Rishi Sharma 1,*, Henning Winker 2, Polina Levontin 3, Laurence Kell 3, Dan Ovando 4, Maria L. D. Palomares 5, Cecilia Pinto 2 and Yimin Ye 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6101; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13116101
Submission received: 8 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 28 May 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We have made substantial changes as requested by the reviewers. Where we disagreed we have provided our rationale. We hope this meets the requirements of the journal.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Sharma et al. proposes to evaluate how Catch only models can be improved.

The title is concise

The abstract can be improved as the style of briefly revealing the data is not very simple and concise. Define all abbreviations used (SRA, CMSY).

Introduction

Line 64: "different methodologies applied to the same dataset can produce disconcertingly divergent conclusions" Please explain.

 

Materials and methods

Line 161: "As most global fisheries do not have a long time series of data" how can you say that? Please cite or provide explanation

 

 

Author Response

We have made substantial changes to the MS as Reviewer 1 requested. We have addressed all concerns here, and where we didn't agree have provided our rationale why. We hope this is adequate. On reviewer 1's points:

The title is concise

Re: Thank you!

 

The abstract can be improved as the style of briefly revealing the data is not very simple and concise. Define all abbreviations used (SRA, CMSY).

          Re: We improved the abstract and defined abbreviations.

 

Introduction

Line 64: "different methodologies applied to the same dataset can produce disconcertingly divergent conclusions" Please explain.

          Re: added an explanatory clause.

 

Materials and methods

Line 161: "As most global fisheries do not have a long time series of data" how can you say that? Please cite or provide explanation

          Re: Qualified by adding ‘that lack traditional assessments’ and provided references to RAM’s and FAO’s databases.

 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revisions and defenses are greay! I have no more comments.

Back to TopTop