Next Article in Journal
Aqueous Extract of Phyllanthus emblica L. Alleviates Functional Dyspepsia through Regulating Gastrointestinal Hormones and Gut Microbiome In Vivo
Next Article in Special Issue
Interaction between Gelatin and Mulberry Leaf Polysaccharides in Miscible System: Physicochemical Characteristics and Rheological Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Edible Mushrooms as a Potential Component of Dietary Interventions for Major Depressive Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protective Effect and Mechanism of Soybean Insoluble Dietary Fiber on the Color Stability of Malvidin-3-O-glucoside
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/foods11101490
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chitosan-Based Materials: An Overview of Potential Applications in Food Packaging

by
Tong Liu
,
Junbo Li
,
Qilong Tang
,
Peng Qiu
,
Dongxia Gou
and
Jun Zhao
*
College of Food Science and Engineering, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(10), 1490; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods11101490
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 18 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 20 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on the Properties of Polysaccharides, Starch, Protein, Pectin, and Fibre in Food Processing)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chitosan is a multifunctional biopolymer that is widely used in the food and medical fields because of its good antibacterial, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibiting activity and its degradability. The biological activity of chitosan as a new food preservation material has gradually become a hot research topic. This paper reviews recent research on the bioactive mechanism of chitosan and introduces strategies for modifying and applying chitosan for food preservation and different preservation techniques to explore the potential application value of active chitosan-based food packaging. Finally, issues and perspectives on the role of chitosan in enhancing the freshness of food products are presented to provide a theoretical basis and scientific reference for subsequent research.

1. Introduction

Chitosan, with the scientific composition of (1,4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose, is the only natural cationic alkaline polysaccharide. Chitin is mainly found in shrimp, crab [1], and insect shells [2]. Chitosan can be produced by the deacetylation of chitin with NaOH, as shown in Figure 1, and by fermentation with some microbial cultures [3]. As a renewable green bio-resource from a wide range of sources, chitosan has superior bacterial inhibition and antioxidant properties and enzyme inhibition activity, and it is edible, nontoxic, and biodegradable [4], so there is a great deal of research being carried out on it in the food, medicine, environmental protection, chemical, cosmetics, and textile fields, among others [5]. It has good prospects in food preservation and green packaging because of its antibacterial [6,7,8,9], antioxidant [10,11,12,13,14], and enzyme inhibiting [15,16,17,18] activities and biodegradability [19,20,21]. However, the tensile strength, structural strength, and physical properties, such as oxygen and water vapor transmission, after being made into film cannot fully meet the requirements of food packaging, so the performance of chitosan as a food packaging material must be improved by employing derivatization, preparing nanocomposites, and compounding it with biological extracts. Many studies have shown that the future direction of food preservation is to make it green, safe, and environmentally friendly preservation [22,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, the use of chitosan as a base material for food preservation has become a research hotspot [27,28]. Even so, research on chitosan to date has not actually resulted in a commercially available packaging product. This paper reviews reports on the relevant biological activities of chitosan in food preservation and discusses the potential applications of chitosan derivatization, chitosan-based nanocomposites, and chitosan–extract composites, as shown in Figure 2, to provide a reference for the application of chitosan in food preservation and the development of novel preservation technologies.

2. Research Methods

In this review, information on the biological activity of chitosan and food packaging based on chitosan was consulted through various literature databases and search engines on the Internet, including but not limited to X-MOL, Google Scholar, PubMed, CNKI, AbleSci, Scopus. Through the integration of the obtained information, the hypothesis of the biological activity mechanism of chitosan in the field of food preservation is proposed, and the advantages and disadvantages of chitosan in the preservation of fresh products by coating or making packaging films are evaluated.

3. Biological Activity of Chitosan

3.1. Bacteriostatic Properties

The broad-spectrum bacterial inhibitory properties of chitosan have been confirmed by in vitro experiments and complex food antimicrobial assays [29,30,31,32]. In the process of food preservation, the use of chitosan coating or film covering the surface of food can, to a certain extent, resist microbial attack, slow down food spoilage, and thus extend the shelf life of food. For example, Wei et al. [33] studied the effects of different concentrations of chitosan on the color and surface microbial populations of frozen duck skin. The results showed that chitosan could form oxygenation competition with color-presenting substances, and 3% chitosan could effectively reduce the total number of surface colonies of duck skin during storage. In addition to the effect of chitosan concentration on the inhibition effect, molecular weight, degree of deacetylation, and bacterial species have also been shown to have an effect. Benhabiles et al. [6] studied the effect of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation on the inhibition effect, comparing the inhibition performance of chitosan on four Gram-positive and seven Gram-negative bacteria. The results showed that chitosan with low molecular weight and a high degree of deacetylation had a better inhibition effect, and among the tested species, chitosan had an inhibition effect on all bacteria except Salmonella typhimurium. The pH of the solution and the presence of metal ions also have an effect on the bacterial inhibitory effect of chitosan. Jing et al. [34] used ANOVA to test the data and concluded that the inhibitory activity of chitosan increased with decreasing pH in the range of >4 and <6. Comparing the effects of metal ions on the inhibitory activity of chitosan at a pH of 4, the results showed that Ca2+ and Mg2+ significantly reduced the inhibitory ability against Gram-negative bacteria. It can be seen that the inhibitory activity of chitosan is related to a variety of factors, with interlocking effects among them, and the best inhibition results can be obtained only by comprehensively analyzing all of the factors.
Although the information on the antimicrobial activity of chitosan is controversial, it is generally accepted that yeasts and mycobacteria are the most sensitive organisms to chitosan, followed by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [35]. The antifungal activity of chitosan is mainly attributed to the inhibition of mycelial growth and spore germination [36]. Early studies showed that chitosan inhibits spore germination, budding tube elongation, and radial growth by sequestering metals, minerals, trace elements, or nutrients required for fungal growth [37]. The inhibition of pathogenic fungi increases with increased chitosan concentration [38], but its application is hindered by low solubility at physiological pH due to its low charge density. Therefore, increasing the positive charge density of chitosan may be the most effective way to improve its solubility and antifungal activity [39]. The antifungal activity of chitosan also depends on its molecular weight [40], which affects the morphogenesis of the fungal cell wall [41]. It has also been shown that chitosan’s inhibition of pathogenic fungi in fruits may be related to its ability to induce increased production of, e.g., polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase [42].
As research progressed, hypotheses on the mechanism of chitosan inhibition were put forward, but the exact mechanism of inhibition has still not been determined. Feng et al. [43] measured the OD of cell contents under UV light at a wavelength of 260 nm and showed an increase in OD. Using transmission electron microscopy to observe changes in the ultrastructure of E. coli and S. aureus before and after the action of chitosan, it was observed that the cell membrane was broken, accompanied by a large amount of content spillage (DNA and mRNA) at the periphery and bacterial apoptosis. Similarly, Hui et al. [44] evaluated the antibacterial activity of chitosan acetate solution against E. coli and S. aureus. The morphology of bacteria after chitosan treatment was observed by transmission electron microscopy. The integrity of the cell membranes of both bacteria and the permeability of the inner and outer membranes of E. coli were investigated by measuring the absorption values at 260 nm UV, fluorescence changes in cells treated with the fluorescent probe 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine, and the release of cytoplasmic h-galactosidase activity. The results showed that chitosan ultimately damaged the bacteria by increasing the permeability of the inner and outer cell membranes, releasing the cell contents. This damage is most likely caused by electrostatic interactions between the NH3+ group in the chitosan acetate solution and the phosphoryl group of the phospholipid fraction of the cell membrane. Imelda et al. [29] confirmed the disruptive effect of chitosan on protein synthesis by β-galactosidase expression assay.
The above studies showed that chitosan can inhibit bacteria by disrupting bacterial cell membranes and protein synthesis. Ming et al. [45] pointed out that chitosan has high chelating ability for various metal ions (including Ni2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, and Cu2+) under acidic conditions. As a chelating agent, chitosan selectively chelates metal ions, thus playing a key role in microbial growth by inhibiting the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. Gooday et al. [46] pointed out that when chitosan crosses the cell wall of fungal pathogens with plant hydrolases as host, it penetrates the nucleus of the fungus, and the positively charged chitosan interacts with the negatively charged DNA, affecting RNA transcription and protein synthesis, thus achieving fungal inhibition.
In summary, there are three generally accepted theories about the mechanism of chitosan inhibition, the first of which is inter-charge interactions. As shown in Figure 3 [17], the electrostatic interaction between R-NH3+ of chitosan and negatively charged groups on the bacterial surface destabilizes the structure of the cell membrane, and the leakage of intracellular material leads to microbial death. The second theory concerns the chelating property of chitosan with metal ions. Chitosan chelates metal ions on the surface of bacteria, forming a microbially unavailable chelate, thus inhibiting microbial growth. The third theory holds that chitosan enters the cell and binds to DNA, and affects RNA transcription and protein expression, thus achieving the effect of bacterial inhibition. Although the above views are generally accepted, there are still many scholars who believe that the molecular weight and degree of deacetylation, and the differences between bacterial species, should also be considered when investigating the inhibition mechanism of chitosan.

3.2. Antioxidant Properties

The antioxidant properties of chitosan have been demonstrated [10,47,48]. It is well known that oxidation is one of the most important issues affecting the quality of meat, and heterocyclic amines, which are generated during the high-temperature processing of foods containing proteins, are carcinogenic substances. Many factors influence the formation of heterocyclic amines, mainly cooking methods, processing conditions (time, temperature), and the presence of antioxidant substances. Therefore, reducing heterocyclic amines by natural compounds and reducing or inhibiting the formation of these carcinogens in cooked meat by plant extracts containing antioxidants have become hot research topics [49].
When chitosan is added to meat products as a food additive, chitosan concentration and temperature are important factors that affect the experimental results. Fatih et al. [50] investigated the effect of adding different concentrations of chitosan (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1% w/w) to meatballs cooked at different temperatures on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines and the quality of the meatballs. The results showed that the heterocyclic amine content of the meatballs increased with increasing temperature (150, 200, and 250 °C), and the heterocyclic amine content showed a decreasing trend with increased chitosan concentration at the same temperature. Similarly, a study by Hojat et al. [51] showed that the addition of chitosan to huso fillets for cooking was effective in reducing heterocyclic amine production. Given that the production of heterocyclic amines usually requires high-temperature conditions, chitosan coatings or films have been less studied for reducing the production of heterocyclic amines. Kader et al. [52] studied four types of chitosan coating with different degrees of deacetylation and molecular weights for cherry preservation and evaluated the changes in total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, total anthocyanin content, ascorbic acid, total pectin content, hardness, and color of cherries. The results showed that the antioxidant capacity of chitosan and the ascorbic acid content in cherries had a trend of increasing and then decreasing with the degree of deacetylation and molecular weight, and the chitosan with 81.22% deacetylation and 273 kDa molecular weight at 4 °C showed the best antioxidant capacity.
Relatively stable DPPH radicals have been widely used to test the ability of compounds to act as free radical scavengers or hydrogen donors [53]. The IC50 value is the concentration at which 50% free radical scavenging is obtained, and the lower the IC50, the more active the sample is as an antioxidant compound and the greater its ability to absorb free radicals. Rainy et al. [54] investigated the antioxidant properties of edible chitosan–galactose complex coating by compounding chitosan and galactose (0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 g), and performed an in vitro test to evaluate the coating and analyze the parameters of antioxidant activity (DPPH method). The results showed a decreasing trend in the IC50 values, followed by an increasing trend. The lowest IC50 value of 43.20 ppm was recorded for the combination of chitosan and 1 g of galactose, which was the best antioxidant in the tested treatments. Similarly, Zhang et al. [55] reported the results of free radical scavenging experiments with different molecular weight chitosan, showing that high-molecular-weight chitosan had a high scavenging effect on hydroxyl radicals, and low-molecular-weight chitosan had a better scavenging effect on superoxide anion radicals and DPPH.
Giuseppina et al. [10] studied the effect of chitosan-based coatings on the freshness of figs by assessing the activities of enzymes, such as catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and peroxidase. The results showed that the addition of chitosan coating significantly increased the total polyphenol, anthocyanin, and flavonoid contents and the antioxidant activity of stored figs, reduced oxidative stress, and prevented browning reactions compared with the untreated group. Miriam et al. [56] studied the effect of nano-chitosan/propolis coating on the shelf life and antioxidant capacity of strawberries, and the results showed higher total phenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity of strawberries in the nano-chitosan/propolis coated group than in the untreated group at the end of the storage period. Chitosan delays the ripening and aging process of food, which extends the shelf life; largely maintains all sensory qualities of food; reduces enzymatic browning; decreases water loss; maintains the bright color, taste, and texture of food; and makes the aroma more durable, thus effectively maintaining the commercial value of food. There are many factors involved in the antioxidant performance of chitosan, and the main research concerns are concentration, degree of deacetylation, molecular weight, and antioxidant enzymes.
As the antioxidant mechanism of chitosan has been investigated, hypotheses have been proposed. Chitosan films in combination with other plant-based flavonoids have antioxidant properties as coatings on food surfaces [57]. Yuntao et al. [13] showed that high-molecular-weight chitosan films have a denser structure and better antibacterial properties. Braber et al. [58] concluded that chitosan biopolymers scavenge free radicals or chelate metal ions through a hydrogen or lone pair electron donor mechanism. The -OH and -NH2 groups in chitosan are the key functional groups for its antioxidant activity [59]. Zhang et al. [60] analyzed the barrier properties of chitosan–cyanidin films and concluded that the increased hydrogen bonding between cyanidin and chitosan molecules leads to a tighter arrangement between molecules inside the film, which improves its gas barrier properties.
The comprehensive analysis of the above studies led to three conjectures regarding chitosan’s antioxidant properties. The first is the barrier effect: chitosan coating can act as a barrier on the fruit surface, changing the internal gas atmosphere, reducing water loss, and delaying ripening. Second, many oxidation processes are carried out with the participation of metal ions, which play a role in transferring electrons during valence changes, and chitosan removes metal ions through chelation, thereby inhibiting oxidation reactions. Third, high-molecular-weight chitosan has denser intramolecular hydrogen bonds, which further prevents oxidation reactions from occurring when food comes into contact with air.

3.3. Enzyme Activity Inhibition

Enzymatic reactions play a non-negligible role in the softening and browning of foods. Tissue browning is inevitable in some fruits and vegetables with damaged surfaces due to the action of polyphenol oxidase. He et al. [18] studied the effect of clove oil–chitosan coating on the quality of fresh-cut lemons at four temperatures of 0, 4, 7, and 10 °C. By analyzing the changes in peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenolic acids, it was concluded that the chitosan coating had a stronger inhibitory effect on enzyme activity as the temperature decreased. Seafood is also highly susceptible to deterioration due to enzymatic reactions, which is the main reason for its quality decline [17].
Chitosan concentration is another important factor influencing enzyme activity. A-Dan et al. [61] investigated the effect of chitosan on papain and showed that with increased chitosan concentration, there was an inhibitory effect on papain when the concentration was greater than about 8.0288 g/L. Arisa et al. [62] investigated the effect of chitosan coating with different molecular weights at a concentration of 1% on the physicochemical properties of red bananas. The results showed that chitosan coating was able to reduce fruit respiration rate, ethylene production, and pectin hardness by inhibiting the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes (polygalacturonase and pectin lyase) that are important in pectin degradation, and with increasing molecular weight, chitosan coating showed better inhibition of enzymatic activity, thus delaying banana spoilage and deterioration. Although the mechanism by which chitosan inhibits the browning of fruits and vegetables and softening of meat tissues has not been elaborated, it must be related to the inhibition of enzymes associated with the occurrence of enzymatic reactions in foods.
With the study of the mechanism of chitosan’s enzymatic activity inhibition, related hypotheses have been proposed. Kurita et al. [63] indicated that polycations may compete with divalent metals, such as Mg2+ and Ca2+, present in the cell wall, thus disrupting the integrity of the cell wall or affecting the activity of degradative enzymes. To resist local browning in fruits and vegetables, chitosan binds suspended polyphenol oxidase molecules through electrostatic interactions to inactivate the enzyme, and the inactivated polyphenol oxidase is unable to transfer electrons directly to molecular oxygen, thus acting as an anti-browning agent [56]. Riaz et al. [64] studied the effect of chitosan-based apple peel polyphenol composite coating on improving the storage quality of strawberries. The antioxidant content of the coated fruits was relatively stable compared to uncoated fruits. The reduced antioxidant activity during storage may lead to decay and senescence. The ability of chitosan-based apple peel polyphenol composite coating to reduce decay, decrease enzymatic activity, and retain the quality attributes of fruits, leading to the degradation of antioxidant compounds, is closely related to the presence of efficient oxygen radical scavengers [65]. Yage et al. [66] used chitosan/nano-titanium dioxide coating to induce film formation on the surface of mangoes, creating a microenvironment that reduced decay and water loss and delayed respiratory peaks to preserve fruit flavor.
In summary, the hypotheses on the mechanism of action of chitosan’s enzyme activity inhibition include the following: First, the chelation of metal ions disrupts the enzyme activation pathway, and calpain and matrix metalloproteinases are Ca2+ dependent endogenous enzymes. Second, chitosan molecules penetrate the sarcoplasm and bind directly to the enzyme, thereby affecting enzyme activity. Third, chitosan may bind to structural proteins, which can affect the degradation and dissociation of enzyme proteins. Fourth, the chitosan coating alters the microenvironment of the sample, thus synthetically modulating the biochemical characteristics of the preserved food. Unfortunately, there are not enough relevant studies, and more research is needed to develop systematic interpretations of these hypotheses.

3.4. Biodegradability

Biodegradable polymer materials can be degraded by microorganisms or their secretions under the action of enzymes or chemical decomposition with a certain time and under certain conditions [67]. The degradation of biodegradable materials is generally accompanied by changes in their chemical and physical properties, reduced molecular weight, and the production of low-molecular-weight substances (CO2, H2O, CH4). Ruchir et al. [20] reported that chitosan coatings are environmentally friendly, biodegradable, and in most cases edible. Aris et al. [19] pointed out that although polymers synthesized with chitosan cannot be completely degraded, mixing chitosan with synthetic polymers can improve the decomposition rate of plastics that are more difficult to decompose. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), which is nontoxic and water-soluble, is one of the most commonly used synthetic polymers for chitosan. Yueming Li et al. [68] studied the effect of biodegradable, antibacterial chitosan starch composite film on the freshness of red grapes. The results showed that the biodegradable film had good water retention and antimicrobial efficacy and could be applied to grape preservation.
Zhang et al. [69] observed a link between degradation rate and molecular weight, degree of deacetylation, and distribution of N-acetyl D-glucosamine residues. Chitosan is a semi-crystalline polymer, and the relationship between chitosan biodegradability and the degree of deacetylation also depends on the degree of crystallinity, which reaches a maximum at a deacetylation degree of 0% (in the form of titin) or 100% (fully deacetylated chitosan) and decreases at intermediate values, with the rate of biodegradation increasing as the degree of crystallinity decreases. Similarly, Croisier et al. [70] found that acetyl residues distributed along the chitosan chain also affect the crystallinity of chitosan and, thus, the biodegradation rate. It can be concluded that smaller chitosan chains biodegrade more efficiently than higher-molecular-weight chitosan. In vivo, chitosan can be degraded by several enzymes, including lysozyme, a nonspecific enzyme present in all mammalian tissues. The degradation products are nontoxic oligosaccharides, and in vitro degradation of chitosan occurs by oxidative, chemical, or enzymatic hydrolysis. These methods are commonly used for low-molecular-weight chitosan prepared under controlled conditions.
In addition to being a polymer with an amino group, chitosan is also a polysaccharide and therefore contains readily breakable glycosidic bonds. Chitosan appears to be degraded in vivo by nonspecific enzymes, but mainly lysozyme has been reported to have this property. The biodegradation of chitosan leads to the formation of nontoxic oligosaccharides. These oligosaccharides, with variable lengths, can potentially be incorporated into metabolic pathways or excreted from the body [71,72]. Therefore, it is clear that chitosan is a strong natural candidate to replace nondegradable plastics in the future and its position as a natural alternative is established. Based on the current research, the relative application of chitosan in food packaging will be developed and commercialized shortly.

4. Status of Research on Chitosan Preservation

4.1. Enhanced Freshness Preservation Performance

Despite the many biological activities of chitosan described above, its antimicrobial and antioxidant capacities are still lacking when it is used for food preservation [73,74]. To address these issues and expand its application, many methods have been investigated to enhance its preservation performance, mainly including derivatization, chitosan nanoparticles, and combinations with natural extracts, essential oils, natural polymers, synthetic polymers, etc.

4.1.1. Chitosan Derivatization

The functional groups of chitosan contain an amino group and two hydroxyl groups, which can easily react with a variety of chemical groups. Introducing new groups by modifying chitosan molecules to produce derivatives with excellent physical and chemical properties is important to expand the applications of chitosan and its derivatives [75]. Previous and current studies have shown that chitosan derivatives have positive effects in terms of antioxidant activity. Xiao et al. [76] studied the use of gallic acid–chitosan derivatives to preserve cherry tomatoes and evaluated the antioxidant and endogenous enzyme activities. The results showed that the enzyme-grafted gallic acid–chitosan derivatives had excellent antioxidant capacity in scavenging DPPH, hydroxyl, and superoxide anion radicals. This resulted in prolonged fruit ripening, reduced weight loss, high hardness, and little change in epidermal color in the treated group, and aromatic compounds remained relatively constant throughout storage due to delayed postharvest senescence.
Similarly, Neslihan et al. [77] synthesized two novel chitosan–Schiff base derivatives by condensation reactions of high- and low-molecular-weight chitosan with cotton phenol and studied their scavenging activity against 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals. They concluded that both chitosan–cotton phenol derivatives had better scavenging ability against DPPH radicals than unmodified chitosan. The modified chitosan had significantly improved antibacterial activity against foodborne bacterial spoilage. Similarly, chitosan derivatives have good film-forming and antimicrobial properties, and the use of film coating treatment has significant effects on inhibiting browning, reducing enzyme activity, maintaining fruit and vegetable quality, and prolonging freshness. Meriem et al. [78] prepared active nanocomposite films of cellulose nanocrystals reinforced with styrene-based quinoxaline-grafted chitosan by the solvent casting method and studied their antibacterial activity against five common bacteria. The films demonstrated good antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Furthermore, films prepared from chitosan derivatives have different physical properties depending on the type and degree of substitution of the grafting groups. Bingnan et al. [79] found that the mechanical properties of chitosan products could be improved with a small amount of differently structured formyl saccharides by establishing intermolecular formyl–sugar bonds. When the amount of sucralfate and cottonseed aldehyde was 0.5%, the breaking strength and strain of chitosan films increased from 28 to 38 MPa and 19% to 48%, respectively, and the wet stability and toughness were improved at the same time. Currently, various chitosan derivatives have been successfully designed and applied to food preservation, as shown in Table 1. There are not many research cases of chitosan derivatives for food preservation due to the concern for their potential toxicity. Therefore, future research should not only explore more chitosan derivatives with specific and enhanced functions, but also develop green chemical processes to avoid toxic residues.

4.1.2. Chitosan Nanoparticles

Due to its large particle size, chitosan does not come into contact with food spoilage factors when used for food preservation, thus limiting the biological activity of chitosan alone when used for this purpose [88]. Studying chitosan nanoparticles is another efficient option to enhance the utilization of chitosan. Melo et al. [89] developed composite pectin films supplemented with copper algae mud chitosan nanoparticles and evaluated their physical and mechanical properties. The mechanical analysis of maximum stress and elongation showed that nanoparticles as fillers increased the toughness of the pectin films. Water vapor permeability tests showed that nanostructured films containing copper sulfur had better barrier properties. More studies on using chitosan nanoparticles to enhance the physical and mechanical properties of chitosan films are presented in Table 2.
Ran et al. [90] studied the use of chitosan nanoparticles for fish preservation and found that the storage life of fish fillets wrapped in composite nanofilms could be extended by 6–8 days through sensory evaluation, microbiological analysis, pH, total volatile alkaline nitrogen value, thiobarbituric acid value, color, texture, and other storage quality indicators. The plant essential oil anthocyanin composite film had the best effect on fish fillet preservation, and the anthocyanin chitosan composite nanoparticle film had the best effect on protecting fish fillet appearance. In another study, modified magnetic chitosan nanomaterials obtained by combining modified chitosan with magnetic materials retained the properties of chitosan with the strong chelating ability of metal ions and had good regenerative properties, greatly expanding the application prospects of chitosan [91].
There are several methods to prepare chitosan nanoparticles, including the ionic gel [92], microemulsion [93], emulsification solvent diffusion [94], polyelectrolyte complex [95], and reversed-phase micellar [96] methods. Chitosan nanoparticles have both the biological properties of chitosan and the small size of nanoparticles with a large contact area. The final performance of nanoparticles also depends on several other parameters, such as the composition of secondary materials in the matrix, the material concentration/ratio, and the reaction time [97]. In addition, studies have reported using different types of chitosan (varying by molecular weight, degree of deacetylation, etc.) [98,99]. The applications of chitosan-based nanoparticles are gradually increasing, and it is expected that chitosan-based nanoparticle formulations will enter the market soon.
Table
Table 2. Correlation of mechanical properties of chitosan nanoparticles after film formation.
Table 2. Correlation of mechanical properties of chitosan nanoparticles after film formation.
PropertyNanomaterialsReference
BarrierChitosan/tripolyphosphate[100]
Water sorptionChitosan/starch[101]
StretchabilityChitosan/chlorogenic acid[102]
Water vaporChitosan/TiO2 and Ag[103]
TransparencyChitosan/curcumin[104]
BreathabilityChitosan/polyoxyethylene[105]

4.1.3. Chitosan Plant Extract Compound

Plant extracts are often rich in low-molecular-weight bioactive ingredients, such as polyphenols, terpenoids, and terpenoids, which are considered to be powerful antibacterial and antioxidant agents [106]. Plant extracts are known not only to act as free radical scavengers in vitro but also to protect the body from free radical activity. The respiration and transpiration of fruits and vegetables during storage can cause water loss, and when water loss reaches 5%, wilting and withering can occur, which can seriously affect the edible value [107]. Table 3 summarizes some recent literature on the use of plant extracts in combination with chitosan-based coatings/films for different food products.
The use of chitosan-based composite coating and preservation solution can reduce water loss, inhibit cellular action, and prolong the storage time of fruits and vegetables. Rambabu et al. [108] investigated the application of mango leaf extract incorporated into chitosan film to enhance the antioxidant activity and characterized the tensile strength. They found that the mango leaf extract–chitosan composite film had better tensile strength (maximum tensile strength of 23.06 ± 0.19 MPa) and less elongation compared to the pure chitosan film (18.14 ± 0.72 MPa). They also evaluated the antioxidant activity of chitosan films in terms of total phenolic content, DPPH radical scavenging ability, iron ion reducing ability, and ABTS radical scavenging ability, and the results showed that the antioxidant activity of increased with the addition of mango leaf extract. Yang et al. [109] conducted similar experiments, in which blueberry leaf extract was added to chitosan coating to maintain the postharvest quality of fresh blueberries. The composite film synthesized with chitosan and plant extracts also had UV-blocking and antioxidant abilities [110]. Wanli et al. [111] studied the process of preparing chitosan–banana peel extract composite film. Different contents of banana peel extract (4%, 8%, and 12%) were added to chitosan membranes using various characterization methods, and the experimental results showed that the chitosan–banana peel extract composite membranes had good antioxidant activity in different food samples.
Plant extracts, when synergized with chitosan, usually have an inhibitory effect on bacterial growth, which is related to metabolic disorders caused in bacteria through disruption of cell membranes, enzyme systems, or genetic material. Ali et al. [112] investigated chicken meat coated with chitosan and containing 1% essential oil of oregano and 1% or 2% grape seed extract stored in the refrigerator. On the 20th day of refrigeration, the minimum viable count of each treatment organism (Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., Lactobacillus, and Saccharomyces (yeast-mold)) was 3.54–4.51 log CFU/mL. Compared with the untreated group, the results indicated that the compound coating was effective in retarding microbial growth and oxidative activity. At present, most of the plant extracts compounded with chitosan are from easily available and nontoxic substances, such as herbs and spices, and they are used in food preservation by obtaining their essential oils, which have active antioxidant and antibacterial active properties when compounded with chitosan. However, there are still problems, such as the complex extraction process, low efficiency, and the effect on the sensory quality of food. Therefore, the extraction and bio-preservation ability of plant extracts still need to be explored in the future in order to provide better technical support for the development of food preservation.
Table
Table 3. Studies on chitosan–plant extract complexes for food coatings.
Table 3. Studies on chitosan–plant extract complexes for food coatings.
CommodityPlant ExtractReference
BlueberryBlueberry leaf[109]
BananaGum arabic[113]
Sierra fish filletsTomato[114]
StrawberryPeony[115]
MangoPomegranate peel[116]
AppleBanana peels[117]
Sweet basil leavesThyme volatile oil[118]
Le Conte pearBeeswax–pollen grains[119]

4.2. Freshness Preservation Technology

In recent years, the preparation of chitosan-based preservation films has become increasingly standardized, and the growing demand for food preservation has greatly contributed to the development of chitosan biofilm preservation technology. In terms of operation, traditional coating and film-making methods for food preservation have been widely used and have shown reliable results. The thickness of chitosan films is usually in the range of 6–80 µm, with an average of 25 µm, as reported by Elena et al. [120]. In addition, emerging technologies, such as film production from plant extracts, by lamination with plastic films, and by laminated layer self-assembly (LbL), are emerging. Both direct coating and bioactive packaging film preservation methods are systematically discussed at a technical level below.

4.2.1. Coating Preservation

Coating preservation refers to covering the food surface with a layer of chitosan solution, which can usually be applied by dip coating, electrostatic spraying, or brushing. Due to its outstanding advantages of convenience and operability, it is often used in food preservation research. For example, Yong et al. [121,122] used electrostatic spraying of chitosan solution to preserve strawberries, which prolonged their shelf life and slowed down the degradation of quality. Rui et al. [123] investigated the potential application of chitosan as a natural growth regulator for bean sprouts by dipping bean sprouts in different concentrations of chitosan solution. The results showed a significant increase in the hypocotyl length and fresh weight of bean sprouts compared to the blank control. In addition, chitosan solution combined with plant extracts have been used as dip coatings to retard the quality deterioration of fruits, vegetables, meat, etc. Mehran et al. [124] applied chitosan solution mixed with Berberis extract and peppermint essential oil to turkey breast meat, and microbial counts and oxidation levels were significantly reduced under refrigerated conditions.
Usually, chitosan-based dip-coating treatment consists of the following steps: First, a pre-determined concentration of chitosan solution is prepared, and then the food is immersed in the solution for a pre-determined time, depending on the characteristics of the food. Finally, the food is removed, the excess solution adhering to the surface is drained, and the product is dried in a specific airflow environment. Regarding other coating methods, all steps are similar to dip coating except for the intermediate steps. Sometimes, repeated coating is applied to enhance preservation during storage [125].
Compared to other coating methods, it is obvious that dip coating is easy to operate under simple conditions. However, it is also prone to problems with dilution and contamination in practical applications. In addition, gravity tends to cause uneven film thickness on the food surface and reduces productivity to some extent [126]. The preservation substrate determines the thickness of the coating, the equipment requirements, and the drying technology used. In addition, self-healing coatings are intelligent materials that can repair coating damage and restore its properties, reducing or eliminating the adverse effects of damage. As a method of fabricating multilayer coatings, laminated layer self-assembly (LbL) is often used to construct self-healing coatings. Yu et al. [127] investigated a self-healing coating by assembling chitosan (CS) with sodium alginate (SA) layer-by-layer, and the damaged area could be completely repaired after three assembly cycles. The self-healing schematic is shown in Figure 4. The mechanical properties, water barrier, and oxygen barrier of the repaired coating were 97%, 95%, and 63% of those of the intact coating, respectively, which basically restored the barrier properties of the intact coating, although the permeability increased. In addition, the coating reduced the effect of coating damage by restoring the barrier properties of the coating and extending the shelf life of the strawberries. Thus, it can be seen that chitosan coating not only slows down food quality degradation, but also demonstrates efficient antioxidant and antibacterial effects. However, the uniformity of covering food and rough sensory effects need to be further improved. Therefore, the application of chitosan coating for freshness is worth further study, as it has the potential to become a low-cost alternative technology for fresh food preservation.

4.2.2. Film-Making and Preservation

Bioactive chitosan packaging films are made by co-blending chitosan solution with bioactive materials to make cling film in which to wrap food and provide freshness. Cling films can be produced in advance in large quantities without the condition of preserved products. They can be broadly divided into two types according to the composite materials: packaging film based on chitosan solution and hybrid film prepared in combination with food-grade plastic film.
Chitosan-based biofilms are often prepared by co-blending with extracts derived from natural plants, which are of increasing interest to the food industry because of their eco-safety and rich nutritional value. The addition of active ingredients not only enhanced the inherent bioactivity of the films, but also improved the final mechanical properties and applicability of the films. For example, Zhang et al. [128] improved the mechanical properties of chitosan films by vanillin modification and showed that the film stretch of vanillin/chitosan composite films increased by 53.3% and moisture permeability decreased by 36.5% compared to pure chitosan films. Ting et al. [129] added spice extracts to chitosan films to extend the shelf life of frozen pork. The data showed that chitosan could interact intermolecularly with the polyphenols in the spices and also caused the formation of covalent bonds between the hydrogen and water molecules of the polyphenols, increasing the hydrophilicity of the composite films. In addition, plant essential oil, an aromatic oily liquid extracted from plant tissues and organs, can not only scavenge free radicals in the body and perform antioxidant functions, but also has the functions of regulating the balance of intestinal flora, killing pathogenic bacteria, and promoting the secretion of digestive juices, which is a plant extract with more applications at present. When the plant essential oil is compounded with a chitosan solution in a certain ratio, the prepared chitosan film will also have the relevant nutritional properties of plant extracts, and the plant extracts can function at low concentrations. The selective gas (CO2 and O2) permeability and good mechanical properties of chitosan make it an excellent film-forming material. However, the low water barrier properties of chitosan films limit their application, as effective control of water transfer is a desirable property for most food packaging, especially in humid environments [130]. Several studies have focused on the moisture permeability of chitosan films containing essential oils or other plant extracts. López et al. [131] found that the addition of carvacrol (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% v/v) significantly reduced the moisture permeability of chitosan films. When essential oils or other plant extracts (tea tree, carvacrol, cinnamon, turmeric, etc.) were added to chitosan films, the moisture permeability was significantly reduced, which may be due to the hydrophobicity of the essential oil particles. It can be seen that various properties of the film or coating can be modified by adding essential oils, and chitosan with essential oils has been shown to increase hydrophobicity, reduce water vapor permeability, and improve the antimicrobial activity of the film.
For the preparation of multilayer or hybrid structured packaging films in combination with food-grade plastic films, synthetic plastics and biodegradable polymers provide sufficient mechanical strength to meet the packaging requirements and are widely used matrix materials [132]. With regard to structured packaging films, the physical and mechanical properties depend heavily on the mixing state and compatibility between the constituent components. Shun et al. [133] prepared chitosan–polylactic acid plastic films by an extrusion method and used them to preserve grouper fillets, then analyzed their physical properties and antibacterial activity. The results showed that the water vapor transmission rate and water content of the plastic films was increased, and inhibition of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Staphylococcus aureus reached over 95%. For hybrid structured packaging films, the thermal stability of the active component is a key factor to consider. Sudharsan et al. [133] prepared a compatible PLA/chitosan composite film with a thickness of 0.25 mm by the solvent casting method, and it demonstrated good thermal stability, low oxygen permeability, and high mechanical properties. Although all the above studies are still at the experimental stage and still some distance from commercialization, it is believed that there will be a positive development trend of bioactive chitosan packaging films through the continuous development of film making technology.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In summary, chitosan has good biological activities, including antibacterial and antioxidant activity and enzyme activity inhibition, and has demonstrated great potential in the field of food preservation. Thus, it has attracted widespread attention. Although there are inconsistent views among domestic and foreign scholars on the mechanism behind chitosan’s preservation of food, the generally accepted views are as follows: (1) inter-charge interaction, (2) chelation of metal ions, (3) disruption of cell membranes to enter bacteria, bind DNA, and affect protein expression, (4) dense intramolecular hydrogen bonding of chitosan, and (5) binding to enzymes or structural proteins, which affects enzyme activity. In addition, chitosan preservation methods are constantly changing and will continue to be integrated.
This review is a discussion and summary of the current status of chitosan in the field of food preservation, to help the reader understand its importance as a sustainable material in this field and related strategies to improve its properties to enlighten future developments. While much work has been done to establish methods and elucidate the positive performance of chitosan in food preservation, there are still many difficulties and theoretical shortcomings in practical application. Therefore, future developments should focus on the following aspects: in-depth research on the mechanism behind chitosan’s food preservation properties, and technical optimization and enrichment of strategies to further approach practical applications. In addition, studies analyzing the synergistic effects between components and methods as well as potential toxicity are also needed. Finally, the advantages of various technologies and composite components should be summarized regularly to help achieve effective the targeted inhibition of food spoilage sources. The future of chitosan as a sustainable material in the food preservation industry is bright, and expanding its application will be an inevitable trend as the technology continues to be developed.

Author Contributions

T.L. performed the conceptual design and supervised the work. J.L. was responsible for writing—original manuscript. Q.T. is responsible for data collection and literature search. P.Q. and D.G. were responsible for the article review. Project management and funding acquisition were handled by J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Science and Technology Research Project of the Jilin Provincial Education Department (JJKH20210618KJ) and the Science and Technology Program of the Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department (20210203135SF).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Science and Technology Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education and the Science and Technology Program of Jilin Provincial Department of Science and Technology for financial support, and the laboratory of Changchun University College of Food for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mulyani, R.; Mulyadi, D.; Yusuf, N. Chitosan Membrane from Shrimp Shells (Panaeus Modonon) as an Antibacterial Food. Proc. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 147, 072006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mohan, K.; Ganesan, A.R.; Muralisankar, T.; Jayakumar, R.; Sathishkumar, P.; Uthayakumar, V.; Chandirasekar, R.; Revathi, N.J. Recent insights into the extraction, characterization, and bioactivities of chitin and chitosan from insects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tan, Y.N.; Lee, P.P.; Chen, W.N.J.F. Dual extraction of crustacean and fungal chitosan from a single Mucor circinelloides fermentation. Fermentation 2020, 6, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, W.; Xue, C.; Mao, X. Chitosan: Structural modification, biological activity and application. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4532–4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kou, S.G.; Peters, L.M.; Mucalo, M.R. Chitosan: A review of sources and preparation methods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Benhabiles, M.S.; Salah, R.; Lounici, H.; Drouiche, N.; Goosen, M.F.A.; Mameri, N. Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 29, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheah, W.Y.; Show, P.-L.; Ng, I.-S.; Lin, G.-Y.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Chang, Y.K. Antibacterial activity of quaternized chitosan modified nanofiber membrane. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hajji, S.; Chaker, A.; Jridi, M.; Maalej, H.; Jellouli, K.; Boufi, S.; Nasri, M.J.E.S.; Research, P. Structural analysis, and antioxidant and antibacterial properties of chitosan-poly (vinyl alcohol) biodegradable films. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 15310–15320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Youssef, A.M.; Abou-Yousef, H.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Kamel, S.J.I. Mechanical and antibacterial properties of novel high performance chitosan/nanocomposite films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 76, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adiletta, G.; Zampella, L.; Coletta, C.; Petriccione, M. Chitosan Coating to Preserve the Qualitative Traits and Improve Antioxidant System in Fresh Figs (Ficus carica L.). Agriculture 2019, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hadidi, M.; Pouramin, S.; Adinepour, F.; Haghani, S.; Jafari, S.M. Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with clove essential oil: Characterization, antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, Y.L.; Tsai, Y.H. Extraction of chitosan from squid pen waste by high hydrostatic pressure: Effects on physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Duan, S.; Li, C.; Hu, B.; Liu, A.; Wu, D.; Cui, H.; Lin, L.; He, J.; et al. Preparation and characterization of chitosan films with three kinds of molecular weight for food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maringgal, B.; Hashim, N.; Mohamed Amin Tawakkal, I.S.; Muda Mohamed, M.T. Recent advance in edible coating and its effect on fresh/fresh-cut fruits quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 96, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Duran, A.; Kahve, H.I. The effect of chitosan coating and vacuum packaging on the microbiological and chemical properties of beef. Meat Sci. 2020, 162, 107961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hamad, A.F.; Han, J.H.; Kim, B.C.; Rather, I.A. The intertwine of nanotechnology with the food industry. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Inanli, A.G.; Tümerkan, E.T.A.; Abed, N.E.; Regenstein, J.M.; Özogul, F. The impact of chitosan on seafood quality and human health: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 404–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.; Shui, Y.; Li, S.; Xing, Y.; Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Li, W.; et al. Quality of fresh cut lemon during different temperature as affected by chitosan coating with clove oil. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020, 23, 1214–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giannakas, A.; Vlacha, M.; Salmas, C.; Leontiou, A.; Katapodis, P.; Stamatis, H.; Barkoula, N.M.; Ladavos, A. Preparation, characterization, mechanical, barrier and antimicrobial properties of chitosan/PVOH/clay nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 140, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.-W. Chitosan-based biodegradable functional films for food packaging applications. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 62, 102346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matica, A.; Menghiu, G.; Ostafe, V.J.N.F.C. Biodegradability of chitosan based products. New Front. Chem. 2017, 26, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ribeiro-Santos, R.; Andrade, M.; de Melo, N.R. Use of essential oils in active food packaging: Recent advances and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 61, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Juan, L.; Ying, F.; Nuerguli, M. Application of different compounding techniques of tea polyphenol complexes in food preservation. J. Food Saf. Guide 2021, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhen, N.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Xue, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhou, D.; Liu, J.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.J.M.B. Protein-based natural antibacterial materials and their applications in food preservation. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bajpai, V.K.; Kamle, M.; Shukla, S.; Mahato, D.K.; Chandra, P.; Hwang, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Huh, Y.S.; Han, Y.-K. Prospects of using nanotechnology for food preservation, safety, and security. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, Y.; Li, B.; Li, C.; Xu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Liang, D.; Huang, C.J.F. Comprehensive Review of Polysaccharide-Based Materials in Edible Packaging: A Sustainable Approach. Foods 2021, 10, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dutta, P.; Tripathi, S.; Mehrotra, G.; Dutta, J.J.F. Perspectives for chitosan based antimicrobial films in food applications. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ansorena, M.R.; Marcovich, N.E.; Pereda, M.J.H.E.; Springer: Berlin, G. Food Biopackaging Based on Chitosan; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 2057–2083. [Google Scholar]
  29. Galvan Marquez, I.; Akuaku, J.; Cruz, I.; Cheetham, J.; Golshani, A.; Smith, M.L. Disruption of protein synthesis as antifungal mode of action by chitosan. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 164, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, N.; Chen, X.-G.; Park, H.-J.; Liu, C.-G.; Liu, C.-S.; Meng, X.-H.; Yu, L.-J. Effect of MW and concentration of chitosan on antibacterial activity of Escherichia coli. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 64, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yilmaz Atay, H. Antibacterial activity of chitosan-based systems. In Functional Chitosan; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 457–489. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun, M.W.; Tong, J.J.; Jiang, L.S.; Xiong, B.H. Factors influencing the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its mechanism of action. J. Acta Zool. Sin. 2018, 30, 4327–4333. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei, C.; Liao, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, F.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, Z. Effects of different levels of chitosan and licorice antioxidants on skin color and surface microbial counts of frozen duck meat. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 45, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yingjun, J.; Youjin, H.; Hui, Q.; Ying, S.; Desen, L.; Rongqian, D. Analysis of the antibacterial activity of chitosan and its antibacterial mechanism. Chin. J. Antibiot. 2006, 19, 361–365. [Google Scholar]
  35. Aider, M.J.L. Chitosan application for active bio-based films production and potential in the food industry. LWT 2010, 43, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arceo-Martinez, M.T.; Jiménez-Mejía, R.; Salgado-Garciglia, R.; Santoyo, G.; Lopez-Meza, J.E.; Loeza-Lara, P.D.J.A. In vitro and in vivo anti-fungal effect of chitosan on post-harvest strawberry pathogens. Agrociencia 2019, 53, 1297–1311. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackson, S.; Heath, I.J.M.R. Roles of calcium ions in hyphal tip growth. Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 57, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kanawi, M.A.; AL Haydar, M.; Radhi, W.N.J.E.J.B. Effect of Chitin and Chitosan in Improvement of Plant Growth and Anti-Fungal Activity. Egypt. J. Bot. 2021, 61, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qin, Y.; Li, P.; Guo, Z.J.C.P. Cationic chitosan derivatives as potential antifungals: A review of structural optimization and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Palma-Guerrero, J.; Jansson, H.B.; Salinas, J.; Lopez-Llorca, L.J.J.M. Effect of chitosan on hyphal growth and spore germination of plant pathogenic and biocontrol fungi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El Ghaouth, A.; Arul, J.; Grenier, J.; Asselin, A.J.P. Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits. Phytopathology 1992, 82, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pastor, C.; Sánchez-González, L.; Marcilla, A.; Chiralt, A.; Cháfer, M.; González-Martínez, C. Quality and safety of table grapes coated with hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose edible coatings containing propolis extract. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 60, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Feng, X.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Wang, T.; Su, Z. Effect of chitosan on bacterial cell membranes. Food Sci. 2009, 30, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, H.; Du, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, L.J.I. Chitosan kills bacteria through cell membrane damage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 95, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kong, M.; Chen, X.G.; Xing, K.; Park, H.J. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: A state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 144, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gooday, G.W.; Jeuniaux, C.; Muzzarelli, R. Chitin in Nature and Technology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yen, M.-T.; Yang, J.-H.; Mau, J.-L.J.C. Antioxidant properties of chitosan from crab shells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 74, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vinsova, J.; Vavrikova, E.J.C. Chitosan derivatives with antimicrobial, antitumour and antioxidant activities—A review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2011, 17, 3596–3607. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nadeem, H.R.; Akhtar, S.; Ismail, T.; Sestili, P.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Ranjha, M.M.A.N.; Jooste, L.; Hano, C.; Aadil, R.M.J.F. Heterocyclic aromatic amines in meat: Formation, isolation, risk assessment, and inhibitory effect of plant extracts. Foods 2021, 10, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Oz, F.; Zaman, A.; Kaya, M. Effect of chitosan on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines and some quality properties of meatball. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e13065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mirsadeghi, H.; Alishahi, A.; Ojagh, M.; Pourashouri, P.J. Preservation. The effect of different kinds of chitosans and cooking methods on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in huso (Huso huso) fillet. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tokatli, K.; Demirdoven, A. Influences of chitosan coatings on functional compounds of sweet cherries. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1808–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kanatt, S.R.; Chander, R.; Sharma, A.J.F.C. Chitosan glucose complex—A novel food preservative. Food Chem. 2008, 106, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sulistijowati, R.; Husain, R.; Datau, M.C. Antioxidant, antibacterial and antifungal activity of edible coating chitosan-galactose complex. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Makassar, Indonesia, 22 June 2019; p. 012032. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, Z.T.; Zhong, Z.M. Study on antioxidant properties of chitosan with different molecular weights. Chem. Manag. 2019, 344, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martínez-González, M.C.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Correa-Pacheco, Z.N.; Corona-Rangel, M.L.; Ventura-Aguilar, R.I.; Del Río-García, J.C.; Ramos-García, M.L. Effect of Nanostructured Chitosan/Propolis Coatings on the Quality and Antioxidant Capacity of Strawberries During Storage. Coatings 2020, 10, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Chitosan based nanocomposite films and coatings: Emerging antimicrobial food packaging alternatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Braber, N.L.V.; Paredes, A.J.; Rossi, Y.E.; Porporatto, C.; Allemandi, D.A.; Borsarelli, C.D.; Correa, S.G.; Montenegro, M.A.J.I. Controlled release and antioxidant activity of chitosan or its glucosamine water-soluble derivative microcapsules loaded with quercetin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kosaraju, S.L.; Weerakkody, R.; Augustin, M.A.J.J. Chitosan−glucose conjugates: Influence of extent of Maillard reaction on antioxidant properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12449–12455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Teng, Y.; Zhang, Z. Study of chitosan-proanthocyanidin high antioxidant antibacterial films. Packag. Eng. 2020, 41, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pan, A.D.; Zeng, H.Y.; Foua, G.B.; Alain, C.; Li, Y.Q. Enzymolysis of chitosan by papain and its kinetics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 135, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wantat, A.; Rojsitthisak, P.; Seraypheap, K. Inhibitory effects of high molecular weight chitosan coating on ‘Hom Thong’ banana fruit softening. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kurita, K.J.P.D. Chemistry and application of chitin and chitosan. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998, 59, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Riaz, A.; Aadil, R.M.; Amoussa, A.M.O.; Bashari, M.; Abid, M.; Hashim, M.M. Preservation. Application of chitosan-based apple peel polyphenols edible coating on the preservation of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa cv. Hongyan) fruit. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sogvar, O.B.; Saba, M.K.; Emamifar, A. Aloe vera and ascorbic acid coatings maintain postharvest quality and reduce microbial load of strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 114, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xing, Y.; Yang, H.; Guo, X.; Bi, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Shui, Y.J.S.H. Effect of chitosan/Nano-TiO2 composite coatings on the postharvest quality and physicochemical characteristics of mango fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 263, 109135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kumar Tiwari, A.; Gautam, M.; Maurya, H.K. Recent Development of Biodegradation Techniques of Polymer. Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah 2018, 6, 414–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, Y.-M.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, S.-J.; Sun, Q.-S. Study on the effect of biodegradable chitosan starch antibacterial composite film on the preservation of red grapes. J. Food Saf. Qual. Insp. 2017, 8, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, H.; Neau, S.H.J.B. In vitro degradation of chitosan by a commercial enzyme preparation: Effect of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 1653–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Croisier, F.; Jérôme, C.J.E. Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 780–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kean, T.; Thanou, M.J.R. Chapter 10—Chitin and chitosan: Sources, production and medical applications. In Renewable Resources for Functional Polymers and Biomaterials; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2011; Volume 12, pp. 292–318. [Google Scholar]
  72. Dash, M.; Chiellini, F.; Ottenbrite, R.M.; Chiellini, E.J.P. Chitosan—A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 981–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Wu, Q.; Gu, Y.; Kan, J.; Jin, C.J.F.H. Effect of protocatechuic acid incorporation on the physical, mechanical, structural and antioxidant properties of chitosan film. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 73, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Narasagoudr, S.S.; Hegde, V.G.; Vanjeri, V.N.; Chougale, R.B.; Masti, S.P.J.C.P. Ethyl vanillin incorporated chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) active films for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huang, G.H. Application of chitosan and its derivatives in the food industry. Food Res. Dev. 2015, 36, 131–134. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang, X.; Wu, H.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Q. Horseradish peroxidase-mediated synthesis of an antioxidant gallic acid-g-chitosan derivative and its preservation application in cherry tomatoes. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 20363–20371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Beyazit, N.; Cakran, H.S.; Cabir, A.; Akiscan, Y.; Demetgul, C. Synthesis, characterization and antioxidant activity of chitosan Schiff base derivatives bearing (-)-gossypol. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fardioui, M.; Meftah Kadmiri, I.; Qaiss, A.E.K.; Bouhfid, R. Bio-active nanocomposite films based on nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced styrylquinoxalin-grafted-chitosan: Antibacterial and mechanical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 114, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Mu, B.; Wu, Q.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y. A sustainable approach to synchronous improvement of wet-stability and toughness of chitosan films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hoa, V.-B.; Song, D.-H.; Seol, K.-H.; Kang, S.-M.; Kim, H.-W.; Kim, J.-H.; Cho, S.H. Coating with chitosan containing lauric acid (C12: 0) significantly extends the shelf-life of aerobically–Packaged beef steaks during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2022, 184, 108696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Benhabiles, M.; Tazdait, D.; Abdi, N.; Lounici, H.; Drouiche, N.; Goosen, M.; Mameri, N. Assessment of coating tomato fruit with shrimp shell chitosan and N, O-carboxymethyl chitosan on postharvest preservation. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2013, 7, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, H.J.F. Postharvest chitosan-g-salicylic acid application alleviates chilling injury and preserves cucumber fruit quality during cold storage. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Niu, X.; Zhu, L.; Xi, L.; Guo, L.; Wang, H.J.F.C. An antimicrobial agent prepared by N-succinyl chitosan immobilized lysozyme and its application in strawberry preservation. Food Control 2020, 108, 106829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, C.; Han, B.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, C.; Sheng, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.J. The quality changes of postharvest mulberry fruit treated by chitosan-g-caffeic acid during cold storage. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C881–C888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, X.; Xue, F.; Li, C.; Adhikari, B.J.I.J.B.M. Physicochemical properties of films produced using nanoemulsions stabilized by carboxymethyl chitosan-peptide conjugates and application in blueberry preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 202, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.; Kan, J.; Jin, C.J. Effect of gallic acid grafted chitosan film packaging on the postharvest quality of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 147, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, G.; Liu, Y.; Yong, H.; Zong, S.; Jin, C.; Liu, J.J.F. Effect of Ferulic Acid-Grafted-Chitosan Coating on the Quality of Pork during Refrigerated Storage. Foods 2021, 10, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xiao, T.; Ting-Ting, Q.; Ruonan, L.; Lisa, Z.; Yan-Yun, Z.; Shun-Sheng, C.; Hong-Cai, Z. Preparation of chitosan nanoparticles and progress of research in food antibacterial. J. Food Sci. 2020, 41, 347–353. [Google Scholar]
  89. Melo, P.T.S.; Nunes, J.C.; Otoni, C.G.; Aouada, F.A.; de Moura, M.R. Combining Cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) Puree, Pectin, and Chitosan Nanoparticles into Novel Edible Films for Food Packaging Applications. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhao, R.; Guan, W.; Zheng, P.; Tian, F.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Cai, L. Development of edible composite film based on chitosan nanoparticles and their application in packaging of fresh red sea bream fillets. Food Control 2022, 132, 108545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tang, Q.; Fu, J.; Dou, X.; He, S.; Zhao, J. Progress of modified chitosan magnetic nanomaterials. J. Compos. 2022, 39, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Agarwal, M.; Agarwal, M.K.; Shrivastav, N.; Pandey, S.; Das, R.; Gaur, P. Preparation of Chitosan Nanoparticles and their In-vitro Characterization. Int. J. Life Sci. Sci. Res. 2018, 4, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Asab, G.; Zereffa, E.A.; Abdo Seghne, T. Synthesis of Silica-Coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles by Microemulsion Method: Characterization and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity. Int. J. Biomater. 2020, 2020, 4783612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Grenha, A. Chitosan nanoparticles: A survey of preparation methods. J. Drug Target 2012, 20, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kumar, A.; Ahuja, M. Carboxymethyl gum kondagogu-chitosan polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles: Preparation and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kafshgari, M.H.; Khorram, M.; Mansouri, M.; Samimi, A.; Osfouri, S. Preparation of alginate and chitosan nanoparticles using a new reverse micellar system. Iran. Polym. J. 2012, 21, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, S.; He, Z.; Xu, F.; Cheng, Y.; Waterhouse, G.I.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Wu, P.J.F.H. Enhancing the performance of konjac glucomannan films through incorporating zein–pectin nanoparticle-stabilized oregano essential oil Pickering emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Babii, O.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G.; Martinez, E.C.; Chen, L. Low molecular weight chitosan nanoparticles for CpG oligodeoxynucleotides delivery: Impact of molecular weight, degree of deacetylation, and mannosylation on intracellular uptake and cytokine induction. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gomes, L.; Paschoalin, V.; Del Aguila, E.J.R.V.Q. Chitosan nanoparticles: Production, physicochemical characteristics and nutraceutical applications. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2017, 9, 387–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. De Moura, M.R.; Aouada, F.A.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Krochta, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.J.J.F.E. Improved barrier and mechanical properties of novel hydroxypropyl methylcellulose edible films with chitosan/tripolyphosphate nanoparticles. J. Food Eng. 2009, 92, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Othman, S.H.; Kechik, N.R.; Shapi’i, R.A.; Talib, R.A.; Tawakkal, I.S.J.J.N. Water sorption and mechanical properties of starch/chitosan nanoparticle films. J. Nanomater. 2019, 2019, 3843949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Nallamuthu, I.; Devi, A.; Khanum, F.J.A.J.P.S. Chlorogenic acid loaded chitosan nanoparticles with sustained release property, retained antioxidant activity and enhanced bioavailability. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Amin, K.A.M.; Panhuis, M.I.H. Reinforced materials based on chitosan, TiO2 and Ag composites. Polymers 2012, 4, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Xin, S.; Xiao, L.; Dong, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Sameen, D.E.; Qin, W.; Zhu, B.J. Preparation of chitosan/curcumin nanoparticles based zein and potato starch composite films for Schizothorax prenati fillet preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yue, T.-T.; Li, X.; Wang, X.-X.; Yan, X.; Yu, M.; Ma, J.-W.; Zhou, Y.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y.-Z.J.N. Electrospinning of carboxymethyl chitosan/polyoxyethylene oxide nanofibers for fruit fresh-keeping. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, Q.; Chunhong, W. Research progress on the application of chitosan and plant extracts in food preservation. Mod. Food 2021, 78–81, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhibing, J.; Shuang, W.; Xu, Y.; Yinmei, C.; Zhenyi, F. Application of edible chitosan coating film in food preservation. J. Jilin Med. Coll. 2018, 39, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rambabu, K.; Bharath, G.; Banat, F.; Show, P.L.; Cocoletzi, H.H. Mango leaf extract incorporated chitosan antioxidant film for active food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, G.; Yue, J.; Gong, X.; Qian, B.; Wang, H.; Deng, Y.; Zhao, Y.J. Blueberry leaf extracts incorporated chitosan coatings for preserving postharvest quality of fresh blueberries. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 92, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sun, M.; Liu, N.; Ni, S.; Bian, H.; Fu, Y.; Chen, X. Poplar Hot Water Extract Enhances Barrier and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan/Bentonite Composite Film for Packaging Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Jiang, W. Development of antioxidant chitosan film with banana peels extract and its application as coating in maintaining the storage quality of apple. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 1205–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mojaddar Langroodi, A.; Nematollahi, A.; Sayadi, M. Chitosan coating incorporated with grape seed extract and Origanum vulgare essential oil: An active packaging for turkey meat preservation. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 2790–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Le, K.H.; La, D.D.; Nguyen, P.T.M.; Nguyen, M.D.-B.; Vo, A.T.K.; Nguyen, M.T.H.; Tran, D.L.; Chang, S.W.; Nguyen, X.H.; Nguyen, D.D.J.P.O.C. Fabrication of Cleistocalyx operculatus extracts/chitosan/gum arabic composite as an edible coating for preservation of banana. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 161, 106550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ramírez-Guerra, H.; Castillo-Yañez, F.; Montaño-Cota, E.; Ruíz-Cruz, S.; Márquez-Ríos, E.; Canizales-Rodríguez, D.; Torres-Arreola, W.; Montoya-Camacho, N.; Ocaño-Higuera, V.J.J.C. Protective effect of an edible tomato plant extract/chitosan coating on the quality and shelf life of sierra fish fillets. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 2436045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Pagliarulo, C.; Sansone, F.; Moccia, S.; Russo, G.L.; Aquino, R.P.; Salvatore, P.; Di Stasio, M.; Volpe, M.G. Preservation of strawberries with an antifungal edible coating using peony extracts in chitosan. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kumar, N.; Petkoska, A.T.; AL-Hilifi, S.A.; Fawole, O.A.J.C. Effect of Chitosan–Pullulan Composite Edible Coating Functionalized with Pomegranate Peel Extract on the Shelf Life of Mango (Mangifera indica). Coatings 2021, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hassan, F.; Ali, E.; Mostafa, N.; Mazrou, R.J.I.J.B.M. Shelf-life extension of sweet basil leaves by edible coating with thyme volatile oil encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sultan, M.; Hafez, O.M.; Saleh, M.A.; Youssef, A.M.J.R.A. Smart edible coating films based on chitosan and beeswax–pollen grains for the postharvest preservation of Le Conte pear. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 9572–9585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Poverenov, E.; Arnon-Rips, H.; Zaitsev, Y.; Bar, V.; Danay, O.; Horev, B.; Bilbao-Sainz, C.; McHugh, T.; Rodov, V.J.F. Potential of chitosan from mushroom waste to enhance quality and storability of fresh-cut melons. Food Chem. 2018, 268, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jiang, Y.; Yu, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhuang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Y. Electrostatic spraying of chitosan coating with different deacetylation degree for strawberry preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 139, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Jiang, Y.; Yu, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhuang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Y. The preservation performance of chitosan coating with different molecular weight on strawberry using electrostatic spraying technique. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, R.; Jiang, Y.; Xiu, L.; Huang, J. Effect of chitosan pre-soaking on the growth and quality of yellow soybean sprouts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1596–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sayadi, M.; Langroodi, A.M.; Pourmohammadi, K. Combined effects of chitosan coating incorporated with Berberis vulgaris extract and Mentha pulegium essential oil and MAP in the shelf life of turkey meat. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 5159–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Yuceer, M.; Caner, C. Antimicrobial lysozyme-chitosan coatings affect functional properties and shelf life of chicken eggs during storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Andrade, R.D.; Skurtys, O.; Osorio, F.A. Atomizing Spray Systems for Application of Edible Coatings. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Du, Y.; Yang, F.; Yu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yao, W.; Xie, Y. Fabrication of novel self-healing edible coating for fruits preservation and its performance maintenance mechanism. Food Chem. 2021, 351, 129284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhang, Z.-H.; Han, Z.; Zeng, X.-A.; Xiong, X.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J. Enhancing mechanical properties of chitosan films via modification with vanillin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Liu, T.; Liu, L.; Gong, X.; Chi, F.; Ma, Z. Fabrication and comparison of active films from chitosan incorporating different spice extracts for shelf life extension of refrigerated pork. Lwt 2021, 135, 110181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sawaya, W.N. Impact of food losses and waste on food security. In Water, Energy & Food Sustainability in the Middle East; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 361–388. [Google Scholar]
  130. López-Mata, M.A.; Ruiz-Cruz, S.; Silva-Beltrán, N.P.; Ornelas-Paz, J.D.J.; Zamudio-Flores, P.B.; Burruel-Ibarra, S.E.J.M. Physicochemical, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of chitosan films incorporated with carvacrol. Molecules 2013, 18, 13735–13753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Mechanical and barrier properties of chitosan combined with other components as food packaging film. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chang, S.H.; Chen, Y.J.; Tseng, H.J.; Hsiao, H.I.; Chai, H.J.; Shang, K.C.; Pan, C.L.; Tsai, G.J. Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan-Polylactate Fabricated Plastic Film and Its Application on the Preservation of Fish Fillet. Polymers 2021, 13, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kasirajan, S.; Umapathy, D.; Chandrasekar, C.; Aafrin, V.; Jenitapeter, M.; Udhyasooriyan, L.; Packirisamy, A.S.B.; Muthusamy, S.J.J. Bioengineering. Preparation of poly (lactic acid) from Prosopis juliflora and incorporation of chitosan for packaging applications. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2019, 128, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 11 01490 g001 550
Figure 1. Preparation of chitosan from chitin by deacetylation.
Figure 1. Preparation of chitosan from chitin by deacetylation.
Foods 11 01490 g001
Foods 11 01490 g002 550
Figure 2. Sources, properties, and applications of chitosan.
Figure 2. Sources, properties, and applications of chitosan.
Foods 11 01490 g002
Foods 11 01490 g003 550
Figure 3. Mechanisms used to explain antibacterial activity of chitosan.
Figure 3. Mechanisms used to explain antibacterial activity of chitosan.
Foods 11 01490 g003
Foods 11 01490 g004 550
Figure 4. Diagram of self-healing behavior of chitosan (CS)/sodium alginate (SA) coating.
Figure 4. Diagram of self-healing behavior of chitosan (CS)/sodium alginate (SA) coating.
Foods 11 01490 g004
Table
Table 1. Related studies on chitosan derivatives for food preservation.
Table 1. Related studies on chitosan derivatives for food preservation.
ProductDerivativeReference
BeefChitosan/lauric[80]
TomatoN, O-carboxymethyl chitosan[81]
CucumberChitosan-g-salicylic[82]
StrawberryN-succinyl chitosan[83]
MulberryChitosan-g-caffeic[84]
BlueberryCarboxymethyl chitosan-peptide[85]
Button mushroomGallic acid-grafted chitosan[86]
PorkFerulic acid-grafted chitosan[87]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, T.; Li, J.; Tang, Q.; Qiu, P.; Gou, D.; Zhao, J. Chitosan-Based Materials: An Overview of Potential Applications in Food Packaging. Foods 2022, 11, 1490. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods11101490

AMA Style

Liu T, Li J, Tang Q, Qiu P, Gou D, Zhao J. Chitosan-Based Materials: An Overview of Potential Applications in Food Packaging. Foods. 2022; 11(10):1490. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods11101490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Tong, Junbo Li, Qilong Tang, Peng Qiu, Dongxia Gou, and Jun Zhao. 2022. "Chitosan-Based Materials: An Overview of Potential Applications in Food Packaging" Foods 11, no. 10: 1490. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods11101490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop