remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Atmospheric Remote Sensing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2020) | Viewed by 38610

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Experimental Sciences Teaching, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Interests: radiometry; radiative transfer; remote sensing; aerosols; water vapor; ozone; clouds; solar and UV radiation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues

This is an invitation to contribute to the Special Issue, “Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor”, regarding the retrieval, analysis and validation of atmospheric components (gases) by remote sensing technique: Water vapor (H2O(v)), CO2 and CH4 as representatives of greenhouse gases; SO2, NO2, CO, HCHO, as main trace gases, and obviously ozone and those related with its decline, such as OCl, OClO, OBr, and CFCs. A wide set of different techniques may be considered, mainly those based on radiometry, spectroscopy (i.e., DOAS, FTS, etc.) in the solar or infrared spectral range, and also including LIDAR and related techniques of general applications for probing the atmosphere. Other techniques, such as GPS and radiosounding are necessary for water vapor retrieval. These techniques may be applied from local to global scales as the main tool for the monitoring of these atmospheric constituents: From surface local measurements, usually arranged into regional or global networks (NDAC, TCCON, Brewer network, etc.) to the great variety of Earth Observing satellite sensors. When long-term data are available, climatology studies, seasonal cycles, and trend analyses will be also welcome. Although clouds and aerosols are not considered as this issue is focused on gases, their effects or interactions in the determination of atmospheric gases are also of great interest. Monitoring of atmospheric gas composition is of vital importance in climate change.

Dr. Victoria E. Cachorro
Guest Editor
Dr. Manuel Antón
Co-Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • remote sensing
  • atmosphere
  • atmospheric gases
  • ozone
  • water vapor
  • radiometry
  • spectroscopy
  • satellite sensors
  • Lidar

Published Papers (12 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

6 pages, 215 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial for the Special Issue “Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor”
by Victoria E. Cachorro and Manuel Antón
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(13), 2074; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12132074 - 28 Jun 2020
Viewed by 1599
Abstract
The observation/monitoring of atmospheric components and water vapor in the atmosphere is today open to very different remote sensing techniques, most of them based on the radiation-matter interaction covering the full electromagnetic spectrum. This SI collects some papers regarding the retrieval, calibration, validation, [...] Read more.
The observation/monitoring of atmospheric components and water vapor in the atmosphere is today open to very different remote sensing techniques, most of them based on the radiation-matter interaction covering the full electromagnetic spectrum. This SI collects some papers regarding the retrieval, calibration, validation, analysis of data and uncertainties, as well as comparative studies on atmospheric gases and water vapor by remote sensing techniques, where different types of sensors, instruments, and algorithms are used or developed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

21 pages, 2716 KiB  
Article
Column Integrated Water Vapor and Aerosol Load Characterization with the New ZEN-R52 Radiometer
by Antonio Fernando Almansa, Emilio Cuevas, África Barreto, Benjamín Torres, Omaira Elena García, Rosa Delia García, Cristian Velasco-Merino, Victoria Eugenia Cachorro, Alberto Berjón, Manuel Mallorquín, César López, Ramón Ramos, Carmen Guirado-Fuentes, Ramón Negrillo and Ángel Máximo de Frutos
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(9), 1424; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12091424 - 30 Apr 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3384
Abstract
The study shows the first results of the column-integrated water vapor retrieved by the new ZEN-R52 radiometer. This new radiometer has been specifically designed to monitor aerosols and atmospheric water vapor with a high degree of autonomy and robustness in order to allow [...] Read more.
The study shows the first results of the column-integrated water vapor retrieved by the new ZEN-R52 radiometer. This new radiometer has been specifically designed to monitor aerosols and atmospheric water vapor with a high degree of autonomy and robustness in order to allow the expansion of the observations of these parameters to remote desert areas from ground-based platforms. The ZEN-R52 device shows substantial improvements compared to the previous ZEN-R41 prototype: a smaller field of view, an increased signal-to-noise ratio, better stray light rejection, and an additional channel (940 nm) for precipitable water vapor (PWV) retrieval. PWV is inferred from the ZEN-R52 Zenith Sky Radiance (ZSR) measurements using a lookup table (LUT) methodology. The improvement of the new ZEN-R52 in terms of ZSR was verified by means of a comparison with the ZEN-R41, and with the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Cimel CE318 (CE318-AERONET) at Izaña Observatory, a Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) high mountain station (Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain), over a 10-month period (August 2017 to June 2018). ZEN-R52 aerosol optical depth (AOD) was extracted by means of the ZEN–AOD–LUT method with an uncertainty of ±0.01 ± 0.13*AOD. ZEN-R52 PWV extracted using a new LUT technique was compared with quasi-simultaneous (±30 s) Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer measurements as reference. A good agreement was found between the two instruments (PWV means a relative difference of 9.1% and an uncertainty of ±0.089 cm or ±0.036 + 0.061*PWV for PWV <1 cm). This comparison analysis was extended using two PWV datasets from the same CE318 reference instrument at Izaña Observatory: one obtained from AERONET (CE318-AERONET), and another one using a specific calibration of the 940-nm channel performed in this work at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center Observatory (CE318-IARC), which improves the PWV product. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 13590 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Sampling Effects on Various Satellite-Derived Integrated Water Vapor Datasets Using GPS Measurements in Germany as Reference
by Cintia Carbajal Henken, Lisa Dirks, Sandra Steinke, Hannes Diedrich, Thomas August and Susanne Crewell
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(7), 1170; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12071170 - 6 Apr 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2700
Abstract
Passive imagers on polar-orbiting satellites provide long-term, accurate integrated water vapor (IWV) data sets. However, these climatologies are affected by sampling biases. In Germany, a dense Global Navigation Satellite System network provides accurate IWV measurements not limited by weather conditions and with high [...] Read more.
Passive imagers on polar-orbiting satellites provide long-term, accurate integrated water vapor (IWV) data sets. However, these climatologies are affected by sampling biases. In Germany, a dense Global Navigation Satellite System network provides accurate IWV measurements not limited by weather conditions and with high temporal resolution. Therefore, they serve as a reference to assess the quality and sampling issues of IWV products from multiple satellite instruments that show different orbital and instrument characteristics. A direct pairwise comparison between one year of IWV data from GPS and satellite instruments reveals overall biases (in kg/m 2 ) of 1.77, 1.36, 1.11, and −0.31 for IASI, MIRS, MODIS, and MODIS-FUB, respectively. Computed monthly means show similar behaviors. No significant impact of averaging time and the low temporal sampling on aggregated satellite IWV data is found, mostly related to the noisy weather conditions in the German domain. In combination with SEVIRI cloud coverage, a change of shape of IWV frequency distributions towards a bi-modal distribution and loss of high IWV values are observed when limiting cases to daytime and clear sky. Overall, sampling affects mean IWV values only marginally, which are rather dominated by the overall retrieval bias, but can lead to significant changes in IWV frequency distributions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 5897 KiB  
Article
Satellite-Observed Variations and Trends in Carbon Monoxide over Asia and Their Sensitivities to Biomass Burning
by Xun Zhang, Jane Liu, Han Han, Yongguang Zhang, Zhe Jiang, Haikun Wang, Lingyun Meng, Yi Chen Li and Yi Liu
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(5), 830; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12050830 - 4 Mar 2020
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 6175
Abstract
As the carbon monoxide (CO) total column over Asia is among the highest in the world, it is important to characterize its variations in space and time. Using Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS) satellite data, the [...] Read more.
As the carbon monoxide (CO) total column over Asia is among the highest in the world, it is important to characterize its variations in space and time. Using Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS) satellite data, the variations and trends in CO total column over Asia and its seven subregions during 2003–2017 are investigated in this study. The CO total column in Asia is higher in spring and winter than in summer and autumn. The seasonal maximum and minimum are in spring and summer respectively in the regional mean over Asia, varying between land and oceans, as well as among the subregions. The CO total column in Asia shows strong interannual variation, with a regional mean coefficient of variation of 5.8% in MOPITT data. From 2003 to 2017, the annual mean of CO total column over Asia decreased significantly at a rate of (0.58 ± 0.15)% per year (or −(0.11 ± 0.03) × 1017 molecules cm−2 per year) in MOPITT data, resulting from significant CO decreases in winter, summer, and spring. In most of the subregions, significant decreasing trends in CO total column are also observed, more obviously over areas with high CO total column, including eastern regions of China and the Sichuan Basin. The regional decreasing trends in these areas are over 1% per year. Over the entire Asia, and in fire-prone subregions including South Siberia, Indo-China Peninsula, and Indonesia, we found significant correlations between the MOPITT CO total column and the fire counts from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The variations in MODIS fire counts may explain 58%, 60%, 36%, and 71% of the interannual variation in CO total column in Asia and these three subregions, respectively. Over different land cover types, the variations in biomass burning may explain 62%, 52%, and 31% of the interannual variation in CO total column, respectively, over the forest, grassland, and shrubland in Asia. Extremes in CO total column in Asia can be largely explained by the extreme fire events, such as the fires over Siberia in 2003 and 2012 and over Indonesia in 2006 and 2015. The significant decreasing trends in MODIS fire counts inside and outside Asia suggest that global biomass burning may be a driver for the decreasing trend in CO total column in Asia, especially in spring. In general, the variations and trends in CO total column over Asia detected by AIRS are similar to but smaller than those by MOPITT. The two datasets show similar spatial and temporal variations in CO total column over Asia, with correlation coefficients of 0.86–0.98 in the annual means. This study shows that the interannual variation in atmospheric CO in Asia is sensitive to biomass burning, while the decreasing trend in atmospheric CO over Asia coincides with the decreasing trend in MODIS fire counts from 2003 to 2017. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 9278 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Environmental Moisture from NWP Models with Measurements from Advanced Geostationary Satellite Imager—A Case Study
by Xiaowei Jiang, Jun Li, Zhenglong Li, Yunheng Xue, Di Di, Pei Wang and Jinlong Li
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(4), 670; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12040670 - 18 Feb 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2688
Abstract
The distribution of tropospheric moisture in the environment is highly associated with storm development. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the uncertainty of moisture fields from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models for better understanding and enhancing storm prediction. With water vapor absorption band [...] Read more.
The distribution of tropospheric moisture in the environment is highly associated with storm development. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the uncertainty of moisture fields from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models for better understanding and enhancing storm prediction. With water vapor absorption band radiance measurements from the advanced imagers onboard the new generation of geostationary weather satellites, it is possible to quantitatively evaluate the environmental moisture fields from NWP models. Three NWP models—Global Forecast System (GFS), Unified Model (UM), Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)—are evaluated with brightness temperature (BT) measurements from the three moisture channels of Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard the Himawari-8 satellite for Typhoon Linfa (2015) case. It is found that the three NWP models have similar performance for lower tropospheric moisture, and GFS has a smaller bias for middle tropospheric moisture. Besides, there is a close relationship between moisture forecasts in the environment and the tropical cyclone (TC) track forecasts in GFS, while regional WRF does not show this pattern. When the infrared and microwave sounder radiance measurements from polar orbit satellite are assimilated in regional WRF, it is clearly shown that the environment moisture fields are improved compared with that with only conventional data are assimilated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 15213 KiB  
Article
Preliminary Evaluation of the Error Budgets in the TALIS Measurements and Their Impact on the Retrievals
by Wenyu Wang, Zhenzhan Wang and Yongqiang Duan
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 468; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12030468 - 2 Feb 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2055
Abstract
The THz Atmospheric Limb Sounder (TALIS) is a Chinese sub-millimeter limb sounder being designed by National Space Science Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to measure the temperature and chemical constituents vertically in the middle and upper atmosphere, with good precision and [...] Read more.
The THz Atmospheric Limb Sounder (TALIS) is a Chinese sub-millimeter limb sounder being designed by National Space Science Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to measure the temperature and chemical constituents vertically in the middle and upper atmosphere, with good precision and vertical resolution. This paper presents a simulation study that assesses the measurement errors and their impacts on the retrievals. Three error sources, including instrument uncertainties, calibration errors and a priori errors, are considered. The sideband weight uncertainty, the local oscillator, the pointing angle offsets and the measurement noise (NEDT), are considered as instrument uncertainties. Calibration errors consist of the hot target offset, the nonlinearity residual of the two-point calibration, use of the Rayleigh–Jeans (R–J) approximation and the choice of the antenna pattern. A priori profile errors of temperature, pressure and species are also considered. The results suggest that the antenna pattern mainly affects the retrievals in the troposphere. The NEDT is a major error source affecting all of the retrievals. The R–J approximation has a great impact upon the retrievals at 643 GHz, and should not be used. The local oscillator offset leads to an obvious error above 50 km. The effect of nonlinearity residuals cannot be neglected above 70 km. The impact of the sideband weight uncertainty and the hot target offset are relatively small. The pointing and the a priori errors can be neglected in most observation regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4546 KiB  
Article
Intercomparison of Integrated Water Vapor Measurements at High Latitudes from Co-Located and Near-Located Instruments
by Ermanno Fionda, Maria Cadeddu, Vinia Mattioli and Rosa Pacione
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(18), 2130; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11182130 - 13 Sep 2019
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2537
Abstract
Data from global positioning system (GPS) ground-based receivers, ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs), and radiosondes (RS) at two high-latitude sites were compared. At one site, the North Slope of Alaska (NSA), Barrow, Alaska (USA), the instruments were co-located, while at the other site, the [...] Read more.
Data from global positioning system (GPS) ground-based receivers, ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs), and radiosondes (RS) at two high-latitude sites were compared. At one site, the North Slope of Alaska (NSA), Barrow, Alaska (USA), the instruments were co-located, while at the other site, the second ARM Mobile Facility (AMF2), Hyytiälä, Finland, the GPS receiver was located about 20 km away from the MWRs and RS. Differences between the GPS-derived integrated water vapor (IWV) and the other three instruments were analyzed in terms of mean differences and standard deviation. A comparison of co-located and near-located independently calibrated instruments allowed us to isolate issues that may be specific to a single system and, to some extent, to isolate the effects of the distance between the GPS receiver and the remaining instruments. The results showed that at these two high-latitude sites, when the IWV was less than 15 kg/m2, the GPS agreed with other instruments within 0.5–0.7 kg/m2. When the variability of water vapor was higher, mostly in the summer months, the GPS agreed with other instruments within 0.8–1 kg/m2. The total random uncertainty between the GPS and the other systems was of the order of 0.6–1 kg/m2 and was the dominant effect when the IWV was higher than 15 kg/m2. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 794 KiB  
Article
Water Vapor Calibration: Using a Raman Lidar and Radiosoundings to Obtain Highly Resolved Water Vapor Profiles
by Birte Solveig Kulla and Christoph Ritter
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(6), 616; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11060616 - 13 Mar 2019
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4245
Abstract
We revised the calibration of a water vapor Raman lidar by co-located radiosoundings for a site in the high European Arctic. For this purpose, we defined robust criteria for a valid calibration. One of these criteria is the logarithm of the water vapor [...] Read more.
We revised the calibration of a water vapor Raman lidar by co-located radiosoundings for a site in the high European Arctic. For this purpose, we defined robust criteria for a valid calibration. One of these criteria is the logarithm of the water vapor mixing ratio between the sonde and the lidar. With an error analysis, we showed that for our site correlations smaller than 0.95 could be explained neither by noise in the lidar nor by wrong assumptions concerning the aerosol or Rayleigh extinction. However, highly variable correlation coefficients between sonde and consecutive lidar profiles were found, suggesting that small scale variability of the humidity was our largest source of error. Therefore, not all co-located radiosoundings are useful for lidar calibration. As we assumed these changes to be non-systematic, averaging over several independent measurements increased the calibration’s quality. The calibration of the water vapor measurements from the lidar for individual profiles varied by less than ±5%. The seasonal median, used for calibration in this study, was stable and reliable (confidence ±1% for the season with most calibration profiles). Thus, the water vapor mixing ratio profiles from the Koldewey Aerosol Raman Lidar (KARL) are very accurate. They show high temporal variability up to 4 km altitude and, therefore, provide additional, independent information to the radiosonde. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 3867 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Bias Correction Methods for GOSAT SWIR XH2O Using TCCON data
by Tran Thi Ngoc Trieu, Isamu Morino, Hirofumi Ohyama, Osamu Uchino, Ralf Sussmann, Thorsten Warneke, Christof Petri, Rigel Kivi, Frank Hase, David F. Pollard, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Voltaire A. Velazco, Laura T. Iraci, James R. Podolske and Manvendra K. Dubey
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(3), 290; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11030290 - 1 Feb 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4512
Abstract
This study evaluated three bias correction methods of systematic biases in column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of water vapor (XH2O) data retrieved from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) Short-Wavelength Infrared (SWIR) observations compared with ground-based data from the Total Carbon Column Observing [...] Read more.
This study evaluated three bias correction methods of systematic biases in column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of water vapor (XH2O) data retrieved from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) Short-Wavelength Infrared (SWIR) observations compared with ground-based data from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). They included an empirically multilinear regression method, altitude bias correction method, and combination of altitude and empirical correction for three cases defined by the temporal and spatial collocation around TCCON site. The results showed that large altitude differences between GOSAT observation points and TCCON instruments are the main cause of bias, and the altitude bias correction method is the most effective bias correction method. The lowest biases result from GOSAT SWIR XH2O data within a 0.5° × 0.5° latitude × longitude box centered at each TCCON site matched with TCCON XH2O data averaged over ±15 min of the GOSAT overpass time. Considering land data, the global bias changed from −1.3 ± 9.3% to −2.2 ± 8.5%, and station bias from −2.3 ± 9.0% to −1.7 ± 8.4%. In mixed land and ocean data, global bias and station bias changed from −0.3 ± 7.6% and −1.9 ± 7.1% to −0.8 ± 7.2% and −2.3 ± 6.8%, respectively, after bias correction. The results also confirmed that the fine spatial and temporal collocation criteria are necessary in bias correction methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 7435 KiB  
Article
A Retrieval of Glyoxal from OMI over China: Investigation of the Effects of Tropospheric NO2
by Yapeng Wang, Jinhua Tao, Liangxiao Cheng, Chao Yu, Zifeng Wang and Liangfu Chen
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(2), 137; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11020137 - 11 Jan 2019
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3228
Abstract
East China is the ‘hotspot’ of glyoxal (CHOCHO), especially over the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, where glyoxal is yielded from the oxidation of aromatics. To better understand the glyoxal spatial-temporal characteristics over China and evaluate the effectiveness of atmospheric prevention efforts on [...] Read more.
East China is the ‘hotspot’ of glyoxal (CHOCHO), especially over the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, where glyoxal is yielded from the oxidation of aromatics. To better understand the glyoxal spatial-temporal characteristics over China and evaluate the effectiveness of atmospheric prevention efforts on the reduction of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, we present an algorithm for glyoxal retrieval using the Ozone Monitoring instrument (OMI) over China. The algorithm is based on the differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) and accounts for the interference of the tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) spatial-temporal distribution on glyoxal retrieval. We conduct a sensitively test based on a synthetic spectrum to optimize the fitting parameters set. It shows that the fitting interval of 430–458 nm and a 4th order polynomial are optimal for glyoxal retrieval when using the daily mean value of the earthshine spectrum in the Pacific region as a reference. In addition, tropospheric NO2 pre-fitted during glyoxal retrieval is first proposed and tested, which shows a ±10% variation compared with the reference scene. The interference of NO2 on glyoxal was further investigated based on the OMI observations, and the spatial distribution showed that changes in the NO2 concentration can affect the glyoxal result depending on the NO2 spatial distribution. A method to prefix NO2 during glyoxal retrieval is proposed in this study and is referred to as OMI-CAS. We perform an intercomparison of the glyoxal from the OMI-CAS with the seasonal datasets provided by different institutions for North China (NC), South China (SC), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and the ChuanYu (CY) region in southwestern China in the year 2005. The results show that our algorithm can obtain the glyoxal spatial and temporal variations in different regions over China. OMI-CAS has the best correlations with other datasets in summer, with the correlations between OMI-CAS and OMI-Harvard, OMI-CAS and OMI-IUP, and OMI-CAS and Sciamachy-IUP being 0.63, 0.67 and 0.67, respectively. Autumn results followed, with the correlations of 0.58, 0.36 and 0.48, respectively, over China. However, the correlations are less or even negative for spring and winter. From the regional perspective, SC has the best correlation compared with other regions, with R reaching 0.80 for OMI-CAS and OMI-IUP in summer. The discrepancies between different glyoxal datasets can be attributed to the fitting parameters and larger glyoxal retrieval uncertainties. Finally, useful recommendations are given based on the results comparison according to region and season. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

12 pages, 462 KiB  
Letter
Evaluation of Water Vapor Radiative Effects Using GPS Data Series over Southwestern Europe
by Javier Vaquero-Martínez, Manuel Antón, Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo and Victoria E. Cachorro
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(8), 1307; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12081307 - 21 Apr 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2116
Abstract
Water vapor radiative effects (WVRE) at surface in the long-wave (LW) and short-wave (SW) spectral ranges under cloud and aerosol free conditions are analyzed for seven stations in Spain over the 2007–2015 period. WVRE is calculated as the difference between the net flux [...] Read more.
Water vapor radiative effects (WVRE) at surface in the long-wave (LW) and short-wave (SW) spectral ranges under cloud and aerosol free conditions are analyzed for seven stations in Spain over the 2007–2015 period. WVRE is calculated as the difference between the net flux obtained by two radiative transfer simulations; one with water vapor from Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements and the other one without any water vapor (dry atmosphere). The WVRE in the LW ranges from 107.9 Wm 2 to 296.7 Wm 2 , while in the SW it goes from 64.9 Wm 2 to 6.0 Wm 2 . The results show a clear seasonal cycle, which allows the classification of stations in three sub-regions. In general, for total (SW + LW) and LW WVRE, winter (DJF) and spring (MAM) values are lower than summer (JJA) and autumn (SON). However, in the case of SW WVRE, the weaker values are in winter and autumn, and the stronger ones in summer and spring. Positive trends for LW (and total) WVRE may partially explain the well-known increase of surface air temperatures in the study region. Additionally, negative trends for SW WVRE are especially remarkable, since they represent about a quarter of the contribution of aerosols to the strong brightening effect (increase of the SW radiation flux at surface associated with a reduction of the cloud cover and aerosol load) observed since the 2000s in the Iberian Peninsula, but with opposite sign, so it is suggested that water vapor could be partially masking the full magnitude of this brightening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 1107 KiB  
Letter
Worldwide Evaluation of Ozone Radiative Forcing in the UV-B Range between 1979 and 2014
by David Mateos and Manuel Antón
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 436; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12030436 - 29 Jan 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2119
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation plays a key role in different planetary mechanisms, thus necessitating a worldwide analysis of this solar spectrum interval. This study offers a worldwide and long-term analysis of ozone radiative forcing (ORF) in the UV-B range between 1979 and 2014. The [...] Read more.
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation plays a key role in different planetary mechanisms, thus necessitating a worldwide analysis of this solar spectrum interval. This study offers a worldwide and long-term analysis of ozone radiative forcing (ORF) in the UV-B range between 1979 and 2014. The method uses monthly total ozone column (TOC) values obtained from the ERA-Interim reanalysis data collection and radiative transfer simulations. A global mean ORF of 0.011 Wm−2 is obtained, with marked differences between mid-latitude and tropical areas. The mid-latitude belts in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres exhibit the following statistically significant ORF trends between 1982 and 2014 with respect to pre-1980 values: 0.007 Wm−2 per decade in the 60–45°S belt and around 0.004 Wm−2 per decade in the 45–30°S and 45–60°N belts. The increase observed in the net UV-B radiation levels at the troposphere might have relevant photochemical effects that impact climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Components and Water Vapor)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop