ijms-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment 2.0

A special issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2022) | Viewed by 1941

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Interests: myeloma bone disease; bone marrow microenvironment; signaling pathways; mechanical stimuli of bone; MOPC315.BM murine model
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue is the continuation of our 2020 Special Issue “Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease—Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment”.

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains a rarely curable plasma cell disorder in the bone marrow, in which 80% of patients already at diagnosis show signs of bone disease, including osteolytic bone destruction and osteoporosis, with symptoms of severe pain and fractures. Due to skeletal-related pathologies, morbidity and mortality of patients is increased, affecting their quality of life. MM cells interfere with bone homeostasis by inhibiting osteoblast function and stimulating osteoclast activity, resulting in massive bone destruction and often multiple focal lesions. The use of bisphosphonates, local irradiation, and orthopedic intervention are standard treatment options. Current therapies often fail to heal bone lesions and to regenerate bone tissue even if active disease is absent. New approaches are needed for better detection and improved monitoring of bone structural changes, particularly in very early stages of the disease, before lytic lesions develop. In this Special Issue, we welcome contributions to all aspects of pathobiology, symptoms, diagnostic tools, and novel treatment options of MM bone disease. Preclinical fundamental and translational work is encouraged, including studies in precursor cells of the bone microenvironment, mouse studies, and novel bioreactor systems to imitate the cell–cell interactions between MM cells and their microenvironment.

Prof. Dr. Franziska Jundt
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Molecular Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. There is an Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal. For details about the APC please see here. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Mouse studies
  • Bone microenvironment
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Signaling pathways
  • Cell–cell interactions
  • Imaging techniques
  • Novel biomarkers

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 3336 KiB  
Article
11C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
by Maria I. Morales-Lozano, Paula Rodriguez-Otero, Lidia Sancho, Jorge M. Nuñez-Cordoba, Elena Prieto, Maria Marcos-Jubilar, Juan J. Rosales, Ana Alfonso, Edgar F. Guillen, Jesus San-Miguel and Maria J. Garcia-Velloso
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9895; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23179895 - 31 Aug 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1538
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy and remains incurable despite therapeutic advances. 18F-FDG (FDG) PET/CT is a relevant tool MM for staging and it is the reference imaging technique for treatment evaluation. However, it has limitations, and investigation [...] Read more.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy and remains incurable despite therapeutic advances. 18F-FDG (FDG) PET/CT is a relevant tool MM for staging and it is the reference imaging technique for treatment evaluation. However, it has limitations, and investigation of other PET tracers is required. Preliminary results with L-methyl-[11C]- methionine (MET), suggest higher sensitivity than 18F-FDG. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of 1FDG and MET in MM patients. We prospectively compared FDG and MET PET/CT for assessment of bone disease and extramedullary disease (EMD) in a series of 52 consecutive patients (8 smoldering MM, 18 newly diagnosed MM and 26 relapsed MM patients). Bone marrow (BM) uptake patterns and the detection of focal lesions (FLs) and EMD were compared. Furthermore, FDG PET parameters with known MM prognostic value were explored for both tracers, as well as total lesion MET uptake (TLMU). Median patient age was 61 years (range, 37–83 years), 54% were male, 13% of them were in stage ISS (International Staging System) III, and 31% had high-risk cytogenetics. FDG PET/CT did not detect active disease in 6 patients, while they were shown to be positive by MET PET/CT. Additionally, MET PET/CT identified a higher number of FLs than FDG in more than half of the patients (63%). For prognostication we focussed on the relapsed cohort, due to the low number of progressions in the two other cohorts. Upon using FDG PET/CT in relapsed patients, the presence of more than 3 FLs (HR 4.61, p = 0.056), more than 10 FLs (HR 5.65, p = 0.013), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) p50 (HR 4.91, p = 0.049) or TMTV p75 (HR 5.32, p = 0.016) were associated with adverse prognosis. In MET PET/CT analysis, TMTV p50 (HR 4.71, p = 0.056), TMTV p75 (HR 6.27, p = 0.007), TLMU p50 (HR 8.8, p = 0.04) and TLMU p75 (HR 6.3, p = 0.007) adversely affected PFS. This study confirmed the diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG in MM. In addition, it highlights that MET has higher sensitivity than FDG PET/CT for detection of myeloma lesions, including FLs. Moreover, we show, for the first time, the prognostic value of TMTV and TLMU MET PET/CT in the imaging evaluation of MM patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop