ijms-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

New Trends in Alzheimer’s Disease Research: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutics 2.0

A special issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Neurobiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 April 2024) | Viewed by 1641

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a health priority in developed societies, along with cardiovascular disease, cancer, stroke and major neuropsychiatric pathologies. The direct and indirect costs for the management of AD create a large economic burden for families, nations and health resources. The cost of worldwide dementia treatment currently exceeds USD 800 billion (>1% of GDP). The average cost per patient/year ranges from USD 30,000 to USD 60,000, depending on the stage of the disease, quality of medical care, social status and country. In terms of global costs (direct, indirect and social costs and costs of informal care), in 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated the total global societal cost of dementia to be about USD 1.3 trillion (>USD 2.8 trillion by 2030).

AD is the most prevalent form of dementia (50–60%). Vascular dementia (30–40%), other forms of dementia (10–15%), and mixed dementia, which is the most frequent form of dementia (>70%) in patients older than 75 years of age, are common presentations of dementia following frequent AD. AD is more frequent in women than in men; the prevalence of dementia is 30.5/1000 in males and 48.2/1000 in females.

The phenotype of AD is the consequence of the premature death of neurons associated with genomic, epigenomic, cerebrovascular and environmental factors. The clinical manifestation of dementia is characterized by progressive cognitive deterioration, behavioral changes and functional decline.

Conventionally, two forms of AD are differentiated: an early form (early onset AD, EOAD, <65 years) and a late-onset AD (LOAD, >65 years), within an apparent pathological continuum. EOAD is associated with familial forms of Mendelian genetics (familial AD, FAD), while LOAD shows a more complex pathogenesis, in which a multitude of polymorphic variants in over 600 genes distributed throughout the human genome converge with diverse environmental factors, which attribute the false phenotypic profile of sporadic AD to the disease.

Both forms of dementia exhibit common neuropathological hallmarks of amyloidopathy and tauopathy characterized by extracellular deposits of aggregated β-amyloid (Aβ) in senile plaques and vessels (amyloid angiopathy) and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), formed by the hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins in microtubules and neurofilaments, likely exerting synergistic effects on AD pathogenesis. Dendritic dystrophy and desarborization, microglia activation, astrogliosis, and neuronal loss are also typical neuropathological markers in the hippocampus and neocortex, where neurotransmitter deficits (cholinergic, monoaminergic, glutamatergic, GABAergic, neuropeptidergic), neurotrophic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, oxidative-stress-related lipid peroxidation, and cerebrovascular (hypoperfusion) damage are also present.

The scientific community, pharmaceutical industry and daily medical care are facing important challenges regarding the management of dementia. The primary causes of AD and its pathogenic mechanisms are still unclear. Reliable biomarkers for an early diagnosis are not yet available. New drugs and novel therapeutic strategies that are able to slow down or halt the course of the disease are urgently needed, assuming that present medications are inefficient and not cost-effective. Since the disease destroys the neurons of susceptible patients for decades before showing symptoms, the golden dream of AD scientific research would be to find a preventive remedy, administered in pre-symptomatic phases, and capable of stopping the progressive destruction of the brain that leads to AD.

The objective of this Special Issue of IJMS is to offer the scientific community an open space to present new findings to (i) better understand the pathogenic mechanisms responsible for this neurodegenerative disease, (ii) identify potential predictive biomarkers that anticipate risk factors and can prophylactically intervene, and (iii) develop new preventive strategies and new forms of therapeutic intervention that slow down the course of the disease once symptoms appear. The best case scenario would be to prevent the disease from manifesting itself in those cases for which it is feasible to presymptomatically identify the risk.

Prof. Dr. Ramón Cacabelos
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Molecular Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. There is an Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal. For details about the APC please see here. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • pathogenic mechanisms
  • genomics
  • epigenetics
  • biomarkers
  • prevention
  • treatment
  • pharmacogenetics

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1696 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Correlation and Diagnostic Accuracy between Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers: A Comparison of the Lumipulse and Simoa Platforms
by Farida Dakterzada, Raffaela Cipriani, Ricard López-Ortega, Alfonso Arias, Iolanda Riba-Llena, Maria Ruiz-Julián, Raquel Huerto, Nuria Tahan, Carlos Matute, Estibaliz Capetillo-Zarate and Gerard Piñol-Ripoll
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(9), 4594; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms25094594 - 23 Apr 2024
Viewed by 148
Abstract
We compared the clinical and analytical performance of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) plasma biomarkers measured using the single-molecule array (Simoa) and Lumipulse platforms. We quantified the plasma levels of amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (Ptau181), and total tau biomarkers in 81 patients [...] Read more.
We compared the clinical and analytical performance of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) plasma biomarkers measured using the single-molecule array (Simoa) and Lumipulse platforms. We quantified the plasma levels of amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (Ptau181), and total tau biomarkers in 81 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 30 with AD, and 16 with non-AD dementia. We found a strong correlation between the Simoa and Lumipulse methods. Concerning the clinical diagnosis, Simoa Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.739, 95% CI 0.592–0.887) and Lumipulse Aβ42 and Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.589–0.882 and AUC 0.733, 95% CI 0.567–0.900) had the highest discriminating power. However, their power was significantly lower than that of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, as measured by Lumipulse (AUC 0.879, 95% CI 0.766–0.992). Simoa Ptau181 and Lumipulse Ptau181/Aβ42 were the markers most consistent with the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status (AUC 0.801, 95% CI 0.712–0.890 vs. AUC 0.870, 95% CI 0.806–0.934, respectively) at the ≥2.127 and ≥0.084 cut-offs, respectively. The performance of the Simoa and Lumipulse plasma AD assays is weaker than that of CSF AD biomarkers. At present, the analysed AD plasma biomarkers may be useful for screening to reduce the number of lumbar punctures in the clinical setting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1148 KiB  
Article
Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of American Elderberry Juice for Improving Cognition and Inflammation in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment
by Ashley F. Curtis, Madison Musich, Amy N. Costa, Joshua Gonzales, Hyeri Gonzales, Bradley J. Ferguson, Briana Kille, Andrew L. Thomas, Xing Wei, Pei Liu, C. Michael Greenlief, Joel I. Shenker and David Q. Beversdorf
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(8), 4352; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms25084352 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1206
Abstract
Despite data showing that nutritional interventions high in antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties (anthocyanin-rich foods, such as blueberries/elderberries) may decrease risk of memory loss and cognitive decline, evidence for such effects in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is limited. This study examined preliminary effects of American elderberry [...] Read more.
Despite data showing that nutritional interventions high in antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties (anthocyanin-rich foods, such as blueberries/elderberries) may decrease risk of memory loss and cognitive decline, evidence for such effects in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is limited. This study examined preliminary effects of American elderberry (Sambucus nigra subsp. canadensis) juice on cognition and inflammatory markers in patients with MCI. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo–controlled trial, patients with MCI (n = 24, Mage = 76.33 ± 6.95) received American elderberry (n = 11) or placebo (n = 13) juice (5 mL orally 3 times a day) for 6 months. At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, patients completed tasks measuring global cognition, verbal memory, language, visuospatial cognitive flexibility/problem solving, and memory. A subsample (n = 12, 7 elderberry/5 placebo) provided blood samples to measure serum inflammatory markers. Multilevel models examined effects of the condition (elderberry/placebo), time (baseline/3 months/6 months), and condition by time interactions on cognition/inflammation outcomes. Attrition rates for elderberry (18%) and placebo (15%) conditions were fairly low. The dosage compliance (elderberry—97%; placebo—97%) and completion of cognitive (elderberry—88%; placebo—87%) and blood-based (elderberry—100%; placebo—100%) assessments was high. Elderberry (not placebo) trended (p = 0.09) towards faster visuospatial problem solving performance from baseline to 6 months. For the elderberry condition, there were significant or significantly trending decreases over time across several markers of low-grade peripheral inflammation, including vasorin, prenylcysteine oxidase 1, and complement Factor D. Only one inflammatory marker showed an increase over time (alpha-2-macroglobin). In contrast, for the placebo, several inflammatory marker levels increased across time (L-lactate dehydrogenase B chain, complement Factor D), with one showing deceased levels over time (L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain). Daily elderberry juice consumption in patients with MCI is feasible and well tolerated and may provide some benefit to visuospatial cognitive flexibility. Preliminary findings suggest elderberry juice may reduce low-grade inflammation compared to a placebo–control. These promising findings support the need for larger, more definitive prospective studies with longer follow-ups to better understand mechanisms of action and the clinical utility of elderberries for potentially mitigating cognitive decline. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop