Innovative Advanced Materials in Prosthodontics

A special issue of Prosthesis (ISSN 2673-1592).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 September 2022) | Viewed by 10650

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences, Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, Via, Consolare Valeria, 98100 Me, Italy
Interests: oral biology; odontogenesis; periodontitis; oral biofilm; wound healing; biomaterials; biocompatibility; titanium surface; enamel; tissue regeneration
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Dental prosthesis is an artifact used to replace the original, lost or compromised, tooth for functional and/or aesthetic reasons. Thanks to the advent of new technologies, it is now possible to offer prostheses and therefore rehabilitations that are increasingly technologically advanced and built with the safest and most advanced materials. The care taken in the design and construction of a dental prosthesis with the help of advanced technologies is aimed at improving quality of life because a dental prosthesis improves and obviously facilitates chewing but is also effective in producing an aesthetic improvement. Developments in the field of dentistry and correct education in the prevention of decay and care of one’s dental apparatus are some of the elements that lead to the prolonged conservation of natural teeth. However, medical advances and better quality of life mean that an increasing number of people reach an advanced age, which makes it necessary to implant a dental prosthesis due to periodontal compromise that causes inevitable edentulism. The purpose of this Special Issue is to promote research on oral rehabilitations, including all types of prosthetic, fixed, removable, implant-supported, mucosal or mixed support rehabilitations. Of particular significance are the originality of the technique and of the materials and their biomechanical features.

Dr. Luca Fiorillo
Dr. Gabriele Cervino
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Prosthesis is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prosthodontics
  • dentistry
  • oral rehabilitation
  • oral health related quality of life
  • systemic implications
  • surgeries adverse effect
  • syndromic patients
  • prosthetic
  • dental implant
  • rehabilitation

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

13 pages, 4917 KiB  
Article
Prosthetic Surgical Templates and Dental Implant Site Time Preparation: An In Vitro Study
by Łukasz Zadrożny, Marta Czajkowska, Marco Tallarico, Leopold Wagner, Jarosław Markowski, Eitan Mijiritsky and Marco Cicciù
Prosthesis 2022, 4(1), 25-37; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/prosthesis4010004 - 30 Jan 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3944
Abstract
Numerous types of prosthodontics surgical guides, with and without metallic sleeves, have been found to be useful in clinical studies. The aim of this in vitro research was to compare the time required to complete the surgical procedure with two differently designed surgical [...] Read more.
Numerous types of prosthodontics surgical guides, with and without metallic sleeves, have been found to be useful in clinical studies. The aim of this in vitro research was to compare the time required to complete the surgical procedure with two differently designed surgical prosthetic templates. Ten identical prototype models of mandible based on a CBCT and optical scan of a partially edentulous patient with missing teeth numbers 37, 46, and 47 were prepared and then printed. Five of these models were used for implant site preparation with a surgical guide without metal sleeves and dedicated surgical kit, and the other five models were used for the same procedure performed with a surgical guide with metal sleeves and a dedicated surgical kit. The time of implant site preparation was measured and recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test for independent samples. Differences between groups were found to be statistically significant (t = −9.94; df = 28; p = 0.0000) with a lower value in favor of the surgical templates without metallic sleeves. Different types of prosthodontics surgical guides, with or without metallic sleeves, seemed to be an important factor which can significantly impact the time of implant site preparation and, therefore, the overall surgical procedure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Advanced Materials in Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7560 KiB  
Article
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets and Archwires by Optical Microscopy and X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy
by Danilo D’Andrea, Dario Milone, Fabiana Nicita, Giacomo Risitano and Dario Santonocito
Prosthesis 2021, 3(4), 342-360; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/prosthesis3040031 - 10 Oct 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2929
Abstract
The wear behaviour and chemical composition of orthodontic components influence the mechanical characteristics of a fixed orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the surface alterations of different types of brackets (aesthetic, metallic, and conventional self-ligating) and archwires (superelastic and [...] Read more.
The wear behaviour and chemical composition of orthodontic components influence the mechanical characteristics of a fixed orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the surface alterations of different types of brackets (aesthetic, metallic, and conventional self-ligating) and archwires (superelastic and thermal) subjected to wear tests through optical microscopy and, subsequently, to identify the chemical elements of accessories by X-ray fluorescence. The cycles (5000 for each bracket and 10,000 for each wire) of the tribological test were carried out in dry conditions inside a machine that allows alternating sliding. The results of the study highlighted different wear behaviours even within the same type of brackets and archwires. The monocrystalline sapphire brackets maintain their aesthetic properties despite traces of wear inside the slots and contain minimal amounts of nickel. Superelastic NiTi archwires have a better overall rating than thermal wires, as they do not show significant surface wear alterations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Advanced Materials in Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 5265 KiB  
Case Report
Full Digital Model-Free Maxillary Prosthetic Rehabilitation by Means of One-Piece Implants: A Proof of Concept Clinical Report with Three-Years Follow Up
by Mario Beretta, Mattia Manfredini, Pier Paolo Poli, Sebastian Tansella and Carlo Maiorana
Prosthesis 2022, 4(2), 202-212; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/prosthesis4020020 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2460
Abstract
Implant rehabilitation is a daily practice in dentistry, and patients often have heightened expectations regarding both the functional and the aesthetic outcome. Implant–abutment connection (IAC) is involved in the long-term aesthetic quality of the rehabilitation. The use of one-piece implants for fixing dentures [...] Read more.
Implant rehabilitation is a daily practice in dentistry, and patients often have heightened expectations regarding both the functional and the aesthetic outcome. Implant–abutment connection (IAC) is involved in the long-term aesthetic quality of the rehabilitation. The use of one-piece implants for fixing dentures may prevent the mechanical and biological implication of the implant–abutment interface, resulting in a better quality of hard and soft tissue maintenance. In this case report, we present a novel one-piece implant in a maxillary rehabilitation with a full model-free digital approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Advanced Materials in Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop